logo
Overkill Security  Because Nothing Says 'Security' Like a Dozen Firewalls and a Biometric Scanner
О проекте Просмотр Уровни подписки Фильтры Обновления проекта Контакты Поделиться Метки
Все проекты
О проекте
A blog about all things techy! Not too much hype, just a lot of cool analysis and insight from different sources.

📌Not sure what level is suitable for you? Check this explanation https://sponsr.ru/overkill_security/55291/Paid_Content/

All places to read, listen and watch content:
➡️Text and other media: TG, Boosty, Teletype.in, VK, X.com
➡️Audio: Mave, you find here other podcast services, e.g. Youtube Podcasts, Spotify, Apple or Amazon
➡️Video: Youtube

The main categories of materials — use tags:
📌news
📌digest

QA — directly or via email overkill_qa@outlook.com
Публикации, доступные бесплатно
Уровни подписки
Единоразовый платёж

Your donation fuels our mission to provide cutting-edge cybersecurity research, in-depth tutorials, and expert insights. Support our work today to empower the community with even more valuable content.

*no refund, no paid content

Помочь проекту
Promo 750₽ месяц

For a limited time, we're offering our Level "Regular" subscription at an unbeatable price—50% off!

Dive into the latest trends and updates in the cybersecurity world with our in-depth articles and expert insights

Offer valid until the end of this month.

Оформить подписку
Regular Reader 1 500₽ месяц 16 200₽ год
(-10%)
При подписке на год для вас действует 10% скидка. 10% основная скидка и 0% доп. скидка за ваш уровень на проекте Overkill Security

Ideal for regular readers who are interested in staying informed about the latest trends and updates in the cybersecurity world without.

Оформить подписку
Pro Reader 3 000₽ месяц 30 600₽ год
(-15%)
При подписке на год для вас действует 15% скидка. 15% основная скидка и 0% доп. скидка за ваш уровень на проекте Overkill Security

Designed for IT professionals, cybersecurity experts, and enthusiasts who seek deeper insights and more comprehensive resources. + Q&A

Оформить подписку
Фильтры
Обновления проекта
Поделиться
Метки
overkillsecurity 142 overkillsecuritypdf 52 news 47 keypoints 38 nsa 26 fbi 25 adapt tactics 11 Living Off the Land 11 LOTL 11 unpacking 10 vulnerability 9 cyber security 8 Digest 8 edge routers 8 Essential Eight Maturity Model 8 malware 8 Maturity Model 8 Monthly Digest 8 research 8 ubiquiti 8 IoT 7 lolbin 7 lolbins 7 Cyber Attacks 6 phishing 6 Forensics 5 Ransomware 5 soho 5 authToken 4 BYOD 4 MDM 4 OAuth 4 Energy Consumption 3 IoMT 3 medical 3 ai 2 AnonSudan 2 authentication 2 av 2 battery 2 Buffer Overflow 2 console architecture 2 cve 2 cybersecurity 2 energy 2 Google 2 incident response 2 MITM 2 mqtt 2 Passkeys 2 Retro 2 Velociraptor 2 video 2 Vintage 2 vmware 2 windows 2 1981 1 5g network research 1 8-bit 1 Ad Removal 1 Ad-Free Experience 1 ADCS 1 advisory 1 airwatch 1 AlphV 1 AMSI 1 android 1 Android15 1 announcement 1 antiPhishing 1 AntiPhishStack 1 antivirus 1 Apple 1 Atlassian 1 Attack 1 AttackGen 1 BatBadBut 1 Behavioral Analytics 1 BianLian 1 bias 1 Biocybersecurity 1 Biometric 1 bite 1 bitlocker 1 bitlocker bypass 1 Black Lotus Labs 1 blackberry 1 blizzard 1 botnet 1 Browser Data Theft 1 BucketLoot 1 CellularSecurity 1 checkpoint 1 china 1 chisel 1 cisa 1 CloudSecurity 1 CloudStorage 1 content 1 content category 1 cpu 1 Credential Dumping 1 CVE-2023-22518 1 CVE-2023-35080 1 CVE-2023-38043 1 CVE-2023-38543 1 CVE-2024-0204 1 CVE-2024-21111 1 CVE-2024-21345 1 cve-2024-21447 1 CVE-2024-24919 1 CVE-2024-26218 1 cve-2024-27129 1 cve-2024-27130 1 cve-2024-27131 1 cve-2024-3400 1 cvss 1 cyber operations 1 Cyber Toufan Al-Aqsa 1 cyberops 1 D-Link 1 dark pink apt 1 data leakage 1 dcrat 1 Demoscene 1 DevSecOps 1 Dex 1 disassembler 1 DOS 1 e8mm 1 EDR 1 Embedded systems 1 Employee Training 1 EntraID 1 ESC8 1 Event ID 4663 1 Event ID 4688 1 Event ID 5145 1 Evilginx 1 EvilLsassTwin 1 Facebook 1 FBI IC3 1 FIDO2 1 filewave 1 Firebase 1 Firmware 1 Fortra's GoAnywhere MFT 1 france 1 FraudDetection 1 fuxnet 1 fuzzer 1 game console 1 gamification 1 GeminiNanoAI 1 genzai 1 go 1 GoogleIO2024 1 GooglePlayProtect 1 GoPhish 1 gpu 1 ICS 1 ICSpector 1 IDA 1 IncidentResponse 1 Industrial Control Systems 1 jazzer 1 jetbrains 1 jvm 1 KASLR 1 KillNet 1 LeftOverLocals 1 Leviathan 1 lg smart tv 1 lockbit 1 LSASS 1 m-trends 1 Machine Learning Integration 1 Mallox 1 MalPurifier 1 mandiant 1 MediHunt 1 Meta Pixel 1 ML 1 mobile network analysis 1 mobileiron 1 nes 1 nexus 1 NGO 1 Nim 1 Nimfilt 1 NtQueryInformationThread 1 OFGB 1 oracle 1 paid content 1 panos 1 Passwordless 1 Phishing Resilience 1 PingFederate 1 Platform Lock-in Tool 1 PlayIntegrityAPI 1 PlayStation 1 playstation 2 1 playstation 3 1 plc 1 podcast 1 Privilege Escalation 1 ps2 1 ps3 1 PulseVPN 1 qcsuper 1 qemu 1 qualcomm diag protocol 1 radio frame capture 1 Raytracing 1 Real-time Attack Detection 1 Red Team 1 Registry Modification 1 Risk Mitigation 1 RiskManagement 1 rodrigo copetti 1 rooted android devices 1 Router 1 rust 1 Sagemcom 1 sandworm 1 ScamCallDetection 1 security 1 Security Awareness 1 session hijacking 1 SharpADWS 1 SharpTerminator 1 shellcode 1 SIEM 1 Siemens 1 skimming 1 Smart Devices 1 snes 1 SSO 1 stack overflow 1 TA427 1 TA547 1 TDDP 1 telecom security 1 Telegram 1 telerik 1 TeleTracker 1 TEMP.Periscope 1 Terminator 1 Think Tanks 1 Threat 1 threat intelligence 1 threat intelligence analysis 1 Threat Simulation 1 tool 1 toolkit 1 tp-link 1 UK 1 UserManagerEoP 1 uta0218 1 virtualbox 1 VPN 1 vu 1 wargame 1 Web Authentication 1 WebAuthn 1 webos 1 What2Log 1 Windows 11 1 Windows Kernel 1 Windstream 1 women 1 WSUS 1 wt-2024-0004 1 wt-2024-0005 1 wt-2024-0006 1 xbox 1 xbox 360 1 xbox original 1 xss 1 Yubico 1 Z80A 1 ZX Spectrum 1 Больше тегов
Смотреть: 12+ мин
logo Overkill Security

Security Maturity Model Even Cybersecurity Needs to Grow Up (Video)


The ‎Essential‏ ‎Eight ‎Maturity ‎Model, ‎that ‎grand‏ ‎old ‎strategic‏ ‎framework‏ ‎whipped ‎up ‎by‏ ‎the ‎wizards‏ ‎at ‎the ‎Australian ‎Cyber‏ ‎Security‏ ‎Centre ‎to‏ ‎magically ‎enhance‏ ‎cybersecurity ‎defenses ‎within ‎organizations. ‎This‏ ‎analysis‏ ‎promises ‎to‏ ‎dive ‎deep‏ ‎into ‎the ‎thrilling ‎world ‎of‏ ‎the‏ ‎model’s‏ ‎structure, ‎the‏ ‎Herculean ‎challenges‏ ‎of ‎implementation,‏ ‎and‏ ‎the ‎dazzling‏ ‎benefits ‎of ‎climbing ‎the ‎maturity‏ ‎ladder.

We’ll ‎provide‏ ‎a‏ ‎qualitative ‎summary ‎of‏ ‎this ‎legendary‏ ‎Essential ‎Eight ‎Maturity ‎Model,‏ ‎offering‏ ‎«valuable» ‎insights‏ ‎into ‎its‏ ‎application ‎and ‎effectiveness. ‎This ‎analysis‏ ‎is‏ ‎touted ‎as‏ ‎a ‎must-read‏ ‎for ‎security ‎professionals, ‎IT ‎managers,‏ ‎and‏ ‎decision-makers‏ ‎across ‎various‏ ‎industries, ‎who‏ ‎are ‎all‏ ‎presumably‏ ‎waiting ‎with‏ ‎bated ‎breath ‎to ‎discover ‎the‏ ‎secret ‎sauce‏ ‎for‏ ‎fortifying ‎their ‎organizations‏ ‎against ‎those‏ ‎pesky ‎cyber ‎threats.

So, ‎buckle‏ ‎up‏ ‎and ‎prepare‏ ‎for ‎an‏ ‎analysis ‎that ‎promises ‎to ‎be‏ ‎as‏ ‎enlightening ‎as‏ ‎it ‎is‏ ‎essential, ‎guiding ‎you ‎through ‎the‏ ‎mystical‏ ‎realm‏ ‎of ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎maturity ‎with‏ ‎the ‎grace‏ ‎and‏ ‎precision ‎of‏ ‎a ‎cybersecurity ‎guru.


The ‎content ‎provides‏ ‎an ‎analysis‏ ‎of‏ ‎the ‎Essential ‎Eight‏ ‎Maturity ‎Model,‏ ‎a ‎strategic ‎framework ‎developed‏ ‎by‏ ‎the ‎Australian‏ ‎Cyber ‎Security‏ ‎Centre ‎to ‎enhance ‎cybersecurity ‎defenses‏ ‎within‏ ‎organizations. ‎The‏ ‎analysis ‎will‏ ‎cover ‎various ‎aspects ‎of ‎the‏ ‎model,‏ ‎including‏ ‎its ‎structure,‏ ‎implementation ‎challenges,‏ ‎and ‎the‏ ‎benefits‏ ‎of ‎achieving‏ ‎different ‎maturity ‎levels.

The ‎analysis ‎offers‏ ‎valuable ‎insights‏ ‎into‏ ‎its ‎application ‎and‏ ‎effectiveness. ‎This‏ ‎analysis ‎is ‎particularly ‎useful‏ ‎for‏ ‎security ‎professionals,‏ ‎IT ‎managers,‏ ‎and ‎decision-makers ‎across ‎various ‎industries,‏ ‎helping‏ ‎them ‎to‏ ‎understand ‎how‏ ‎to ‎better ‎protect ‎their ‎organizations‏ ‎from‏ ‎cyber‏ ‎threats ‎and‏ ‎enhance ‎their‏ ‎cybersecurity ‎measures.


Full‏ ‎content‏ ‎(all-in-one ‎episodes)

Читать: 5+ мин
logo Overkill Security

Human Factors in Biocybersecurity Wargames & Gamification

The ‎paper‏ ‎«Human ‎Factors ‎in ‎Biocybersecurity ‎Wargames»‏ ‎offers ‎a‏ ‎thrilling‏ ‎guide ‎to ‎safeguarding‏ ‎bioprocessing ‎centers.‏ ‎The ‎authors, ‎clearly ‎having‏ ‎too‏ ‎much ‎time‏ ‎on ‎their‏ ‎hands, ‎emphasize ‎the ‎«fast-paced» ‎nature‏ ‎of‏ ‎biological ‎and‏ ‎bioprocessing ‎developments.‏ ‎Labs, ‎whether ‎rolling ‎in ‎cash‏ ‎or‏ ‎scraping‏ ‎by, ‎are‏ ‎apparently ‎prime‏ ‎targets ‎for‏ ‎cyber‏ ‎mischief. ‎Who‏ ‎knew ‎that ‎underpaid ‎workers ‎and‏ ‎sub-standard ‎resources‏ ‎could‏ ‎be ‎security ‎risks?

The‏ ‎paper ‎also‏ ‎highlights ‎the ‎importance ‎of‏ ‎wargames.‏ ‎Yes, ‎wargames.‏ ‎Because ‎what‏ ‎better ‎way ‎to ‎prepare ‎for‏ ‎cyber‏ ‎threats ‎than‏ ‎by ‎playing‏ ‎pretend? ‎Participants ‎are ‎divided ‎into‏ ‎«data‏ ‎defenders»‏ ‎and ‎«data‏ ‎hackers, ‎»‏ ‎engaging ‎in‏ ‎a‏ ‎thrilling ‎game‏ ‎of ‎«find ‎the ‎vulnerability ‎and‏ ‎patch ‎it.»

In‏ ‎the‏ ‎discussion, ‎the ‎authors‏ ‎reveal ‎common‏ ‎exploitations ‎found ‎during ‎these‏ ‎wargames,‏ ‎such ‎as‏ ‎the ‎inefficiency‏ ‎of ‎security ‎theater ‎and ‎the‏ ‎security‏ ‎implications ‎of‏ ‎miscommunications. ‎Obviously,‏ ‎the ‎only ‎way ‎to ‎stay‏ ‎ahead‏ ‎in‏ ‎this ‎fast-paced‏ ‎field ‎is‏ ‎to ‎keep‏ ‎playing‏ ‎those ‎wargames‏ ‎and ‎staying ‎updated ‎on ‎the‏ ‎latest ‎trends.‏ ‎After‏ ‎all, ‎nothing ‎says‏ ‎«cutting-edge» ‎like‏ ‎a ‎thrilling ‎ride ‎through‏ ‎the‏ ‎world ‎of‏ ‎cyber ‎threats,‏ ‎complete ‎with ‎all ‎the ‎excitement‏ ‎of‏ ‎a ‎board‏ ‎game ‎night.

----

The‏ ‎paper ‎«Human ‎Factors ‎in ‎Biocybersecurity‏ ‎Wargames»‏ ‎emphasizes‏ ‎the ‎need‏ ‎to ‎understand‏ ‎vulnerabilities ‎in‏ ‎the‏ ‎processing ‎of‏ ‎biologics ‎and ‎how ‎they ‎intersect‏ ‎with ‎cyber‏ ‎and‏ ‎cyber-physical ‎systems. ‎This‏ ‎understanding ‎is‏ ‎crucial ‎for ‎ensuring ‎product‏ ‎and‏ ‎brand ‎integrity‏ ‎and ‎protecting‏ ‎those ‎served ‎by ‎these ‎systems.‏ ‎It‏ ‎discusses ‎the‏ ‎growing ‎prominence‏ ‎of ‎biocybersecurity ‎and ‎its ‎importance‏ ‎to‏ ‎bioprocessing‏ ‎in ‎both‏ ‎domestic ‎and‏ ‎international ‎contexts.


Scope‏ ‎of‏ ‎Bioprocessing:

📌 Bioprocessing ‎encompasses‏ ‎the ‎entire ‎lifecycle ‎of ‎biosystems‏ ‎and ‎their‏ ‎components,‏ ‎from ‎initial ‎research‏ ‎to ‎development,‏ ‎manufacturing, ‎and ‎commercialization.

📌 It ‎significantly‏ ‎contributes‏ ‎to ‎the‏ ‎global ‎economy,‏ ‎with ‎applications ‎in ‎food, ‎fuel,‏ ‎cosmetics,‏ ‎drugs, ‎and‏ ‎green ‎technology.

Vulnerability‏ ‎of ‎Bioprocessing ‎Pipelines:

📌 The ‎bioprocessing ‎pipeline‏ ‎is‏ ‎susceptible‏ ‎to ‎attacks‏ ‎at ‎various‏ ‎stages, ‎especially‏ ‎where‏ ‎bioprocessing ‎equipment‏ ‎interfaces ‎with ‎the ‎internet.

📌 This ‎vulnerability‏ ‎necessitates ‎enhanced‏ ‎scrutiny‏ ‎in ‎the ‎design‏ ‎and ‎monitoring‏ ‎of ‎bioprocessing ‎pipelines ‎to‏ ‎prevent‏ ‎potential ‎disruptions.

Role‏ ‎of ‎Information‏ ‎Technology ‎(IT):

📌 Progress ‎in ‎bioprocessing ‎is‏ ‎increasingly‏ ‎dependent ‎on‏ ‎automation ‎and‏ ‎advanced ‎algorithmic ‎processes, ‎which ‎require‏ ‎substantial‏ ‎IT‏ ‎engagement.

📌 IT ‎spending‏ ‎is ‎substantial‏ ‎and ‎growing,‏ ‎paralleling‏ ‎the ‎growth‏ ‎in ‎bioprocessing.

Open-Source ‎Methodologies ‎and ‎Digital‏ ‎Growth:

📌 The ‎adoption‏ ‎of‏ ‎open-source ‎methodologies ‎has‏ ‎led ‎to‏ ‎significant ‎growth ‎in ‎communication‏ ‎and‏ ‎digital ‎technology‏ ‎development ‎worldwide.

📌 This‏ ‎growth ‎is ‎further ‎accelerated ‎by‏ ‎advancements‏ ‎in ‎biological‏ ‎computing ‎and‏ ‎storage ‎technologies.

