logo
Snarky Security  Trust No One, Especially Not Us… Because We Know That Nothing Is Truly Secure
О проекте Просмотр Уровни подписки Фильтры Обновления проекта Контакты Поделиться Метки
Все проекты
О проекте
Reading about IT and InfoSecurity press, watching videos and following news channels can be a rather toxic activity and bad idea, as it involves discarding the important information from a wide array of all the advertising, company PR, and news article.

Given that my readers, in the absence of sufficient time, have expressed a desire to «be more informed on various IT topics», I’m proposing a project that will do both short-term and long-term analysis, reviews, and interpretations of the flow of information I come across.

Here’s what’s going to happen:
— Obtaining hard-to-come-by facts and content
— Making notes on topics and trends that are not widely reflected in public information field

📌Not sure what level is suitable for you? Check this explanation https://sponsr.ru/snarky_security/55292/Paid_level_explained/

All places to read, listen to, and watch content.
➡️Text and other media: TG, Boosty, Teletype.in, VK, X.com
➡️Audio: Mave, you find here other podcast services, e.g. Youtube Podcasts, Spotify, Apple or Amazon
➡️Video: Youtube

The main categories of materials — use tags:
📌news
📌digest

QA — directly or via email snarky_qa@outlook.com
Публикации, доступные бесплатно
Уровни подписки
Единоразовый платёж

Your donation fuels our mission to provide cutting-edge cybersecurity research, in-depth tutorials, and expert insights. Support our work today to empower the community with even more valuable content.

*no refund, no paid content

Помочь проекту
Promo 750₽ месяц
Доступны сообщения

For a limited time, we're offering our Level "Regular" subscription at an unbeatable price—50% off!

Dive into the latest trends and updates in the cybersecurity world with our in-depth articles and expert insights

Offer valid until the end of this month.

Оформить подписку
Regular Reader 1 500₽ месяц 16 200₽ год
(-10%)
При подписке на год для вас действует 10% скидка. 10% основная скидка и 0% доп. скидка за ваш уровень на проекте Snarky Security
Доступны сообщения

Ideal for regular readers who are interested in staying informed about the latest trends and updates in the cybersecurity world.

Оформить подписку
Pro Reader 3 000₽ месяц 30 600₽ год
(-15%)
При подписке на год для вас действует 15% скидка. 15% основная скидка и 0% доп. скидка за ваш уровень на проекте Snarky Security
Доступны сообщения

Designed for IT professionals, cybersecurity experts, and enthusiasts who seek deeper insights and more comprehensive resources. + Q&A

Оформить подписку
Фильтры
Обновления проекта
Поделиться
Метки
snarkysecurity 156 snarkysecuritypdf 59 news 51 keypoints 41 ai 22 research 22 Cyber Insurance 20 Cyber Insurance Market 19 cybersecurity 16 unpacking 12 AGI 11 Nakasone 11 risk management 11 CTEM 10 nsa 10 OpenAi 10 usa 9 cyber operations 8 discovery 8 EM (Exposure Management) 8 prioritization 8 threat management 8 validation 8 Marine Security 7 Maritime security 7 announcement 6 china 6 Cyber Defense Doctrine 6 cyberbiosecurity 6 Digest 6 Espionage 6 Maritime 6 Monthly Digest 6 biosecurity 5 biotech 5 biotechnology 5 Bioweapon 5 marine 5 patent 5 phishing 5 Russia 5 bio 4 cyber security 4 dgap 4 medical security 4 risks 4 sanctions 4 security 4 content 3 cyber attack 3 data leakage 3 Israel 3 medical communication 3 osint 3 video 3 badges 2 cfr 2 console architecture 2 cyber threat 2 cyberops 2 data breach 2 data theft 2 DICOM 2 EU 2 europol 2 fake news 2 funding 2 Healthcare 2 ICS 2 intelbroker 2 leads 2 malware 2 marketing 2 marketing strategy 2 medicine 2 Microsoft 2 military 2 ML 2 offensive 2 sabotage 2 submarine 2 surveillance 2 tech 2 tracking 2 U.S. Air Force 2 united kingdom 2 vulnerabilities 2 Academic Plagiarism 1 AI Plagiarism 1 Air-Gapped Systems 1 aircraft 1 Amazon 1 amazon web services 1 Antarctica 1 antartica 1 APAC 1 APT29 1 APT42 1 ArcaneDoor 1 Ascension 1 astra 1 astra linux 1 AT&T 1 auto 1 aviation industry 1 aws 1 BeiDou 1 blockchain 1 Boeing 1 books 1 bot 1 broker 1 cable 1 Catholic 1 cisa 1 CISO 1 CISOStressFest 1 compliance 1 content category 1 Continuous Management 1 Copy-Paste Culture 1 criminal charges 1 cuba 1 Cuttlefish 1 cyber 1 Cybercrime 1 CyberDome 1 CybersecurityPressure 1 cybsafe 1 Czech Republic 1 DASF 1 Databricks AI Security Framework 1 defense 1 deferred prosecution agreement 1 dell 1 democracy 1 digital solidarity 1 diplomacy 1 Discord 1 ebike 1 ecosystem 1 end-to-end AI 1 EUelections2024 1 fake 1 fbi 1 fiscal year 1 Framework 1 FTC 1 game console 1 Games 1 GCJ-02 1 gemini 1 Gemma 1 Generative 1 germany 1 global times 1 GLONASS 1 Google 1 google news 1 Government 1 GPS 1 great powers 1 guide 1 hackaton 1 Handala 1 Human Centric Security 1 HumanErrorFTW 1 humanoid robot 1 ICC 1 IIoT 1 incident response 1 Inclusive 1 india 1 indonesia 1 InformationManipulation 1 insurance 1 intelbro 1 Intelligence 1 IoMT 1 IoT 1 iran 1 Iron Dome 1 jamming 1 korea 1 law enforcement 1 lea 1 legal issues 1 LiabilityNightmares 1 Llama 1 LLM 1 LLMs 1 LNG 1 marin 1 market 1 mass 1 message queue 1 military aviation 1 ModelBest 1 Mossad 1 mq broker 1 MTAC 1 National Vulnerability Database 1 NavIC 1 Navigation 1 nes 1 nozomi 1 nsm22 1 nvd 1 NVidia 1 ofac 1 oil 1 Olympics 1 paid content 1 Palestine 1 paris 1 Plagiarism Scandals 1 PlayStation 1 playstation 2 1 playstation 3 1 podcast 1 police 1 PressReleaseDiplomacy 1 ps2 1 ps3 1 radar systems 1 railway 1 Ransomware 1 regulatory 1 Risk-Based Approach 1 rodrigo copetti 1 Russian 1 safety oversight 1 scam 1 semiconductors 1 ShinBet 1 snes 1 Social Engineering: 1 social network 1 spy 1 spyware 1 Stanford 1 surv 1 T-Mobile 1 te 1 technology 1 Tensor 1 Threat 1 Threat Exposure Management 1 Typosquatting 1 uae 1 UK 1 UNC1549 1 UnitedHealth Group 1 us 1 US11483343B2 1 US11496512B2 1 US11611582B2 1 US20220232015A1 1 US9071600B2 1 Verizon 1 VK 1 Vulnerability Management 1 water sector 1 webex 1 Westchester 1 Whatsapp 1 women 1 xbox 1 xbox 360 1 xbox original 1 xz 1 zcaler 1 сybersecurity 1 Больше тегов
Читать: 4+ мин
logo Snarky Security

[Announcement] The Art of Alienating Your Audience. A Guide 'Who Needs Customers, Anyway' to Failing in Cyber security Marketing

Welcome, ‎aspiring‏ ‎marketing ‎maestros, ‎to ‎the ‎ultimate‏ ‎guide ‎on‏ ‎how‏ ‎to ‎alienate ‎your‏ ‎audience ‎and‏ ‎tank ‎your ‎cybersecurity ‎business!‏ ‎Are‏ ‎you ‎tired‏ ‎of ‎actually‏ ‎connecting ‎with ‎potential ‎customers ‎and‏ ‎generating‏ ‎quality ‎leads?‏ ‎Do ‎you‏ ‎yearn ‎for ‎the ‎sweet ‎sound‏ ‎of‏ ‎unsubscribe‏ ‎clicks ‎and‏ ‎the ‎satisfying‏ ‎ping ‎of‏ ‎your‏ ‎emails ‎landing‏ ‎directly ‎in ‎spam ‎folders? ‎Well,‏ ‎buckle ‎up,‏ ‎because‏ ‎you’re ‎in ‎for‏ ‎a ‎treat!

In‏ ‎this ‎comprehensive ‎masterclass ‎of‏ ‎marketing‏ ‎mayhem, ‎we’ll‏ ‎explore ‎the‏ ‎fine ‎art ‎of ‎annoying ‎your‏ ‎prospects,‏ ‎confusing ‎your‏ ‎sales ‎team,‏ ‎and ‎generally ‎making ‎a ‎mess‏ ‎of‏ ‎your‏ ‎cybersecurity ‎marketing‏ ‎efforts. ‎From‏ ‎bombarding ‎inboxes‏ ‎with‏ ‎irrelevant ‎mass‏ ‎emails ‎to ‎creating ‎lead ‎generation‏ ‎forms ‎so‏ ‎lengthy‏ ‎they’d ‎make ‎War‏ ‎and ‎Peace‏ ‎look ‎like ‎a ‎tweet,‏ ‎we’ve‏ ‎got ‎all‏ ‎the ‎tips‏ ‎and ‎tricks ‎you ‎need ‎to‏ ‎ensure‏ ‎your ‎marketing‏ ‎strategy ‎is‏ ‎as ‎effective ‎as ‎a ‎chocolate‏ ‎teapot.

📌The‏ ‎Complexities‏ ‎of ‎Cybersecurity‏ ‎Marketing: ‎Cybersecurity‏ ‎marketing ‎is‏ ‎a‏ ‎nuanced ‎and‏ ‎challenging ‎field, ‎requiring ‎a ‎deep‏ ‎understanding ‎of‏ ‎both‏ ‎the ‎technical ‎aspects‏ ‎of ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎and ‎the ‎intricacies ‎of‏ ‎marketing.‏ ‎But ‎who‏ ‎needs ‎to‏ ‎understand ‎their ‎target ‎audience ‎when‏ ‎you‏ ‎can ‎just‏ ‎blast ‎generic‏ ‎messages ‎to ‎everyone? ‎After ‎all,‏ ‎why‏ ‎bother‏ ‎with ‎personalized‏ ‎content ‎when‏ ‎you ‎can‏ ‎just‏ ‎send ‎the‏ ‎same ‎email ‎to ‎a ‎financial‏ ‎director, ‎a‏ ‎CISO,‏ ‎and ‎a ‎CEO‏ ‎and ‎hope‏ ‎for ‎the ‎best?

📌The ‎Frustration‏ ‎with‏ ‎Lead ‎Generation‏ ‎Forms: ‎Ah,‏ ‎the ‎ubiquitous ‎lead ‎generation ‎form.‏ ‎You‏ ‎find ‎an‏ ‎interesting ‎piece‏ ‎of ‎content, ‎click ‎to ‎download‏ ‎it,‏ ‎and‏ ‎are ‎immediately‏ ‎redirected ‎to‏ ‎a ‎form‏ ‎with‏ ‎a ‎dozen‏ ‎fields ‎to ‎fill ‎out. ‎This‏ ‎practice ‎is‏ ‎driven‏ ‎by ‎the ‎need‏ ‎to ‎generate‏ ‎leads, ‎but ‎it ‎often‏ ‎results‏ ‎in ‎collecting‏ ‎useless ‎data.‏ ‎Many ‎users ‎resort ‎to ‎using‏ ‎autofill‏ ‎features ‎with‏ ‎outdated ‎or‏ ‎incorrect ‎information ‎just ‎to ‎bypass‏ ‎these‏ ‎forms.‏ ‎This ‎leads‏ ‎to ‎a‏ ‎cycle ‎where‏ ‎marketers‏ ‎gather ‎irrelevant‏ ‎data, ‎users ‎unsubscribe ‎from ‎spam‏ ‎emails, ‎and‏ ‎the‏ ‎quality ‎of ‎leads‏ ‎remains ‎poor.‏ ‎But ‎hey, ‎who ‎needs‏ ‎accurate‏ ‎data ‎when‏ ‎you ‎can‏ ‎have ‎a ‎bloated ‎CRM ‎full‏ ‎of‏ ‎irrelevant ‎contacts?

📌Ineffective‏ ‎Mass ‎Email‏ ‎Campaigns ‎& ‎the ‎Misguided ‎Focus‏ ‎on‏ ‎Lead‏ ‎Quantity: Mass ‎email‏ ‎campaigns ‎are‏ ‎another ‎area‏ ‎where‏ ‎cybersecurity ‎marketing‏ ‎often ‎falls ‎short. ‎Sending ‎out‏ ‎thousands ‎of‏ ‎generic‏ ‎emails ‎asking ‎if‏ ‎recipients ‎have‏ ‎cybersecurity ‎issues ‎and ‎offering‏ ‎solutions‏ ‎without ‎considering‏ ‎the ‎recipient’s‏ ‎industry ‎or ‎role ‎is ‎ineffective.‏ ‎Financial‏ ‎directors, ‎CISOs,‏ ‎and ‎CEOs‏ ‎have ‎different ‎concerns ‎and ‎require‏ ‎tailored‏ ‎messaging.‏ ‎Yet, ‎marketers‏ ‎often ‎focus‏ ‎on ‎the‏ ‎quantity‏ ‎of ‎emails‏ ‎sent ‎rather ‎than ‎the ‎quality‏ ‎of ‎engagement.‏ ‎Because‏ ‎nothing ‎says ‎«we‏ ‎care» ‎like‏ ‎a ‎one-size-fits-all ‎email ‎blast,‏ ‎right?

📌The‏ ‎Disconnect ‎Between‏ ‎Marketing ‎and‏ ‎Sales: Marketing ‎in ‎the ‎cybersecurity ‎sector‏ ‎is‏ ‎supposed ‎to‏ ‎build ‎a‏ ‎positive ‎brand ‎image, ‎enhance ‎customer‏ ‎loyalty,‏ ‎and‏ ‎support ‎the‏ ‎sales ‎process.‏ ‎However, ‎the‏ ‎current‏ ‎approach ‎often‏ ‎leads ‎to ‎customer ‎irritation. ‎In‏ ‎the ‎B2B‏ ‎segment,‏ ‎most ‎sales ‎are‏ ‎made ‎through‏ ‎direct ‎contact ‎with ‎decision-makers,‏ ‎not‏ ‎through ‎impulsive‏ ‎purchases ‎driven‏ ‎by ‎advertisements. ‎Therefore, ‎the ‎primary‏ ‎goal‏ ‎of ‎marketing‏ ‎should ‎be‏ ‎to ‎assist ‎in ‎the ‎sales‏ ‎process‏ ‎by‏ ‎understanding ‎customer‏ ‎pain ‎points,‏ ‎providing ‎solutions,‏ ‎and‏ ‎addressing ‎objections.‏ ‎But ‎why ‎bother ‎with ‎alignment‏ ‎when ‎you‏ ‎can‏ ‎have ‎marketing ‎and‏ ‎sales ‎teams‏ ‎working ‎in ‎silos, ‎each‏ ‎blissfully‏ ‎unaware ‎of‏ ‎the ‎other’s‏ ‎strategies ‎and ‎challenges?

📌Bridging ‎the ‎Gap‏ ‎Between‏ ‎Sales ‎and‏ ‎Marketing: ‎The‏ ‎disconnect ‎between ‎sales ‎and ‎marketing‏ ‎teams‏ ‎in‏ ‎the ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎industry ‎can‏ ‎significantly ‎hinder‏ ‎the‏ ‎effectiveness ‎of‏ ‎both ‎functions. ‎This ‎misalignment ‎often‏ ‎results ‎in‏ ‎wasted‏ ‎resources, ‎missed ‎opportunities,‏ ‎and ‎a‏ ‎lack ‎of ‎cohesive ‎strategy.‏ ‎But‏ ‎who ‎needs‏ ‎a ‎cohesive‏ ‎strategy ‎when ‎you ‎can ‎just‏ ‎blame‏ ‎the ‎other‏ ‎team ‎for‏ ‎your ‎failures?

So, ‎grab ‎your ‎«Cybersecurity‏ ‎for‏ ‎Dummies»‏ ‎book, ‎dust‏ ‎off ‎that‏ ‎decade-old ‎email‏ ‎list,‏ ‎and ‎prepare‏ ‎to ‎learn ‎how ‎to ‎fail‏ ‎spectacularly ‎in‏ ‎the‏ ‎high-stakes ‎world ‎of‏ ‎cybersecurity ‎marketing.‏ ‎After ‎all, ‎who ‎needs‏ ‎customers‏ ‎when ‎you‏ ‎can ‎have‏ ‎a ‎perfectly ‎polished ‎strategy ‎for‏ ‎driving‏ ‎them ‎away?‏ ‎Let’s ‎dive‏ ‎in ‎and ‎discover ‎the ‎true‏ ‎meaning‏ ‎of‏ ‎«security ‎through‏ ‎obscurity» ‎—‏ ‎by ‎making‏ ‎your‏ ‎marketing ‎so‏ ‎obscure, ‎no ‎one ‎will ‎ever‏ ‎find ‎you!


Read‏ ‎further


Смотреть: 39+ мин
logo Snarky Security

OpenAI’s Spyware Overlord: The Expert with a Controversial NSA Playbook (Video)

Video ‎edition‏ ‎(check ‎out ‎different ‎players ‎if‏ ‎anything ‎doesn’t‏ ‎work)



Related‏ ‎content ‎(PDF)


Ladies ‎and‏ ‎gentlemen, ‎grab‏ ‎your ‎tinfoil ‎hats ‎and‏ ‎prepare‏ ‎for ‎a‏ ‎wild ‎ride‏ ‎through ‎the ‎labyrinth ‎of ‎cyber‏ ‎espionage‏ ‎and ‎AI‏ ‎overlords. ‎Yes,‏ ‎you ‎read ‎that ‎right. ‎OpenAI,‏ ‎in‏ ‎its‏ ‎infinite ‎wisdom,‏ ‎has ‎decided‏ ‎to ‎appoint‏ ‎none‏ ‎other ‎than‏ ‎General ‎Paul ‎M. ‎Nakasone, ‎the‏ ‎former ‎director‏ ‎of‏ ‎the ‎NSA, ‎to‏ ‎its ‎board‏ ‎of ‎directors. ‎Because ‎who‏ ‎better‏ ‎to ‎ensure‏ ‎the ‎ethical‏ ‎development ‎of ‎artificial ‎intelligence ‎than‏ ‎a‏ ‎man ‎with‏ ‎a ‎resume‏ ‎that ‎reads ‎like ‎a ‎spy‏ ‎thriller?

📌Meet‏ ‎General‏ ‎Paul ‎M.‏ ‎Nakasone: ‎General‏ ‎Nakasone ‎isn’t‏ ‎just‏ ‎any ‎retired‏ ‎military ‎officer; ‎he’s ‎the ‎longest-serving‏ ‎leader ‎of‏ ‎the‏ ‎U.S. ‎Cyber ‎Command‏ ‎and ‎former‏ ‎director ‎of ‎the ‎NSA.‏ ‎His‏ ‎resume ‎reads‏ ‎like ‎a‏ ‎who’s ‎who ‎of ‎cyber ‎warfare‏ ‎and‏ ‎digital ‎espionage.‏ ‎From ‎establishing‏ ‎the ‎NSA’s ‎Artificial ‎Intelligence ‎Security‏ ‎Center‏ ‎to‏ ‎leading ‎the‏ ‎charge ‎against‏ ‎cyber ‎threats‏ ‎from‏ ‎nation-states, ‎Nakasone’s‏ ‎expertise ‎is ‎as ‎deep ‎as‏ ‎it ‎is‏ ‎controversial.

📌The‏ ‎Safety ‎and ‎Security‏ ‎Committee: ‎In‏ ‎a ‎bid ‎to ‎fortify‏ ‎its‏ ‎defenses, ‎OpenAI‏ ‎has ‎created‏ ‎a ‎Safety ‎and ‎Security ‎Committee,‏ ‎and‏ ‎guess ‎who’s‏ ‎at ‎the‏ ‎helm? ‎That’s ‎right, ‎General ‎Nakasone.‏ ‎This‏ ‎committee‏ ‎is ‎tasked‏ ‎with ‎evaluating‏ ‎and ‎enhancing‏ ‎OpenAI’s‏ ‎security ‎measures,‏ ‎ensuring ‎that ‎their ‎AI ‎models‏ ‎are ‎as‏ ‎secure‏ ‎as ‎Fort ‎Knox.‏ ‎Or ‎at‏ ‎least, ‎that’s ‎the ‎plan.‏ ‎Given‏ ‎Nakasone’s ‎background,‏ ‎one ‎can‏ ‎only ‎wonder ‎if ‎OpenAI’s ‎definition‏ ‎of‏ ‎«security» ‎might‏ ‎lean ‎a‏ ‎bit ‎towards ‎the ‎Orwellian.

📌Industry ‎Reactions.‏ ‎Applause‏ ‎and‏ ‎Alarm ‎Bells:‏ ‎The ‎industry‏ ‎is ‎abuzz‏ ‎with‏ ‎reactions ‎to‏ ‎Nakasone’s ‎appointment. ‎Some ‎hail ‎it‏ ‎as ‎a‏ ‎masterstroke,‏ ‎bringing ‎unparalleled ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎expertise ‎to‏ ‎the ‎AI ‎frontier. ‎Others,‏ ‎however,‏ ‎are ‎less‏ ‎enthusiastic. ‎Critics‏ ‎point ‎out ‎the ‎potential ‎conflicts‏ ‎of‏ ‎interest ‎and‏ ‎the ‎murky‏ ‎waters ‎of ‎data ‎privacy ‎that‏ ‎come‏ ‎with‏ ‎a ‎former‏ ‎NSA ‎director‏ ‎overseeing ‎AI‏ ‎development.‏ ‎After ‎all,‏ ‎who ‎better ‎to ‎secure ‎your‏ ‎data ‎than‏ ‎someone‏ ‎who ‎spent ‎years‏ ‎finding ‎ways‏ ‎to ‎collect ‎it?

📌The ‎Global‏ ‎Implications: Nakasone’s‏ ‎appointment ‎isn’t‏ ‎just ‎a‏ ‎domestic ‎affair; ‎it ‎has ‎global‏ ‎ramifications.‏ ‎Countries ‎around‏ ‎the ‎world‏ ‎are ‎likely ‎to ‎scrutinize ‎OpenAI’s‏ ‎activities‏ ‎more‏ ‎closely, ‎wary‏ ‎of ‎potential‏ ‎surveillance ‎and‏ ‎data‏ ‎privacy ‎issues.‏ ‎This ‎move ‎could ‎intensify ‎the‏ ‎tech ‎cold‏ ‎war,‏ ‎with ‎nations ‎like‏ ‎China ‎and‏ ‎Russia ‎ramping ‎up ‎their‏ ‎own‏ ‎AI ‎and‏ ‎cybersecurity ‎efforts‏ ‎in ‎response.

In ‎this ‎riveting ‎this‏ ‎document,‏ ‎you’ll ‎discover‏ ‎how ‎the‏ ‎mastermind ‎behind ‎the ‎NSA’s ‎most‏ ‎controversial‏ ‎surveillance‏ ‎programs ‎is‏ ‎now ‎tasked‏ ‎with ‎guiding‏ ‎the‏ ‎future ‎of‏ ‎AI. ‎Spoiler ‎alert: ‎it’s ‎all‏ ‎about ‎«cybersecurity»‏ ‎and‏ ‎«national ‎security"—terms ‎that‏ ‎are ‎sure‏ ‎to ‎make ‎you ‎sleep‏ ‎better‏ ‎at ‎night.‏ ‎So ‎sit‏ ‎back, ‎relax, ‎and ‎enjoy ‎the‏ ‎show‏ ‎as ‎we‏ ‎delve ‎into‏ ‎the ‎fascinating ‎world ‎of ‎AI‏ ‎development‏ ‎under‏ ‎the ‎watchful‏ ‎eye ‎of‏ ‎Big ‎Brother.


Читать: 6+ мин
logo Snarky Security

Navigating Ethical and Security Concerns: Challenges Facing Nakasone and OpenAI

The ‎recent‏ ‎controversies ‎surrounding ‎OpenAI ‎highlight ‎the‏ ‎challenges ‎that‏ ‎lie‏ ‎ahead ‎in ‎ensuring‏ ‎the ‎safe‏ ‎and ‎responsible ‎development ‎of‏ ‎artificial‏ ‎intelligence. ‎The‏ ‎company's ‎handling‏ ‎of ‎the ‎Scarlett ‎Johansson ‎incident‏ ‎and‏ ‎the ‎departure‏ ‎of ‎key‏ ‎safety ‎researchers ‎have ‎raised ‎concerns‏ ‎about‏ ‎OpenAI's‏ ‎commitment ‎to‏ ‎safety ‎and‏ ‎ethical ‎considerations‏ ‎in‏ ‎its ‎pursuit‏ ‎of ‎AGI.

📌 Safety ‎and ‎Ethical ‎Concerns: The‏ ‎incident ‎with‏ ‎Scarlett‏ ‎Johansson ‎has ‎sparked‏ ‎debates ‎about‏ ‎the ‎limits ‎of ‎copyright‏ ‎and‏ ‎the ‎right‏ ‎of ‎publicity‏ ‎in ‎the ‎context ‎of ‎AI.‏ ‎The‏ ‎use ‎of‏ ‎AI ‎models‏ ‎that ‎mimic ‎human ‎voices ‎and‏ ‎likenesses‏ ‎raises‏ ‎questions ‎about‏ ‎the ‎ownership‏ ‎and ‎control‏ ‎of‏ ‎these ‎digital‏ ‎representations. ‎The ‎lack ‎of ‎transparency‏ ‎and ‎accountability‏ ‎in‏ ‎AI ‎development ‎can‏ ‎lead ‎to‏ ‎the ‎misuse ‎of ‎AI‏ ‎systems,‏ ‎which ‎can‏ ‎have ‎significant‏ ‎consequences ‎for ‎individuals ‎and ‎society.

📌 Regulatory‏ ‎Framework:‏ ‎The ‎development‏ ‎of ‎AI‏ ‎requires ‎a ‎robust ‎regulatory ‎framework‏ ‎that‏ ‎addresses‏ ‎the ‎ethical‏ ‎and ‎safety‏ ‎implications ‎of‏ ‎AI.‏ ‎The ‎lack‏ ‎of ‎clear ‎guidelines ‎and ‎regulations‏ ‎can ‎lead‏ ‎to‏ ‎the ‎misuse ‎of‏ ‎AI, ‎which‏ ‎can ‎have ‎significant ‎consequences‏ ‎for‏ ‎individuals ‎and‏ ‎society. ‎The‏ ‎need ‎for ‎a ‎comprehensive ‎regulatory‏ ‎framework‏ ‎that ‎balances‏ ‎the ‎benefits‏ ‎of ‎AI ‎with ‎the ‎need‏ ‎to‏ ‎ensure‏ ‎safety ‎and‏ ‎ethical ‎considerations‏ ‎is ‎crucial.

📌 International‏ ‎Cooperation:‏ ‎The ‎development‏ ‎of ‎AI ‎is ‎a ‎global‏ ‎endeavor ‎that‏ ‎requires‏ ‎international ‎cooperation ‎and‏ ‎collaboration. ‎The‏ ‎lack ‎of ‎global ‎standards‏ ‎and‏ ‎guidelines ‎can‏ ‎lead ‎to‏ ‎the ‎misuse ‎of ‎AI, ‎which‏ ‎can‏ ‎have ‎significant‏ ‎consequences ‎for‏ ‎individuals ‎and ‎society. ‎The ‎need‏ ‎for‏ ‎international‏ ‎cooperation ‎and‏ ‎collaboration ‎to‏ ‎establish ‎common‏ ‎standards‏ ‎and ‎guidelines‏ ‎for ‎AI ‎development ‎is ‎essential.

📌 Public‏ ‎Awareness ‎and‏ ‎Education: The‏ ‎development ‎of ‎AI‏ ‎requires ‎public‏ ‎awareness ‎and ‎education ‎about‏ ‎the‏ ‎benefits ‎and‏ ‎risks ‎of‏ ‎AI. ‎The ‎lack ‎of ‎public‏ ‎understanding‏ ‎about ‎AI‏ ‎can ‎lead‏ ‎to ‎the ‎misuse ‎of ‎AI,‏ ‎which‏ ‎can‏ ‎have ‎significant‏ ‎consequences ‎for‏ ‎individuals ‎and‏ ‎society.‏ ‎The ‎need‏ ‎for ‎public ‎awareness ‎and ‎education‏ ‎about ‎AI‏ ‎is‏ ‎crucial ‎to ‎ensure‏ ‎that ‎AI‏ ‎is ‎developed ‎and ‎used‏ ‎responsibly.

📌 Research‏ ‎and ‎Development:‏ ‎The ‎development‏ ‎of ‎AI ‎requires ‎continuous ‎research‏ ‎and‏ ‎development ‎to‏ ‎ensure ‎that‏ ‎AI ‎systems ‎are ‎safe ‎and‏ ‎beneficial.‏ ‎The‏ ‎lack ‎of‏ ‎investment ‎in‏ ‎research ‎and‏ ‎development‏ ‎can ‎lead‏ ‎to ‎the ‎misuse ‎of ‎AI,‏ ‎which ‎can‏ ‎have‏ ‎significant ‎consequences ‎for‏ ‎individuals ‎and‏ ‎society. ‎The ‎need ‎for‏ ‎continuous‏ ‎research ‎and‏ ‎development ‎is‏ ‎essential ‎to ‎ensure ‎that ‎AI‏ ‎is‏ ‎developed ‎and‏ ‎used ‎responsibly.

📌 Governance‏ ‎and ‎Oversight: ‎The ‎development ‎of‏ ‎AI‏ ‎requires‏ ‎effective ‎governance‏ ‎and ‎oversight‏ ‎to ‎ensure‏ ‎that‏ ‎AI ‎systems‏ ‎are ‎safe ‎and ‎beneficial. ‎The‏ ‎lack ‎of‏ ‎governance‏ ‎and ‎oversight ‎can‏ ‎lead ‎to‏ ‎the ‎misuse ‎of ‎AI,‏ ‎which‏ ‎can ‎have‏ ‎significant ‎consequences‏ ‎for ‎individuals ‎and ‎society. ‎The‏ ‎need‏ ‎for ‎effective‏ ‎governance ‎and‏ ‎oversight ‎is ‎crucial ‎to ‎ensure‏ ‎that‏ ‎AI‏ ‎is ‎developed‏ ‎and ‎used‏ ‎responsibly.

📌 Transparency ‎and‏ ‎Accountability: The‏ ‎development ‎of‏ ‎AI ‎requires ‎transparency ‎and ‎accountability‏ ‎to ‎ensure‏ ‎that‏ ‎AI ‎systems ‎are‏ ‎safe ‎and‏ ‎beneficial. ‎The ‎lack ‎of‏ ‎transparency‏ ‎and ‎accountability‏ ‎can ‎lead‏ ‎to ‎the ‎misuse ‎of ‎AI,‏ ‎which‏ ‎can ‎have‏ ‎significant ‎consequences‏ ‎for ‎individuals ‎and ‎society. ‎The‏ ‎need‏ ‎for‏ ‎transparency ‎and‏ ‎accountability ‎is‏ ‎crucial ‎to‏ ‎ensure‏ ‎that ‎AI‏ ‎is ‎developed ‎and ‎used ‎responsibly.

📌 Human-Centered‏ ‎Approach: ‎The‏ ‎development‏ ‎of ‎AI ‎requires‏ ‎a ‎human-centered‏ ‎approach ‎that ‎prioritizes ‎human‏ ‎well-being‏ ‎and ‎safety.‏ ‎The ‎lack‏ ‎of ‎a ‎human-centered ‎approach ‎can‏ ‎lead‏ ‎to ‎the‏ ‎misuse ‎of‏ ‎AI, ‎which ‎can ‎have ‎significant‏ ‎consequences‏ ‎for‏ ‎individuals ‎and‏ ‎society. ‎The‏ ‎need ‎for‏ ‎a‏ ‎human-centered ‎approach‏ ‎is ‎essential ‎to ‎ensure ‎that‏ ‎AI ‎is‏ ‎developed‏ ‎and ‎used ‎responsibly.

📌 Value‏ ‎Alignment: ‎The‏ ‎development ‎of ‎AI ‎requires‏ ‎value‏ ‎alignment ‎to‏ ‎ensure ‎that‏ ‎AI ‎systems ‎are ‎safe ‎and‏ ‎beneficial.‏ ‎The ‎lack‏ ‎of ‎value‏ ‎alignment ‎can ‎lead ‎to ‎the‏ ‎misuse‏ ‎of‏ ‎AI, ‎which‏ ‎can ‎have‏ ‎significant ‎consequences‏ ‎for‏ ‎individuals ‎and‏ ‎society. ‎The ‎need ‎for ‎value‏ ‎alignment ‎is‏ ‎crucial‏ ‎to ‎ensure ‎that‏ ‎AI ‎is‏ ‎developed ‎and ‎used ‎responsibly.

📌 Explainability:‏ ‎The‏ ‎development ‎of‏ ‎AI ‎requires‏ ‎explainability ‎to ‎ensure ‎that ‎AI‏ ‎systems‏ ‎are ‎safe‏ ‎and ‎beneficial.‏ ‎The ‎lack ‎of ‎explainability ‎can‏ ‎lead‏ ‎to‏ ‎the ‎misuse‏ ‎of ‎AI,‏ ‎which ‎can‏ ‎have‏ ‎significant ‎consequences‏ ‎for ‎individuals ‎and ‎society. ‎The‏ ‎need ‎for‏ ‎explainability‏ ‎is ‎essential ‎to‏ ‎ensure ‎that‏ ‎AI ‎is ‎developed ‎and‏ ‎used‏ ‎responsibly.

📌 Human ‎Oversight:‏ ‎The ‎development‏ ‎of ‎AI ‎requires ‎human ‎oversight‏ ‎to‏ ‎ensure ‎that‏ ‎AI ‎systems‏ ‎are ‎safe ‎and ‎beneficial. ‎The‏ ‎lack‏ ‎of‏ ‎human ‎oversight‏ ‎can ‎lead‏ ‎to ‎the‏ ‎misuse‏ ‎of ‎AI,‏ ‎which ‎can ‎have ‎significant ‎consequences‏ ‎for ‎individuals‏ ‎and‏ ‎society. ‎The ‎need‏ ‎for ‎human‏ ‎oversight ‎is ‎crucial ‎to‏ ‎ensure‏ ‎that ‎AI‏ ‎is ‎developed‏ ‎and ‎used ‎responsibly.

📌 Whistleblower ‎Protection: ‎The‏ ‎development‏ ‎of ‎AI‏ ‎requires ‎whistleblower‏ ‎protection ‎to ‎ensure ‎that ‎AI‏ ‎systems‏ ‎are‏ ‎safe ‎and‏ ‎beneficial. ‎The‏ ‎lack ‎of‏ ‎whistleblower‏ ‎protection ‎can‏ ‎lead ‎to ‎the ‎misuse ‎of‏ ‎AI, ‎which‏ ‎can‏ ‎have ‎significant ‎consequences‏ ‎for ‎individuals‏ ‎and ‎society. ‎The ‎need‏ ‎for‏ ‎whistleblower ‎protection‏ ‎is ‎essential‏ ‎to ‎ensure ‎that ‎AI ‎is‏ ‎developed‏ ‎and ‎used‏ ‎responsibly.

📌 Independent ‎Oversight:‏ ‎The ‎development ‎of ‎AI ‎requires‏ ‎independent‏ ‎oversight‏ ‎to ‎ensure‏ ‎that ‎AI‏ ‎systems ‎are‏ ‎safe‏ ‎and ‎beneficial.‏ ‎The ‎lack ‎of ‎independent ‎oversight‏ ‎can ‎lead‏ ‎to‏ ‎the ‎misuse ‎of‏ ‎AI, ‎which‏ ‎can ‎have ‎significant ‎consequences‏ ‎for‏ ‎individuals ‎and‏ ‎society. ‎The‏ ‎need ‎for ‎independent ‎oversight ‎is‏ ‎crucial‏ ‎to ‎ensure‏ ‎that ‎AI‏ ‎is ‎developed ‎and ‎used ‎responsibly.