Need ‎for ‎New ‎Expertise:

📌 The‏ ‎integration‏ ‎of‏ ‎biocomputing, ‎bioprocessing,‏ ‎and ‎storage‏ ‎technologies ‎will‏ ‎necessitate‏ ‎new ‎expertise‏ ‎in ‎both ‎operation ‎and ‎defense.

📌 Basic‏ ‎data ‎and‏ ‎process‏ ‎protection ‎measures ‎remain‏ ‎crucial ‎despite‏ ‎technological ‎advancements.

Importance ‎of ‎Wargames:

📌 To‏ ‎manage‏ ‎and ‎secure‏ ‎connected ‎bioprocessing‏ ‎infrastructure, ‎IT ‎teams ‎must ‎employ‏ ‎wargames‏ ‎to ‎simulate‏ ‎and ‎address‏ ‎potential ‎risks.

📌 These ‎simulations ‎are ‎essential‏ ‎for‏ ‎preparing‏ ‎organizations ‎to‏ ‎handle ‎vulnerabilities‏ ‎in ‎their‏ ‎bioprocessing‏ ‎pipelines.


Unpacking ‎in‏ ‎more ‎detail



Читать: 4+ мин
logo Snarky Security

[Announcement] The Art of Alienating Your Audience. A Guide 'Who Needs Customers, Anyway' to Failing in Cyber security Marketing

Welcome, ‎aspiring‏ ‎marketing ‎maestros, ‎to ‎the ‎ultimate‏ ‎guide ‎on‏ ‎how‏ ‎to ‎alienate ‎your‏ ‎audience ‎and‏ ‎tank ‎your ‎cybersecurity ‎business!‏ ‎Are‏ ‎you ‎tired‏ ‎of ‎actually‏ ‎connecting ‎with ‎potential ‎customers ‎and‏ ‎generating‏ ‎quality ‎leads?‏ ‎Do ‎you‏ ‎yearn ‎for ‎the ‎sweet ‎sound‏ ‎of‏ ‎unsubscribe‏ ‎clicks ‎and‏ ‎the ‎satisfying‏ ‎ping ‎of‏ ‎your‏ ‎emails ‎landing‏ ‎directly ‎in ‎spam ‎folders? ‎Well,‏ ‎buckle ‎up,‏ ‎because‏ ‎you’re ‎in ‎for‏ ‎a ‎treat!

In‏ ‎this ‎comprehensive ‎masterclass ‎of‏ ‎marketing‏ ‎mayhem, ‎we’ll‏ ‎explore ‎the‏ ‎fine ‎art ‎of ‎annoying ‎your‏ ‎prospects,‏ ‎confusing ‎your‏ ‎sales ‎team,‏ ‎and ‎generally ‎making ‎a ‎mess‏ ‎of‏ ‎your‏ ‎cybersecurity ‎marketing‏ ‎efforts. ‎From‏ ‎bombarding ‎inboxes‏ ‎with‏ ‎irrelevant ‎mass‏ ‎emails ‎to ‎creating ‎lead ‎generation‏ ‎forms ‎so‏ ‎lengthy‏ ‎they’d ‎make ‎War‏ ‎and ‎Peace‏ ‎look ‎like ‎a ‎tweet,‏ ‎we’ve‏ ‎got ‎all‏ ‎the ‎tips‏ ‎and ‎tricks ‎you ‎need ‎to‏ ‎ensure‏ ‎your ‎marketing‏ ‎strategy ‎is‏ ‎as ‎effective ‎as ‎a ‎chocolate‏ ‎teapot.

📌The‏ ‎Complexities‏ ‎of ‎Cybersecurity‏ ‎Marketing: ‎Cybersecurity‏ ‎marketing ‎is‏ ‎a‏ ‎nuanced ‎and‏ ‎challenging ‎field, ‎requiring ‎a ‎deep‏ ‎understanding ‎of‏ ‎both‏ ‎the ‎technical ‎aspects‏ ‎of ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎and ‎the ‎intricacies ‎of‏ ‎marketing.‏ ‎But ‎who‏ ‎needs ‎to‏ ‎understand ‎their ‎target ‎audience ‎when‏ ‎you‏ ‎can ‎just‏ ‎blast ‎generic‏ ‎messages ‎to ‎everyone? ‎After ‎all,‏ ‎why‏ ‎bother‏ ‎with ‎personalized‏ ‎content ‎when‏ ‎you ‎can‏ ‎just‏ ‎send ‎the‏ ‎same ‎email ‎to ‎a ‎financial‏ ‎director, ‎a‏ ‎CISO,‏ ‎and ‎a ‎CEO‏ ‎and ‎hope‏ ‎for ‎the ‎best?

📌The ‎Frustration‏ ‎with‏ ‎Lead ‎Generation‏ ‎Forms: ‎Ah,‏ ‎the ‎ubiquitous ‎lead ‎generation ‎form.‏ ‎You‏ ‎find ‎an‏ ‎interesting ‎piece‏ ‎of ‎content, ‎click ‎to ‎download‏ ‎it,‏ ‎and‏ ‎are ‎immediately‏ ‎redirected ‎to‏ ‎a ‎form‏ ‎with‏ ‎a ‎dozen‏ ‎fields ‎to ‎fill ‎out. ‎This‏ ‎practice ‎is‏ ‎driven‏ ‎by ‎the ‎need‏ ‎to ‎generate‏ ‎leads, ‎but ‎it ‎often‏ ‎results‏ ‎in ‎collecting‏ ‎useless ‎data.‏ ‎Many ‎users ‎resort ‎to ‎using‏ ‎autofill‏ ‎features ‎with‏ ‎outdated ‎or‏ ‎incorrect ‎information ‎just ‎to ‎bypass‏ ‎these‏ ‎forms.‏ ‎This ‎leads‏ ‎to ‎a‏ ‎cycle ‎where‏ ‎marketers‏ ‎gather ‎irrelevant‏ ‎data, ‎users ‎unsubscribe ‎from ‎spam‏ ‎emails, ‎and‏ ‎the‏ ‎quality ‎of ‎leads‏ ‎remains ‎poor.‏ ‎But ‎hey, ‎who ‎needs‏ ‎accurate‏ ‎data ‎when‏ ‎you ‎can‏ ‎have ‎a ‎bloated ‎CRM ‎full‏ ‎of‏ ‎irrelevant ‎contacts?

📌Ineffective‏ ‎Mass ‎Email‏ ‎Campaigns ‎& ‎the ‎Misguided ‎Focus‏ ‎on‏ ‎Lead‏ ‎Quantity: Mass ‎email‏ ‎campaigns ‎are‏ ‎another ‎area‏ ‎where‏ ‎cybersecurity ‎marketing‏ ‎often ‎falls ‎short. ‎Sending ‎out‏ ‎thousands ‎of‏ ‎generic‏ ‎emails ‎asking ‎if‏ ‎recipients ‎have‏ ‎cybersecurity ‎issues ‎and ‎offering‏ ‎solutions‏ ‎without ‎considering‏ ‎the ‎recipient’s‏ ‎industry ‎or ‎role ‎is ‎ineffective.‏ ‎Financial‏ ‎directors, ‎CISOs,‏ ‎and ‎CEOs‏ ‎have ‎different ‎concerns ‎and ‎require‏ ‎tailored‏ ‎messaging.‏ ‎Yet, ‎marketers‏ ‎often ‎focus‏ ‎on ‎the‏ ‎quantity‏ ‎of ‎emails‏ ‎sent ‎rather ‎than ‎the ‎quality‏ ‎of ‎engagement.‏ ‎Because‏ ‎nothing ‎says ‎«we‏ ‎care» ‎like‏ ‎a ‎one-size-fits-all ‎email ‎blast,‏ ‎right?

📌The‏ ‎Disconnect ‎Between‏ ‎Marketing ‎and‏ ‎Sales: Marketing ‎in ‎the ‎cybersecurity ‎sector‏ ‎is‏ ‎supposed ‎to‏ ‎build ‎a‏ ‎positive ‎brand ‎image, ‎enhance ‎customer‏ ‎loyalty,‏ ‎and‏ ‎support ‎the‏ ‎sales ‎process.‏ ‎However, ‎the‏ ‎current‏ ‎approach ‎often‏ ‎leads ‎to ‎customer ‎irritation. ‎In‏ ‎the ‎B2B‏ ‎segment,‏ ‎most ‎sales ‎are‏ ‎made ‎through‏ ‎direct ‎contact ‎with ‎decision-makers,‏ ‎not‏ ‎through ‎impulsive‏ ‎purchases ‎driven‏ ‎by ‎advertisements. ‎Therefore, ‎the ‎primary‏ ‎goal‏ ‎of ‎marketing‏ ‎should ‎be‏ ‎to ‎assist ‎in ‎the ‎sales‏ ‎process‏ ‎by‏ ‎understanding ‎customer‏ ‎pain ‎points,‏ ‎providing ‎solutions,‏ ‎and‏ ‎addressing ‎objections.‏ ‎But ‎why ‎bother ‎with ‎alignment‏ ‎when ‎you‏ ‎can‏ ‎have ‎marketing ‎and‏ ‎sales ‎teams‏ ‎working ‎in ‎silos, ‎each‏ ‎blissfully‏ ‎unaware ‎of‏ ‎the ‎other’s‏ ‎strategies ‎and ‎challenges?

📌Bridging ‎the ‎Gap‏ ‎Between‏ ‎Sales ‎and‏ ‎Marketing: ‎The‏ ‎disconnect ‎between ‎sales ‎and ‎marketing‏ ‎teams‏ ‎in‏ ‎the ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎industry ‎can‏ ‎significantly ‎hinder‏ ‎the‏ ‎effectiveness ‎of‏ ‎both ‎functions. ‎This ‎misalignment ‎often‏ ‎results ‎in‏ ‎wasted‏ ‎resources, ‎missed ‎opportunities,‏ ‎and ‎a‏ ‎lack ‎of ‎cohesive ‎strategy.‏ ‎But‏ ‎who ‎needs‏ ‎a ‎cohesive‏ ‎strategy ‎when ‎you ‎can ‎just‏ ‎blame‏ ‎the ‎other‏ ‎team ‎for‏ ‎your ‎failures?

So, ‎grab ‎your ‎«Cybersecurity‏ ‎for‏ ‎Dummies»‏ ‎book, ‎dust‏ ‎off ‎that‏ ‎decade-old ‎email‏ ‎list,‏ ‎and ‎prepare‏ ‎to ‎learn ‎how ‎to ‎fail‏ ‎spectacularly ‎in‏ ‎the‏ ‎high-stakes ‎world ‎of‏ ‎cybersecurity ‎marketing.‏ ‎After ‎all, ‎who ‎needs‏ ‎customers‏ ‎when ‎you‏ ‎can ‎have‏ ‎a ‎perfectly ‎polished ‎strategy ‎for‏ ‎driving‏ ‎them ‎away?‏ ‎Let’s ‎dive‏ ‎in ‎and ‎discover ‎the ‎true‏ ‎meaning‏ ‎of‏ ‎«security ‎through‏ ‎obscurity» ‎—‏ ‎by ‎making‏ ‎your‏ ‎marketing ‎so‏ ‎obscure, ‎no ‎one ‎will ‎ever‏ ‎find ‎you!


Read‏ ‎further


Смотреть: 39+ мин
logo Snarky Security

OpenAI’s Spyware Overlord: The Expert with a Controversial NSA Playbook (Video)

Video ‎edition‏ ‎(check ‎out ‎different ‎players ‎if‏ ‎anything ‎doesn’t‏ ‎work)



Related‏ ‎content ‎(PDF)


Ladies ‎and‏ ‎gentlemen, ‎grab‏ ‎your ‎tinfoil ‎hats ‎and‏ ‎prepare‏ ‎for ‎a‏ ‎wild ‎ride‏ ‎through ‎the ‎labyrinth ‎of ‎cyber‏ ‎espionage‏ ‎and ‎AI‏ ‎overlords. ‎Yes,‏ ‎you ‎read ‎that ‎right. ‎OpenAI,‏ ‎in‏ ‎its‏ ‎infinite ‎wisdom,‏ ‎has ‎decided‏ ‎to ‎appoint‏ ‎none‏ ‎other ‎than‏ ‎General ‎Paul ‎M. ‎Nakasone, ‎the‏ ‎former ‎director‏ ‎of‏ ‎the ‎NSA, ‎to‏ ‎its ‎board‏ ‎of ‎directors. ‎Because ‎who‏ ‎better‏ ‎to ‎ensure‏ ‎the ‎ethical‏ ‎development ‎of ‎artificial ‎intelligence ‎than‏ ‎a‏ ‎man ‎with‏ ‎a ‎resume‏ ‎that ‎reads ‎like ‎a ‎spy‏ ‎thriller?

📌Meet‏ ‎General‏ ‎Paul ‎M.‏ ‎Nakasone: ‎General‏ ‎Nakasone ‎isn’t‏ ‎just‏ ‎any ‎retired‏ ‎military ‎officer; ‎he’s ‎the ‎longest-serving‏ ‎leader ‎of‏ ‎the‏ ‎U.S. ‎Cyber ‎Command‏ ‎and ‎former‏ ‎director ‎of ‎the ‎NSA.‏ ‎His‏ ‎resume ‎reads‏ ‎like ‎a‏ ‎who’s ‎who ‎of ‎cyber ‎warfare‏ ‎and‏ ‎digital ‎espionage.‏ ‎From ‎establishing‏ ‎the ‎NSA’s ‎Artificial ‎Intelligence ‎Security‏ ‎Center‏ ‎to‏ ‎leading ‎the‏ ‎charge ‎against‏ ‎cyber ‎threats‏ ‎from‏ ‎nation-states, ‎Nakasone’s‏ ‎expertise ‎is ‎as ‎deep ‎as‏ ‎it ‎is‏ ‎controversial.

📌The‏ ‎Safety ‎and ‎Security‏ ‎Committee: ‎In‏ ‎a ‎bid ‎to ‎fortify‏ ‎its‏ ‎defenses, ‎OpenAI‏ ‎has ‎created‏ ‎a ‎Safety ‎and ‎Security ‎Committee,‏ ‎and‏ ‎guess ‎who’s‏ ‎at ‎the‏ ‎helm? ‎That’s ‎right, ‎General ‎Nakasone.‏ ‎This‏ ‎committee‏ ‎is ‎tasked‏ ‎with ‎evaluating‏ ‎and ‎enhancing‏ ‎OpenAI’s‏ ‎security ‎measures,‏ ‎ensuring ‎that ‎their ‎AI ‎models‏ ‎are ‎as‏ ‎secure‏ ‎as ‎Fort ‎Knox.‏ ‎Or ‎at‏ ‎least, ‎that’s ‎the ‎plan.‏ ‎Given‏ ‎Nakasone’s ‎background,‏ ‎one ‎can‏ ‎only ‎wonder ‎if ‎OpenAI’s ‎definition‏ ‎of‏ ‎«security» ‎might‏ ‎lean ‎a‏ ‎bit ‎towards ‎the ‎Orwellian.

📌Industry ‎Reactions.‏ ‎Applause‏ ‎and‏ ‎Alarm ‎Bells:‏ ‎The ‎industry‏ ‎is ‎abuzz‏ ‎with‏ ‎reactions ‎to‏ ‎Nakasone’s ‎appointment. ‎Some ‎hail ‎it‏ ‎as ‎a‏ ‎masterstroke,‏ ‎bringing ‎unparalleled ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎expertise ‎to‏ ‎the ‎AI ‎frontier. ‎Others,‏ ‎however,‏ ‎are ‎less‏ ‎enthusiastic. ‎Critics‏ ‎point ‎out ‎the ‎potential ‎conflicts‏ ‎of‏ ‎interest ‎and‏ ‎the ‎murky‏ ‎waters ‎of ‎data ‎privacy ‎that‏ ‎come‏ ‎with‏ ‎a ‎former‏ ‎NSA ‎director‏ ‎overseeing ‎AI‏ ‎development.‏ ‎After ‎all,‏ ‎who ‎better ‎to ‎secure ‎your‏ ‎data ‎than‏ ‎someone‏ ‎who ‎spent ‎years‏ ‎finding ‎ways‏ ‎to ‎collect ‎it?

📌The ‎Global‏ ‎Implications: Nakasone’s‏ ‎appointment ‎isn’t‏ ‎just ‎a‏ ‎domestic ‎affair; ‎it ‎has ‎global‏ ‎ramifications.‏ ‎Countries ‎around‏ ‎the ‎world‏ ‎are ‎likely ‎to ‎scrutinize ‎OpenAI’s‏ ‎activities‏ ‎more‏ ‎closely, ‎wary‏ ‎of ‎potential‏ ‎surveillance ‎and‏ ‎data‏ ‎privacy ‎issues.‏ ‎This ‎move ‎could ‎intensify ‎the‏ ‎tech ‎cold‏ ‎war,‏ ‎with ‎nations ‎like‏ ‎China ‎and‏ ‎Russia ‎ramping ‎up ‎their‏ ‎own‏ ‎AI ‎and‏ ‎cybersecurity ‎efforts‏ ‎in ‎response.

In ‎this ‎riveting ‎this‏ ‎document,‏ ‎you’ll ‎discover‏ ‎how ‎the‏ ‎mastermind ‎behind ‎the ‎NSA’s ‎most‏ ‎controversial‏ ‎surveillance‏ ‎programs ‎is‏ ‎now ‎tasked‏ ‎with ‎guiding‏ ‎the‏ ‎future ‎of‏ ‎AI. ‎Spoiler ‎alert: ‎it’s ‎all‏ ‎about ‎«cybersecurity»‏ ‎and‏ ‎«national ‎security"—terms ‎that‏ ‎are ‎sure‏ ‎to ‎make ‎you ‎sleep‏ ‎better‏ ‎at ‎night.‏ ‎So ‎sit‏ ‎back, ‎relax, ‎and ‎enjoy ‎the‏ ‎show‏ ‎as ‎we‏ ‎delve ‎into‏ ‎the ‎fascinating ‎world ‎of ‎AI‏ ‎development‏ ‎under‏ ‎the ‎watchful‏ ‎eye ‎of‏ ‎Big ‎Brother.