📌 Public‏ ‎Engagement:‏ ‎The‏ ‎development ‎of‏ ‎AI ‎requires‏ ‎public ‎engagement‏ ‎to‏ ‎ensure ‎that‏ ‎AI ‎systems ‎are ‎safe ‎and‏ ‎beneficial. ‎The‏ ‎lack‏ ‎of ‎public ‎engagement‏ ‎can ‎lead‏ ‎to ‎the ‎misuse ‎of‏ ‎AI,‏ ‎which ‎can‏ ‎have ‎significant‏ ‎consequences ‎for ‎individuals ‎and ‎society.‏ ‎The‏ ‎need ‎for‏ ‎public ‎engagement‏ ‎is ‎crucial ‎to ‎ensure ‎that‏ ‎AI‏ ‎is‏ ‎developed ‎and‏ ‎used ‎responsibly.

📌 Continuous‏ ‎Monitoring: ‎The‏ ‎development‏ ‎of ‎AI‏ ‎requires ‎continuous ‎monitoring ‎to ‎ensure‏ ‎that ‎AI‏ ‎systems‏ ‎are ‎safe ‎and‏ ‎beneficial. ‎The‏ ‎lack ‎of ‎continuous ‎monitoring‏ ‎can‏ ‎lead ‎to‏ ‎the ‎misuse‏ ‎of ‎AI, ‎which ‎can ‎have‏ ‎significant‏ ‎consequences ‎for‏ ‎individuals ‎and‏ ‎society. ‎The ‎need ‎for ‎continuous‏ ‎monitoring‏ ‎is‏ ‎crucial ‎to‏ ‎ensure ‎that‏ ‎AI ‎is‏ ‎developed‏ ‎and ‎used‏ ‎responsibly.

📌 Cybersecurity: ‎The ‎development ‎of ‎AI‏ ‎requires ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎to‏ ‎ensure ‎that ‎AI‏ ‎systems ‎are‏ ‎safe ‎and ‎beneficial. ‎The‏ ‎lack‏ ‎of ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎can ‎lead‏ ‎to ‎the ‎misuse ‎of ‎AI,‏ ‎which‏ ‎can ‎have‏ ‎significant ‎consequences‏ ‎for ‎individuals ‎and ‎society. ‎The‏ ‎need‏ ‎for‏ ‎cybersecurity ‎is‏ ‎crucial ‎to‏ ‎ensure ‎that‏ ‎AI‏ ‎is ‎developed‏ ‎and ‎used ‎responsibly.

📌 Cybersecurity ‎Risks ‎for‏ ‎AI ‎Safety:‏ ‎The‏ ‎development ‎of ‎AI‏ ‎requires ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎to ‎ensure ‎that ‎AI‏ ‎systems‏ ‎are ‎safe‏ ‎and ‎beneficial.‏ ‎The ‎lack ‎of ‎cybersecurity ‎can‏ ‎lead‏ ‎to ‎the‏ ‎misuse ‎of‏ ‎AI, ‎which ‎can ‎have ‎significant‏ ‎consequences‏ ‎for‏ ‎individuals ‎and‏ ‎society. ‎The‏ ‎need ‎for‏ ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎is ‎crucial‏ ‎to ‎ensure ‎that ‎AI ‎is‏ ‎developed ‎and‏ ‎used‏ ‎responsibly.

Читать: 2+ мин
logo Snarky Security

Bridging Military and AI: The Potential Impact of Nakasone's Expertise on OpenAI's Development

In ‎terms‏ ‎of ‎specific ‎countries ‎and ‎companies,‏ ‎the ‎impact‏ ‎of‏ ‎the ‎appointment ‎will‏ ‎depend ‎on‏ ‎their ‎individual ‎relationships ‎with‏ ‎OpenAI‏ ‎and ‎the‏ ‎United ‎States.‏ ‎Some ‎countries, ‎such ‎as ‎China,‏ ‎may‏ ‎view ‎the‏ ‎appointment ‎as‏ ‎a ‎threat ‎to ‎their ‎national‏ ‎security‏ ‎and‏ ‎economic ‎interests,‏ ‎while ‎others,‏ ‎such ‎as‏ ‎the‏ ‎United ‎Kingdom,‏ ‎may ‎see ‎it ‎as ‎an‏ ‎opportunity ‎for‏ ‎increased‏ ‎cooperation ‎and ‎collaboration.

Companies‏ ‎worldwide ‎may‏ ‎also ‎need ‎to ‎reassess‏ ‎their‏ ‎relationships ‎with‏ ‎OpenAI ‎and‏ ‎the ‎United ‎States ‎government ‎in‏ ‎light‏ ‎of ‎the‏ ‎appointment. ‎This‏ ‎could ‎lead ‎to ‎changes ‎in‏ ‎business‏ ‎strategies,‏ ‎partnerships, ‎and‏ ‎investments ‎in‏ ‎the ‎AI‏ ‎sector.

📌 Enhanced‏ ‎Cybersecurity: ‎The‏ ‎former ‎NSA ‎director's ‎expertise ‎in‏ ‎cybersecurity ‎can‏ ‎help‏ ‎OpenAI ‎strengthen ‎its‏ ‎defenses ‎against‏ ‎cyber ‎threats, ‎which ‎is‏ ‎crucial‏ ‎in ‎today's‏ ‎interconnected ‎world.‏ ‎This ‎can ‎lead ‎to ‎increased‏ ‎trust‏ ‎in ‎OpenAI's‏ ‎products ‎and‏ ‎services ‎among ‎global ‎customers.

📌 Global ‎Surveillance‏ ‎Concerns: The‏ ‎NSA's‏ ‎history ‎of‏ ‎global ‎surveillance‏ ‎raises ‎concerns‏ ‎about‏ ‎the ‎potential‏ ‎misuse ‎of ‎OpenAI's ‎technology ‎for‏ ‎mass ‎surveillance.‏ ‎This‏ ‎could ‎lead ‎to‏ ‎increased ‎scrutiny‏ ‎from ‎governments ‎and ‎civil‏ ‎society‏ ‎organizations ‎worldwide.

📌 Impact‏ ‎on ‎Global‏ ‎Competitors: ‎The ‎appointment ‎may ‎give‏ ‎OpenAI‏ ‎a ‎competitive‏ ‎edge ‎in‏ ‎the ‎global ‎AI ‎market, ‎potentially‏ ‎threatening‏ ‎the‏ ‎interests ‎of‏ ‎other ‎AI‏ ‎companies ‎worldwide.‏ ‎This‏ ‎could ‎lead‏ ‎to ‎increased ‎competition ‎and ‎innovation‏ ‎in ‎the‏ ‎AI‏ ‎sector.

📌 Global ‎Governance: ‎The‏ ‎integration ‎of‏ ‎a ‎former ‎NSA ‎director‏ ‎into‏ ‎OpenAI's ‎board‏ ‎may ‎raise‏ ‎questions ‎about ‎the ‎governance ‎of‏ ‎AI‏ ‎development ‎and‏ ‎deployment ‎globally.‏ ‎This ‎could ‎lead ‎to ‎calls‏ ‎for‏ ‎more‏ ‎robust ‎international‏ ‎regulations ‎and‏ ‎standards ‎for‏ ‎AI‏ ‎development.

📌 National ‎Security‏ ‎Implications: The ‎appointment ‎may ‎have ‎national‏ ‎security ‎implications‏ ‎for‏ ‎countries ‎that ‎are‏ ‎not ‎aligned‏ ‎with ‎the ‎United ‎States.‏ ‎This‏ ‎could ‎lead‏ ‎to ‎increased‏ ‎tensions ‎and ‎concerns ‎about ‎the‏ ‎potential‏ ‎misuse ‎of‏ ‎AI ‎technology‏ ‎for ‎geopolitical ‎gain.

📌 Global ‎Economic ‎Impact: The‏ ‎increased‏ ‎focus‏ ‎on ‎AI‏ ‎development ‎and‏ ‎deployment ‎could‏ ‎have‏ ‎significant ‎economic‏ ‎implications ‎globally. ‎This ‎could ‎lead‏ ‎to ‎job‏ ‎displacement,‏ ‎changes ‎in ‎global‏ ‎supply ‎chains,‏ ‎and ‎shifts ‎in ‎economic‏ ‎power‏ ‎dynamics.

📌 Global ‎Cooperation:‏ ‎The ‎appointment‏ ‎may ‎also ‎lead ‎to ‎increased‏ ‎cooperation‏ ‎between ‎governments‏ ‎and ‎private‏ ‎companies ‎worldwide ‎to ‎address ‎the‏ ‎challenges‏ ‎and‏ ‎opportunities ‎posed‏ ‎by ‎AI.‏ ‎This ‎could‏ ‎lead‏ ‎to ‎the‏ ‎development ‎of ‎new ‎international ‎standards‏ ‎and ‎agreements‏ ‎on‏ ‎AI ‎development ‎and‏ ‎deployment.

Читать: 3+ мин
logo Snarky Security

OpenAI’s Spyware Overlord: The Expert with a Controversial NSA Playbook

Читать: 3+ мин
logo Snarky Security

[Announcement] OpenAI’s Spyware Overlord: The Expert with a Controversial NSA Playbook

Ladies ‎and‏ ‎gentlemen, ‎grab ‎your ‎tinfoil ‎hats‏ ‎and ‎prepare‏ ‎for‏ ‎a ‎wild ‎ride‏ ‎through ‎the‏ ‎labyrinth ‎of ‎cyber ‎espionage‏ ‎and‏ ‎AI ‎overlords.‏ ‎Yes, ‎you‏ ‎read ‎that ‎right. ‎OpenAI, ‎in‏ ‎its‏ ‎infinite ‎wisdom,‏ ‎has ‎decided‏ ‎to ‎appoint ‎none ‎other ‎than‏ ‎General‏ ‎Paul‏ ‎M. ‎Nakasone,‏ ‎the ‎former‏ ‎director ‎of‏ ‎the‏ ‎NSA, ‎to‏ ‎its ‎board ‎of ‎directors. ‎Because‏ ‎who ‎better‏ ‎to‏ ‎ensure ‎the ‎ethical‏ ‎development ‎of‏ ‎artificial ‎intelligence ‎than ‎a‏ ‎man‏ ‎with ‎a‏ ‎resume ‎that‏ ‎reads ‎like ‎a ‎spy ‎thriller?

📌Meet‏ ‎General‏ ‎Paul ‎M.‏ ‎Nakasone: ‎General‏ ‎Nakasone ‎isn’t ‎just ‎any ‎retired‏ ‎military‏ ‎officer;‏ ‎he’s ‎the‏ ‎longest-serving ‎leader‏ ‎of ‎the‏ ‎U.S.‏ ‎Cyber ‎Command‏ ‎and ‎former ‎director ‎of ‎the‏ ‎NSA. ‎His‏ ‎resume‏ ‎reads ‎like ‎a‏ ‎who’s ‎who‏ ‎of ‎cyber ‎warfare ‎and‏ ‎digital‏ ‎espionage. ‎From‏ ‎establishing ‎the‏ ‎NSA’s ‎Artificial ‎Intelligence ‎Security ‎Center‏ ‎to‏ ‎leading ‎the‏ ‎charge ‎against‏ ‎cyber ‎threats ‎from ‎nation-states, ‎Nakasone’s‏ ‎expertise‏ ‎is‏ ‎as ‎deep‏ ‎as ‎it‏ ‎is ‎controversial.

📌The‏ ‎Safety‏ ‎and ‎Security‏ ‎Committee: ‎In ‎a ‎bid ‎to‏ ‎fortify ‎its‏ ‎defenses,‏ ‎OpenAI ‎has ‎created‏ ‎a ‎Safety‏ ‎and ‎Security ‎Committee, ‎and‏ ‎guess‏ ‎who’s ‎at‏ ‎the ‎helm?‏ ‎That’s ‎right, ‎General ‎Nakasone. ‎This‏ ‎committee‏ ‎is ‎tasked‏ ‎with ‎evaluating‏ ‎and ‎enhancing ‎OpenAI’s ‎security ‎measures,‏ ‎ensuring‏ ‎that‏ ‎their ‎AI‏ ‎models ‎are‏ ‎as ‎secure‏ ‎as‏ ‎Fort ‎Knox.‏ ‎Or ‎at ‎least, ‎that’s ‎the‏ ‎plan. ‎Given‏ ‎Nakasone’s‏ ‎background, ‎one ‎can‏ ‎only ‎wonder‏ ‎if ‎OpenAI’s ‎definition ‎of‏ ‎«security»‏ ‎might ‎lean‏ ‎a ‎bit‏ ‎towards ‎the ‎Orwellian.

📌Industry ‎Reactions. ‎Applause‏ ‎and‏ ‎Alarm ‎Bells:‏ ‎The ‎industry‏ ‎is ‎abuzz ‎with ‎reactions ‎to‏ ‎Nakasone’s‏ ‎appointment.‏ ‎Some ‎hail‏ ‎it ‎as‏ ‎a ‎masterstroke,‏ ‎bringing‏ ‎unparalleled ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎expertise ‎to ‎the ‎AI ‎frontier.‏ ‎Others, ‎however,‏ ‎are‏ ‎less ‎enthusiastic. ‎Critics‏ ‎point ‎out‏ ‎the ‎potential ‎conflicts ‎of‏ ‎interest‏ ‎and ‎the‏ ‎murky ‎waters‏ ‎of ‎data ‎privacy ‎that ‎come‏ ‎with‏ ‎a ‎former‏ ‎NSA ‎director‏ ‎overseeing ‎AI ‎development. ‎After ‎all,‏ ‎who‏ ‎better‏ ‎to ‎secure‏ ‎your ‎data‏ ‎than ‎someone‏ ‎who‏ ‎spent ‎years‏ ‎finding ‎ways ‎to ‎collect ‎it?

📌The‏ ‎Global ‎Implications: Nakasone’s‏ ‎appointment‏ ‎isn’t ‎just ‎a‏ ‎domestic ‎affair;‏ ‎it ‎has ‎global ‎ramifications.‏ ‎Countries‏ ‎around ‎the‏ ‎world ‎are‏ ‎likely ‎to ‎scrutinize ‎OpenAI’s ‎activities‏ ‎more‏ ‎closely, ‎wary‏ ‎of ‎potential‏ ‎surveillance ‎and ‎data ‎privacy ‎issues.‏ ‎This‏ ‎move‏ ‎could ‎intensify‏ ‎the ‎tech‏ ‎cold ‎war,‏ ‎with‏ ‎nations ‎like‏ ‎China ‎and ‎Russia ‎ramping ‎up‏ ‎their ‎own‏ ‎AI‏ ‎and ‎cybersecurity ‎efforts‏ ‎in ‎response.

In‏ ‎this ‎riveting ‎this ‎document,‏ ‎you’ll‏ ‎discover ‎how‏ ‎the ‎mastermind‏ ‎behind ‎the ‎NSA’s ‎most ‎controversial‏ ‎surveillance‏ ‎programs ‎is‏ ‎now ‎tasked‏ ‎with ‎guiding ‎the ‎future ‎of‏ ‎AI.‏ ‎Spoiler‏ ‎alert: ‎it’s‏ ‎all ‎about‏ ‎«cybersecurity» ‎and‏ ‎«national‏ ‎security"—terms ‎that‏ ‎are ‎sure ‎to ‎make ‎you‏ ‎sleep ‎better‏ ‎at‏ ‎night. ‎So ‎sit‏ ‎back, ‎relax,‏ ‎and ‎enjoy ‎the ‎show‏ ‎as‏ ‎we ‎delve‏ ‎into ‎the‏ ‎fascinating ‎world ‎of ‎AI ‎development‏ ‎under‏ ‎the ‎watchful‏ ‎eye ‎of‏ ‎Big ‎Brother.


Continue ‎Reading

Читать: 3+ мин
logo Snarky Security

AI Race Heats Up: How Nakasone's Move Affects OpenAI's Competitors

📌 DeepMind ‎(United‏ ‎Kingdom): DeepMind, ‎a ‎leading ‎AI ‎research‏ ‎organization, ‎may‏ ‎benefit‏ ‎from ‎increased ‎scrutiny‏ ‎on ‎OpenAI's‏ ‎data ‎handling ‎practices ‎and‏ ‎potential‏ ‎security ‎risks.‏ ‎Concerns ‎about‏ ‎surveillance ‎and ‎privacy ‎could ‎drive‏ ‎some‏ ‎partners ‎and‏ ‎customers ‎to‏ ‎prefer ‎DeepMind's ‎more ‎transparent ‎and‏ ‎ethically-focused‏ ‎approach‏ ‎to ‎AI‏ ‎development.

📌 Anthropic ‎(United‏ ‎States): ‎Anthropic,‏ ‎which‏ ‎emphasizes ‎ethical‏ ‎AI ‎development, ‎could ‎see ‎a‏ ‎boost ‎in‏ ‎credibility‏ ‎and ‎support. ‎The‏ ‎appointment ‎of‏ ‎a ‎former ‎NSA ‎director‏ ‎to‏ ‎OpenAI's ‎board‏ ‎might ‎raise‏ ‎concerns ‎about ‎OpenAI's ‎commitment ‎to‏ ‎AI‏ ‎safety ‎and‏ ‎ethics, ‎potentially‏ ‎driving ‎stakeholders ‎towards ‎Anthropic's ‎more‏ ‎principled‏ ‎stance.

📌 Cohere‏ ‎(Canada): ‎Cohere,‏ ‎which ‎focuses‏ ‎on ‎developing‏ ‎language‏ ‎models ‎for‏ ‎enterprise ‎users, ‎might ‎benefit ‎from‏ ‎concerns ‎about‏ ‎OpenAI's‏ ‎data ‎handling ‎and‏ ‎security ‎practices.‏ ‎Enterprises ‎wary ‎of ‎potential‏ ‎surveillance‏ ‎implications ‎may‏ ‎prefer ‎Cohere's‏ ‎solutions, ‎which ‎could ‎be ‎perceived‏ ‎as‏ ‎more ‎secure‏ ‎and ‎privacy-conscious.

📌 Stability‏ ‎AI ‎(United ‎Kingdom): ‎Stability ‎AI,‏ ‎an‏ ‎open-source‏ ‎AI ‎research‏ ‎organization, ‎could‏ ‎attract ‎more‏ ‎support‏ ‎from ‎the‏ ‎open-source ‎community ‎and ‎stakeholders ‎concerned‏ ‎about ‎transparency.‏ ‎The‏ ‎appointment ‎of ‎a‏ ‎former ‎NSA‏ ‎director ‎might ‎lead ‎to‏ ‎fears‏ ‎of ‎increased‏ ‎surveillance, ‎making‏ ‎Stability ‎AI's ‎open-source ‎and ‎transparent‏ ‎approach‏ ‎more ‎appealing.

📌 EleutherAI‏ ‎(United ‎States):‏ ‎EleutherAI, ‎a ‎nonprofit ‎AI ‎research‏ ‎organization,‏ ‎could‏ ‎gain ‎traction‏ ‎among ‎those‏ ‎who ‎prioritize‏ ‎ethical‏ ‎AI ‎development‏ ‎and ‎transparency. ‎The ‎potential ‎for‏ ‎increased ‎surveillance‏ ‎under‏ ‎OpenAI's ‎new ‎leadership‏ ‎might ‎drive‏ ‎researchers ‎and ‎collaborators ‎towards‏ ‎EleutherAI's‏ ‎open ‎and‏ ‎ethical ‎AI‏ ‎initiatives.

📌 Hugging ‎Face ‎(United ‎States): ‎Hugging‏ ‎Face,‏ ‎known ‎for‏ ‎providing ‎AI‏ ‎models ‎and ‎tools ‎for ‎developers,‏ ‎might‏ ‎see‏ ‎increased ‎interest‏ ‎from ‎developers‏ ‎and ‎enterprises‏ ‎concerned‏ ‎about ‎privacy‏ ‎and ‎surveillance. ‎The ‎appointment ‎of‏ ‎a ‎former‏ ‎NSA‏ ‎director ‎could ‎lead‏ ‎to ‎a‏ ‎preference ‎for ‎Hugging ‎Face's‏ ‎more‏ ‎transparent ‎and‏ ‎community-driven ‎approach.

📌 Google‏ ‎AI ‎(United ‎States): ‎Google ‎AI,‏ ‎a‏ ‎major ‎player‏ ‎in ‎the‏ ‎AI ‎research ‎space, ‎might ‎leverage‏ ‎concerns‏ ‎about‏ ‎OpenAI's ‎new‏ ‎leadership ‎to‏ ‎position ‎itself‏ ‎as‏ ‎a ‎more‏ ‎trustworthy ‎and ‎secure ‎alternative. ‎Google's‏ ‎extensive ‎resources‏ ‎and‏ ‎established ‎reputation ‎could‏ ‎attract ‎partners‏ ‎and ‎customers ‎looking ‎for‏ ‎stability‏ ‎and ‎security.

📌 Tencent‏ ‎(China): ‎Tencent,‏ ‎a ‎significant ‎competitor ‎in ‎the‏ ‎AI‏ ‎space, ‎might‏ ‎use ‎the‏ ‎appointment ‎to ‎highlight ‎potential ‎security‏ ‎and‏ ‎surveillance‏ ‎risks ‎associated‏ ‎with ‎OpenAI.‏ ‎This ‎could‏ ‎strengthen‏ ‎Tencent's ‎position‏ ‎in ‎markets ‎where ‎concerns ‎about‏ ‎U.S. ‎surveillance‏ ‎are‏ ‎particularly ‎pronounced.

📌 Baidu ‎(China):‏ ‎Baidu, ‎another‏ ‎prominent ‎Chinese ‎AI ‎company,‏ ‎could‏ ‎capitalize ‎on‏ ‎the ‎appointment‏ ‎by ‎emphasizing ‎its ‎commitment ‎to‏ ‎privacy‏ ‎and ‎security.‏ ‎Concerns ‎about‏ ‎OpenAI's ‎ties ‎to ‎U.S. ‎intelligence‏ ‎could‏ ‎drive‏ ‎some ‎international‏ ‎partners ‎and‏ ‎customers ‎towards‏ ‎Baidu's‏ ‎AI ‎solutions.

📌 Alibaba‏ ‎(China): ‎Alibaba, ‎a ‎major ‎player‏ ‎in ‎the‏ ‎AI‏ ‎industry, ‎might ‎benefit‏ ‎from ‎increased‏ ‎skepticism ‎about ‎OpenAI's ‎data‏ ‎practices‏ ‎and ‎potential‏ ‎surveillance. ‎The‏ ‎company ‎could ‎attract ‎customers ‎and‏ ‎partners‏ ‎looking ‎for‏ ‎alternatives ‎to‏ ‎U.S.-based ‎AI ‎providers ‎perceived ‎as‏ ‎having‏ ‎close‏ ‎ties ‎to‏ ‎intelligence ‎agencies.

Читать: 4+ мин
logo Snarky Security

Global Implications: International Responses to Nakasone Joining OpenAI

The ‎appointment‏ ‎of ‎a ‎former ‎NSA ‎director‏ ‎to ‎OpenAI's‏ ‎board‏ ‎of ‎directors ‎is‏ ‎obviously ‎to‏ ‎have ‎far-reaching ‎implications ‎for‏ ‎international‏ ‎relations ‎and‏ ‎global ‎security.‏ ‎Countries ‎around ‎the ‎world ‎may‏ ‎respond‏ ‎with ‎increased‏ ‎scrutiny, ‎regulatory‏ ‎actions, ‎and ‎efforts ‎to ‎enhance‏ ‎their‏ ‎own‏ ‎AI ‎capabilities.‏ ‎The ‎global‏ ‎community ‎may‏ ‎also‏ ‎push ‎for‏ ‎stronger ‎international ‎regulations ‎and ‎ethical‏ ‎guidelines ‎to‏ ‎govern‏ ‎the ‎use ‎of‏ ‎AI ‎in‏ ‎national ‎security.

European ‎Union

📌 Increased ‎Scrutiny:‏ ‎The‏ ‎European ‎Union‏ ‎(EU) ‎is‏ ‎to ‎scrutinize ‎OpenAI's ‎activities ‎more‏ ‎closely,‏ ‎given ‎its‏ ‎stringent ‎data‏ ‎protection ‎regulations ‎under ‎the ‎General‏ ‎Data‏ ‎Protection‏ ‎Regulation ‎(GDPR).‏ ‎Concerns ‎about‏ ‎privacy ‎and‏ ‎data‏ ‎security ‎could‏ ‎lead ‎to ‎more ‎rigorous ‎oversight‏ ‎and ‎potential‏ ‎regulatory‏ ‎actions ‎against ‎OpenAI.

📌 Calls‏ ‎for ‎Transparency:‏ ‎European ‎countries ‎may ‎demand‏ ‎greater‏ ‎transparency ‎from‏ ‎OpenAI ‎regarding‏ ‎its ‎data ‎handling ‎practices ‎and‏ ‎the‏ ‎extent ‎of‏ ‎its ‎collaboration‏ ‎with ‎U.S. ‎intelligence ‎agencies. ‎This‏ ‎could‏ ‎lead‏ ‎to ‎increased‏ ‎pressure ‎on‏ ‎OpenAI ‎to‏ ‎disclose‏ ‎more ‎information‏ ‎about ‎its ‎operations ‎and ‎partnerships.

China

📌 Heightened‏ ‎Tensions: China's ‎government‏ ‎may‏ ‎view ‎the ‎appointment‏ ‎as ‎a‏ ‎strategic ‎move ‎by ‎the‏ ‎U.S.‏ ‎to ‎enhance‏ ‎its ‎AI‏ ‎capabilities ‎for ‎national ‎security ‎purposes.‏ ‎This‏ ‎could ‎exacerbate‏ ‎existing ‎tensions‏ ‎between ‎the ‎two ‎countries, ‎particularly‏ ‎in‏ ‎the‏ ‎realm ‎of‏ ‎technology ‎and‏ ‎cybersecurity.

📌 Accelerated ‎AI‏ ‎Development:‏ ‎In ‎response,‏ ‎China ‎may ‎accelerate ‎its ‎own‏ ‎AI ‎development‏ ‎initiatives‏ ‎to ‎maintain ‎its‏ ‎competitive ‎edge.‏ ‎This ‎could ‎lead ‎to‏ ‎increased‏ ‎investments ‎in‏ ‎AI ‎research‏ ‎and ‎development, ‎as ‎well ‎as‏ ‎efforts‏ ‎to ‎enhance‏ ‎its ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎measures.

Russia

📌 Suspicion ‎and ‎Countermeasures: ‎Russia ‎is‏ ‎likely‏ ‎to‏ ‎view ‎the‏ ‎NSA's ‎involvement‏ ‎in ‎OpenAI‏ ‎with‏ ‎suspicion, ‎interpreting‏ ‎it ‎as ‎an ‎attempt ‎to‏ ‎extend ‎U.S.‏ ‎influence‏ ‎in ‎the ‎AI‏ ‎sector. ‎This‏ ‎could ‎prompt ‎Russia ‎to‏ ‎implement‏ ‎countermeasures, ‎such‏ ‎as ‎bolstering‏ ‎its ‎own ‎AI ‎capabilities ‎and‏ ‎enhancing‏ ‎its ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎defenses.

📌 Anticipate of ‎Cyber‏ ‎Activities: The ‎United ‎States ‎may ‎anticipate‏ ‎an‏ ‎escalation‏ ‎in ‎Russian‏ ‎cyber ‎activities‏ ‎targeting ‎its‏ ‎artificial‏ ‎intelligence ‎(AI)‏ ‎infrastructure, ‎aiming ‎to ‎gather ‎intelligence‏ ‎or ‎disrupt‏ ‎operations.‏ ‎

Middle ‎East

📌 Security ‎Concerns: Countries‏ ‎in ‎the‏ ‎Middle ‎East ‎may ‎express‏ ‎concerns‏ ‎about ‎the‏ ‎potential ‎for‏ ‎AI ‎technologies ‎to ‎be ‎used‏ ‎for‏ ‎surveillance ‎and‏ ‎intelligence ‎gathering.‏ ‎This ‎could ‎lead ‎to ‎calls‏ ‎for‏ ‎international‏ ‎regulations ‎to‏ ‎govern ‎the‏ ‎use ‎of‏ ‎AI‏ ‎in ‎national‏ ‎security.

📌 Regional ‎Cooperation: ‎Some ‎Middle ‎Eastern‏ ‎countries ‎may‏ ‎seek‏ ‎to ‎cooperate ‎with‏ ‎other ‎nations‏ ‎to ‎develop ‎their ‎own‏ ‎AI‏ ‎capabilities, ‎reducing‏ ‎their ‎reliance‏ ‎on ‎U.S. ‎technology ‎and ‎mitigating‏ ‎potential‏ ‎security ‎risks.

Africa

📌 Cautious‏ ‎Optimism: African ‎nations‏ ‎may ‎view ‎the ‎NSA's ‎involvement‏ ‎in‏ ‎OpenAI‏ ‎with ‎cautious‏ ‎optimism, ‎recognizing‏ ‎the ‎potential‏ ‎benefits‏ ‎of ‎AI‏ ‎for ‎economic ‎development ‎and ‎security.‏ ‎However, ‎they‏ ‎may‏ ‎also ‎be ‎wary‏ ‎of ‎the‏ ‎implications ‎for ‎data ‎privacy‏ ‎and‏ ‎sovereignty.

📌 Capacity ‎Building:‏ ‎In ‎response,‏ ‎African ‎countries ‎may ‎focus ‎on‏ ‎building‏ ‎their ‎own‏ ‎AI ‎capacities,‏ ‎investing ‎in ‎education ‎and ‎infrastructure‏ ‎to‏ ‎harness‏ ‎the ‎benefits‏ ‎of ‎AI‏ ‎while ‎safeguarding‏ ‎against‏ ‎potential ‎risks.

Latin‏ ‎America

📌 Regulatory ‎Responses: ‎Latin ‎American ‎countries‏ ‎may ‎respond‏ ‎by‏ ‎strengthening ‎their ‎regulatory‏ ‎frameworks ‎to‏ ‎ensure ‎that ‎AI ‎technologies‏ ‎are‏ ‎used ‎responsibly‏ ‎and ‎ethically.‏ ‎This ‎could ‎involve ‎the ‎development‏ ‎of‏ ‎new ‎laws‏ ‎and ‎policies‏ ‎to ‎govern ‎AI ‎use ‎and‏ ‎protect‏ ‎citizens'‏ ‎rights.

📌 Collaborative ‎Efforts: Some‏ ‎countries ‎in‏ ‎the ‎region‏ ‎may‏ ‎seek ‎to‏ ‎collaborate ‎with ‎international ‎organizations ‎and‏ ‎other ‎nations‏ ‎to‏ ‎develop ‎best ‎practices‏ ‎for ‎AI‏ ‎governance ‎and ‎security.

Global ‎Implications

📌 International‏ ‎Regulations:‏ ‎The ‎NSA's‏ ‎involvement ‎in‏ ‎OpenAI ‎could ‎lead ‎to ‎increased‏ ‎calls‏ ‎for ‎international‏ ‎regulations ‎to‏ ‎govern ‎the ‎use ‎of ‎AI‏ ‎in‏ ‎national‏ ‎security. ‎This‏ ‎could ‎involve‏ ‎the ‎development‏ ‎of‏ ‎treaties ‎and‏ ‎agreements ‎to ‎ensure ‎that ‎AI‏ ‎technologies ‎are‏ ‎used‏ ‎responsibly ‎and ‎ethically.

📌 Ethical‏ ‎Considerations: The ‎global‏ ‎community ‎may ‎place ‎greater‏ ‎emphasis‏ ‎on ‎the‏ ‎ethical ‎implications‏ ‎of ‎AI ‎development, ‎advocating ‎for‏ ‎transparency,‏ ‎accountability, ‎and‏ ‎the ‎protection‏ ‎of ‎human ‎rights ‎in ‎the‏ ‎use‏ ‎of‏ ‎AI ‎technologies.

Читать: 2+ мин
logo Snarky Security

Tech Giants Respond: Industry Perspectives on Nakasone's Appointment to OpenAI

While ‎Nakasone's‏ ‎appointment ‎has ‎been ‎met ‎with‏ ‎both ‎positive‏ ‎and‏ ‎negative ‎reactions, ‎the‏ ‎general ‎consensus‏ ‎is ‎that ‎his ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎expertise‏ ‎will ‎be‏ ‎beneficial ‎to‏ ‎OpenAI. ‎However, ‎concerns ‎about ‎transparency‏ ‎and‏ ‎potential ‎conflicts‏ ‎of ‎interest‏ ‎remain, ‎and ‎it ‎is ‎crucial‏ ‎for‏ ‎OpenAI‏ ‎to ‎address‏ ‎these ‎issues‏ ‎to ‎ensure‏ ‎the‏ ‎safe ‎and‏ ‎responsible ‎development ‎of ‎AGI.

Positive ‎Reactions

📌 Cybersecurity‏ ‎Expertise: Many ‎have‏ ‎welcomed‏ ‎Nakasone's ‎appointment, ‎citing‏ ‎his ‎extensive‏ ‎experience ‎in ‎cybersecurity ‎and‏ ‎national‏ ‎security ‎as‏ ‎a ‎significant‏ ‎asset ‎to ‎OpenAI. ‎His ‎insights‏ ‎are‏ ‎expected ‎to‏ ‎enhance ‎the‏ ‎company's ‎safety ‎and ‎security ‎practices,‏ ‎particularly‏ ‎in‏ ‎the ‎development‏ ‎of ‎artificial‏ ‎general ‎intelligence‏ ‎(AGI).

📌 Commitment‏ ‎to ‎Security:‏ ‎Nakasone's ‎addition ‎to ‎the ‎board‏ ‎underscores ‎OpenAI's‏ ‎commitment‏ ‎to ‎prioritizing ‎security‏ ‎in ‎its‏ ‎AI ‎initiatives. ‎This ‎move‏ ‎is‏ ‎seen ‎as‏ ‎a ‎positive‏ ‎step ‎towards ‎ensuring ‎that ‎AI‏ ‎developments‏ ‎adhere ‎to‏ ‎the ‎highest‏ ‎standards ‎of ‎safety ‎and ‎ethical‏ ‎considerations.

📌 Calming‏ ‎Influence:‏ ‎Nakasone's ‎background‏ ‎and ‎connections‏ ‎are ‎believed‏ ‎to‏ ‎provide ‎a‏ ‎calming ‎influence ‎for ‎concerned ‎shareholders,‏ ‎as ‎his‏ ‎expertise‏ ‎and ‎reputation ‎can‏ ‎help ‎alleviate‏ ‎fears ‎about ‎the ‎potential‏ ‎risks‏ ‎associated ‎with‏ ‎OpenAI's ‎rapid‏ ‎expansion.

Negative ‎Reactions

📌 Questionable ‎Data ‎Acquisition: Some ‎critics‏ ‎have‏ ‎raised ‎concerns‏ ‎about ‎Nakasone's‏ ‎past ‎involvement ‎in ‎the ‎acquisition‏ ‎of‏ ‎questionable‏ ‎data ‎for‏ ‎the ‎NSA's‏ ‎surveillance ‎networks.‏ ‎This‏ ‎has ‎led‏ ‎to ‎comparisons ‎with ‎OpenAI's ‎own‏ ‎practices ‎of‏ ‎collecting‏ ‎large ‎amounts ‎of‏ ‎data ‎from‏ ‎the ‎internet, ‎which ‎some‏ ‎argue‏ ‎may ‎not‏ ‎be ‎entirely‏ ‎ethical.

📌 Lack ‎of ‎Transparency: ‎The ‎exact‏ ‎functions‏ ‎and ‎operations‏ ‎of ‎the‏ ‎Safety ‎and ‎Security ‎Committee, ‎which‏ ‎Nakasone‏ ‎will‏ ‎join, ‎remain‏ ‎unclear. ‎This‏ ‎lack ‎of‏ ‎transparency‏ ‎has ‎raised‏ ‎concerns ‎among ‎some ‎observers, ‎particularly‏ ‎given ‎the‏ ‎recent‏ ‎departures ‎of ‎key‏ ‎safety ‎personnel‏ ‎from ‎OpenAI.

📌 Potential ‎Conflicts ‎of‏ ‎Interest: Some‏ ‎have ‎questioned‏ ‎whether ‎Nakasone's‏ ‎military ‎and ‎intelligence ‎background ‎may‏ ‎lead‏ ‎to ‎conflicts‏ ‎of ‎interest,‏ ‎particularly ‎if ‎OpenAI's ‎AI ‎technologies‏ ‎are‏ ‎used‏ ‎for ‎national‏ ‎security ‎or‏ ‎defense ‎purposes.