Читать: 6+ мин
logo Snarky Security

Navigating Ethical and Security Concerns: Challenges Facing Nakasone and OpenAI

The ‎recent‏ ‎controversies ‎surrounding ‎OpenAI ‎highlight ‎the‏ ‎challenges ‎that‏ ‎lie‏ ‎ahead ‎in ‎ensuring‏ ‎the ‎safe‏ ‎and ‎responsible ‎development ‎of‏ ‎artificial‏ ‎intelligence. ‎The‏ ‎company's ‎handling‏ ‎of ‎the ‎Scarlett ‎Johansson ‎incident‏ ‎and‏ ‎the ‎departure‏ ‎of ‎key‏ ‎safety ‎researchers ‎have ‎raised ‎concerns‏ ‎about‏ ‎OpenAI's‏ ‎commitment ‎to‏ ‎safety ‎and‏ ‎ethical ‎considerations‏ ‎in‏ ‎its ‎pursuit‏ ‎of ‎AGI.

📌 Safety ‎and ‎Ethical ‎Concerns: The‏ ‎incident ‎with‏ ‎Scarlett‏ ‎Johansson ‎has ‎sparked‏ ‎debates ‎about‏ ‎the ‎limits ‎of ‎copyright‏ ‎and‏ ‎the ‎right‏ ‎of ‎publicity‏ ‎in ‎the ‎context ‎of ‎AI.‏ ‎The‏ ‎use ‎of‏ ‎AI ‎models‏ ‎that ‎mimic ‎human ‎voices ‎and‏ ‎likenesses‏ ‎raises‏ ‎questions ‎about‏ ‎the ‎ownership‏ ‎and ‎control‏ ‎of‏ ‎these ‎digital‏ ‎representations. ‎The ‎lack ‎of ‎transparency‏ ‎and ‎accountability‏ ‎in‏ ‎AI ‎development ‎can‏ ‎lead ‎to‏ ‎the ‎misuse ‎of ‎AI‏ ‎systems,‏ ‎which ‎can‏ ‎have ‎significant‏ ‎consequences ‎for ‎individuals ‎and ‎society.

📌 Regulatory‏ ‎Framework:‏ ‎The ‎development‏ ‎of ‎AI‏ ‎requires ‎a ‎robust ‎regulatory ‎framework‏ ‎that‏ ‎addresses‏ ‎the ‎ethical‏ ‎and ‎safety‏ ‎implications ‎of‏ ‎AI.‏ ‎The ‎lack‏ ‎of ‎clear ‎guidelines ‎and ‎regulations‏ ‎can ‎lead‏ ‎to‏ ‎the ‎misuse ‎of‏ ‎AI, ‎which‏ ‎can ‎have ‎significant ‎consequences‏ ‎for‏ ‎individuals ‎and‏ ‎society. ‎The‏ ‎need ‎for ‎a ‎comprehensive ‎regulatory‏ ‎framework‏ ‎that ‎balances‏ ‎the ‎benefits‏ ‎of ‎AI ‎with ‎the ‎need‏ ‎to‏ ‎ensure‏ ‎safety ‎and‏ ‎ethical ‎considerations‏ ‎is ‎crucial.

📌 International‏ ‎Cooperation:‏ ‎The ‎development‏ ‎of ‎AI ‎is ‎a ‎global‏ ‎endeavor ‎that‏ ‎requires‏ ‎international ‎cooperation ‎and‏ ‎collaboration. ‎The‏ ‎lack ‎of ‎global ‎standards‏ ‎and‏ ‎guidelines ‎can‏ ‎lead ‎to‏ ‎the ‎misuse ‎of ‎AI, ‎which‏ ‎can‏ ‎have ‎significant‏ ‎consequences ‎for‏ ‎individuals ‎and ‎society. ‎The ‎need‏ ‎for‏ ‎international‏ ‎cooperation ‎and‏ ‎collaboration ‎to‏ ‎establish ‎common‏ ‎standards‏ ‎and ‎guidelines‏ ‎for ‎AI ‎development ‎is ‎essential.

📌 Public‏ ‎Awareness ‎and‏ ‎Education: The‏ ‎development ‎of ‎AI‏ ‎requires ‎public‏ ‎awareness ‎and ‎education ‎about‏ ‎the‏ ‎benefits ‎and‏ ‎risks ‎of‏ ‎AI. ‎The ‎lack ‎of ‎public‏ ‎understanding‏ ‎about ‎AI‏ ‎can ‎lead‏ ‎to ‎the ‎misuse ‎of ‎AI,‏ ‎which‏ ‎can‏ ‎have ‎significant‏ ‎consequences ‎for‏ ‎individuals ‎and‏ ‎society.‏ ‎The ‎need‏ ‎for ‎public ‎awareness ‎and ‎education‏ ‎about ‎AI‏ ‎is‏ ‎crucial ‎to ‎ensure‏ ‎that ‎AI‏ ‎is ‎developed ‎and ‎used‏ ‎responsibly.

📌 Research‏ ‎and ‎Development:‏ ‎The ‎development‏ ‎of ‎AI ‎requires ‎continuous ‎research‏ ‎and‏ ‎development ‎to‏ ‎ensure ‎that‏ ‎AI ‎systems ‎are ‎safe ‎and‏ ‎beneficial.‏ ‎The‏ ‎lack ‎of‏ ‎investment ‎in‏ ‎research ‎and‏ ‎development‏ ‎can ‎lead‏ ‎to ‎the ‎misuse ‎of ‎AI,‏ ‎which ‎can‏ ‎have‏ ‎significant ‎consequences ‎for‏ ‎individuals ‎and‏ ‎society. ‎The ‎need ‎for‏ ‎continuous‏ ‎research ‎and‏ ‎development ‎is‏ ‎essential ‎to ‎ensure ‎that ‎AI‏ ‎is‏ ‎developed ‎and‏ ‎used ‎responsibly.

📌 Governance‏ ‎and ‎Oversight: ‎The ‎development ‎of‏ ‎AI‏ ‎requires‏ ‎effective ‎governance‏ ‎and ‎oversight‏ ‎to ‎ensure‏ ‎that‏ ‎AI ‎systems‏ ‎are ‎safe ‎and ‎beneficial. ‎The‏ ‎lack ‎of‏ ‎governance‏ ‎and ‎oversight ‎can‏ ‎lead ‎to‏ ‎the ‎misuse ‎of ‎AI,‏ ‎which‏ ‎can ‎have‏ ‎significant ‎consequences‏ ‎for ‎individuals ‎and ‎society. ‎The‏ ‎need‏ ‎for ‎effective‏ ‎governance ‎and‏ ‎oversight ‎is ‎crucial ‎to ‎ensure‏ ‎that‏ ‎AI‏ ‎is ‎developed‏ ‎and ‎used‏ ‎responsibly.

📌 Transparency ‎and‏ ‎Accountability: The‏ ‎development ‎of‏ ‎AI ‎requires ‎transparency ‎and ‎accountability‏ ‎to ‎ensure‏ ‎that‏ ‎AI ‎systems ‎are‏ ‎safe ‎and‏ ‎beneficial. ‎The ‎lack ‎of‏ ‎transparency‏ ‎and ‎accountability‏ ‎can ‎lead‏ ‎to ‎the ‎misuse ‎of ‎AI,‏ ‎which‏ ‎can ‎have‏ ‎significant ‎consequences‏ ‎for ‎individuals ‎and ‎society. ‎The‏ ‎need‏ ‎for‏ ‎transparency ‎and‏ ‎accountability ‎is‏ ‎crucial ‎to‏ ‎ensure‏ ‎that ‎AI‏ ‎is ‎developed ‎and ‎used ‎responsibly.

📌 Human-Centered‏ ‎Approach: ‎The‏ ‎development‏ ‎of ‎AI ‎requires‏ ‎a ‎human-centered‏ ‎approach ‎that ‎prioritizes ‎human‏ ‎well-being‏ ‎and ‎safety.‏ ‎The ‎lack‏ ‎of ‎a ‎human-centered ‎approach ‎can‏ ‎lead‏ ‎to ‎the‏ ‎misuse ‎of‏ ‎AI, ‎which ‎can ‎have ‎significant‏ ‎consequences‏ ‎for‏ ‎individuals ‎and‏ ‎society. ‎The‏ ‎need ‎for‏ ‎a‏ ‎human-centered ‎approach‏ ‎is ‎essential ‎to ‎ensure ‎that‏ ‎AI ‎is‏ ‎developed‏ ‎and ‎used ‎responsibly.

📌 Value‏ ‎Alignment: ‎The‏ ‎development ‎of ‎AI ‎requires‏ ‎value‏ ‎alignment ‎to‏ ‎ensure ‎that‏ ‎AI ‎systems ‎are ‎safe ‎and‏ ‎beneficial.‏ ‎The ‎lack‏ ‎of ‎value‏ ‎alignment ‎can ‎lead ‎to ‎the‏ ‎misuse‏ ‎of‏ ‎AI, ‎which‏ ‎can ‎have‏ ‎significant ‎consequences‏ ‎for‏ ‎individuals ‎and‏ ‎society. ‎The ‎need ‎for ‎value‏ ‎alignment ‎is‏ ‎crucial‏ ‎to ‎ensure ‎that‏ ‎AI ‎is‏ ‎developed ‎and ‎used ‎responsibly.

📌 Explainability:‏ ‎The‏ ‎development ‎of‏ ‎AI ‎requires‏ ‎explainability ‎to ‎ensure ‎that ‎AI‏ ‎systems‏ ‎are ‎safe‏ ‎and ‎beneficial.‏ ‎The ‎lack ‎of ‎explainability ‎can‏ ‎lead‏ ‎to‏ ‎the ‎misuse‏ ‎of ‎AI,‏ ‎which ‎can‏ ‎have‏ ‎significant ‎consequences‏ ‎for ‎individuals ‎and ‎society. ‎The‏ ‎need ‎for‏ ‎explainability‏ ‎is ‎essential ‎to‏ ‎ensure ‎that‏ ‎AI ‎is ‎developed ‎and‏ ‎used‏ ‎responsibly.

📌 Human ‎Oversight:‏ ‎The ‎development‏ ‎of ‎AI ‎requires ‎human ‎oversight‏ ‎to‏ ‎ensure ‎that‏ ‎AI ‎systems‏ ‎are ‎safe ‎and ‎beneficial. ‎The‏ ‎lack‏ ‎of‏ ‎human ‎oversight‏ ‎can ‎lead‏ ‎to ‎the‏ ‎misuse‏ ‎of ‎AI,‏ ‎which ‎can ‎have ‎significant ‎consequences‏ ‎for ‎individuals‏ ‎and‏ ‎society. ‎The ‎need‏ ‎for ‎human‏ ‎oversight ‎is ‎crucial ‎to‏ ‎ensure‏ ‎that ‎AI‏ ‎is ‎developed‏ ‎and ‎used ‎responsibly.

📌 Whistleblower ‎Protection: ‎The‏ ‎development‏ ‎of ‎AI‏ ‎requires ‎whistleblower‏ ‎protection ‎to ‎ensure ‎that ‎AI‏ ‎systems‏ ‎are‏ ‎safe ‎and‏ ‎beneficial. ‎The‏ ‎lack ‎of‏ ‎whistleblower‏ ‎protection ‎can‏ ‎lead ‎to ‎the ‎misuse ‎of‏ ‎AI, ‎which‏ ‎can‏ ‎have ‎significant ‎consequences‏ ‎for ‎individuals‏ ‎and ‎society. ‎The ‎need‏ ‎for‏ ‎whistleblower ‎protection‏ ‎is ‎essential‏ ‎to ‎ensure ‎that ‎AI ‎is‏ ‎developed‏ ‎and ‎used‏ ‎responsibly.

📌 Independent ‎Oversight:‏ ‎The ‎development ‎of ‎AI ‎requires‏ ‎independent‏ ‎oversight‏ ‎to ‎ensure‏ ‎that ‎AI‏ ‎systems ‎are‏ ‎safe‏ ‎and ‎beneficial.‏ ‎The ‎lack ‎of ‎independent ‎oversight‏ ‎can ‎lead‏ ‎to‏ ‎the ‎misuse ‎of‏ ‎AI, ‎which‏ ‎can ‎have ‎significant ‎consequences‏ ‎for‏ ‎individuals ‎and‏ ‎society. ‎The‏ ‎need ‎for ‎independent ‎oversight ‎is‏ ‎crucial‏ ‎to ‎ensure‏ ‎that ‎AI‏ ‎is ‎developed ‎and ‎used ‎responsibly.

📌 Public‏ ‎Engagement:‏ ‎The‏ ‎development ‎of‏ ‎AI ‎requires‏ ‎public ‎engagement‏ ‎to‏ ‎ensure ‎that‏ ‎AI ‎systems ‎are ‎safe ‎and‏ ‎beneficial. ‎The‏ ‎lack‏ ‎of ‎public ‎engagement‏ ‎can ‎lead‏ ‎to ‎the ‎misuse ‎of‏ ‎AI,‏ ‎which ‎can‏ ‎have ‎significant‏ ‎consequences ‎for ‎individuals ‎and ‎society.‏ ‎The‏ ‎need ‎for‏ ‎public ‎engagement‏ ‎is ‎crucial ‎to ‎ensure ‎that‏ ‎AI‏ ‎is‏ ‎developed ‎and‏ ‎used ‎responsibly.

📌 Continuous‏ ‎Monitoring: ‎The‏ ‎development‏ ‎of ‎AI‏ ‎requires ‎continuous ‎monitoring ‎to ‎ensure‏ ‎that ‎AI‏ ‎systems‏ ‎are ‎safe ‎and‏ ‎beneficial. ‎The‏ ‎lack ‎of ‎continuous ‎monitoring‏ ‎can‏ ‎lead ‎to‏ ‎the ‎misuse‏ ‎of ‎AI, ‎which ‎can ‎have‏ ‎significant‏ ‎consequences ‎for‏ ‎individuals ‎and‏ ‎society. ‎The ‎need ‎for ‎continuous‏ ‎monitoring‏ ‎is‏ ‎crucial ‎to‏ ‎ensure ‎that‏ ‎AI ‎is‏ ‎developed‏ ‎and ‎used‏ ‎responsibly.

📌 Cybersecurity: ‎The ‎development ‎of ‎AI‏ ‎requires ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎to‏ ‎ensure ‎that ‎AI‏ ‎systems ‎are‏ ‎safe ‎and ‎beneficial. ‎The‏ ‎lack‏ ‎of ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎can ‎lead‏ ‎to ‎the ‎misuse ‎of ‎AI,‏ ‎which‏ ‎can ‎have‏ ‎significant ‎consequences‏ ‎for ‎individuals ‎and ‎society. ‎The‏ ‎need‏ ‎for‏ ‎cybersecurity ‎is‏ ‎crucial ‎to‏ ‎ensure ‎that‏ ‎AI‏ ‎is ‎developed‏ ‎and ‎used ‎responsibly.

📌 Cybersecurity ‎Risks ‎for‏ ‎AI ‎Safety:‏ ‎The‏ ‎development ‎of ‎AI‏ ‎requires ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎to ‎ensure ‎that ‎AI‏ ‎systems‏ ‎are ‎safe‏ ‎and ‎beneficial.‏ ‎The ‎lack ‎of ‎cybersecurity ‎can‏ ‎lead‏ ‎to ‎the‏ ‎misuse ‎of‏ ‎AI, ‎which ‎can ‎have ‎significant‏ ‎consequences‏ ‎for‏ ‎individuals ‎and‏ ‎society. ‎The‏ ‎need ‎for‏ ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎is ‎crucial‏ ‎to ‎ensure ‎that ‎AI ‎is‏ ‎developed ‎and‏ ‎used‏ ‎responsibly.

Читать: 2+ мин
logo Snarky Security

Bridging Military and AI: The Potential Impact of Nakasone's Expertise on OpenAI's Development

In ‎terms‏ ‎of ‎specific ‎countries ‎and ‎companies,‏ ‎the ‎impact‏ ‎of‏ ‎the ‎appointment ‎will‏ ‎depend ‎on‏ ‎their ‎individual ‎relationships ‎with‏ ‎OpenAI‏ ‎and ‎the‏ ‎United ‎States.‏ ‎Some ‎countries, ‎such ‎as ‎China,‏ ‎may‏ ‎view ‎the‏ ‎appointment ‎as‏ ‎a ‎threat ‎to ‎their ‎national‏ ‎security‏ ‎and‏ ‎economic ‎interests,‏ ‎while ‎others,‏ ‎such ‎as‏ ‎the‏ ‎United ‎Kingdom,‏ ‎may ‎see ‎it ‎as ‎an‏ ‎opportunity ‎for‏ ‎increased‏ ‎cooperation ‎and ‎collaboration.

Companies‏ ‎worldwide ‎may‏ ‎also ‎need ‎to ‎reassess‏ ‎their‏ ‎relationships ‎with‏ ‎OpenAI ‎and‏ ‎the ‎United ‎States ‎government ‎in‏ ‎light‏ ‎of ‎the‏ ‎appointment. ‎This‏ ‎could ‎lead ‎to ‎changes ‎in‏ ‎business‏ ‎strategies,‏ ‎partnerships, ‎and‏ ‎investments ‎in‏ ‎the ‎AI‏ ‎sector.

📌 Enhanced‏ ‎Cybersecurity: ‎The‏ ‎former ‎NSA ‎director's ‎expertise ‎in‏ ‎cybersecurity ‎can‏ ‎help‏ ‎OpenAI ‎strengthen ‎its‏ ‎defenses ‎against‏ ‎cyber ‎threats, ‎which ‎is‏ ‎crucial‏ ‎in ‎today's‏ ‎interconnected ‎world.‏ ‎This ‎can ‎lead ‎to ‎increased‏ ‎trust‏ ‎in ‎OpenAI's‏ ‎products ‎and‏ ‎services ‎among ‎global ‎customers.

📌 Global ‎Surveillance‏ ‎Concerns: The‏ ‎NSA's‏ ‎history ‎of‏ ‎global ‎surveillance‏ ‎raises ‎concerns‏ ‎about‏ ‎the ‎potential‏ ‎misuse ‎of ‎OpenAI's ‎technology ‎for‏ ‎mass ‎surveillance.‏ ‎This‏ ‎could ‎lead ‎to‏ ‎increased ‎scrutiny‏ ‎from ‎governments ‎and ‎civil‏ ‎society‏ ‎organizations ‎worldwide.

📌 Impact‏ ‎on ‎Global‏ ‎Competitors: ‎The ‎appointment ‎may ‎give‏ ‎OpenAI‏ ‎a ‎competitive‏ ‎edge ‎in‏ ‎the ‎global ‎AI ‎market, ‎potentially‏ ‎threatening‏ ‎the‏ ‎interests ‎of‏ ‎other ‎AI‏ ‎companies ‎worldwide.‏ ‎This‏ ‎could ‎lead‏ ‎to ‎increased ‎competition ‎and ‎innovation‏ ‎in ‎the‏ ‎AI‏ ‎sector.

📌 Global ‎Governance: ‎The‏ ‎integration ‎of‏ ‎a ‎former ‎NSA ‎director‏ ‎into‏ ‎OpenAI's ‎board‏ ‎may ‎raise‏ ‎questions ‎about ‎the ‎governance ‎of‏ ‎AI‏ ‎development ‎and‏ ‎deployment ‎globally.‏ ‎This ‎could ‎lead ‎to ‎calls‏ ‎for‏ ‎more‏ ‎robust ‎international‏ ‎regulations ‎and‏ ‎standards ‎for‏ ‎AI‏ ‎development.

📌 National ‎Security‏ ‎Implications: The ‎appointment ‎may ‎have ‎national‏ ‎security ‎implications‏ ‎for‏ ‎countries ‎that ‎are‏ ‎not ‎aligned‏ ‎with ‎the ‎United ‎States.‏ ‎This‏ ‎could ‎lead‏ ‎to ‎increased‏ ‎tensions ‎and ‎concerns ‎about ‎the‏ ‎potential‏ ‎misuse ‎of‏ ‎AI ‎technology‏ ‎for ‎geopolitical ‎gain.

📌 Global ‎Economic ‎Impact: The‏ ‎increased‏ ‎focus‏ ‎on ‎AI‏ ‎development ‎and‏ ‎deployment ‎could‏ ‎have‏ ‎significant ‎economic‏ ‎implications ‎globally. ‎This ‎could ‎lead‏ ‎to ‎job‏ ‎displacement,‏ ‎changes ‎in ‎global‏ ‎supply ‎chains,‏ ‎and ‎shifts ‎in ‎economic‏ ‎power‏ ‎dynamics.

📌 Global ‎Cooperation:‏ ‎The ‎appointment‏ ‎may ‎also ‎lead ‎to ‎increased‏ ‎cooperation‏ ‎between ‎governments‏ ‎and ‎private‏ ‎companies ‎worldwide ‎to ‎address ‎the‏ ‎challenges‏ ‎and‏ ‎opportunities ‎posed‏ ‎by ‎AI.‏ ‎This ‎could‏ ‎lead‏ ‎to ‎the‏ ‎development ‎of ‎new ‎international ‎standards‏ ‎and ‎agreements‏ ‎on‏ ‎AI ‎development ‎and‏ ‎deployment.

Читать: 3+ мин
logo Snarky Security

OpenAI’s Spyware Overlord: The Expert with a Controversial NSA Playbook

Читать: 3+ мин
logo Snarky Security

[Announcement] OpenAI’s Spyware Overlord: The Expert with a Controversial NSA Playbook

Ladies ‎and‏ ‎gentlemen, ‎grab ‎your ‎tinfoil ‎hats‏ ‎and ‎prepare‏ ‎for‏ ‎a ‎wild ‎ride‏ ‎through ‎the‏ ‎labyrinth ‎of ‎cyber ‎espionage‏ ‎and‏ ‎AI ‎overlords.‏ ‎Yes, ‎you‏ ‎read ‎that ‎right. ‎OpenAI, ‎in‏ ‎its‏ ‎infinite ‎wisdom,‏ ‎has ‎decided‏ ‎to ‎appoint ‎none ‎other ‎than‏ ‎General‏ ‎Paul‏ ‎M. ‎Nakasone,‏ ‎the ‎former‏ ‎director ‎of‏ ‎the‏ ‎NSA, ‎to‏ ‎its ‎board ‎of ‎directors. ‎Because‏ ‎who ‎better‏ ‎to‏ ‎ensure ‎the ‎ethical‏ ‎development ‎of‏ ‎artificial ‎intelligence ‎than ‎a‏ ‎man‏ ‎with ‎a‏ ‎resume ‎that‏ ‎reads ‎like ‎a ‎spy ‎thriller?

📌Meet‏ ‎General‏ ‎Paul ‎M.‏ ‎Nakasone: ‎General‏ ‎Nakasone ‎isn’t ‎just ‎any ‎retired‏ ‎military‏ ‎officer;‏ ‎he’s ‎the‏ ‎longest-serving ‎leader‏ ‎of ‎the‏ ‎U.S.‏ ‎Cyber ‎Command‏ ‎and ‎former ‎director ‎of ‎the‏ ‎NSA. ‎His‏ ‎resume‏ ‎reads ‎like ‎a‏ ‎who’s ‎who‏ ‎of ‎cyber ‎warfare ‎and‏ ‎digital‏ ‎espionage. ‎From‏ ‎establishing ‎the‏ ‎NSA’s ‎Artificial ‎Intelligence ‎Security ‎Center‏ ‎to‏ ‎leading ‎the‏ ‎charge ‎against‏ ‎cyber ‎threats ‎from ‎nation-states, ‎Nakasone’s‏ ‎expertise‏ ‎is‏ ‎as ‎deep‏ ‎as ‎it‏ ‎is ‎controversial.

📌The‏ ‎Safety‏ ‎and ‎Security‏ ‎Committee: ‎In ‎a ‎bid ‎to‏ ‎fortify ‎its‏ ‎defenses,‏ ‎OpenAI ‎has ‎created‏ ‎a ‎Safety‏ ‎and ‎Security ‎Committee, ‎and‏ ‎guess‏ ‎who’s ‎at‏ ‎the ‎helm?‏ ‎That’s ‎right, ‎General ‎Nakasone. ‎This‏ ‎committee‏ ‎is ‎tasked‏ ‎with ‎evaluating‏ ‎and ‎enhancing ‎OpenAI’s ‎security ‎measures,‏ ‎ensuring‏ ‎that‏ ‎their ‎AI‏ ‎models ‎are‏ ‎as ‎secure‏ ‎as‏ ‎Fort ‎Knox.‏ ‎Or ‎at ‎least, ‎that’s ‎the‏ ‎plan. ‎Given‏ ‎Nakasone’s‏ ‎background, ‎one ‎can‏ ‎only ‎wonder‏ ‎if ‎OpenAI’s ‎definition ‎of‏ ‎«security»‏ ‎might ‎lean‏ ‎a ‎bit‏ ‎towards ‎the ‎Orwellian.

📌Industry ‎Reactions. ‎Applause‏ ‎and‏ ‎Alarm ‎Bells:‏ ‎The ‎industry‏ ‎is ‎abuzz ‎with ‎reactions ‎to‏ ‎Nakasone’s‏ ‎appointment.‏ ‎Some ‎hail‏ ‎it ‎as‏ ‎a ‎masterstroke,‏ ‎bringing‏ ‎unparalleled ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎expertise ‎to ‎the ‎AI ‎frontier.‏ ‎Others, ‎however,‏ ‎are‏ ‎less ‎enthusiastic. ‎Critics‏ ‎point ‎out‏ ‎the ‎potential ‎conflicts ‎of‏ ‎interest‏ ‎and ‎the‏ ‎murky ‎waters‏ ‎of ‎data ‎privacy ‎that ‎come‏ ‎with‏ ‎a ‎former‏ ‎NSA ‎director‏ ‎overseeing ‎AI ‎development. ‎After ‎all,‏ ‎who‏ ‎better‏ ‎to ‎secure‏ ‎your ‎data‏ ‎than ‎someone‏ ‎who‏ ‎spent ‎years‏ ‎finding ‎ways ‎to ‎collect ‎it?

📌The‏ ‎Global ‎Implications: Nakasone’s‏ ‎appointment‏ ‎isn’t ‎just ‎a‏ ‎domestic ‎affair;‏ ‎it ‎has ‎global ‎ramifications.‏ ‎Countries‏ ‎around ‎the‏ ‎world ‎are‏ ‎likely ‎to ‎scrutinize ‎OpenAI’s ‎activities‏ ‎more‏ ‎closely, ‎wary‏ ‎of ‎potential‏ ‎surveillance ‎and ‎data ‎privacy ‎issues.‏ ‎This‏ ‎move‏ ‎could ‎intensify‏ ‎the ‎tech‏ ‎cold ‎war,‏ ‎with‏ ‎nations ‎like‏ ‎China ‎and ‎Russia ‎ramping ‎up‏ ‎their ‎own‏ ‎AI‏ ‎and ‎cybersecurity ‎efforts‏ ‎in ‎response.

In‏ ‎this ‎riveting ‎this ‎document,‏ ‎you’ll‏ ‎discover ‎how‏ ‎the ‎mastermind‏ ‎behind ‎the ‎NSA’s ‎most ‎controversial‏ ‎surveillance‏ ‎programs ‎is‏ ‎now ‎tasked‏ ‎with ‎guiding ‎the ‎future ‎of‏ ‎AI.‏ ‎Spoiler‏ ‎alert: ‎it’s‏ ‎all ‎about‏ ‎«cybersecurity» ‎and‏ ‎«national‏ ‎security"—terms ‎that‏ ‎are ‎sure ‎to ‎make ‎you‏ ‎sleep ‎better‏ ‎at‏ ‎night. ‎So ‎sit‏ ‎back, ‎relax,‏ ‎and ‎enjoy ‎the ‎show‏ ‎as‏ ‎we ‎delve‏ ‎into ‎the‏ ‎fascinating ‎world ‎of ‎AI ‎development‏ ‎under‏ ‎the ‎watchful‏ ‎eye ‎of‏ ‎Big ‎Brother.


Continue ‎Reading

Читать: 3+ мин
logo Snarky Security

AI Race Heats Up: How Nakasone's Move Affects OpenAI's Competitors

📌 DeepMind ‎(United‏ ‎Kingdom): DeepMind, ‎a ‎leading ‎AI ‎research‏ ‎organization, ‎may‏ ‎benefit‏ ‎from ‎increased ‎scrutiny‏ ‎on ‎OpenAI's‏ ‎data ‎handling ‎practices ‎and‏ ‎potential‏ ‎security ‎risks.‏ ‎Concerns ‎about‏ ‎surveillance ‎and ‎privacy ‎could ‎drive‏ ‎some‏ ‎partners ‎and‏ ‎customers ‎to‏ ‎prefer ‎DeepMind's ‎more ‎transparent ‎and‏ ‎ethically-focused‏ ‎approach‏ ‎to ‎AI‏ ‎development.

📌 Anthropic ‎(United‏ ‎States): ‎Anthropic,‏ ‎which‏ ‎emphasizes ‎ethical‏ ‎AI ‎development, ‎could ‎see ‎a‏ ‎boost ‎in‏ ‎credibility‏ ‎and ‎support. ‎The‏ ‎appointment ‎of‏ ‎a ‎former ‎NSA ‎director‏ ‎to‏ ‎OpenAI's ‎board‏ ‎might ‎raise‏ ‎concerns ‎about ‎OpenAI's ‎commitment ‎to‏ ‎AI‏ ‎safety ‎and‏ ‎ethics, ‎potentially‏ ‎driving ‎stakeholders ‎towards ‎Anthropic's ‎more‏ ‎principled‏ ‎stance.

📌 Cohere‏ ‎(Canada): ‎Cohere,‏ ‎which ‎focuses‏ ‎on ‎developing‏ ‎language‏ ‎models ‎for‏ ‎enterprise ‎users, ‎might ‎benefit ‎from‏ ‎concerns ‎about‏ ‎OpenAI's‏ ‎data ‎handling ‎and‏ ‎security ‎practices.‏ ‎Enterprises ‎wary ‎of ‎potential‏ ‎surveillance‏ ‎implications ‎may‏ ‎prefer ‎Cohere's‏ ‎solutions, ‎which ‎could ‎be ‎perceived‏ ‎as‏ ‎more ‎secure‏ ‎and ‎privacy-conscious.

📌 Stability‏ ‎AI ‎(United ‎Kingdom): ‎Stability ‎AI,‏ ‎an‏ ‎open-source‏ ‎AI ‎research‏ ‎organization, ‎could‏ ‎attract ‎more‏ ‎support‏ ‎from ‎the‏ ‎open-source ‎community ‎and ‎stakeholders ‎concerned‏ ‎about ‎transparency.‏ ‎The‏ ‎appointment ‎of ‎a‏ ‎former ‎NSA‏ ‎director ‎might ‎lead ‎to‏ ‎fears‏ ‎of ‎increased‏ ‎surveillance, ‎making‏ ‎Stability ‎AI's ‎open-source ‎and ‎transparent‏ ‎approach‏ ‎more ‎appealing.

📌 EleutherAI‏ ‎(United ‎States):‏ ‎EleutherAI, ‎a ‎nonprofit ‎AI ‎research‏ ‎organization,‏ ‎could‏ ‎gain ‎traction‏ ‎among ‎those‏ ‎who ‎prioritize‏ ‎ethical‏ ‎AI ‎development‏ ‎and ‎transparency. ‎The ‎potential ‎for‏ ‎increased ‎surveillance‏ ‎under‏ ‎OpenAI's ‎new ‎leadership‏ ‎might ‎drive‏ ‎researchers ‎and ‎collaborators ‎towards‏ ‎EleutherAI's‏ ‎open ‎and‏ ‎ethical ‎AI‏ ‎initiatives.

📌 Hugging ‎Face ‎(United ‎States): ‎Hugging‏ ‎Face,‏ ‎known ‎for‏ ‎providing ‎AI‏ ‎models ‎and ‎tools ‎for ‎developers,‏ ‎might‏ ‎see‏ ‎increased ‎interest‏ ‎from ‎developers‏ ‎and ‎enterprises‏ ‎concerned‏ ‎about ‎privacy‏ ‎and ‎surveillance. ‎The ‎appointment ‎of‏ ‎a ‎former‏ ‎NSA‏ ‎director ‎could ‎lead‏ ‎to ‎a‏ ‎preference ‎for ‎Hugging ‎Face's‏ ‎more‏ ‎transparent ‎and‏ ‎community-driven ‎approach.

📌 Google‏ ‎AI ‎(United ‎States): ‎Google ‎AI,‏ ‎a‏ ‎major ‎player‏ ‎in ‎the‏ ‎AI ‎research ‎space, ‎might ‎leverage‏ ‎concerns‏ ‎about‏ ‎OpenAI's ‎new‏ ‎leadership ‎to‏ ‎position ‎itself‏ ‎as‏ ‎a ‎more‏ ‎trustworthy ‎and ‎secure ‎alternative. ‎Google's‏ ‎extensive ‎resources‏ ‎and‏ ‎established ‎reputation ‎could‏ ‎attract ‎partners‏ ‎and ‎customers ‎looking ‎for‏ ‎stability‏ ‎and ‎security.

📌 Tencent‏ ‎(China): ‎Tencent,‏ ‎a ‎significant ‎competitor ‎in ‎the‏ ‎AI‏ ‎space, ‎might‏ ‎use ‎the‏ ‎appointment ‎to ‎highlight ‎potential ‎security‏ ‎and‏ ‎surveillance‏ ‎risks ‎associated‏ ‎with ‎OpenAI.‏ ‎This ‎could‏ ‎strengthen‏ ‎Tencent's ‎position‏ ‎in ‎markets ‎where ‎concerns ‎about‏ ‎U.S. ‎surveillance‏ ‎are‏ ‎particularly ‎pronounced.

📌 Baidu ‎(China):‏ ‎Baidu, ‎another‏ ‎prominent ‎Chinese ‎AI ‎company,‏ ‎could‏ ‎capitalize ‎on‏ ‎the ‎appointment‏ ‎by ‎emphasizing ‎its ‎commitment ‎to‏ ‎privacy‏ ‎and ‎security.‏ ‎Concerns ‎about‏ ‎OpenAI's ‎ties ‎to ‎U.S. ‎intelligence‏ ‎could‏ ‎drive‏ ‎some ‎international‏ ‎partners ‎and‏ ‎customers ‎towards‏ ‎Baidu's‏ ‎AI ‎solutions.

📌 Alibaba‏ ‎(China): ‎Alibaba, ‎a ‎major ‎player‏ ‎in ‎the‏ ‎AI‏ ‎industry, ‎might ‎benefit‏ ‎from ‎increased‏ ‎skepticism ‎about ‎OpenAI's ‎data‏ ‎practices‏ ‎and ‎potential‏ ‎surveillance. ‎The‏ ‎company ‎could ‎attract ‎customers ‎and‏ ‎partners‏ ‎looking ‎for‏ ‎alternatives ‎to‏ ‎U.S.-based ‎AI ‎providers ‎perceived ‎as‏ ‎having‏ ‎close‏ ‎ties ‎to‏ ‎intelligence ‎agencies.