Читать: 2+ мин
logo Snarky Security

Securing the Future of AI: Nakasone's Role on OpenAI's Safety and Security Committee

 Key ‎Responsibilities

📌 Safety‏ ‎and ‎Security ‎Committee: ‎Nakasone ‎will‏ ‎join ‎OpenAI's‏ ‎Safety‏ ‎and ‎Security ‎Committee,‏ ‎which ‎is‏ ‎responsible ‎for ‎making ‎recommendations‏ ‎to‏ ‎the ‎full‏ ‎board ‎on‏ ‎critical ‎safety ‎and ‎security ‎decisions‏ ‎for‏ ‎all ‎OpenAI‏ ‎projects ‎and‏ ‎operations. ‎The ‎committee's ‎initial ‎task‏ ‎is‏ ‎to‏ ‎evaluate ‎and‏ ‎further ‎develop‏ ‎OpenAI's ‎processes‏ ‎and‏ ‎safeguards ‎over‏ ‎the ‎next ‎90 ‎days.

📌 Cybersecurity ‎Guidance:‏ ‎Nakasone's ‎insights‏ ‎will‏ ‎contribute ‎to ‎OpenAI's‏ ‎efforts ‎to‏ ‎better ‎understand ‎how ‎AI‏ ‎can‏ ‎be ‎used‏ ‎to ‎strengthen‏ ‎cybersecurity ‎by ‎quickly ‎detecting ‎and‏ ‎responding‏ ‎to ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎threats.

📌 Board ‎Oversight:‏ ‎As ‎a ‎member ‎of ‎the‏ ‎board‏ ‎of‏ ‎directors, ‎Nakasone‏ ‎will ‎exercise‏ ‎oversight ‎over‏ ‎OpenAI's‏ ‎safety ‎and‏ ‎security ‎decisions, ‎ensuring ‎that ‎the‏ ‎company's ‎mission‏ ‎to‏ ‎ensure ‎AGI ‎benefits‏ ‎all ‎of‏ ‎humanity ‎is ‎aligned ‎with‏ ‎its‏ ‎cybersecurity ‎practices.

Impact‏ ‎on ‎OpenAI

Nakasone's‏ ‎appointment ‎is ‎significant ‎for ‎OpenAI,‏ ‎as‏ ‎it ‎underscores‏ ‎the ‎company's‏ ‎commitment ‎to ‎safety ‎and ‎security‏ ‎in‏ ‎the‏ ‎development ‎of‏ ‎AGI. ‎His‏ ‎expertise ‎will‏ ‎help‏ ‎guide ‎OpenAI‏ ‎in ‎achieving ‎its ‎mission ‎and‏ ‎ensuring ‎that‏ ‎its‏ ‎AI ‎systems ‎are‏ ‎securely ‎built‏ ‎and ‎deployed. ‎The ‎addition‏ ‎of‏ ‎Nakasone ‎to‏ ‎the ‎board‏ ‎also ‎reflects ‎OpenAI's ‎efforts ‎to‏ ‎strengthen‏ ‎its ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎posture ‎and‏ ‎address ‎concerns ‎about ‎the ‎potential‏ ‎risks‏ ‎associated‏ ‎with ‎advanced‏ ‎AI ‎systems.

Industry‏ ‎Reactions

Industry ‎experts‏ ‎have‏ ‎welcomed ‎Nakasone's‏ ‎appointment, ‎noting ‎that ‎his ‎experience‏ ‎in ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎and‏ ‎national ‎security ‎will‏ ‎be ‎invaluable‏ ‎in ‎guiding ‎OpenAI's ‎safety‏ ‎and‏ ‎security ‎efforts.‏ ‎The ‎move‏ ‎is ‎seen ‎as ‎a ‎positive‏ ‎step‏ ‎towards ‎ensuring‏ ‎that ‎AI‏ ‎development ‎is ‎aligned ‎with ‎safety‏ ‎and‏ ‎security‏ ‎considerations.

Future ‎Directions:‏ ‎

As ‎OpenAI‏ ‎continues ‎to‏ ‎develop‏ ‎its ‎AGI‏ ‎capabilities, ‎Nakasone's ‎role ‎will ‎be‏ ‎crucial ‎in‏ ‎ensuring‏ ‎that ‎the ‎company's‏ ‎safety ‎and‏ ‎security ‎practices ‎evolve ‎to‏ ‎meet‏ ‎the ‎challenges‏ ‎posed ‎by‏ ‎increasingly ‎sophisticated ‎AI ‎systems. ‎His‏ ‎expertise‏ ‎will ‎help‏ ‎inform ‎OpenAI's‏ ‎approach ‎to ‎cybersecurity ‎and ‎ensure‏ ‎that‏ ‎the‏ ‎company's ‎AI‏ ‎systems ‎are‏ ‎designed ‎with‏ ‎safety‏ ‎and ‎security‏ ‎in ‎mind.

Читать: 5+ мин
logo Snarky Security

From NSA to AI: General Paul Nakasone's Cybersecurity Legacy

General ‎Paul‏ ‎Nakasone, ‎the ‎former ‎commander ‎of‏ ‎U.S. ‎Cyber‏ ‎Command‏ ‎and ‎director ‎of‏ ‎the ‎National‏ ‎Security ‎Agency ‎(NSA), ‎has‏ ‎extensive‏ ‎cybersecurity ‎expertise.‏ ‎His ‎leadership‏ ‎roles ‎have ‎been ‎instrumental ‎in‏ ‎shaping‏ ‎the ‎U.S.‏ ‎military's ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎posture ‎and ‎ensuring ‎the ‎nation's‏ ‎defense‏ ‎against‏ ‎cyber ‎threats.

Key‏ ‎Roles ‎and‏ ‎Responsibilities

📌Commander, ‎U.S.‏ ‎Cyber‏ ‎Command: ‎Nakasone‏ ‎led ‎U.S. ‎Cyber ‎Command, ‎which‏ ‎is ‎responsible‏ ‎for‏ ‎defending ‎the ‎Department‏ ‎of ‎Defense‏ ‎(DoD) ‎information ‎networks ‎and‏ ‎conducting‏ ‎cyber ‎operations‏ ‎to ‎support‏ ‎military ‎operations ‎and ‎national ‎security‏ ‎objectives.

📌Director,‏ ‎National ‎Security‏ ‎Agency ‎(NSA):‏ ‎As ‎the ‎director ‎of ‎the‏ ‎NSA,‏ ‎Nakasone‏ ‎oversaw ‎the‏ ‎agency's ‎efforts‏ ‎to ‎gather‏ ‎and‏ ‎analyze ‎foreign‏ ‎intelligence, ‎protect ‎U.S. ‎information ‎systems,‏ ‎and ‎provide‏ ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎guidance ‎to ‎the‏ ‎U.S. ‎government‏ ‎and ‎private ‎sector.

📌Chief, ‎Central‏ ‎Security‏ ‎Service ‎(CSS): Nakasone‏ ‎also ‎served‏ ‎as ‎the ‎chief ‎of ‎the‏ ‎Central‏ ‎Security ‎Service,‏ ‎which ‎is‏ ‎responsible ‎for ‎providing ‎cryptographic ‎and‏ ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎support‏ ‎to ‎the‏ ‎U.S. ‎military‏ ‎and ‎other‏ ‎government‏ ‎agencies.

Cybersecurity ‎Initiatives‏ ‎and ‎Achievements

📌 Establishment ‎of ‎the ‎NSA's‏ ‎Artificial ‎Intelligence‏ ‎Security‏ ‎Center: Nakasone ‎launched ‎the‏ ‎NSA's ‎Artificial‏ ‎Intelligence ‎Security ‎Center, ‎which‏ ‎focuses‏ ‎on ‎protecting‏ ‎AI ‎systems‏ ‎from ‎learning, ‎doing, ‎and ‎revealing‏ ‎the‏ ‎wrong ‎thing.‏ ‎The ‎center‏ ‎aims ‎to ‎ensure ‎the ‎confidentiality,‏ ‎integrity,‏ ‎and‏ ‎availability ‎of‏ ‎information ‎and‏ ‎services.

📌 Cybersecurity ‎Collaboration‏ ‎Center: Nakasone‏ ‎established ‎the‏ ‎Cybersecurity ‎Collaboration ‎Center, ‎which ‎brings‏ ‎together ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎experts‏ ‎from ‎the ‎NSA,‏ ‎industry, ‎and‏ ‎academia ‎to ‎share ‎insights,‏ ‎tradecraft,‏ ‎and ‎threat‏ ‎information.

📌Hunt ‎Forward‏ ‎Operations: Under ‎Nakasone's ‎leadership, ‎U.S. ‎Cyber‏ ‎Command‏ ‎conducted ‎hunt‏ ‎forward ‎operations,‏ ‎which ‎involve ‎sending ‎cyber ‎teams‏ ‎to‏ ‎partner‏ ‎countries ‎to‏ ‎hunt ‎for‏ ‎malicious ‎cyber‏ ‎activity‏ ‎on ‎their‏ ‎networks.

📌 Cybersecurity ‎Guidance ‎and ‎Standards: ‎Nakasone‏ ‎played ‎a‏ ‎key‏ ‎role ‎in ‎developing‏ ‎and ‎promoting‏ ‎cybersecurity ‎guidance ‎and ‎standards‏ ‎for‏ ‎the ‎U.S.‏ ‎government ‎and‏ ‎private ‎sector, ‎including ‎the ‎National‏ ‎Institute‏ ‎of ‎Standards‏ ‎and ‎Technology‏ ‎(NIST) ‎Cybersecurity ‎Framework.

Awards ‎and ‎Recognition

Nakasone‏ ‎has‏ ‎received‏ ‎numerous ‎awards‏ ‎and ‎recognition‏ ‎for ‎his‏ ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎expertise ‎and‏ ‎leadership, ‎including:

📌 2022 Wash100 ‎Award: ‎Nakasone ‎received‏ ‎the ‎2022‏ ‎Wash100‏ ‎Award ‎for ‎his‏ ‎leadership ‎in‏ ‎cybersecurity ‎and ‎his ‎efforts‏ ‎to‏ ‎boost ‎the‏ ‎U.S. ‎military's‏ ‎defenses ‎against ‎cyber ‎threats.

📌2023 Cybersecurity ‎Person‏ ‎of‏ ‎the ‎Year:‏ ‎Nakasone ‎was‏ ‎named ‎the ‎2023 ‎Cybersecurity ‎Person‏ ‎of‏ ‎the‏ ‎Year ‎by‏ ‎Cybercrime ‎Magazine‏ ‎for ‎his‏ ‎outstanding‏ ‎contributions ‎to‏ ‎the ‎cybersecurity ‎industry.

Post-Military ‎Career

After ‎retiring‏ ‎from ‎the‏ ‎military,‏ ‎Nakasone ‎joined ‎OpenAI's‏ ‎board ‎of‏ ‎directors, ‎where ‎he ‎will‏ ‎contribute‏ ‎his ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎expertise ‎to‏ ‎the ‎development ‎of ‎AI ‎technologies.‏ ‎He‏ ‎also ‎became‏ ‎the ‎founding‏ ‎director ‎of ‎Vanderbilt ‎University's ‎Institute‏ ‎for‏ ‎National‏ ‎Defense ‎and‏ ‎Global ‎Security,‏ ‎where ‎he‏ ‎will‏ ‎lead ‎research‏ ‎and ‎education ‎initiatives ‎focused ‎on‏ ‎national ‎security‏ ‎and‏ ‎global ‎stability.

Spyware ‎activities‏ ‎and ‎campaigns

📌 SolarWinds‏ ‎Hack: ‎Nakasone ‎was ‎involved‏ ‎in‏ ‎the ‎response‏ ‎to ‎the‏ ‎SolarWinds ‎hack, ‎which ‎was ‎attributed‏ ‎to‏ ‎Russian ‎hackers.‏ ‎He ‎acknowledged‏ ‎that ‎the ‎U.S. ‎government ‎lacked‏ ‎visibility‏ ‎into‏ ‎the ‎hacking‏ ‎campaign, ‎which‏ ‎exploited ‎domestic‏ ‎internet‏ ‎infrastructure.

📌 Microsoft ‎Exchange‏ ‎Server ‎Hack: ‎Nakasone ‎also ‎addressed‏ ‎the ‎Microsoft‏ ‎Exchange‏ ‎Server ‎hack, ‎which‏ ‎was ‎attributed‏ ‎to ‎Chinese ‎hackers. ‎He‏ ‎emphasized‏ ‎the ‎need‏ ‎for ‎better‏ ‎visibility ‎into ‎domestic ‎campaigns ‎and‏ ‎the‏ ‎importance ‎of‏ ‎partnerships ‎between‏ ‎the ‎government ‎and ‎private ‎sector‏ ‎to‏ ‎combat‏ ‎such ‎threats.

📌 Russian‏ ‎and ‎Chinese‏ ‎Hacking: ‎Nakasone‏ ‎has‏ ‎spoken ‎about‏ ‎the ‎persistent ‎threat ‎posed ‎by‏ ‎Russian ‎and‏ ‎Chinese‏ ‎hackers, ‎highlighting ‎their‏ ‎sophistication ‎and‏ ‎intent ‎to ‎compromise ‎U.S.‏ ‎critical‏ ‎infrastructure.

📌 Cybersecurity ‎Collaboration‏ ‎Center: ‎Nakasone‏ ‎has ‎emphasized ‎the ‎importance ‎of‏ ‎the‏ ‎NSA's ‎Cybersecurity‏ ‎Collaboration ‎Center,‏ ‎which ‎partners ‎with ‎the ‎domestic‏ ‎private‏ ‎sector‏ ‎to ‎rapidly‏ ‎communicate ‎and‏ ‎share ‎threat‏ ‎information.

📌 Hunt‏ ‎Forward ‎Operations:‏ ‎Nakasone ‎has ‎discussed ‎the ‎concept‏ ‎of ‎"hunt‏ ‎forward"‏ ‎operations, ‎where ‎U.S.‏ ‎Cyber ‎Command‏ ‎teams ‎are ‎sent ‎to‏ ‎partner‏ ‎countries ‎to‏ ‎hunt ‎for‏ ‎malware ‎and ‎other ‎cyber ‎threats‏ ‎on‏ ‎their ‎networks

Leadership‏ ‎impact

📌 Cybersecurity ‎Collaboration‏ ‎Center: Nakasone ‎established ‎the ‎Cybersecurity ‎Collaboration‏ ‎Center,‏ ‎which‏ ‎aims ‎to‏ ‎share ‎threat‏ ‎information ‎and‏ ‎best‏ ‎practices ‎with‏ ‎the ‎private ‎sector ‎to ‎enhance‏ ‎cybersecurity.

📌 Artificial ‎Intelligence‏ ‎Security‏ ‎Center: ‎Nakasone ‎launched‏ ‎the ‎Artificial‏ ‎Intelligence ‎Security ‎Center ‎to‏ ‎focus‏ ‎on ‎protecting‏ ‎AI ‎systems‏ ‎from ‎learning, ‎doing, ‎and ‎revealing‏ ‎the‏ ‎wrong ‎thing.

📌 Hunt‏ ‎Forward ‎Operations:‏ ‎Nakasone ‎oversaw ‎the ‎development ‎of‏ ‎Hunt‏ ‎Forward‏ ‎Operations, ‎which‏ ‎involves ‎sending‏ ‎cyber ‎teams‏ ‎to‏ ‎partner ‎countries‏ ‎to ‎hunt ‎for ‎malicious ‎cyber‏ ‎activity ‎on‏ ‎their‏ ‎networks.

📌 Election ‎Security: ‎Nakasone‏ ‎played ‎a‏ ‎crucial ‎role ‎in ‎defending‏ ‎U.S.‏ ‎elections ‎from‏ ‎foreign ‎interference,‏ ‎including ‎the ‎2022 ‎midterm ‎election.

📌 Ransomware‏ ‎Combat:‏ ‎Nakasone ‎acknowledged‏ ‎the ‎growing‏ ‎threat ‎of ‎ransomware ‎and ‎took‏ ‎steps‏ ‎to‏ ‎combat ‎it,‏ ‎including ‎launching‏ ‎an ‎offensive‏ ‎strike‏ ‎against ‎the‏ ‎Internet ‎Research ‎Agency.

📌 Cybersecurity ‎Alerts: Nakasone ‎emphasized‏ ‎the ‎importance‏ ‎of‏ ‎issuing ‎security ‎alerts‏ ‎alongside ‎other‏ ‎federal ‎agencies ‎to ‎warn‏ ‎the‏ ‎general ‎public‏ ‎about ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎dangers.

📌 Cybersecurity ‎Collaboration: ‎Nakasone ‎fostered ‎collaboration‏ ‎between‏ ‎the ‎NSA‏ ‎and ‎other‏ ‎government ‎agencies, ‎as ‎well ‎as‏ ‎with‏ ‎the‏ ‎private ‎sector,‏ ‎to ‎enhance‏ ‎cybersecurity ‎efforts.

📌 China‏ ‎Outcomes‏ ‎Group: Nakasone ‎created‏ ‎a ‎combined ‎USCYBERCOM-NSA ‎China ‎Outcomes‏ ‎Group ‎to‏ ‎oversee‏ ‎efforts ‎to ‎counter‏ ‎Chinese ‎cyber‏ ‎threats

Читать: 3+ мин
logo Snarky Security

OpenAI's Strategic Move: Welcoming Cybersecurity Expertise to the Board

OpenAI, ‎a‏ ‎leading ‎artificial ‎intelligence ‎research ‎organization,‏ ‎has ‎appointed‏ ‎retired‏ ‎U.S. ‎Army ‎General‏ ‎Paul ‎M.‏ ‎Nakasone, ‎former ‎director ‎of‏ ‎the‏ ‎National ‎Security‏ ‎Agency ‎(NSA),‏ ‎to ‎its ‎board ‎of ‎directors.‏ ‎Nakasone,‏ ‎who ‎served‏ ‎as ‎the‏ ‎longest-serving ‎leader ‎of ‎U.S. ‎Cyber‏ ‎Command‏ ‎and‏ ‎NSA, ‎brings‏ ‎extensive ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎expertise ‎to‏ ‎OpenAI.‏ ‎This ‎appointment‏ ‎underscores ‎OpenAI's ‎commitment ‎to ‎ensuring‏ ‎the ‎safe‏ ‎and‏ ‎beneficial ‎development ‎of‏ ‎artificial ‎general‏ ‎intelligence ‎(AGI).