Читать: 4+ мин
logo Snarky Security

Global Implications: International Responses to Nakasone Joining OpenAI

The ‎appointment‏ ‎of ‎a ‎former ‎NSA ‎director‏ ‎to ‎OpenAI's‏ ‎board‏ ‎of ‎directors ‎is‏ ‎obviously ‎to‏ ‎have ‎far-reaching ‎implications ‎for‏ ‎international‏ ‎relations ‎and‏ ‎global ‎security.‏ ‎Countries ‎around ‎the ‎world ‎may‏ ‎respond‏ ‎with ‎increased‏ ‎scrutiny, ‎regulatory‏ ‎actions, ‎and ‎efforts ‎to ‎enhance‏ ‎their‏ ‎own‏ ‎AI ‎capabilities.‏ ‎The ‎global‏ ‎community ‎may‏ ‎also‏ ‎push ‎for‏ ‎stronger ‎international ‎regulations ‎and ‎ethical‏ ‎guidelines ‎to‏ ‎govern‏ ‎the ‎use ‎of‏ ‎AI ‎in‏ ‎national ‎security.

European ‎Union

📌 Increased ‎Scrutiny:‏ ‎The‏ ‎European ‎Union‏ ‎(EU) ‎is‏ ‎to ‎scrutinize ‎OpenAI's ‎activities ‎more‏ ‎closely,‏ ‎given ‎its‏ ‎stringent ‎data‏ ‎protection ‎regulations ‎under ‎the ‎General‏ ‎Data‏ ‎Protection‏ ‎Regulation ‎(GDPR).‏ ‎Concerns ‎about‏ ‎privacy ‎and‏ ‎data‏ ‎security ‎could‏ ‎lead ‎to ‎more ‎rigorous ‎oversight‏ ‎and ‎potential‏ ‎regulatory‏ ‎actions ‎against ‎OpenAI.

📌 Calls‏ ‎for ‎Transparency:‏ ‎European ‎countries ‎may ‎demand‏ ‎greater‏ ‎transparency ‎from‏ ‎OpenAI ‎regarding‏ ‎its ‎data ‎handling ‎practices ‎and‏ ‎the‏ ‎extent ‎of‏ ‎its ‎collaboration‏ ‎with ‎U.S. ‎intelligence ‎agencies. ‎This‏ ‎could‏ ‎lead‏ ‎to ‎increased‏ ‎pressure ‎on‏ ‎OpenAI ‎to‏ ‎disclose‏ ‎more ‎information‏ ‎about ‎its ‎operations ‎and ‎partnerships.

China

📌 Heightened‏ ‎Tensions: China's ‎government‏ ‎may‏ ‎view ‎the ‎appointment‏ ‎as ‎a‏ ‎strategic ‎move ‎by ‎the‏ ‎U.S.‏ ‎to ‎enhance‏ ‎its ‎AI‏ ‎capabilities ‎for ‎national ‎security ‎purposes.‏ ‎This‏ ‎could ‎exacerbate‏ ‎existing ‎tensions‏ ‎between ‎the ‎two ‎countries, ‎particularly‏ ‎in‏ ‎the‏ ‎realm ‎of‏ ‎technology ‎and‏ ‎cybersecurity.

📌 Accelerated ‎AI‏ ‎Development:‏ ‎In ‎response,‏ ‎China ‎may ‎accelerate ‎its ‎own‏ ‎AI ‎development‏ ‎initiatives‏ ‎to ‎maintain ‎its‏ ‎competitive ‎edge.‏ ‎This ‎could ‎lead ‎to‏ ‎increased‏ ‎investments ‎in‏ ‎AI ‎research‏ ‎and ‎development, ‎as ‎well ‎as‏ ‎efforts‏ ‎to ‎enhance‏ ‎its ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎measures.

Russia

📌 Suspicion ‎and ‎Countermeasures: ‎Russia ‎is‏ ‎likely‏ ‎to‏ ‎view ‎the‏ ‎NSA's ‎involvement‏ ‎in ‎OpenAI‏ ‎with‏ ‎suspicion, ‎interpreting‏ ‎it ‎as ‎an ‎attempt ‎to‏ ‎extend ‎U.S.‏ ‎influence‏ ‎in ‎the ‎AI‏ ‎sector. ‎This‏ ‎could ‎prompt ‎Russia ‎to‏ ‎implement‏ ‎countermeasures, ‎such‏ ‎as ‎bolstering‏ ‎its ‎own ‎AI ‎capabilities ‎and‏ ‎enhancing‏ ‎its ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎defenses.

📌 Anticipate of ‎Cyber‏ ‎Activities: The ‎United ‎States ‎may ‎anticipate‏ ‎an‏ ‎escalation‏ ‎in ‎Russian‏ ‎cyber ‎activities‏ ‎targeting ‎its‏ ‎artificial‏ ‎intelligence ‎(AI)‏ ‎infrastructure, ‎aiming ‎to ‎gather ‎intelligence‏ ‎or ‎disrupt‏ ‎operations.‏ ‎

Middle ‎East

📌 Security ‎Concerns: Countries‏ ‎in ‎the‏ ‎Middle ‎East ‎may ‎express‏ ‎concerns‏ ‎about ‎the‏ ‎potential ‎for‏ ‎AI ‎technologies ‎to ‎be ‎used‏ ‎for‏ ‎surveillance ‎and‏ ‎intelligence ‎gathering.‏ ‎This ‎could ‎lead ‎to ‎calls‏ ‎for‏ ‎international‏ ‎regulations ‎to‏ ‎govern ‎the‏ ‎use ‎of‏ ‎AI‏ ‎in ‎national‏ ‎security.

📌 Regional ‎Cooperation: ‎Some ‎Middle ‎Eastern‏ ‎countries ‎may‏ ‎seek‏ ‎to ‎cooperate ‎with‏ ‎other ‎nations‏ ‎to ‎develop ‎their ‎own‏ ‎AI‏ ‎capabilities, ‎reducing‏ ‎their ‎reliance‏ ‎on ‎U.S. ‎technology ‎and ‎mitigating‏ ‎potential‏ ‎security ‎risks.

Africa

📌 Cautious‏ ‎Optimism: African ‎nations‏ ‎may ‎view ‎the ‎NSA's ‎involvement‏ ‎in‏ ‎OpenAI‏ ‎with ‎cautious‏ ‎optimism, ‎recognizing‏ ‎the ‎potential‏ ‎benefits‏ ‎of ‎AI‏ ‎for ‎economic ‎development ‎and ‎security.‏ ‎However, ‎they‏ ‎may‏ ‎also ‎be ‎wary‏ ‎of ‎the‏ ‎implications ‎for ‎data ‎privacy‏ ‎and‏ ‎sovereignty.

📌 Capacity ‎Building:‏ ‎In ‎response,‏ ‎African ‎countries ‎may ‎focus ‎on‏ ‎building‏ ‎their ‎own‏ ‎AI ‎capacities,‏ ‎investing ‎in ‎education ‎and ‎infrastructure‏ ‎to‏ ‎harness‏ ‎the ‎benefits‏ ‎of ‎AI‏ ‎while ‎safeguarding‏ ‎against‏ ‎potential ‎risks.

Latin‏ ‎America

📌 Regulatory ‎Responses: ‎Latin ‎American ‎countries‏ ‎may ‎respond‏ ‎by‏ ‎strengthening ‎their ‎regulatory‏ ‎frameworks ‎to‏ ‎ensure ‎that ‎AI ‎technologies‏ ‎are‏ ‎used ‎responsibly‏ ‎and ‎ethically.‏ ‎This ‎could ‎involve ‎the ‎development‏ ‎of‏ ‎new ‎laws‏ ‎and ‎policies‏ ‎to ‎govern ‎AI ‎use ‎and‏ ‎protect‏ ‎citizens'‏ ‎rights.

📌 Collaborative ‎Efforts: Some‏ ‎countries ‎in‏ ‎the ‎region‏ ‎may‏ ‎seek ‎to‏ ‎collaborate ‎with ‎international ‎organizations ‎and‏ ‎other ‎nations‏ ‎to‏ ‎develop ‎best ‎practices‏ ‎for ‎AI‏ ‎governance ‎and ‎security.

Global ‎Implications

📌 International‏ ‎Regulations:‏ ‎The ‎NSA's‏ ‎involvement ‎in‏ ‎OpenAI ‎could ‎lead ‎to ‎increased‏ ‎calls‏ ‎for ‎international‏ ‎regulations ‎to‏ ‎govern ‎the ‎use ‎of ‎AI‏ ‎in‏ ‎national‏ ‎security. ‎This‏ ‎could ‎involve‏ ‎the ‎development‏ ‎of‏ ‎treaties ‎and‏ ‎agreements ‎to ‎ensure ‎that ‎AI‏ ‎technologies ‎are‏ ‎used‏ ‎responsibly ‎and ‎ethically.

📌 Ethical‏ ‎Considerations: The ‎global‏ ‎community ‎may ‎place ‎greater‏ ‎emphasis‏ ‎on ‎the‏ ‎ethical ‎implications‏ ‎of ‎AI ‎development, ‎advocating ‎for‏ ‎transparency,‏ ‎accountability, ‎and‏ ‎the ‎protection‏ ‎of ‎human ‎rights ‎in ‎the‏ ‎use‏ ‎of‏ ‎AI ‎technologies.

Читать: 2+ мин
logo Snarky Security

Tech Giants Respond: Industry Perspectives on Nakasone's Appointment to OpenAI

While ‎Nakasone's‏ ‎appointment ‎has ‎been ‎met ‎with‏ ‎both ‎positive‏ ‎and‏ ‎negative ‎reactions, ‎the‏ ‎general ‎consensus‏ ‎is ‎that ‎his ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎expertise‏ ‎will ‎be‏ ‎beneficial ‎to‏ ‎OpenAI. ‎However, ‎concerns ‎about ‎transparency‏ ‎and‏ ‎potential ‎conflicts‏ ‎of ‎interest‏ ‎remain, ‎and ‎it ‎is ‎crucial‏ ‎for‏ ‎OpenAI‏ ‎to ‎address‏ ‎these ‎issues‏ ‎to ‎ensure‏ ‎the‏ ‎safe ‎and‏ ‎responsible ‎development ‎of ‎AGI.

Positive ‎Reactions

📌 Cybersecurity‏ ‎Expertise: Many ‎have‏ ‎welcomed‏ ‎Nakasone's ‎appointment, ‎citing‏ ‎his ‎extensive‏ ‎experience ‎in ‎cybersecurity ‎and‏ ‎national‏ ‎security ‎as‏ ‎a ‎significant‏ ‎asset ‎to ‎OpenAI. ‎His ‎insights‏ ‎are‏ ‎expected ‎to‏ ‎enhance ‎the‏ ‎company's ‎safety ‎and ‎security ‎practices,‏ ‎particularly‏ ‎in‏ ‎the ‎development‏ ‎of ‎artificial‏ ‎general ‎intelligence‏ ‎(AGI).

📌 Commitment‏ ‎to ‎Security:‏ ‎Nakasone's ‎addition ‎to ‎the ‎board‏ ‎underscores ‎OpenAI's‏ ‎commitment‏ ‎to ‎prioritizing ‎security‏ ‎in ‎its‏ ‎AI ‎initiatives. ‎This ‎move‏ ‎is‏ ‎seen ‎as‏ ‎a ‎positive‏ ‎step ‎towards ‎ensuring ‎that ‎AI‏ ‎developments‏ ‎adhere ‎to‏ ‎the ‎highest‏ ‎standards ‎of ‎safety ‎and ‎ethical‏ ‎considerations.

📌 Calming‏ ‎Influence:‏ ‎Nakasone's ‎background‏ ‎and ‎connections‏ ‎are ‎believed‏ ‎to‏ ‎provide ‎a‏ ‎calming ‎influence ‎for ‎concerned ‎shareholders,‏ ‎as ‎his‏ ‎expertise‏ ‎and ‎reputation ‎can‏ ‎help ‎alleviate‏ ‎fears ‎about ‎the ‎potential‏ ‎risks‏ ‎associated ‎with‏ ‎OpenAI's ‎rapid‏ ‎expansion.

Negative ‎Reactions

📌 Questionable ‎Data ‎Acquisition: Some ‎critics‏ ‎have‏ ‎raised ‎concerns‏ ‎about ‎Nakasone's‏ ‎past ‎involvement ‎in ‎the ‎acquisition‏ ‎of‏ ‎questionable‏ ‎data ‎for‏ ‎the ‎NSA's‏ ‎surveillance ‎networks.‏ ‎This‏ ‎has ‎led‏ ‎to ‎comparisons ‎with ‎OpenAI's ‎own‏ ‎practices ‎of‏ ‎collecting‏ ‎large ‎amounts ‎of‏ ‎data ‎from‏ ‎the ‎internet, ‎which ‎some‏ ‎argue‏ ‎may ‎not‏ ‎be ‎entirely‏ ‎ethical.

📌 Lack ‎of ‎Transparency: ‎The ‎exact‏ ‎functions‏ ‎and ‎operations‏ ‎of ‎the‏ ‎Safety ‎and ‎Security ‎Committee, ‎which‏ ‎Nakasone‏ ‎will‏ ‎join, ‎remain‏ ‎unclear. ‎This‏ ‎lack ‎of‏ ‎transparency‏ ‎has ‎raised‏ ‎concerns ‎among ‎some ‎observers, ‎particularly‏ ‎given ‎the‏ ‎recent‏ ‎departures ‎of ‎key‏ ‎safety ‎personnel‏ ‎from ‎OpenAI.

📌 Potential ‎Conflicts ‎of‏ ‎Interest: Some‏ ‎have ‎questioned‏ ‎whether ‎Nakasone's‏ ‎military ‎and ‎intelligence ‎background ‎may‏ ‎lead‏ ‎to ‎conflicts‏ ‎of ‎interest,‏ ‎particularly ‎if ‎OpenAI's ‎AI ‎technologies‏ ‎are‏ ‎used‏ ‎for ‎national‏ ‎security ‎or‏ ‎defense ‎purposes.

Читать: 2+ мин
logo Snarky Security

Securing the Future of AI: Nakasone's Role on OpenAI's Safety and Security Committee

 Key ‎Responsibilities

📌 Safety‏ ‎and ‎Security ‎Committee: ‎Nakasone ‎will‏ ‎join ‎OpenAI's‏ ‎Safety‏ ‎and ‎Security ‎Committee,‏ ‎which ‎is‏ ‎responsible ‎for ‎making ‎recommendations‏ ‎to‏ ‎the ‎full‏ ‎board ‎on‏ ‎critical ‎safety ‎and ‎security ‎decisions‏ ‎for‏ ‎all ‎OpenAI‏ ‎projects ‎and‏ ‎operations. ‎The ‎committee's ‎initial ‎task‏ ‎is‏ ‎to‏ ‎evaluate ‎and‏ ‎further ‎develop‏ ‎OpenAI's ‎processes‏ ‎and‏ ‎safeguards ‎over‏ ‎the ‎next ‎90 ‎days.

📌 Cybersecurity ‎Guidance:‏ ‎Nakasone's ‎insights‏ ‎will‏ ‎contribute ‎to ‎OpenAI's‏ ‎efforts ‎to‏ ‎better ‎understand ‎how ‎AI‏ ‎can‏ ‎be ‎used‏ ‎to ‎strengthen‏ ‎cybersecurity ‎by ‎quickly ‎detecting ‎and‏ ‎responding‏ ‎to ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎threats.

📌 Board ‎Oversight:‏ ‎As ‎a ‎member ‎of ‎the‏ ‎board‏ ‎of‏ ‎directors, ‎Nakasone‏ ‎will ‎exercise‏ ‎oversight ‎over‏ ‎OpenAI's‏ ‎safety ‎and‏ ‎security ‎decisions, ‎ensuring ‎that ‎the‏ ‎company's ‎mission‏ ‎to‏ ‎ensure ‎AGI ‎benefits‏ ‎all ‎of‏ ‎humanity ‎is ‎aligned ‎with‏ ‎its‏ ‎cybersecurity ‎practices.

Impact‏ ‎on ‎OpenAI

Nakasone's‏ ‎appointment ‎is ‎significant ‎for ‎OpenAI,‏ ‎as‏ ‎it ‎underscores‏ ‎the ‎company's‏ ‎commitment ‎to ‎safety ‎and ‎security‏ ‎in‏ ‎the‏ ‎development ‎of‏ ‎AGI. ‎His‏ ‎expertise ‎will‏ ‎help‏ ‎guide ‎OpenAI‏ ‎in ‎achieving ‎its ‎mission ‎and‏ ‎ensuring ‎that‏ ‎its‏ ‎AI ‎systems ‎are‏ ‎securely ‎built‏ ‎and ‎deployed. ‎The ‎addition‏ ‎of‏ ‎Nakasone ‎to‏ ‎the ‎board‏ ‎also ‎reflects ‎OpenAI's ‎efforts ‎to‏ ‎strengthen‏ ‎its ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎posture ‎and‏ ‎address ‎concerns ‎about ‎the ‎potential‏ ‎risks‏ ‎associated‏ ‎with ‎advanced‏ ‎AI ‎systems.

Industry‏ ‎Reactions

Industry ‎experts‏ ‎have‏ ‎welcomed ‎Nakasone's‏ ‎appointment, ‎noting ‎that ‎his ‎experience‏ ‎in ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎and‏ ‎national ‎security ‎will‏ ‎be ‎invaluable‏ ‎in ‎guiding ‎OpenAI's ‎safety‏ ‎and‏ ‎security ‎efforts.‏ ‎The ‎move‏ ‎is ‎seen ‎as ‎a ‎positive‏ ‎step‏ ‎towards ‎ensuring‏ ‎that ‎AI‏ ‎development ‎is ‎aligned ‎with ‎safety‏ ‎and‏ ‎security‏ ‎considerations.

Future ‎Directions:‏ ‎

As ‎OpenAI‏ ‎continues ‎to‏ ‎develop‏ ‎its ‎AGI‏ ‎capabilities, ‎Nakasone's ‎role ‎will ‎be‏ ‎crucial ‎in‏ ‎ensuring‏ ‎that ‎the ‎company's‏ ‎safety ‎and‏ ‎security ‎practices ‎evolve ‎to‏ ‎meet‏ ‎the ‎challenges‏ ‎posed ‎by‏ ‎increasingly ‎sophisticated ‎AI ‎systems. ‎His‏ ‎expertise‏ ‎will ‎help‏ ‎inform ‎OpenAI's‏ ‎approach ‎to ‎cybersecurity ‎and ‎ensure‏ ‎that‏ ‎the‏ ‎company's ‎AI‏ ‎systems ‎are‏ ‎designed ‎with‏ ‎safety‏ ‎and ‎security‏ ‎in ‎mind.