In ‎a ‎significant‏ ‎move‏ ‎to ‎bolster‏ ‎its ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎capabilities, ‎OpenAI, ‎a ‎leading ‎artificial‏ ‎intelligence‏ ‎research ‎and‏ ‎development ‎company,‏ ‎has ‎appointed ‎retired ‎U.S. ‎Army‏ ‎General‏ ‎Paul‏ ‎M. ‎Nakasone‏ ‎to ‎its‏ ‎board ‎of‏ ‎directors.‏ ‎Nakasone, ‎who‏ ‎previously ‎served ‎as ‎the ‎director‏ ‎of ‎the‏ ‎National‏ ‎Security ‎Agency ‎(NSA)‏ ‎and ‎the‏ ‎commander ‎of ‎U.S. ‎Cyber‏ ‎Command,‏ ‎brings ‎extensive‏ ‎experience ‎in‏ ‎cybersecurity ‎and ‎national ‎security ‎to‏ ‎the‏ ‎table. ‎His‏ ‎appointment ‎underscores‏ ‎OpenAI's ‎commitment ‎to ‎ensuring ‎the‏ ‎safe‏ ‎and‏ ‎beneficial ‎development‏ ‎of ‎artificial‏ ‎general ‎intelligence‏ ‎(AGI).

Nakasone's‏ ‎military ‎career‏ ‎spanned ‎over ‎three ‎decades, ‎during‏ ‎which ‎he‏ ‎played‏ ‎a ‎pivotal ‎role‏ ‎in ‎shaping‏ ‎the ‎U.S. ‎military's ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎posture.‏ ‎As ‎the‏ ‎longest-serving ‎leader‏ ‎of ‎U.S. ‎Cyber ‎Command, ‎he‏ ‎oversaw‏ ‎the ‎creation‏ ‎of ‎the‏ ‎command ‎and ‎was ‎instrumental ‎in‏ ‎developing‏ ‎the‏ ‎country's ‎cyber‏ ‎defense ‎capabilities.‏ ‎His ‎tenure‏ ‎at‏ ‎the ‎NSA‏ ‎saw ‎the ‎establishment ‎of ‎the‏ ‎Artificial ‎Intelligence‏ ‎Security‏ ‎Center, ‎which ‎focuses‏ ‎on ‎safeguarding‏ ‎the ‎nation's ‎digital ‎infrastructure‏ ‎and‏ ‎advancing ‎its‏ ‎cyberdefense ‎capabilities.

At‏ ‎OpenAI, ‎Nakasone ‎will ‎initially ‎join‏ ‎the‏ ‎Safety ‎and‏ ‎Security ‎Committee,‏ ‎which ‎is ‎responsible ‎for ‎making‏ ‎critical‏ ‎safety‏ ‎and ‎security‏ ‎decisions ‎for‏ ‎all ‎OpenAI‏ ‎projects‏ ‎and ‎operations.‏ ‎His ‎insights ‎will ‎significantly ‎contribute‏ ‎to ‎the‏ ‎company's‏ ‎efforts ‎to ‎better‏ ‎understand ‎how‏ ‎AI ‎can ‎be ‎used‏ ‎to‏ ‎strengthen ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎by ‎quickly‏ ‎detecting ‎and ‎responding ‎to ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎threats.‏ ‎Nakasone's ‎expertise‏ ‎will ‎be‏ ‎invaluable ‎in ‎guiding ‎OpenAI ‎in‏ ‎achieving‏ ‎its‏ ‎mission ‎of‏ ‎ensuring ‎that‏ ‎AGI ‎benefits‏ ‎all‏ ‎of ‎humanity.

The‏ ‎appointment ‎has ‎been ‎met ‎with‏ ‎positive ‎reactions‏ ‎from‏ ‎industry ‎experts. ‎Many‏ ‎believe ‎that‏ ‎Nakasone's ‎military ‎and ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎background‏ ‎will ‎provide‏ ‎invaluable ‎insights,‏ ‎particularly ‎as ‎AI ‎technologies ‎become‏ ‎increasingly‏ ‎integral ‎to‏ ‎national ‎security‏ ‎and ‎defense ‎strategies. ‎His ‎experience‏ ‎in‏ ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎will ‎help‏ ‎OpenAI ‎navigate‏ ‎the ‎complex‏ ‎landscape‏ ‎of ‎AI‏ ‎safety ‎and ‎ensure ‎that ‎its‏ ‎AI ‎systems‏ ‎are‏ ‎robust ‎against ‎various‏ ‎forms ‎of‏ ‎cyber ‎threats.

While ‎Nakasone's ‎appointment‏ ‎is‏ ‎a ‎significant‏ ‎step ‎forward,‏ ‎OpenAI ‎still ‎faces ‎challenges ‎in‏ ‎ensuring‏ ‎the ‎safe‏ ‎and ‎responsible‏ ‎development ‎of ‎AI. ‎The ‎company‏ ‎has‏ ‎recently‏ ‎seen ‎departures‏ ‎of ‎key‏ ‎safety ‎personnel,‏ ‎including‏ ‎co-founder ‎and‏ ‎chief ‎scientist ‎Ilya ‎Sutskever ‎and‏ ‎Jan ‎Leike,‏ ‎who‏ ‎were ‎outspokenly ‎concerned‏ ‎about ‎the‏ ‎company's ‎prioritization ‎of ‎safety‏ ‎processes.‏ ‎Nakasone's ‎role‏ ‎will ‎be‏ ‎crucial ‎in ‎addressing ‎these ‎concerns‏ ‎and‏ ‎ensuring ‎that‏ ‎OpenAI's ‎AI‏ ‎systems ‎are ‎developed ‎with ‎safety‏ ‎and‏ ‎security‏ ‎at ‎their‏ ‎core.

Читать: 6+ мин
logo Snarky Security

Ship Happens. Plugging the Leaks in Your Maritime Cyber Defenses

Читать: 6+ мин
logo Snarky Security

Ship Happens. Plugging the Leaks in Your Maritime Cyber Defenses. Announcement

The ‎joys‏ ‎of ‎discussing ‎crewless ‎ships ‎and‏ ‎their ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎woes!‏ ‎This ‎document ‎delves‏ ‎into ‎the‏ ‎world ‎of ‎Maritime ‎Autonomous‏ ‎Surface‏ ‎Ships ‎(MASS),‏ ‎where ‎the‏ ‎absence ‎of ‎a ‎crew ‎doesn’t‏ ‎mean‏ ‎a ‎lack‏ ‎of ‎nightmares‏ ‎of ‎cybersecurity, ‎or ‎legal ‎tangles,‏ ‎and‏ ‎regulatory‏ ‎hurdles.

The ‎maritime‏ ‎industry ‎lags‏ ‎a ‎whopping‏ ‎20‏ ‎years ‎behind‏ ‎other ‎sectors ‎in ‎cybersecurity. ‎Cyber‏ ‎penetration ‎tests‏ ‎have‏ ‎shown ‎that ‎hacking‏ ‎into ‎ship‏ ‎systems ‎like ‎the ‎Electronic‏ ‎Chart‏ ‎Display ‎and‏ ‎Information ‎System‏ ‎(ECDIS) ‎is ‎as ‎easy ‎as‏ ‎pie—a‏ ‎rather ‎unsettling‏ ‎thought ‎when‏ ‎those ‎systems ‎control ‎steering ‎and‏ ‎ballast.

As‏ ‎for‏ ‎the ‎stakeholders,‏ ‎from ‎ship‏ ‎manufacturers ‎to‏ ‎insurers,‏ ‎everyone’s ‎got‏ ‎a ‎stake ‎in ‎this ‎game.‏ ‎They’re ‎all‏ ‎keen‏ ‎to ‎steer ‎the‏ ‎development ‎and‏ ‎implementation ‎of ‎MASS, ‎hopefully‏ ‎without‏ ‎hitting ‎too‏ ‎many ‎icebergs‏ ‎along ‎the ‎way ‎but ‎lot‏ ‎of‏ ‎money.

This ‎document‏ ‎issues ‎it‏ ‎addresses ‎are ‎grounded ‎in ‎reality.‏ ‎The‏ ‎integration‏ ‎of ‎MASS‏ ‎into ‎the‏ ‎global ‎shipping‏ ‎industry‏ ‎is ‎not‏ ‎just ‎about ‎technological ‎advancement ‎but‏ ‎securing ‎that‏ ‎technology‏ ‎from ‎threats ‎that‏ ‎could ‎sink‏ ‎it ‎faster ‎than ‎a‏ ‎torpedo.‏ ‎The ‎seriousness‏ ‎of ‎ensuring‏ ‎safety, ‎security, ‎and ‎compliance ‎with‏ ‎international‏ ‎standards ‎cannot‏ ‎be ‎overstated,‏ ‎making ‎this ‎analysis ‎a ‎crucial‏ ‎navigational‏ ‎tool‏ ‎for ‎anyone‏ ‎involved ‎in‏ ‎the ‎future‏ ‎of‏ ‎maritime ‎operations.


Full‏ ‎PDF ‎/ ‎article


This ‎document ‎offers‏ ‎a ‎comprehensive‏ ‎analysis‏ ‎of ‎the ‎challenges‏ ‎associated ‎with‏ ‎crewless ‎ships, ‎specifically ‎addressing‏ ‎issues‏ ‎related ‎to‏ ‎cybersecurity, ‎technology,‏ ‎law, ‎and ‎regulation ‎of ‎Maritime‏ ‎Autonomous‏ ‎Surface ‎Ships‏ ‎(MASS). ‎The‏ ‎analysis ‎delves ‎into ‎various ‎critical‏ ‎aspects‏ ‎of‏ ‎MASS, ‎including‏ ‎the ‎technological‏ ‎advancements, ‎legal‏ ‎and‏ ‎regulatory ‎challenges,‏ ‎and ‎cybersecurity ‎implications ‎associated ‎with‏ ‎these ‎uncrewed‏ ‎vessels,‏ ‎such ‎as ‎exploration‏ ‎of ‎the‏ ‎current ‎state ‎and ‎future‏ ‎prospects‏ ‎of ‎MASS‏ ‎technology, ‎emphasizing‏ ‎its ‎potential ‎to ‎revolutionize ‎the‏ ‎maritime‏ ‎industry, ‎the‏ ‎unique ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎risks ‎posed ‎by ‎autonomous ‎ships‏ ‎and‏ ‎the‏ ‎strategies ‎being‏ ‎implemented ‎to‏ ‎mitigate ‎these‏ ‎risks.

The‏ ‎analysis ‎highlights‏ ‎the ‎intersection ‎of ‎maritime ‎technology‏ ‎with ‎regulatory‏ ‎and‏ ‎security ‎concerns. ‎It‏ ‎is ‎particularly‏ ‎useful ‎for ‎security ‎professionals,‏ ‎maritime‏ ‎industry ‎stakeholders,‏ ‎policymakers, ‎and‏ ‎academics. ‎By ‎understanding ‎the ‎implications‏ ‎of‏ ‎MASS ‎deployment,‏ ‎these ‎professionals‏ ‎can ‎better ‎navigate ‎the ‎complexities‏ ‎of‏ ‎integrating‏ ‎advanced ‎autonomous‏ ‎technologies ‎into‏ ‎the ‎global‏ ‎shipping‏ ‎industry, ‎ensuring‏ ‎safety, ‎security, ‎and ‎compliance ‎with‏ ‎international ‎laws‏ ‎and‏ ‎standards.

The ‎transformative ‎potential‏ ‎of ‎MASS‏ ‎is ‎driven ‎by ‎advancements‏ ‎in‏ ‎big ‎data,‏ ‎machine ‎learning,‏ ‎and ‎artificial ‎intelligence. ‎These ‎technologies‏ ‎are‏ ‎set ‎to‏ ‎revolutionize ‎the‏ ‎$14 ‎trillion ‎shipping ‎industry, ‎traditionally‏ ‎reliant‏ ‎on‏ ‎human ‎crews.

📌 Cybersecurity‏ ‎Lag ‎in‏ ‎Maritime ‎Industry: the‏ ‎maritime‏ ‎industry ‎is‏ ‎significantly ‎behind ‎other ‎sectors ‎in‏ ‎terms ‎of‏ ‎cybersecurity,‏ ‎approximately ‎by ‎20‏ ‎years. ‎This‏ ‎lag ‎presents ‎unique ‎vulnerabilities‏ ‎and‏ ‎challenges ‎that‏ ‎are ‎only‏ ‎beginning ‎to ‎be ‎fully ‎understood.

📌 Vulnerabilities‏ ‎in‏ ‎Ship ‎Systems: cybersecurity‏ ‎vulnerabilities ‎in‏ ‎maritime ‎systems ‎are ‎highlighted ‎by‏ ‎the‏ ‎ease‏ ‎with ‎which‏ ‎critical ‎systems‏ ‎can ‎be‏ ‎accessed‏ ‎and ‎manipulated.‏ ‎For ‎example, ‎cyber ‎penetration ‎tests‏ ‎have ‎demonstrated‏ ‎the‏ ‎simplicity ‎of ‎hacking‏ ‎into ‎ship‏ ‎systems ‎like ‎the ‎Electronic‏ ‎Chart‏ ‎Display ‎and‏ ‎Information ‎System‏ ‎(ECDIS), ‎radar ‎displays, ‎and ‎critical‏ ‎operational‏ ‎systems ‎such‏ ‎as ‎steering‏ ‎and ‎ballast.

📌 Challenges ‎with ‎Conventional ‎Ships: in‏ ‎conventional‏ ‎ships,‏ ‎the ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎risks ‎are‏ ‎exacerbated ‎by‏ ‎the‏ ‎use ‎of‏ ‎outdated ‎computer ‎systems, ‎often ‎a‏ ‎decade ‎old,‏ ‎and‏ ‎vulnerable ‎satellite ‎communication‏ ‎system. ‎These‏ ‎vulnerabilities ‎make ‎ships ‎susceptible‏ ‎to‏ ‎cyber-attacks ‎that‏ ‎can ‎compromise‏ ‎critical ‎information ‎and ‎systems ‎within‏ ‎minutes.

📌 Increased‏ ‎Risks ‎with‏ ‎Uncrewed ‎Ships: the‏ ‎transition ‎to ‎uncrewed, ‎autonomous ‎ships‏ ‎introduces‏ ‎a‏ ‎new ‎layer‏ ‎of ‎complexity‏ ‎to ‎cybersecurity.‏ ‎Every‏ ‎system ‎and‏ ‎operation ‎on ‎these ‎ships ‎depends‏ ‎on ‎interconnected‏ ‎digital‏ ‎technologies, ‎making ‎them‏ ‎prime ‎targets‏ ‎for ‎cyber-attacks ‎including ‎monitoring,‏ ‎communication,‏ ‎and ‎navigation,‏ ‎relies ‎on‏ ‎digital ‎connectivity.

📌 Need ‎for ‎Built-in ‎Cybersecurity:‏ ‎the‏ ‎necessity ‎of‏ ‎incorporating ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎measures ‎right ‎from ‎the ‎design‏ ‎phase‏ ‎of‏ ‎maritime ‎autonomous‏ ‎surface ‎ships‏ ‎is ‎crucial‏ ‎to‏ ‎ensure ‎that‏ ‎these ‎vessels ‎are ‎equipped ‎to‏ ‎handle ‎potential‏ ‎cyber‏ ‎threats ‎and ‎to‏ ‎safeguard ‎their‏ ‎operational ‎integrity.

📌 Regulatory ‎and ‎Policy‏ ‎Recommendations: It‏ ‎is ‎suggested‏ ‎that ‎policymakers‏ ‎and ‎regulators ‎need ‎to ‎be‏ ‎well-versed‏ ‎with ‎technological‏ ‎capabilities ‎to‏ ‎shape ‎effective ‎cybersecurity ‎policies ‎and‏ ‎regulations‏ ‎for‏ ‎maritime ‎operations,‏ ‎UK’s ‎Marine‏ ‎Guidance ‎Note‏ ‎(MGN)‏ ‎669 ‎as‏ ‎an ‎example ‎of ‎regulatory ‎efforts‏ ‎to ‎address‏ ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎in ‎maritime ‎operations.

📌 Stakeholder‏ ‎Interest: ‎ship‏ ‎manufacturers, ‎operators, ‎insurers, ‎and‏ ‎regulators,‏ ‎all ‎of‏ ‎whom ‎are‏ ‎keen ‎to ‎influence ‎the ‎development‏ ‎and‏ ‎implementation ‎of‏ ‎MASS

The ‎International‏ ‎Maritime ‎Organization ‎(IMO) ‎has ‎developed‏ ‎a‏ ‎four-point‏ ‎taxonomy ‎to‏ ‎categorize ‎Maritime‏ ‎Autonomous ‎Surface‏ ‎Ships‏ ‎(MASS) ‎based‏ ‎on ‎the ‎level ‎of ‎autonomy‏ ‎and ‎human‏ ‎involvement:

📌 Degree‏ ‎1: Ships ‎with ‎automated‏ ‎systems ‎where‏ ‎humans ‎are ‎on ‎board‏ ‎to‏ ‎operate ‎and‏ ‎control.

📌 Degree ‎2:‏ ‎Remotely ‎controlled ‎ships ‎with ‎seafarers‏ ‎on‏ ‎board.

📌 Degree ‎3: Remotely‏ ‎controlled ‎ships‏ ‎without ‎seafarers ‎on ‎board.

📌 Degree ‎4:‏ ‎Fully‏ ‎autonomous‏ ‎ships ‎that‏ ‎can ‎operate‏ ‎without ‎human‏ ‎intervention,‏ ‎either ‎on‏ ‎board ‎or ‎remotely

📌Variety ‎in ‎MASS‏ ‎Design ‎and‏ ‎Operation:‏ ‎The ‎taxonomy ‎underscores‏ ‎the ‎diversity‏ ‎in ‎design ‎and ‎operational‏ ‎capabilities‏ ‎of ‎MASS,‏ ‎ranging ‎from‏ ‎partially ‎automated ‎systems ‎to ‎fully‏ ‎autonomous‏ ‎operations. ‎This‏ ‎diversity ‎necessitates‏ ‎a ‎nuanced ‎approach ‎to ‎regulation‏ ‎and‏ ‎oversight.

📌Terminology‏ ‎Clarification: To ‎avoid‏ ‎confusion ‎due‏ ‎to ‎the‏ ‎interchangeable‏ ‎use ‎of‏ ‎terms ‎like ‎«remotely ‎controlled» ‎and‏ ‎«autonomous, ‎»‏ ‎the‏ ‎term ‎MASS ‎is‏ ‎adopted ‎as‏ ‎an ‎overarching ‎term ‎for‏ ‎all‏ ‎categories ‎within‏ ‎the ‎taxonomy.‏ ‎Specific ‎terms ‎are ‎used ‎when‏ ‎referring‏ ‎to ‎particular‏ ‎categories ‎of‏ ‎vessels.

📌Diverse ‎Applications ‎and ‎Sizes: MASS ‎are‏ ‎not‏ ‎limited‏ ‎to ‎a‏ ‎single ‎type‏ ‎or ‎size‏ ‎of‏ ‎vessel. ‎They‏ ‎encompass ‎a ‎wide ‎range ‎of‏ ‎ships, ‎from‏ ‎small,‏ ‎unmanned ‎surface ‎vehicles‏ ‎to ‎large‏ ‎autonomous ‎cargo ‎ships. ‎This‏ ‎diversity‏ ‎is ‎reflected‏ ‎in ‎their‏ ‎various ‎applications, ‎including ‎commercial, ‎civilian,‏ ‎law‏ ‎enforcement, ‎and‏ ‎military ‎uses.

📌Emergence‏ ‎and ‎Integration ‎of ‎MASS: ‎Autonomous‏ ‎ships‏ ‎are‏ ‎already ‎emerging‏ ‎and ‎being‏ ‎integrated ‎into‏ ‎multiple‏ ‎sectors. ‎This‏ ‎ongoing ‎development ‎necessitates ‎a ‎systematic‏ ‎and ‎comprehensive‏ ‎analysis‏ ‎by ‎policymakers, ‎regulators,‏ ‎academia, ‎and‏ ‎the ‎public ‎to ‎ensure‏ ‎their‏ ‎safe, ‎secure,‏ ‎and ‎sustainable‏ ‎integration ‎into ‎international ‎shipping.


Читать: 4+ мин
logo Snarky Security

Boeing’s Safety Saga: A Tale of Corporate Shenanigans

The ‎joys‏ ‎of ‎being ‎a ‎multinational ‎corporation‏ ‎with ‎deep‏ ‎pockets‏ ‎and ‎a ‎knack‏ ‎for ‎dodging‏ ‎accountability. ‎Boeing, ‎the ‎esteemed‏ ‎aircraft‏ ‎manufacturer, ‎has‏ ‎once ‎again‏ ‎found ‎itself ‎in ‎the ‎midst‏ ‎of‏ ‎a ‎safety‏ ‎crisis, ‎and‏ ‎we’re ‎not ‎surprised. ‎After ‎all,‏ ‎who‏ ‎needs‏ ‎to ‎worry‏ ‎about ‎a‏ ‎few ‎hundred‏ ‎lives‏ ‎lost ‎when‏ ‎there ‎are ‎profits ‎to ‎be‏ ‎made ‎and‏ ‎shareholders‏ ‎to ‎appease?

According ‎to‏ ‎The ‎New‏ ‎York ‎Times, ‎the ‎US‏ ‎Department‏ ‎of ‎Justice‏ ‎is ‎considering‏ ‎a ‎deferred ‎prosecution ‎agreement ‎with‏ ‎Boeing,‏ ‎which ‎would‏ ‎allow ‎the‏ ‎company ‎to ‎avoid ‎criminal ‎charges‏ ‎but‏ ‎require‏ ‎the ‎appointment‏ ‎of ‎a‏ ‎federal ‎monitor‏ ‎to‏ ‎oversee ‎its‏ ‎safety ‎improvements. ‎Wow, ‎what ‎a‏ ‎slap ‎on‏ ‎the‏ ‎wrist. ‎It’s ‎not‏ ‎like ‎they’ve‏ ‎been ‎playing ‎fast ‎and‏ ‎loose‏ ‎with ‎safety‏ ‎protocols ‎or‏ ‎anything.

Let’s ‎recap ‎the ‎highlights ‎of‏ ‎Boeing’s‏ ‎recent ‎safety‏ ‎record:

📌Two ‎fatal‏ ‎crashes ‎of ‎the ‎737 ‎Max: Remember‏ ‎those?‏ ‎Yeah,‏ ‎the ‎ones‏ ‎that ‎killed‏ ‎346 ‎people‏ ‎and‏ ‎led ‎to‏ ‎a ‎global ‎grounding ‎of ‎the‏ ‎aircraft. ‎No‏ ‎big‏ ‎deal, ‎just ‎a‏ ‎minor ‎oversight‏ ‎on ‎Boeing’s ‎part.

📌Door ‎plug‏ ‎blowout‏ ‎on ‎an‏ ‎Alaska ‎Airlines‏ ‎737 ‎Max: Because ‎who ‎needs ‎a‏ ‎door‏ ‎on ‎a‏ ‎plane, ‎anyway?‏ ‎It’s ‎not ‎like ‎it’s ‎a‏ ‎safety‏ ‎feature‏ ‎or ‎anything.

📌Whistleblowers‏ ‎alleging ‎shoddy‏ ‎manufacturing ‎practices: Oh,‏ ‎those‏ ‎pesky ‎whistleblowers‏ ‎and ‎their ‎«concerns» ‎about ‎safety.‏ ‎Just ‎a‏ ‎bunch‏ ‎of ‎disgruntled ‎employees,‏ ‎right?

📌Federal ‎investigations‏ ‎and ‎audits ‎revealing ‎quality‏ ‎control‏ ‎issues: ‎Just‏ ‎a ‎few‏ ‎minor ‎discrepancies ‎in ‎the ‎manufacturing‏ ‎process.‏ ‎Nothing ‎to‏ ‎see ‎here,‏ ‎folks.

And ‎now, ‎Boeing ‎gets ‎to‏ ‎add‏ ‎a‏ ‎federal ‎monitor‏ ‎to ‎its‏ ‎payroll ‎to‏ ‎ensure‏ ‎that ‎it’s‏ ‎taking ‎safety ‎seriously. ‎Because, ‎you‏ ‎know, ‎the‏ ‎company’s‏ ‎track ‎record ‎on‏ ‎safety ‎is‏ ‎just ‎spotless. ‎This ‎monitor‏ ‎will‏ ‎surely ‎be‏ ‎able ‎to‏ ‎keep ‎an ‎eye ‎on ‎things‏ ‎and‏ ‎prevent ‎any‏ ‎future ‎incidents.‏ ‎*eyeroll*

Cybersecurity ‎Incidents

📌In ‎November ‎2023, ‎Boeing‏ ‎confirmed‏ ‎a‏ ‎cyberattack ‎that‏ ‎impacted ‎its‏ ‎parts ‎and‏ ‎distribution‏ ‎business, ‎which‏ ‎did ‎not ‎affect ‎flight ‎safety.‏ ‎The ‎attack‏ ‎was‏ ‎attributed ‎to ‎the‏ ‎LockBit ‎ransomware‏ ‎gang, ‎which ‎had ‎stolen‏ ‎sensitive‏ ‎data ‎and‏ ‎threatened ‎to‏ ‎leak ‎it ‎if ‎Boeing ‎did‏ ‎not‏ ‎meet ‎its‏ ‎demands. ‎Boeing‏ ‎declined ‎to ‎comment ‎on ‎whether‏ ‎it‏ ‎had‏ ‎paid ‎a‏ ‎ransom ‎or‏ ‎received ‎a‏ ‎ransom‏ ‎demand.

📌In ‎addition‏ ‎to ‎the ‎LockBit ‎attack, ‎Boeing‏ ‎has ‎faced‏ ‎other‏ ‎cybersecurity ‎incidents, ‎including‏ ‎a ‎cyberattack‏ ‎on ‎its ‎subsidiary ‎Jeppesen,‏ ‎which‏ ‎distributes ‎airspace‏ ‎safety ‎notices‏ ‎to ‎pilots. ‎The ‎company ‎has‏ ‎also‏ ‎been ‎targeted‏ ‎by ‎pro-Russian‏ ‎hacking ‎groups, ‎which ‎launched ‎distributed‏ ‎denial-of-service‏ ‎(DDoS)‏ ‎attacks ‎against‏ ‎Boeing ‎in‏ ‎December ‎2022.

Legal‏ ‎Issues

📌Boeing’s‏ ‎legal ‎troubles‏ ‎are ‎also ‎mounting. ‎In ‎May‏ ‎2024, ‎the‏ ‎US‏ ‎Justice ‎Department ‎determined‏ ‎that ‎Boeing‏ ‎had ‎breached ‎its ‎2021‏ ‎deferred‏ ‎prosecution ‎agreement‏ ‎(DPA) ‎related‏ ‎to ‎the ‎737 ‎MAX ‎crashes.‏ ‎The‏ ‎DPA ‎had‏ ‎shielded ‎Boeing‏ ‎from ‎criminal ‎liability ‎in ‎exchange‏ ‎for‏ ‎a‏ ‎$2.5 ‎billion‏ ‎fine ‎and‏ ‎commitments ‎to‏ ‎improve‏ ‎its ‎safety‏ ‎and ‎compliance ‎practices.

📌The ‎Justice ‎Department‏ ‎has ‎given‏ ‎Boeing‏ ‎until ‎July ‎7‏ ‎to ‎respond‏ ‎to ‎the ‎breach ‎and‏ ‎outline‏ ‎its ‎remedial‏ ‎actions. ‎If‏ ‎Boeing ‎fails ‎to ‎comply, ‎it‏ ‎could‏ ‎face ‎criminal‏ ‎prosecution ‎for‏ ‎any ‎federal ‎violations. ‎The ‎company‏ ‎has‏ ‎maintained‏ ‎that ‎it‏ ‎has ‎honored‏ ‎the ‎terms‏ ‎of‏ ‎the ‎DPA,‏ ‎but ‎the ‎Justice ‎Department ‎disagrees.

Impact‏ ‎on ‎Boeing’s‏ ‎Reputation

📌Boeing’s‏ ‎cybersecurity ‎incidents ‎and‏ ‎legal ‎issues‏ ‎have ‎damaged ‎its ‎reputation‏ ‎and‏ ‎raised ‎concerns‏ ‎about ‎its‏ ‎ability ‎to ‎protect ‎sensitive ‎data‏ ‎and‏ ‎ensure ‎the‏ ‎safety ‎of‏ ‎its ‎aircraft. ‎The ‎company’s ‎troubles‏ ‎have‏ ‎also‏ ‎led ‎to‏ ‎calls ‎for‏ ‎greater ‎accountability‏ ‎and‏ ‎transparency ‎in‏ ‎the ‎aviation ‎industry.

📌Boeing’s ‎cybersecurity ‎challenges‏ ‎and ‎legal‏ ‎woes‏ ‎highlight ‎the ‎importance‏ ‎of ‎robust‏ ‎cybersecurity ‎measures ‎and ‎compliance‏ ‎with‏ ‎regulatory ‎agreements.‏ ‎The ‎company‏ ‎must ‎take ‎swift ‎action ‎to‏ ‎address‏ ‎its ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎vulnerabilities ‎and‏ ‎legal ‎issues ‎to ‎restore ‎public‏ ‎trust‏ ‎and‏ ‎ensure ‎the‏ ‎safety ‎of‏ ‎its ‎aircraft.

As‏ ‎the‏ ‎saying ‎goes,‏ ‎«Here, ‎everything ‎is ‎simple, ‎except‏ ‎for ‎the‏ ‎money.»‏ ‎And ‎Boeing ‎has‏ ‎plenty ‎of‏ ‎that ‎to ‎throw ‎around.‏ ‎So,‏ ‎let’s ‎all‏ ‎just ‎take‏ ‎a ‎deep ‎breath ‎and ‎trust‏ ‎that‏ ‎the ‎company‏ ‎will ‎magically‏ ‎fix ‎its ‎safety ‎issues ‎with‏ ‎the‏ ‎help‏ ‎of ‎a‏ ‎federal ‎monitor.‏ ‎After ‎all,‏ ‎it’s‏ ‎not ‎like‏ ‎they ‎have ‎a ‎history ‎of‏ ‎prioritizing ‎profits‏ ‎over‏ ‎people ‎or ‎anything.

Читать: 3+ мин
logo Snarky Security

CYBSAFE-Oh, Behave! 2023-FINAL REPORT

The ‎document‏ ‎«CYBSAFE-Oh, ‎Behave! ‎2023-FINAL ‎REPORT» is ‎a‏ ‎rather ‎enlightening‏ ‎(and‏ ‎somewhat ‎amusing) ‎exploration‏ ‎of ‎the‏ ‎current ‎state ‎of ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎awareness,‏ ‎attitudes, ‎and‏ ‎behaviors ‎among‏ ‎internet ‎users. ‎The ‎report, ‎with‏ ‎a‏ ‎touch ‎of‏ ‎irony, ‎reveals‏ ‎that ‎while ‎most ‎people ‎are‏ ‎aware‏ ‎of‏ ‎cybersecurity ‎risks,‏ ‎they ‎don’t‏ ‎always ‎take‏ ‎the‏ ‎necessary ‎steps‏ ‎to ‎protect ‎themselves. ‎For ‎instance,‏ ‎only ‎60%‏ ‎use‏ ‎strong ‎passwords, ‎and‏ ‎a ‎mere‏ ‎40% ‎use ‎multi-factor ‎authentication‏ ‎(MFA).‏ ‎Despite ‎being‏ ‎aware ‎of‏ ‎phishing ‎scams, ‎many ‎still ‎fall‏ ‎for‏ ‎them, ‎which‏ ‎is ‎a‏ ‎bit ‎like ‎knowing ‎the ‎stove‏ ‎is‏ ‎hot‏ ‎but ‎touching‏ ‎it ‎anyway.

The‏ ‎report ‎also‏ ‎highlights‏ ‎some ‎generational‏ ‎differences ‎in ‎attitudes ‎and ‎behaviors‏ ‎towards ‎cybersecurity.‏ ‎Younger‏ ‎generations, ‎such ‎as‏ ‎Gen ‎Z‏ ‎and ‎Millennials, ‎are ‎more‏ ‎digitally‏ ‎connected ‎but‏ ‎also ‎exhibit‏ ‎riskier ‎password ‎practices ‎and ‎are‏ ‎more‏ ‎skeptical ‎about‏ ‎the ‎value‏ ‎of ‎online ‎security ‎efforts. ‎It’s‏ ‎a‏ ‎bit‏ ‎like ‎giving‏ ‎a ‎teenager‏ ‎the ‎keys‏ ‎to‏ ‎a ‎sports‏ ‎car ‎and ‎expecting ‎them ‎not‏ ‎to ‎speed.

The‏ ‎media’s‏ ‎role ‎in ‎shaping‏ ‎people’s ‎views‏ ‎towards ‎online ‎security ‎is‏ ‎also‏ ‎discussed. ‎While‏ ‎it ‎motivates‏ ‎some ‎to ‎take ‎protective ‎actions‏ ‎and‏ ‎stay ‎informed,‏ ‎others ‎feel‏ ‎that ‎it ‎evokes ‎fear ‎and‏ ‎overcomplicates‏ ‎security‏ ‎matters. ‎It’s‏ ‎a ‎bit‏ ‎like ‎watching‏ ‎a‏ ‎horror ‎movie‏ ‎to ‎learn ‎about ‎home ‎security.

The‏ ‎report ‎also‏ ‎delves‏ ‎into ‎the ‎effectiveness‏ ‎of ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎training, ‎with ‎only ‎26%‏ ‎of‏ ‎participants ‎having‏ ‎access ‎to‏ ‎and ‎taking ‎advantage ‎of ‎such‏ ‎training.‏ ‎It’s ‎a‏ ‎bit ‎like‏ ‎having ‎a ‎gym ‎membership ‎but‏ ‎only‏ ‎going‏ ‎once ‎a‏ ‎month.

In ‎a‏ ‎nutshell, ‎the‏ ‎report‏ ‎is ‎a‏ ‎comprehensive ‎analysis ‎of ‎the ‎current‏ ‎state ‎of‏ ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎awareness, ‎attitudes, ‎and‏ ‎behaviors ‎among‏ ‎internet ‎users, ‎with ‎a‏ ‎healthy‏ ‎dose ‎of‏ ‎irony ‎and‏ ‎a ‎touch ‎of ‎sarcasm. ‎It’s‏ ‎a‏ ‎bit ‎like‏ ‎a ‎reality‏ ‎check, ‎served ‎with ‎a ‎side‏ ‎of‏ ‎humor.


Unpacking‏ ‎in ‎more‏ ‎detail

Смотреть: 12+ мин
logo Overkill Security

Security Maturity Model Even Cybersecurity Needs to Grow Up (Video)


The ‎Essential‏ ‎Eight ‎Maturity ‎Model, ‎that ‎grand‏ ‎old ‎strategic‏ ‎framework‏ ‎whipped ‎up ‎by‏ ‎the ‎wizards‏ ‎at ‎the ‎Australian ‎Cyber‏ ‎Security‏ ‎Centre ‎to‏ ‎magically ‎enhance‏ ‎cybersecurity ‎defenses ‎within ‎organizations. ‎This‏ ‎analysis‏ ‎promises ‎to‏ ‎dive ‎deep‏ ‎into ‎the ‎thrilling ‎world ‎of‏ ‎the‏ ‎model’s‏ ‎structure, ‎the‏ ‎Herculean ‎challenges‏ ‎of ‎implementation,‏ ‎and‏ ‎the ‎dazzling‏ ‎benefits ‎of ‎climbing ‎the ‎maturity‏ ‎ladder.

We’ll ‎provide‏ ‎a‏ ‎qualitative ‎summary ‎of‏ ‎this ‎legendary‏ ‎Essential ‎Eight ‎Maturity ‎Model,‏ ‎offering‏ ‎«valuable» ‎insights‏ ‎into ‎its‏ ‎application ‎and ‎effectiveness. ‎This ‎analysis‏ ‎is‏ ‎touted ‎as‏ ‎a ‎must-read‏ ‎for ‎security ‎professionals, ‎IT ‎managers,‏ ‎and‏ ‎decision-makers‏ ‎across ‎various‏ ‎industries, ‎who‏ ‎are ‎all‏ ‎presumably‏ ‎waiting ‎with‏ ‎bated ‎breath ‎to ‎discover ‎the‏ ‎secret ‎sauce‏ ‎for‏ ‎fortifying ‎their ‎organizations‏ ‎against ‎those‏ ‎pesky ‎cyber ‎threats.