Читать: 5+ мин
logo Snarky Security

From NSA to AI: General Paul Nakasone's Cybersecurity Legacy

General ‎Paul‏ ‎Nakasone, ‎the ‎former ‎commander ‎of‏ ‎U.S. ‎Cyber‏ ‎Command‏ ‎and ‎director ‎of‏ ‎the ‎National‏ ‎Security ‎Agency ‎(NSA), ‎has‏ ‎extensive‏ ‎cybersecurity ‎expertise.‏ ‎His ‎leadership‏ ‎roles ‎have ‎been ‎instrumental ‎in‏ ‎shaping‏ ‎the ‎U.S.‏ ‎military's ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎posture ‎and ‎ensuring ‎the ‎nation's‏ ‎defense‏ ‎against‏ ‎cyber ‎threats.

Key‏ ‎Roles ‎and‏ ‎Responsibilities

📌Commander, ‎U.S.‏ ‎Cyber‏ ‎Command: ‎Nakasone‏ ‎led ‎U.S. ‎Cyber ‎Command, ‎which‏ ‎is ‎responsible‏ ‎for‏ ‎defending ‎the ‎Department‏ ‎of ‎Defense‏ ‎(DoD) ‎information ‎networks ‎and‏ ‎conducting‏ ‎cyber ‎operations‏ ‎to ‎support‏ ‎military ‎operations ‎and ‎national ‎security‏ ‎objectives.

📌Director,‏ ‎National ‎Security‏ ‎Agency ‎(NSA):‏ ‎As ‎the ‎director ‎of ‎the‏ ‎NSA,‏ ‎Nakasone‏ ‎oversaw ‎the‏ ‎agency's ‎efforts‏ ‎to ‎gather‏ ‎and‏ ‎analyze ‎foreign‏ ‎intelligence, ‎protect ‎U.S. ‎information ‎systems,‏ ‎and ‎provide‏ ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎guidance ‎to ‎the‏ ‎U.S. ‎government‏ ‎and ‎private ‎sector.

📌Chief, ‎Central‏ ‎Security‏ ‎Service ‎(CSS): Nakasone‏ ‎also ‎served‏ ‎as ‎the ‎chief ‎of ‎the‏ ‎Central‏ ‎Security ‎Service,‏ ‎which ‎is‏ ‎responsible ‎for ‎providing ‎cryptographic ‎and‏ ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎support‏ ‎to ‎the‏ ‎U.S. ‎military‏ ‎and ‎other‏ ‎government‏ ‎agencies.

Cybersecurity ‎Initiatives‏ ‎and ‎Achievements

📌 Establishment ‎of ‎the ‎NSA's‏ ‎Artificial ‎Intelligence‏ ‎Security‏ ‎Center: Nakasone ‎launched ‎the‏ ‎NSA's ‎Artificial‏ ‎Intelligence ‎Security ‎Center, ‎which‏ ‎focuses‏ ‎on ‎protecting‏ ‎AI ‎systems‏ ‎from ‎learning, ‎doing, ‎and ‎revealing‏ ‎the‏ ‎wrong ‎thing.‏ ‎The ‎center‏ ‎aims ‎to ‎ensure ‎the ‎confidentiality,‏ ‎integrity,‏ ‎and‏ ‎availability ‎of‏ ‎information ‎and‏ ‎services.

📌 Cybersecurity ‎Collaboration‏ ‎Center: Nakasone‏ ‎established ‎the‏ ‎Cybersecurity ‎Collaboration ‎Center, ‎which ‎brings‏ ‎together ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎experts‏ ‎from ‎the ‎NSA,‏ ‎industry, ‎and‏ ‎academia ‎to ‎share ‎insights,‏ ‎tradecraft,‏ ‎and ‎threat‏ ‎information.

📌Hunt ‎Forward‏ ‎Operations: Under ‎Nakasone's ‎leadership, ‎U.S. ‎Cyber‏ ‎Command‏ ‎conducted ‎hunt‏ ‎forward ‎operations,‏ ‎which ‎involve ‎sending ‎cyber ‎teams‏ ‎to‏ ‎partner‏ ‎countries ‎to‏ ‎hunt ‎for‏ ‎malicious ‎cyber‏ ‎activity‏ ‎on ‎their‏ ‎networks.

📌 Cybersecurity ‎Guidance ‎and ‎Standards: ‎Nakasone‏ ‎played ‎a‏ ‎key‏ ‎role ‎in ‎developing‏ ‎and ‎promoting‏ ‎cybersecurity ‎guidance ‎and ‎standards‏ ‎for‏ ‎the ‎U.S.‏ ‎government ‎and‏ ‎private ‎sector, ‎including ‎the ‎National‏ ‎Institute‏ ‎of ‎Standards‏ ‎and ‎Technology‏ ‎(NIST) ‎Cybersecurity ‎Framework.

Awards ‎and ‎Recognition

Nakasone‏ ‎has‏ ‎received‏ ‎numerous ‎awards‏ ‎and ‎recognition‏ ‎for ‎his‏ ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎expertise ‎and‏ ‎leadership, ‎including:

📌 2022 Wash100 ‎Award: ‎Nakasone ‎received‏ ‎the ‎2022‏ ‎Wash100‏ ‎Award ‎for ‎his‏ ‎leadership ‎in‏ ‎cybersecurity ‎and ‎his ‎efforts‏ ‎to‏ ‎boost ‎the‏ ‎U.S. ‎military's‏ ‎defenses ‎against ‎cyber ‎threats.

📌2023 Cybersecurity ‎Person‏ ‎of‏ ‎the ‎Year:‏ ‎Nakasone ‎was‏ ‎named ‎the ‎2023 ‎Cybersecurity ‎Person‏ ‎of‏ ‎the‏ ‎Year ‎by‏ ‎Cybercrime ‎Magazine‏ ‎for ‎his‏ ‎outstanding‏ ‎contributions ‎to‏ ‎the ‎cybersecurity ‎industry.

Post-Military ‎Career

After ‎retiring‏ ‎from ‎the‏ ‎military,‏ ‎Nakasone ‎joined ‎OpenAI's‏ ‎board ‎of‏ ‎directors, ‎where ‎he ‎will‏ ‎contribute‏ ‎his ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎expertise ‎to‏ ‎the ‎development ‎of ‎AI ‎technologies.‏ ‎He‏ ‎also ‎became‏ ‎the ‎founding‏ ‎director ‎of ‎Vanderbilt ‎University's ‎Institute‏ ‎for‏ ‎National‏ ‎Defense ‎and‏ ‎Global ‎Security,‏ ‎where ‎he‏ ‎will‏ ‎lead ‎research‏ ‎and ‎education ‎initiatives ‎focused ‎on‏ ‎national ‎security‏ ‎and‏ ‎global ‎stability.

Spyware ‎activities‏ ‎and ‎campaigns

📌 SolarWinds‏ ‎Hack: ‎Nakasone ‎was ‎involved‏ ‎in‏ ‎the ‎response‏ ‎to ‎the‏ ‎SolarWinds ‎hack, ‎which ‎was ‎attributed‏ ‎to‏ ‎Russian ‎hackers.‏ ‎He ‎acknowledged‏ ‎that ‎the ‎U.S. ‎government ‎lacked‏ ‎visibility‏ ‎into‏ ‎the ‎hacking‏ ‎campaign, ‎which‏ ‎exploited ‎domestic‏ ‎internet‏ ‎infrastructure.

📌 Microsoft ‎Exchange‏ ‎Server ‎Hack: ‎Nakasone ‎also ‎addressed‏ ‎the ‎Microsoft‏ ‎Exchange‏ ‎Server ‎hack, ‎which‏ ‎was ‎attributed‏ ‎to ‎Chinese ‎hackers. ‎He‏ ‎emphasized‏ ‎the ‎need‏ ‎for ‎better‏ ‎visibility ‎into ‎domestic ‎campaigns ‎and‏ ‎the‏ ‎importance ‎of‏ ‎partnerships ‎between‏ ‎the ‎government ‎and ‎private ‎sector‏ ‎to‏ ‎combat‏ ‎such ‎threats.

📌 Russian‏ ‎and ‎Chinese‏ ‎Hacking: ‎Nakasone‏ ‎has‏ ‎spoken ‎about‏ ‎the ‎persistent ‎threat ‎posed ‎by‏ ‎Russian ‎and‏ ‎Chinese‏ ‎hackers, ‎highlighting ‎their‏ ‎sophistication ‎and‏ ‎intent ‎to ‎compromise ‎U.S.‏ ‎critical‏ ‎infrastructure.

📌 Cybersecurity ‎Collaboration‏ ‎Center: ‎Nakasone‏ ‎has ‎emphasized ‎the ‎importance ‎of‏ ‎the‏ ‎NSA's ‎Cybersecurity‏ ‎Collaboration ‎Center,‏ ‎which ‎partners ‎with ‎the ‎domestic‏ ‎private‏ ‎sector‏ ‎to ‎rapidly‏ ‎communicate ‎and‏ ‎share ‎threat‏ ‎information.

📌 Hunt‏ ‎Forward ‎Operations:‏ ‎Nakasone ‎has ‎discussed ‎the ‎concept‏ ‎of ‎"hunt‏ ‎forward"‏ ‎operations, ‎where ‎U.S.‏ ‎Cyber ‎Command‏ ‎teams ‎are ‎sent ‎to‏ ‎partner‏ ‎countries ‎to‏ ‎hunt ‎for‏ ‎malware ‎and ‎other ‎cyber ‎threats‏ ‎on‏ ‎their ‎networks

Leadership‏ ‎impact

📌 Cybersecurity ‎Collaboration‏ ‎Center: Nakasone ‎established ‎the ‎Cybersecurity ‎Collaboration‏ ‎Center,‏ ‎which‏ ‎aims ‎to‏ ‎share ‎threat‏ ‎information ‎and‏ ‎best‏ ‎practices ‎with‏ ‎the ‎private ‎sector ‎to ‎enhance‏ ‎cybersecurity.

📌 Artificial ‎Intelligence‏ ‎Security‏ ‎Center: ‎Nakasone ‎launched‏ ‎the ‎Artificial‏ ‎Intelligence ‎Security ‎Center ‎to‏ ‎focus‏ ‎on ‎protecting‏ ‎AI ‎systems‏ ‎from ‎learning, ‎doing, ‎and ‎revealing‏ ‎the‏ ‎wrong ‎thing.

📌 Hunt‏ ‎Forward ‎Operations:‏ ‎Nakasone ‎oversaw ‎the ‎development ‎of‏ ‎Hunt‏ ‎Forward‏ ‎Operations, ‎which‏ ‎involves ‎sending‏ ‎cyber ‎teams‏ ‎to‏ ‎partner ‎countries‏ ‎to ‎hunt ‎for ‎malicious ‎cyber‏ ‎activity ‎on‏ ‎their‏ ‎networks.

📌 Election ‎Security: ‎Nakasone‏ ‎played ‎a‏ ‎crucial ‎role ‎in ‎defending‏ ‎U.S.‏ ‎elections ‎from‏ ‎foreign ‎interference,‏ ‎including ‎the ‎2022 ‎midterm ‎election.

📌 Ransomware‏ ‎Combat:‏ ‎Nakasone ‎acknowledged‏ ‎the ‎growing‏ ‎threat ‎of ‎ransomware ‎and ‎took‏ ‎steps‏ ‎to‏ ‎combat ‎it,‏ ‎including ‎launching‏ ‎an ‎offensive‏ ‎strike‏ ‎against ‎the‏ ‎Internet ‎Research ‎Agency.

📌 Cybersecurity ‎Alerts: Nakasone ‎emphasized‏ ‎the ‎importance‏ ‎of‏ ‎issuing ‎security ‎alerts‏ ‎alongside ‎other‏ ‎federal ‎agencies ‎to ‎warn‏ ‎the‏ ‎general ‎public‏ ‎about ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎dangers.

📌 Cybersecurity ‎Collaboration: ‎Nakasone ‎fostered ‎collaboration‏ ‎between‏ ‎the ‎NSA‏ ‎and ‎other‏ ‎government ‎agencies, ‎as ‎well ‎as‏ ‎with‏ ‎the‏ ‎private ‎sector,‏ ‎to ‎enhance‏ ‎cybersecurity ‎efforts.

📌 China‏ ‎Outcomes‏ ‎Group: Nakasone ‎created‏ ‎a ‎combined ‎USCYBERCOM-NSA ‎China ‎Outcomes‏ ‎Group ‎to‏ ‎oversee‏ ‎efforts ‎to ‎counter‏ ‎Chinese ‎cyber‏ ‎threats

Читать: 3+ мин
logo Snarky Security

OpenAI's Strategic Move: Welcoming Cybersecurity Expertise to the Board

OpenAI, ‎a‏ ‎leading ‎artificial ‎intelligence ‎research ‎organization,‏ ‎has ‎appointed‏ ‎retired‏ ‎U.S. ‎Army ‎General‏ ‎Paul ‎M.‏ ‎Nakasone, ‎former ‎director ‎of‏ ‎the‏ ‎National ‎Security‏ ‎Agency ‎(NSA),‏ ‎to ‎its ‎board ‎of ‎directors.‏ ‎Nakasone,‏ ‎who ‎served‏ ‎as ‎the‏ ‎longest-serving ‎leader ‎of ‎U.S. ‎Cyber‏ ‎Command‏ ‎and‏ ‎NSA, ‎brings‏ ‎extensive ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎expertise ‎to‏ ‎OpenAI.‏ ‎This ‎appointment‏ ‎underscores ‎OpenAI's ‎commitment ‎to ‎ensuring‏ ‎the ‎safe‏ ‎and‏ ‎beneficial ‎development ‎of‏ ‎artificial ‎general‏ ‎intelligence ‎(AGI).

In ‎a ‎significant‏ ‎move‏ ‎to ‎bolster‏ ‎its ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎capabilities, ‎OpenAI, ‎a ‎leading ‎artificial‏ ‎intelligence‏ ‎research ‎and‏ ‎development ‎company,‏ ‎has ‎appointed ‎retired ‎U.S. ‎Army‏ ‎General‏ ‎Paul‏ ‎M. ‎Nakasone‏ ‎to ‎its‏ ‎board ‎of‏ ‎directors.‏ ‎Nakasone, ‎who‏ ‎previously ‎served ‎as ‎the ‎director‏ ‎of ‎the‏ ‎National‏ ‎Security ‎Agency ‎(NSA)‏ ‎and ‎the‏ ‎commander ‎of ‎U.S. ‎Cyber‏ ‎Command,‏ ‎brings ‎extensive‏ ‎experience ‎in‏ ‎cybersecurity ‎and ‎national ‎security ‎to‏ ‎the‏ ‎table. ‎His‏ ‎appointment ‎underscores‏ ‎OpenAI's ‎commitment ‎to ‎ensuring ‎the‏ ‎safe‏ ‎and‏ ‎beneficial ‎development‏ ‎of ‎artificial‏ ‎general ‎intelligence‏ ‎(AGI).

Nakasone's‏ ‎military ‎career‏ ‎spanned ‎over ‎three ‎decades, ‎during‏ ‎which ‎he‏ ‎played‏ ‎a ‎pivotal ‎role‏ ‎in ‎shaping‏ ‎the ‎U.S. ‎military's ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎posture.‏ ‎As ‎the‏ ‎longest-serving ‎leader‏ ‎of ‎U.S. ‎Cyber ‎Command, ‎he‏ ‎oversaw‏ ‎the ‎creation‏ ‎of ‎the‏ ‎command ‎and ‎was ‎instrumental ‎in‏ ‎developing‏ ‎the‏ ‎country's ‎cyber‏ ‎defense ‎capabilities.‏ ‎His ‎tenure‏ ‎at‏ ‎the ‎NSA‏ ‎saw ‎the ‎establishment ‎of ‎the‏ ‎Artificial ‎Intelligence‏ ‎Security‏ ‎Center, ‎which ‎focuses‏ ‎on ‎safeguarding‏ ‎the ‎nation's ‎digital ‎infrastructure‏ ‎and‏ ‎advancing ‎its‏ ‎cyberdefense ‎capabilities.

At‏ ‎OpenAI, ‎Nakasone ‎will ‎initially ‎join‏ ‎the‏ ‎Safety ‎and‏ ‎Security ‎Committee,‏ ‎which ‎is ‎responsible ‎for ‎making‏ ‎critical‏ ‎safety‏ ‎and ‎security‏ ‎decisions ‎for‏ ‎all ‎OpenAI‏ ‎projects‏ ‎and ‎operations.‏ ‎His ‎insights ‎will ‎significantly ‎contribute‏ ‎to ‎the‏ ‎company's‏ ‎efforts ‎to ‎better‏ ‎understand ‎how‏ ‎AI ‎can ‎be ‎used‏ ‎to‏ ‎strengthen ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎by ‎quickly‏ ‎detecting ‎and ‎responding ‎to ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎threats.‏ ‎Nakasone's ‎expertise‏ ‎will ‎be‏ ‎invaluable ‎in ‎guiding ‎OpenAI ‎in‏ ‎achieving‏ ‎its‏ ‎mission ‎of‏ ‎ensuring ‎that‏ ‎AGI ‎benefits‏ ‎all‏ ‎of ‎humanity.

The‏ ‎appointment ‎has ‎been ‎met ‎with‏ ‎positive ‎reactions‏ ‎from‏ ‎industry ‎experts. ‎Many‏ ‎believe ‎that‏ ‎Nakasone's ‎military ‎and ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎background‏ ‎will ‎provide‏ ‎invaluable ‎insights,‏ ‎particularly ‎as ‎AI ‎technologies ‎become‏ ‎increasingly‏ ‎integral ‎to‏ ‎national ‎security‏ ‎and ‎defense ‎strategies. ‎His ‎experience‏ ‎in‏ ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎will ‎help‏ ‎OpenAI ‎navigate‏ ‎the ‎complex‏ ‎landscape‏ ‎of ‎AI‏ ‎safety ‎and ‎ensure ‎that ‎its‏ ‎AI ‎systems‏ ‎are‏ ‎robust ‎against ‎various‏ ‎forms ‎of‏ ‎cyber ‎threats.

While ‎Nakasone's ‎appointment‏ ‎is‏ ‎a ‎significant‏ ‎step ‎forward,‏ ‎OpenAI ‎still ‎faces ‎challenges ‎in‏ ‎ensuring‏ ‎the ‎safe‏ ‎and ‎responsible‏ ‎development ‎of ‎AI. ‎The ‎company‏ ‎has‏ ‎recently‏ ‎seen ‎departures‏ ‎of ‎key‏ ‎safety ‎personnel,‏ ‎including‏ ‎co-founder ‎and‏ ‎chief ‎scientist ‎Ilya ‎Sutskever ‎and‏ ‎Jan ‎Leike,‏ ‎who‏ ‎were ‎outspokenly ‎concerned‏ ‎about ‎the‏ ‎company's ‎prioritization ‎of ‎safety‏ ‎processes.‏ ‎Nakasone's ‎role‏ ‎will ‎be‏ ‎crucial ‎in ‎addressing ‎these ‎concerns‏ ‎and‏ ‎ensuring ‎that‏ ‎OpenAI's ‎AI‏ ‎systems ‎are ‎developed ‎with ‎safety‏ ‎and‏ ‎security‏ ‎at ‎their‏ ‎core.

Читать: 6+ мин
logo Snarky Security

Ship Happens. Plugging the Leaks in Your Maritime Cyber Defenses

Читать: 6+ мин
logo Snarky Security

Ship Happens. Plugging the Leaks in Your Maritime Cyber Defenses. Announcement

The ‎joys‏ ‎of ‎discussing ‎crewless ‎ships ‎and‏ ‎their ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎woes!‏ ‎This ‎document ‎delves‏ ‎into ‎the‏ ‎world ‎of ‎Maritime ‎Autonomous‏ ‎Surface‏ ‎Ships ‎(MASS),‏ ‎where ‎the‏ ‎absence ‎of ‎a ‎crew ‎doesn’t‏ ‎mean‏ ‎a ‎lack‏ ‎of ‎nightmares‏ ‎of ‎cybersecurity, ‎or ‎legal ‎tangles,‏ ‎and‏ ‎regulatory‏ ‎hurdles.

The ‎maritime‏ ‎industry ‎lags‏ ‎a ‎whopping‏ ‎20‏ ‎years ‎behind‏ ‎other ‎sectors ‎in ‎cybersecurity. ‎Cyber‏ ‎penetration ‎tests‏ ‎have‏ ‎shown ‎that ‎hacking‏ ‎into ‎ship‏ ‎systems ‎like ‎the ‎Electronic‏ ‎Chart‏ ‎Display ‎and‏ ‎Information ‎System‏ ‎(ECDIS) ‎is ‎as ‎easy ‎as‏ ‎pie—a‏ ‎rather ‎unsettling‏ ‎thought ‎when‏ ‎those ‎systems ‎control ‎steering ‎and‏ ‎ballast.

As‏ ‎for‏ ‎the ‎stakeholders,‏ ‎from ‎ship‏ ‎manufacturers ‎to‏ ‎insurers,‏ ‎everyone’s ‎got‏ ‎a ‎stake ‎in ‎this ‎game.‏ ‎They’re ‎all‏ ‎keen‏ ‎to ‎steer ‎the‏ ‎development ‎and‏ ‎implementation ‎of ‎MASS, ‎hopefully‏ ‎without‏ ‎hitting ‎too‏ ‎many ‎icebergs‏ ‎along ‎the ‎way ‎but ‎lot‏ ‎of‏ ‎money.

This ‎document‏ ‎issues ‎it‏ ‎addresses ‎are ‎grounded ‎in ‎reality.‏ ‎The‏ ‎integration‏ ‎of ‎MASS‏ ‎into ‎the‏ ‎global ‎shipping‏ ‎industry‏ ‎is ‎not‏ ‎just ‎about ‎technological ‎advancement ‎but‏ ‎securing ‎that‏ ‎technology‏ ‎from ‎threats ‎that‏ ‎could ‎sink‏ ‎it ‎faster ‎than ‎a‏ ‎torpedo.‏ ‎The ‎seriousness‏ ‎of ‎ensuring‏ ‎safety, ‎security, ‎and ‎compliance ‎with‏ ‎international‏ ‎standards ‎cannot‏ ‎be ‎overstated,‏ ‎making ‎this ‎analysis ‎a ‎crucial‏ ‎navigational‏ ‎tool‏ ‎for ‎anyone‏ ‎involved ‎in‏ ‎the ‎future‏ ‎of‏ ‎maritime ‎operations.


Full‏ ‎PDF ‎/ ‎article


This ‎document ‎offers‏ ‎a ‎comprehensive‏ ‎analysis‏ ‎of ‎the ‎challenges‏ ‎associated ‎with‏ ‎crewless ‎ships, ‎specifically ‎addressing‏ ‎issues‏ ‎related ‎to‏ ‎cybersecurity, ‎technology,‏ ‎law, ‎and ‎regulation ‎of ‎Maritime‏ ‎Autonomous‏ ‎Surface ‎Ships‏ ‎(MASS). ‎The‏ ‎analysis ‎delves ‎into ‎various ‎critical‏ ‎aspects‏ ‎of‏ ‎MASS, ‎including‏ ‎the ‎technological‏ ‎advancements, ‎legal‏ ‎and‏ ‎regulatory ‎challenges,‏ ‎and ‎cybersecurity ‎implications ‎associated ‎with‏ ‎these ‎uncrewed‏ ‎vessels,‏ ‎such ‎as ‎exploration‏ ‎of ‎the‏ ‎current ‎state ‎and ‎future‏ ‎prospects‏ ‎of ‎MASS‏ ‎technology, ‎emphasizing‏ ‎its ‎potential ‎to ‎revolutionize ‎the‏ ‎maritime‏ ‎industry, ‎the‏ ‎unique ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎risks ‎posed ‎by ‎autonomous ‎ships‏ ‎and‏ ‎the‏ ‎strategies ‎being‏ ‎implemented ‎to‏ ‎mitigate ‎these‏ ‎risks.

The‏ ‎analysis ‎highlights‏ ‎the ‎intersection ‎of ‎maritime ‎technology‏ ‎with ‎regulatory‏ ‎and‏ ‎security ‎concerns. ‎It‏ ‎is ‎particularly‏ ‎useful ‎for ‎security ‎professionals,‏ ‎maritime‏ ‎industry ‎stakeholders,‏ ‎policymakers, ‎and‏ ‎academics. ‎By ‎understanding ‎the ‎implications‏ ‎of‏ ‎MASS ‎deployment,‏ ‎these ‎professionals‏ ‎can ‎better ‎navigate ‎the ‎complexities‏ ‎of‏ ‎integrating‏ ‎advanced ‎autonomous‏ ‎technologies ‎into‏ ‎the ‎global‏ ‎shipping‏ ‎industry, ‎ensuring‏ ‎safety, ‎security, ‎and ‎compliance ‎with‏ ‎international ‎laws‏ ‎and‏ ‎standards.

The ‎transformative ‎potential‏ ‎of ‎MASS‏ ‎is ‎driven ‎by ‎advancements‏ ‎in‏ ‎big ‎data,‏ ‎machine ‎learning,‏ ‎and ‎artificial ‎intelligence. ‎These ‎technologies‏ ‎are‏ ‎set ‎to‏ ‎revolutionize ‎the‏ ‎$14 ‎trillion ‎shipping ‎industry, ‎traditionally‏ ‎reliant‏ ‎on‏ ‎human ‎crews.

📌 Cybersecurity‏ ‎Lag ‎in‏ ‎Maritime ‎Industry: the‏ ‎maritime‏ ‎industry ‎is‏ ‎significantly ‎behind ‎other ‎sectors ‎in‏ ‎terms ‎of‏ ‎cybersecurity,‏ ‎approximately ‎by ‎20‏ ‎years. ‎This‏ ‎lag ‎presents ‎unique ‎vulnerabilities‏ ‎and‏ ‎challenges ‎that‏ ‎are ‎only‏ ‎beginning ‎to ‎be ‎fully ‎understood.

📌 Vulnerabilities‏ ‎in‏ ‎Ship ‎Systems: cybersecurity‏ ‎vulnerabilities ‎in‏ ‎maritime ‎systems ‎are ‎highlighted ‎by‏ ‎the‏ ‎ease‏ ‎with ‎which‏ ‎critical ‎systems‏ ‎can ‎be‏ ‎accessed‏ ‎and ‎manipulated.‏ ‎For ‎example, ‎cyber ‎penetration ‎tests‏ ‎have ‎demonstrated‏ ‎the‏ ‎simplicity ‎of ‎hacking‏ ‎into ‎ship‏ ‎systems ‎like ‎the ‎Electronic‏ ‎Chart‏ ‎Display ‎and‏ ‎Information ‎System‏ ‎(ECDIS), ‎radar ‎displays, ‎and ‎critical‏ ‎operational‏ ‎systems ‎such‏ ‎as ‎steering‏ ‎and ‎ballast.

📌 Challenges ‎with ‎Conventional ‎Ships: in‏ ‎conventional‏ ‎ships,‏ ‎the ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎risks ‎are‏ ‎exacerbated ‎by‏ ‎the‏ ‎use ‎of‏ ‎outdated ‎computer ‎systems, ‎often ‎a‏ ‎decade ‎old,‏ ‎and‏ ‎vulnerable ‎satellite ‎communication‏ ‎system. ‎These‏ ‎vulnerabilities ‎make ‎ships ‎susceptible‏ ‎to‏ ‎cyber-attacks ‎that‏ ‎can ‎compromise‏ ‎critical ‎information ‎and ‎systems ‎within‏ ‎minutes.

📌 Increased‏ ‎Risks ‎with‏ ‎Uncrewed ‎Ships: the‏ ‎transition ‎to ‎uncrewed, ‎autonomous ‎ships‏ ‎introduces‏ ‎a‏ ‎new ‎layer‏ ‎of ‎complexity‏ ‎to ‎cybersecurity.‏ ‎Every‏ ‎system ‎and‏ ‎operation ‎on ‎these ‎ships ‎depends‏ ‎on ‎interconnected‏ ‎digital‏ ‎technologies, ‎making ‎them‏ ‎prime ‎targets‏ ‎for ‎cyber-attacks ‎including ‎monitoring,‏ ‎communication,‏ ‎and ‎navigation,‏ ‎relies ‎on‏ ‎digital ‎connectivity.

📌 Need ‎for ‎Built-in ‎Cybersecurity:‏ ‎the‏ ‎necessity ‎of‏ ‎incorporating ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎measures ‎right ‎from ‎the ‎design‏ ‎phase‏ ‎of‏ ‎maritime ‎autonomous‏ ‎surface ‎ships‏ ‎is ‎crucial‏ ‎to‏ ‎ensure ‎that‏ ‎these ‎vessels ‎are ‎equipped ‎to‏ ‎handle ‎potential‏ ‎cyber‏ ‎threats ‎and ‎to‏ ‎safeguard ‎their‏ ‎operational ‎integrity.

📌 Regulatory ‎and ‎Policy‏ ‎Recommendations: It‏ ‎is ‎suggested‏ ‎that ‎policymakers‏ ‎and ‎regulators ‎need ‎to ‎be‏ ‎well-versed‏ ‎with ‎technological‏ ‎capabilities ‎to‏ ‎shape ‎effective ‎cybersecurity ‎policies ‎and‏ ‎regulations‏ ‎for‏ ‎maritime ‎operations,‏ ‎UK’s ‎Marine‏ ‎Guidance ‎Note‏ ‎(MGN)‏ ‎669 ‎as‏ ‎an ‎example ‎of ‎regulatory ‎efforts‏ ‎to ‎address‏ ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎in ‎maritime ‎operations.

📌 Stakeholder‏ ‎Interest: ‎ship‏ ‎manufacturers, ‎operators, ‎insurers, ‎and‏ ‎regulators,‏ ‎all ‎of‏ ‎whom ‎are‏ ‎keen ‎to ‎influence ‎the ‎development‏ ‎and‏ ‎implementation ‎of‏ ‎MASS

The ‎International‏ ‎Maritime ‎Organization ‎(IMO) ‎has ‎developed‏ ‎a‏ ‎four-point‏ ‎taxonomy ‎to‏ ‎categorize ‎Maritime‏ ‎Autonomous ‎Surface‏ ‎Ships‏ ‎(MASS) ‎based‏ ‎on ‎the ‎level ‎of ‎autonomy‏ ‎and ‎human‏ ‎involvement:

📌 Degree‏ ‎1: Ships ‎with ‎automated‏ ‎systems ‎where‏ ‎humans ‎are ‎on ‎board‏ ‎to‏ ‎operate ‎and‏ ‎control.

📌 Degree ‎2:‏ ‎Remotely ‎controlled ‎ships ‎with ‎seafarers‏ ‎on‏ ‎board.

📌 Degree ‎3: Remotely‏ ‎controlled ‎ships‏ ‎without ‎seafarers ‎on ‎board.

📌 Degree ‎4:‏ ‎Fully‏ ‎autonomous‏ ‎ships ‎that‏ ‎can ‎operate‏ ‎without ‎human‏ ‎intervention,‏ ‎either ‎on‏ ‎board ‎or ‎remotely

📌Variety ‎in ‎MASS‏ ‎Design ‎and‏ ‎Operation:‏ ‎The ‎taxonomy ‎underscores‏ ‎the ‎diversity‏ ‎in ‎design ‎and ‎operational‏ ‎capabilities‏ ‎of ‎MASS,‏ ‎ranging ‎from‏ ‎partially ‎automated ‎systems ‎to ‎fully‏ ‎autonomous‏ ‎operations. ‎This‏ ‎diversity ‎necessitates‏ ‎a ‎nuanced ‎approach ‎to ‎regulation‏ ‎and‏ ‎oversight.

📌Terminology‏ ‎Clarification: To ‎avoid‏ ‎confusion ‎due‏ ‎to ‎the‏ ‎interchangeable‏ ‎use ‎of‏ ‎terms ‎like ‎«remotely ‎controlled» ‎and‏ ‎«autonomous, ‎»‏ ‎the‏ ‎term ‎MASS ‎is‏ ‎adopted ‎as‏ ‎an ‎overarching ‎term ‎for‏ ‎all‏ ‎categories ‎within‏ ‎the ‎taxonomy.‏ ‎Specific ‎terms ‎are ‎used ‎when‏ ‎referring‏ ‎to ‎particular‏ ‎categories ‎of‏ ‎vessels.

📌Diverse ‎Applications ‎and ‎Sizes: MASS ‎are‏ ‎not‏ ‎limited‏ ‎to ‎a‏ ‎single ‎type‏ ‎or ‎size‏ ‎of‏ ‎vessel. ‎They‏ ‎encompass ‎a ‎wide ‎range ‎of‏ ‎ships, ‎from‏ ‎small,‏ ‎unmanned ‎surface ‎vehicles‏ ‎to ‎large‏ ‎autonomous ‎cargo ‎ships. ‎This‏ ‎diversity‏ ‎is ‎reflected‏ ‎in ‎their‏ ‎various ‎applications, ‎including ‎commercial, ‎civilian,‏ ‎law‏ ‎enforcement, ‎and‏ ‎military ‎uses.

📌Emergence‏ ‎and ‎Integration ‎of ‎MASS: ‎Autonomous‏ ‎ships‏ ‎are‏ ‎already ‎emerging‏ ‎and ‎being‏ ‎integrated ‎into‏ ‎multiple‏ ‎sectors. ‎This‏ ‎ongoing ‎development ‎necessitates ‎a ‎systematic‏ ‎and ‎comprehensive‏ ‎analysis‏ ‎by ‎policymakers, ‎regulators,‏ ‎academia, ‎and‏ ‎the ‎public ‎to ‎ensure‏ ‎their‏ ‎safe, ‎secure,‏ ‎and ‎sustainable‏ ‎integration ‎into ‎international ‎shipping.


Читать: 4+ мин
logo Snarky Security

Boeing’s Safety Saga: A Tale of Corporate Shenanigans

The ‎joys‏ ‎of ‎being ‎a ‎multinational ‎corporation‏ ‎with ‎deep‏ ‎pockets‏ ‎and ‎a ‎knack‏ ‎for ‎dodging‏ ‎accountability. ‎Boeing, ‎the ‎esteemed‏ ‎aircraft‏ ‎manufacturer, ‎has‏ ‎once ‎again‏ ‎found ‎itself ‎in ‎the ‎midst‏ ‎of‏ ‎a ‎safety‏ ‎crisis, ‎and‏ ‎we’re ‎not ‎surprised. ‎After ‎all,‏ ‎who‏ ‎needs‏ ‎to ‎worry‏ ‎about ‎a‏ ‎few ‎hundred‏ ‎lives‏ ‎lost ‎when‏ ‎there ‎are ‎profits ‎to ‎be‏ ‎made ‎and‏ ‎shareholders‏ ‎to ‎appease?

According ‎to‏ ‎The ‎New‏ ‎York ‎Times, ‎the ‎US‏ ‎Department‏ ‎of ‎Justice‏ ‎is ‎considering‏ ‎a ‎deferred ‎prosecution ‎agreement ‎with‏ ‎Boeing,‏ ‎which ‎would‏ ‎allow ‎the‏ ‎company ‎to ‎avoid ‎criminal ‎charges‏ ‎but‏ ‎require‏ ‎the ‎appointment‏ ‎of ‎a‏ ‎federal ‎monitor‏ ‎to‏ ‎oversee ‎its‏ ‎safety ‎improvements. ‎Wow, ‎what ‎a‏ ‎slap ‎on‏ ‎the‏ ‎wrist. ‎It’s ‎not‏ ‎like ‎they’ve‏ ‎been ‎playing ‎fast ‎and‏ ‎loose‏ ‎with ‎safety‏ ‎protocols ‎or‏ ‎anything.