So, ‎buckle‏ ‎up‏ ‎and ‎prepare‏ ‎for ‎an‏ ‎analysis ‎that ‎promises ‎to ‎be‏ ‎as‏ ‎enlightening ‎as‏ ‎it ‎is‏ ‎essential, ‎guiding ‎you ‎through ‎the‏ ‎mystical‏ ‎realm‏ ‎of ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎maturity ‎with‏ ‎the ‎grace‏ ‎and‏ ‎precision ‎of‏ ‎a ‎cybersecurity ‎guru.


The ‎content ‎provides‏ ‎an ‎analysis‏ ‎of‏ ‎the ‎Essential ‎Eight‏ ‎Maturity ‎Model,‏ ‎a ‎strategic ‎framework ‎developed‏ ‎by‏ ‎the ‎Australian‏ ‎Cyber ‎Security‏ ‎Centre ‎to ‎enhance ‎cybersecurity ‎defenses‏ ‎within‏ ‎organizations. ‎The‏ ‎analysis ‎will‏ ‎cover ‎various ‎aspects ‎of ‎the‏ ‎model,‏ ‎including‏ ‎its ‎structure,‏ ‎implementation ‎challenges,‏ ‎and ‎the‏ ‎benefits‏ ‎of ‎achieving‏ ‎different ‎maturity ‎levels.

The ‎analysis ‎offers‏ ‎valuable ‎insights‏ ‎into‏ ‎its ‎application ‎and‏ ‎effectiveness. ‎This‏ ‎analysis ‎is ‎particularly ‎useful‏ ‎for‏ ‎security ‎professionals,‏ ‎IT ‎managers,‏ ‎and ‎decision-makers ‎across ‎various ‎industries,‏ ‎helping‏ ‎them ‎to‏ ‎understand ‎how‏ ‎to ‎better ‎protect ‎their ‎organizations‏ ‎from‏ ‎cyber‏ ‎threats ‎and‏ ‎enhance ‎their‏ ‎cybersecurity ‎measures.


Full‏ ‎content‏ ‎(all-in-one ‎episodes)

Читать: 5+ мин
logo Overkill Security

Human Factors in Biocybersecurity Wargames & Gamification

The ‎paper‏ ‎«Human ‎Factors ‎in ‎Biocybersecurity ‎Wargames»‏ ‎offers ‎a‏ ‎thrilling‏ ‎guide ‎to ‎safeguarding‏ ‎bioprocessing ‎centers.‏ ‎The ‎authors, ‎clearly ‎having‏ ‎too‏ ‎much ‎time‏ ‎on ‎their‏ ‎hands, ‎emphasize ‎the ‎«fast-paced» ‎nature‏ ‎of‏ ‎biological ‎and‏ ‎bioprocessing ‎developments.‏ ‎Labs, ‎whether ‎rolling ‎in ‎cash‏ ‎or‏ ‎scraping‏ ‎by, ‎are‏ ‎apparently ‎prime‏ ‎targets ‎for‏ ‎cyber‏ ‎mischief. ‎Who‏ ‎knew ‎that ‎underpaid ‎workers ‎and‏ ‎sub-standard ‎resources‏ ‎could‏ ‎be ‎security ‎risks?

The‏ ‎paper ‎also‏ ‎highlights ‎the ‎importance ‎of‏ ‎wargames.‏ ‎Yes, ‎wargames.‏ ‎Because ‎what‏ ‎better ‎way ‎to ‎prepare ‎for‏ ‎cyber‏ ‎threats ‎than‏ ‎by ‎playing‏ ‎pretend? ‎Participants ‎are ‎divided ‎into‏ ‎«data‏ ‎defenders»‏ ‎and ‎«data‏ ‎hackers, ‎»‏ ‎engaging ‎in‏ ‎a‏ ‎thrilling ‎game‏ ‎of ‎«find ‎the ‎vulnerability ‎and‏ ‎patch ‎it.»

In‏ ‎the‏ ‎discussion, ‎the ‎authors‏ ‎reveal ‎common‏ ‎exploitations ‎found ‎during ‎these‏ ‎wargames,‏ ‎such ‎as‏ ‎the ‎inefficiency‏ ‎of ‎security ‎theater ‎and ‎the‏ ‎security‏ ‎implications ‎of‏ ‎miscommunications. ‎Obviously,‏ ‎the ‎only ‎way ‎to ‎stay‏ ‎ahead‏ ‎in‏ ‎this ‎fast-paced‏ ‎field ‎is‏ ‎to ‎keep‏ ‎playing‏ ‎those ‎wargames‏ ‎and ‎staying ‎updated ‎on ‎the‏ ‎latest ‎trends.‏ ‎After‏ ‎all, ‎nothing ‎says‏ ‎«cutting-edge» ‎like‏ ‎a ‎thrilling ‎ride ‎through‏ ‎the‏ ‎world ‎of‏ ‎cyber ‎threats,‏ ‎complete ‎with ‎all ‎the ‎excitement‏ ‎of‏ ‎a ‎board‏ ‎game ‎night.

----

The‏ ‎paper ‎«Human ‎Factors ‎in ‎Biocybersecurity‏ ‎Wargames»‏ ‎emphasizes‏ ‎the ‎need‏ ‎to ‎understand‏ ‎vulnerabilities ‎in‏ ‎the‏ ‎processing ‎of‏ ‎biologics ‎and ‎how ‎they ‎intersect‏ ‎with ‎cyber‏ ‎and‏ ‎cyber-physical ‎systems. ‎This‏ ‎understanding ‎is‏ ‎crucial ‎for ‎ensuring ‎product‏ ‎and‏ ‎brand ‎integrity‏ ‎and ‎protecting‏ ‎those ‎served ‎by ‎these ‎systems.‏ ‎It‏ ‎discusses ‎the‏ ‎growing ‎prominence‏ ‎of ‎biocybersecurity ‎and ‎its ‎importance‏ ‎to‏ ‎bioprocessing‏ ‎in ‎both‏ ‎domestic ‎and‏ ‎international ‎contexts.


Scope‏ ‎of‏ ‎Bioprocessing:

📌 Bioprocessing ‎encompasses‏ ‎the ‎entire ‎lifecycle ‎of ‎biosystems‏ ‎and ‎their‏ ‎components,‏ ‎from ‎initial ‎research‏ ‎to ‎development,‏ ‎manufacturing, ‎and ‎commercialization.

📌 It ‎significantly‏ ‎contributes‏ ‎to ‎the‏ ‎global ‎economy,‏ ‎with ‎applications ‎in ‎food, ‎fuel,‏ ‎cosmetics,‏ ‎drugs, ‎and‏ ‎green ‎technology.

Vulnerability‏ ‎of ‎Bioprocessing ‎Pipelines:

📌 The ‎bioprocessing ‎pipeline‏ ‎is‏ ‎susceptible‏ ‎to ‎attacks‏ ‎at ‎various‏ ‎stages, ‎especially‏ ‎where‏ ‎bioprocessing ‎equipment‏ ‎interfaces ‎with ‎the ‎internet.

📌 This ‎vulnerability‏ ‎necessitates ‎enhanced‏ ‎scrutiny‏ ‎in ‎the ‎design‏ ‎and ‎monitoring‏ ‎of ‎bioprocessing ‎pipelines ‎to‏ ‎prevent‏ ‎potential ‎disruptions.

Role‏ ‎of ‎Information‏ ‎Technology ‎(IT):

📌 Progress ‎in ‎bioprocessing ‎is‏ ‎increasingly‏ ‎dependent ‎on‏ ‎automation ‎and‏ ‎advanced ‎algorithmic ‎processes, ‎which ‎require‏ ‎substantial‏ ‎IT‏ ‎engagement.

📌 IT ‎spending‏ ‎is ‎substantial‏ ‎and ‎growing,‏ ‎paralleling‏ ‎the ‎growth‏ ‎in ‎bioprocessing.

Open-Source ‎Methodologies ‎and ‎Digital‏ ‎Growth:

📌 The ‎adoption‏ ‎of‏ ‎open-source ‎methodologies ‎has‏ ‎led ‎to‏ ‎significant ‎growth ‎in ‎communication‏ ‎and‏ ‎digital ‎technology‏ ‎development ‎worldwide.

📌 This‏ ‎growth ‎is ‎further ‎accelerated ‎by‏ ‎advancements‏ ‎in ‎biological‏ ‎computing ‎and‏ ‎storage ‎technologies.

Need ‎for ‎New ‎Expertise:

📌 The‏ ‎integration‏ ‎of‏ ‎biocomputing, ‎bioprocessing,‏ ‎and ‎storage‏ ‎technologies ‎will‏ ‎necessitate‏ ‎new ‎expertise‏ ‎in ‎both ‎operation ‎and ‎defense.

📌 Basic‏ ‎data ‎and‏ ‎process‏ ‎protection ‎measures ‎remain‏ ‎crucial ‎despite‏ ‎technological ‎advancements.

Importance ‎of ‎Wargames:

📌 To‏ ‎manage‏ ‎and ‎secure‏ ‎connected ‎bioprocessing‏ ‎infrastructure, ‎IT ‎teams ‎must ‎employ‏ ‎wargames‏ ‎to ‎simulate‏ ‎and ‎address‏ ‎potential ‎risks.

📌 These ‎simulations ‎are ‎essential‏ ‎for‏ ‎preparing‏ ‎organizations ‎to‏ ‎handle ‎vulnerabilities‏ ‎in ‎their‏ ‎bioprocessing‏ ‎pipelines.


Unpacking ‎in‏ ‎more ‎detail



Читать: 3+ мин
logo Ирония безопасности

CYBSAFE-Oh, Behave! 2023-FINAL REPORT

Документ ‎«CYBSAFE-Oh,‏ ‎Behave! ‎2023-FINAL ‎REPORT» представляет ‎собой ‎довольно‏ ‎поучительное ‎(и‏ ‎несколько‏ ‎забавное) ‎исследование ‎текущего‏ ‎состояния ‎осведомлённости,‏ ‎отношения ‎и ‎поведения ‎пользователей‏ ‎в‏ ‎области ‎кибербезопасности.‏ ‎Отчёт ‎с‏ ‎долей ‎иронии ‎показывает, ‎что, ‎хотя‏ ‎большинство‏ ‎людей ‎осведомлены‏ ‎о ‎рисках‏ ‎кибербезопасности, ‎они ‎не ‎всегда ‎предпринимают‏ ‎необходимые‏ ‎шаги‏ ‎для ‎собственной‏ ‎защиты. ‎Например,‏ ‎только ‎60%‏ ‎используют‏ ‎надёжные ‎пароли,‏ ‎и ‎лишь ‎40% ‎используют ‎многофакторную‏ ‎аутентификацию ‎(MFA).‏ ‎Несмотря‏ ‎на ‎то, ‎что‏ ‎многие ‎знают‏ ‎о ‎фишинговых ‎мошенничествах, ‎они‏ ‎все‏ ‎равно ‎попадаются‏ ‎на ‎них‏ ‎(кололись, ‎но ‎продолжали ‎есть ‎кактус)

В‏ ‎отчёте‏ ‎также ‎подчёркиваются‏ ‎некоторые ‎различия‏ ‎поколений ‎в ‎отношении ‎и ‎поведении‏ ‎к‏ ‎кибербезопасности.‏ ‎Z ‎и‏ ‎миллениумы, ‎в‏ ‎большей ‎степени‏ ‎вовлечены‏ ‎в ‎цифровые‏ ‎технология, ‎но ‎также ‎более ‎рискованно‏ ‎используют ‎пароли‏ ‎и‏ ‎более ‎скептически ‎относится‏ ‎к ‎ценности‏ ‎мер ‎по ‎обеспечению ‎безопасности.

Также‏ ‎обсуждается‏ ‎роль ‎средств‏ ‎массовой ‎информации‏ ‎в ‎формировании ‎взглядов ‎людей ‎на‏ ‎онлайн-безопасность.‏ ‎В ‎то‏ ‎время ‎как‏ ‎одних ‎это ‎побуждает ‎предпринимать ‎направленные‏ ‎на‏ ‎защиту‏ ‎действия ‎и‏ ‎оставаться ‎в‏ ‎курсе ‎событий,‏ ‎другие‏ ‎считают, ‎что‏ ‎это ‎вызывает ‎страх ‎и ‎чрезмерно‏ ‎усложняет ‎вопросы‏ ‎безопасности‏ ‎(как ‎в ‎классических‏ ‎фильмах ‎ужасов)

В‏ ‎отчёте ‎также ‎рассматривается ‎эффективность‏ ‎обучения‏ ‎по ‎кибербезопасности:‏ ‎только ‎26%‏ ‎участников ‎имеют ‎доступ ‎к ‎такому‏ ‎обучению‏ ‎и ‎пользуются‏ ‎его ‎преимуществами.‏ ‎Это ‎немного ‎похоже ‎на ‎абонемент‏ ‎в‏ ‎спортзал,‏ ‎но ‎только‏ ‎раз ‎в‏ ‎месяц, ‎для‏ ‎фоток‏ ‎в ‎соцсети.

В‏ ‎двух ‎словах, ‎отчёт ‎представляет ‎собой‏ ‎всесторонний ‎анализ‏ ‎текущего‏ ‎состояния ‎осведомлённости, ‎отношения‏ ‎и ‎поведения‏ ‎пользователей ‎Интернета ‎в ‎области‏ ‎кибербезопасности‏ ‎на ‎результаты‏ ‎которого ‎без‏ ‎сарказма ‎не ‎взглянешь.


Подробный ‎разбор

Обновления проекта

Метки

snarkysecurity 156 snarkysecuritypdf 59 news 51 keypoints 41 ai 22 research 22 Cyber Insurance 20 Cyber Insurance Market 19 cybersecurity 16 unpacking 12 AGI 11 Nakasone 11 risk management 11 CTEM 10 nsa 10 OpenAi 10 usa 9 cyber operations 8 discovery 8 EM (Exposure Management) 8 prioritization 8 threat management 8 validation 8 Marine Security 7 Maritime security 7 announcement 6 china 6 Cyber Defense Doctrine 6 cyberbiosecurity 6 Digest 6 Espionage 6 Maritime 6 Monthly Digest 6 biosecurity 5 biotech 5 biotechnology 5 Bioweapon 5 marine 5 patent 5 phishing 5 Russia 5 bio 4 cyber security 4 dgap 4 medical security 4 risks 4 sanctions 4 security 4 content 3 cyber attack 3 data leakage 3 Israel 3 medical communication 3 osint 3 video 3 badges 2 cfr 2 console architecture 2 cyber threat 2 cyberops 2 data breach 2 data theft 2 DICOM 2 EU 2 europol 2 fake news 2 funding 2 Healthcare 2 ICS 2 intelbroker 2 leads 2 malware 2 marketing 2 marketing strategy 2 medicine 2 Microsoft 2 military 2 ML 2 offensive 2 sabotage 2 submarine 2 surveillance 2 tech 2 tracking 2 U.S. Air Force 2 united kingdom 2 vulnerabilities 2 Academic Plagiarism 1 AI Plagiarism 1 Air-Gapped Systems 1 aircraft 1 Amazon 1 amazon web services 1 Antarctica 1 antartica 1 APAC 1 APT29 1 APT42 1 ArcaneDoor 1 Ascension 1 astra 1 astra linux 1 AT&T 1 auto 1 aviation industry 1 aws 1 BeiDou 1 blockchain 1 Boeing 1 books 1 bot 1 broker 1 cable 1 Catholic 1 cisa 1 CISO 1 CISOStressFest 1 compliance 1 content category 1 Continuous Management 1 Copy-Paste Culture 1 criminal charges 1 cuba 1 Cuttlefish 1 cyber 1 Cybercrime 1 CyberDome 1 CybersecurityPressure 1 cybsafe 1 Czech Republic 1 DASF 1 Databricks AI Security Framework 1 defense 1 deferred prosecution agreement 1 dell 1 democracy 1 digital solidarity 1 diplomacy 1 Discord 1 ebike 1 ecosystem 1 end-to-end AI 1 EUelections2024 1 fake 1 fbi 1 fiscal year 1 Framework 1 FTC 1 game console 1 Games 1 GCJ-02 1 gemini 1 Gemma 1 Generative 1 germany 1 global times 1 GLONASS 1 Google 1 google news 1 Government 1 GPS 1 great powers 1 guide 1 hackaton 1 Handala 1 Human Centric Security 1 HumanErrorFTW 1 humanoid robot 1 ICC 1 IIoT 1 incident response 1 Inclusive 1 india 1 indonesia 1 InformationManipulation 1 insurance 1 intelbro 1 Intelligence 1 IoMT 1 IoT 1 iran 1 Iron Dome 1 jamming 1 korea 1 law enforcement 1 lea 1 legal issues 1 LiabilityNightmares 1 Llama 1 LLM 1 LLMs 1 LNG 1 marin 1 market 1 mass 1 message queue 1 military aviation 1 ModelBest 1 Mossad 1 mq broker 1 MTAC 1 National Vulnerability Database 1 NavIC 1 Navigation 1 nes 1 nozomi 1 nsm22 1 nvd 1 NVidia 1 ofac 1 oil 1 Olympics 1 paid content 1 Palestine 1 paris 1 Plagiarism Scandals 1 PlayStation 1 playstation 2 1 playstation 3 1 podcast 1 police 1 PressReleaseDiplomacy 1 ps2 1 ps3 1 radar systems 1 railway 1 Ransomware 1 regulatory 1 Risk-Based Approach 1 rodrigo copetti 1 Russian 1 safety oversight 1 scam 1 semiconductors 1 ShinBet 1 snes 1 Social Engineering: 1 social network 1 spy 1 spyware 1 Stanford 1 surv 1 T-Mobile 1 te 1 technology 1 Tensor 1 Threat 1 Threat Exposure Management 1 Typosquatting 1 uae 1 UK 1 UNC1549 1 UnitedHealth Group 1 us 1 US11483343B2 1 US11496512B2 1 US11611582B2 1 US20220232015A1 1 US9071600B2 1 Verizon 1 VK 1 Vulnerability Management 1 water sector 1 webex 1 Westchester 1 Whatsapp 1 women 1 xbox 1 xbox 360 1 xbox original 1 xz 1 zcaler 1 сybersecurity 1 Больше тегов

Фильтры

Подарить подписку

Будет создан код, который позволит адресату получить бесплатный для него доступ на определённый уровень подписки.

Оплата за этого пользователя будет списываться с вашей карты вплоть до отмены подписки. Код может быть показан на экране или отправлен по почте вместе с инструкцией.

Будет создан код, который позволит адресату получить сумму на баланс.

Разово будет списана указанная сумма и зачислена на баланс пользователя, воспользовавшегося данным промокодом.

Добавить карту
0/2048