Let’s ‎recap ‎the ‎highlights ‎of‏ ‎Boeing’s‏ ‎recent ‎safety‏ ‎record:

📌Two ‎fatal‏ ‎crashes ‎of ‎the ‎737 ‎Max: Remember‏ ‎those?‏ ‎Yeah,‏ ‎the ‎ones‏ ‎that ‎killed‏ ‎346 ‎people‏ ‎and‏ ‎led ‎to‏ ‎a ‎global ‎grounding ‎of ‎the‏ ‎aircraft. ‎No‏ ‎big‏ ‎deal, ‎just ‎a‏ ‎minor ‎oversight‏ ‎on ‎Boeing’s ‎part.

📌Door ‎plug‏ ‎blowout‏ ‎on ‎an‏ ‎Alaska ‎Airlines‏ ‎737 ‎Max: Because ‎who ‎needs ‎a‏ ‎door‏ ‎on ‎a‏ ‎plane, ‎anyway?‏ ‎It’s ‎not ‎like ‎it’s ‎a‏ ‎safety‏ ‎feature‏ ‎or ‎anything.

📌Whistleblowers‏ ‎alleging ‎shoddy‏ ‎manufacturing ‎practices: Oh,‏ ‎those‏ ‎pesky ‎whistleblowers‏ ‎and ‎their ‎«concerns» ‎about ‎safety.‏ ‎Just ‎a‏ ‎bunch‏ ‎of ‎disgruntled ‎employees,‏ ‎right?

📌Federal ‎investigations‏ ‎and ‎audits ‎revealing ‎quality‏ ‎control‏ ‎issues: ‎Just‏ ‎a ‎few‏ ‎minor ‎discrepancies ‎in ‎the ‎manufacturing‏ ‎process.‏ ‎Nothing ‎to‏ ‎see ‎here,‏ ‎folks.

And ‎now, ‎Boeing ‎gets ‎to‏ ‎add‏ ‎a‏ ‎federal ‎monitor‏ ‎to ‎its‏ ‎payroll ‎to‏ ‎ensure‏ ‎that ‎it’s‏ ‎taking ‎safety ‎seriously. ‎Because, ‎you‏ ‎know, ‎the‏ ‎company’s‏ ‎track ‎record ‎on‏ ‎safety ‎is‏ ‎just ‎spotless. ‎This ‎monitor‏ ‎will‏ ‎surely ‎be‏ ‎able ‎to‏ ‎keep ‎an ‎eye ‎on ‎things‏ ‎and‏ ‎prevent ‎any‏ ‎future ‎incidents.‏ ‎*eyeroll*

Cybersecurity ‎Incidents

📌In ‎November ‎2023, ‎Boeing‏ ‎confirmed‏ ‎a‏ ‎cyberattack ‎that‏ ‎impacted ‎its‏ ‎parts ‎and‏ ‎distribution‏ ‎business, ‎which‏ ‎did ‎not ‎affect ‎flight ‎safety.‏ ‎The ‎attack‏ ‎was‏ ‎attributed ‎to ‎the‏ ‎LockBit ‎ransomware‏ ‎gang, ‎which ‎had ‎stolen‏ ‎sensitive‏ ‎data ‎and‏ ‎threatened ‎to‏ ‎leak ‎it ‎if ‎Boeing ‎did‏ ‎not‏ ‎meet ‎its‏ ‎demands. ‎Boeing‏ ‎declined ‎to ‎comment ‎on ‎whether‏ ‎it‏ ‎had‏ ‎paid ‎a‏ ‎ransom ‎or‏ ‎received ‎a‏ ‎ransom‏ ‎demand.

📌In ‎addition‏ ‎to ‎the ‎LockBit ‎attack, ‎Boeing‏ ‎has ‎faced‏ ‎other‏ ‎cybersecurity ‎incidents, ‎including‏ ‎a ‎cyberattack‏ ‎on ‎its ‎subsidiary ‎Jeppesen,‏ ‎which‏ ‎distributes ‎airspace‏ ‎safety ‎notices‏ ‎to ‎pilots. ‎The ‎company ‎has‏ ‎also‏ ‎been ‎targeted‏ ‎by ‎pro-Russian‏ ‎hacking ‎groups, ‎which ‎launched ‎distributed‏ ‎denial-of-service‏ ‎(DDoS)‏ ‎attacks ‎against‏ ‎Boeing ‎in‏ ‎December ‎2022.

Legal‏ ‎Issues

📌Boeing’s‏ ‎legal ‎troubles‏ ‎are ‎also ‎mounting. ‎In ‎May‏ ‎2024, ‎the‏ ‎US‏ ‎Justice ‎Department ‎determined‏ ‎that ‎Boeing‏ ‎had ‎breached ‎its ‎2021‏ ‎deferred‏ ‎prosecution ‎agreement‏ ‎(DPA) ‎related‏ ‎to ‎the ‎737 ‎MAX ‎crashes.‏ ‎The‏ ‎DPA ‎had‏ ‎shielded ‎Boeing‏ ‎from ‎criminal ‎liability ‎in ‎exchange‏ ‎for‏ ‎a‏ ‎$2.5 ‎billion‏ ‎fine ‎and‏ ‎commitments ‎to‏ ‎improve‏ ‎its ‎safety‏ ‎and ‎compliance ‎practices.

📌The ‎Justice ‎Department‏ ‎has ‎given‏ ‎Boeing‏ ‎until ‎July ‎7‏ ‎to ‎respond‏ ‎to ‎the ‎breach ‎and‏ ‎outline‏ ‎its ‎remedial‏ ‎actions. ‎If‏ ‎Boeing ‎fails ‎to ‎comply, ‎it‏ ‎could‏ ‎face ‎criminal‏ ‎prosecution ‎for‏ ‎any ‎federal ‎violations. ‎The ‎company‏ ‎has‏ ‎maintained‏ ‎that ‎it‏ ‎has ‎honored‏ ‎the ‎terms‏ ‎of‏ ‎the ‎DPA,‏ ‎but ‎the ‎Justice ‎Department ‎disagrees.

Impact‏ ‎on ‎Boeing’s‏ ‎Reputation

📌Boeing’s‏ ‎cybersecurity ‎incidents ‎and‏ ‎legal ‎issues‏ ‎have ‎damaged ‎its ‎reputation‏ ‎and‏ ‎raised ‎concerns‏ ‎about ‎its‏ ‎ability ‎to ‎protect ‎sensitive ‎data‏ ‎and‏ ‎ensure ‎the‏ ‎safety ‎of‏ ‎its ‎aircraft. ‎The ‎company’s ‎troubles‏ ‎have‏ ‎also‏ ‎led ‎to‏ ‎calls ‎for‏ ‎greater ‎accountability‏ ‎and‏ ‎transparency ‎in‏ ‎the ‎aviation ‎industry.

📌Boeing’s ‎cybersecurity ‎challenges‏ ‎and ‎legal‏ ‎woes‏ ‎highlight ‎the ‎importance‏ ‎of ‎robust‏ ‎cybersecurity ‎measures ‎and ‎compliance‏ ‎with‏ ‎regulatory ‎agreements.‏ ‎The ‎company‏ ‎must ‎take ‎swift ‎action ‎to‏ ‎address‏ ‎its ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎vulnerabilities ‎and‏ ‎legal ‎issues ‎to ‎restore ‎public‏ ‎trust‏ ‎and‏ ‎ensure ‎the‏ ‎safety ‎of‏ ‎its ‎aircraft.

As‏ ‎the‏ ‎saying ‎goes,‏ ‎«Here, ‎everything ‎is ‎simple, ‎except‏ ‎for ‎the‏ ‎money.»‏ ‎And ‎Boeing ‎has‏ ‎plenty ‎of‏ ‎that ‎to ‎throw ‎around.‏ ‎So,‏ ‎let’s ‎all‏ ‎just ‎take‏ ‎a ‎deep ‎breath ‎and ‎trust‏ ‎that‏ ‎the ‎company‏ ‎will ‎magically‏ ‎fix ‎its ‎safety ‎issues ‎with‏ ‎the‏ ‎help‏ ‎of ‎a‏ ‎federal ‎monitor.‏ ‎After ‎all,‏ ‎it’s‏ ‎not ‎like‏ ‎they ‎have ‎a ‎history ‎of‏ ‎prioritizing ‎profits‏ ‎over‏ ‎people ‎or ‎anything.

Читать: 3+ мин
logo Snarky Security

CYBSAFE-Oh, Behave! 2023-FINAL REPORT

The ‎document‏ ‎«CYBSAFE-Oh, ‎Behave! ‎2023-FINAL ‎REPORT» is ‎a‏ ‎rather ‎enlightening‏ ‎(and‏ ‎somewhat ‎amusing) ‎exploration‏ ‎of ‎the‏ ‎current ‎state ‎of ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎awareness,‏ ‎attitudes, ‎and‏ ‎behaviors ‎among‏ ‎internet ‎users. ‎The ‎report, ‎with‏ ‎a‏ ‎touch ‎of‏ ‎irony, ‎reveals‏ ‎that ‎while ‎most ‎people ‎are‏ ‎aware‏ ‎of‏ ‎cybersecurity ‎risks,‏ ‎they ‎don’t‏ ‎always ‎take‏ ‎the‏ ‎necessary ‎steps‏ ‎to ‎protect ‎themselves. ‎For ‎instance,‏ ‎only ‎60%‏ ‎use‏ ‎strong ‎passwords, ‎and‏ ‎a ‎mere‏ ‎40% ‎use ‎multi-factor ‎authentication‏ ‎(MFA).‏ ‎Despite ‎being‏ ‎aware ‎of‏ ‎phishing ‎scams, ‎many ‎still ‎fall‏ ‎for‏ ‎them, ‎which‏ ‎is ‎a‏ ‎bit ‎like ‎knowing ‎the ‎stove‏ ‎is‏ ‎hot‏ ‎but ‎touching‏ ‎it ‎anyway.

The‏ ‎report ‎also‏ ‎highlights‏ ‎some ‎generational‏ ‎differences ‎in ‎attitudes ‎and ‎behaviors‏ ‎towards ‎cybersecurity.‏ ‎Younger‏ ‎generations, ‎such ‎as‏ ‎Gen ‎Z‏ ‎and ‎Millennials, ‎are ‎more‏ ‎digitally‏ ‎connected ‎but‏ ‎also ‎exhibit‏ ‎riskier ‎password ‎practices ‎and ‎are‏ ‎more‏ ‎skeptical ‎about‏ ‎the ‎value‏ ‎of ‎online ‎security ‎efforts. ‎It’s‏ ‎a‏ ‎bit‏ ‎like ‎giving‏ ‎a ‎teenager‏ ‎the ‎keys‏ ‎to‏ ‎a ‎sports‏ ‎car ‎and ‎expecting ‎them ‎not‏ ‎to ‎speed.

The‏ ‎media’s‏ ‎role ‎in ‎shaping‏ ‎people’s ‎views‏ ‎towards ‎online ‎security ‎is‏ ‎also‏ ‎discussed. ‎While‏ ‎it ‎motivates‏ ‎some ‎to ‎take ‎protective ‎actions‏ ‎and‏ ‎stay ‎informed,‏ ‎others ‎feel‏ ‎that ‎it ‎evokes ‎fear ‎and‏ ‎overcomplicates‏ ‎security‏ ‎matters. ‎It’s‏ ‎a ‎bit‏ ‎like ‎watching‏ ‎a‏ ‎horror ‎movie‏ ‎to ‎learn ‎about ‎home ‎security.

The‏ ‎report ‎also‏ ‎delves‏ ‎into ‎the ‎effectiveness‏ ‎of ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎training, ‎with ‎only ‎26%‏ ‎of‏ ‎participants ‎having‏ ‎access ‎to‏ ‎and ‎taking ‎advantage ‎of ‎such‏ ‎training.‏ ‎It’s ‎a‏ ‎bit ‎like‏ ‎having ‎a ‎gym ‎membership ‎but‏ ‎only‏ ‎going‏ ‎once ‎a‏ ‎month.

In ‎a‏ ‎nutshell, ‎the‏ ‎report‏ ‎is ‎a‏ ‎comprehensive ‎analysis ‎of ‎the ‎current‏ ‎state ‎of‏ ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎awareness, ‎attitudes, ‎and‏ ‎behaviors ‎among‏ ‎internet ‎users, ‎with ‎a‏ ‎healthy‏ ‎dose ‎of‏ ‎irony ‎and‏ ‎a ‎touch ‎of ‎sarcasm. ‎It’s‏ ‎a‏ ‎bit ‎like‏ ‎a ‎reality‏ ‎check, ‎served ‎with ‎a ‎side‏ ‎of‏ ‎humor.


Unpacking‏ ‎in ‎more‏ ‎detail

Читать: 3+ мин
logo Ирония безопасности

CYBSAFE-Oh, Behave! 2023-FINAL REPORT

Документ ‎«CYBSAFE-Oh,‏ ‎Behave! ‎2023-FINAL ‎REPORT» представляет ‎собой ‎довольно‏ ‎поучительное ‎(и‏ ‎несколько‏ ‎забавное) ‎исследование ‎текущего‏ ‎состояния ‎осведомлённости,‏ ‎отношения ‎и ‎поведения ‎пользователей‏ ‎в‏ ‎области ‎кибербезопасности.‏ ‎Отчёт ‎с‏ ‎долей ‎иронии ‎показывает, ‎что, ‎хотя‏ ‎большинство‏ ‎людей ‎осведомлены‏ ‎о ‎рисках‏ ‎кибербезопасности, ‎они ‎не ‎всегда ‎предпринимают‏ ‎необходимые‏ ‎шаги‏ ‎для ‎собственной‏ ‎защиты. ‎Например,‏ ‎только ‎60%‏ ‎используют‏ ‎надёжные ‎пароли,‏ ‎и ‎лишь ‎40% ‎используют ‎многофакторную‏ ‎аутентификацию ‎(MFA).‏ ‎Несмотря‏ ‎на ‎то, ‎что‏ ‎многие ‎знают‏ ‎о ‎фишинговых ‎мошенничествах, ‎они‏ ‎все‏ ‎равно ‎попадаются‏ ‎на ‎них‏ ‎(кололись, ‎но ‎продолжали ‎есть ‎кактус)

В‏ ‎отчёте‏ ‎также ‎подчёркиваются‏ ‎некоторые ‎различия‏ ‎поколений ‎в ‎отношении ‎и ‎поведении‏ ‎к‏ ‎кибербезопасности.‏ ‎Z ‎и‏ ‎миллениумы, ‎в‏ ‎большей ‎степени‏ ‎вовлечены‏ ‎в ‎цифровые‏ ‎технология, ‎но ‎также ‎более ‎рискованно‏ ‎используют ‎пароли‏ ‎и‏ ‎более ‎скептически ‎относится‏ ‎к ‎ценности‏ ‎мер ‎по ‎обеспечению ‎безопасности.

Также‏ ‎обсуждается‏ ‎роль ‎средств‏ ‎массовой ‎информации‏ ‎в ‎формировании ‎взглядов ‎людей ‎на‏ ‎онлайн-безопасность.‏ ‎В ‎то‏ ‎время ‎как‏ ‎одних ‎это ‎побуждает ‎предпринимать ‎направленные‏ ‎на‏ ‎защиту‏ ‎действия ‎и‏ ‎оставаться ‎в‏ ‎курсе ‎событий,‏ ‎другие‏ ‎считают, ‎что‏ ‎это ‎вызывает ‎страх ‎и ‎чрезмерно‏ ‎усложняет ‎вопросы‏ ‎безопасности‏ ‎(как ‎в ‎классических‏ ‎фильмах ‎ужасов)

В‏ ‎отчёте ‎также ‎рассматривается ‎эффективность‏ ‎обучения‏ ‎по ‎кибербезопасности:‏ ‎только ‎26%‏ ‎участников ‎имеют ‎доступ ‎к ‎такому‏ ‎обучению‏ ‎и ‎пользуются‏ ‎его ‎преимуществами.‏ ‎Это ‎немного ‎похоже ‎на ‎абонемент‏ ‎в‏ ‎спортзал,‏ ‎но ‎только‏ ‎раз ‎в‏ ‎месяц, ‎для‏ ‎фоток‏ ‎в ‎соцсети.

В‏ ‎двух ‎словах, ‎отчёт ‎представляет ‎собой‏ ‎всесторонний ‎анализ‏ ‎текущего‏ ‎состояния ‎осведомлённости, ‎отношения‏ ‎и ‎поведения‏ ‎пользователей ‎Интернета ‎в ‎области‏ ‎кибербезопасности‏ ‎на ‎результаты‏ ‎которого ‎без‏ ‎сарказма ‎не ‎взглянешь.


Подробный ‎разбор

Обновления проекта

Метки

overkillsecurity 142 overkillsecuritypdf 52 news 47 keypoints 38 nsa 26 fbi 25 adapt tactics 11 Living Off the Land 11 LOTL 11 unpacking 10 vulnerability 9 cyber security 8 Digest 8 edge routers 8 Essential Eight Maturity Model 8 malware 8 Maturity Model 8 Monthly Digest 8 research 8 ubiquiti 8 IoT 7 lolbin 7 lolbins 7 Cyber Attacks 6 phishing 6 Forensics 5 Ransomware 5 soho 5 authToken 4 BYOD 4 MDM 4 OAuth 4 Energy Consumption 3 IoMT 3 medical 3 ai 2 AnonSudan 2 authentication 2 av 2 battery 2 Buffer Overflow 2 console architecture 2 cve 2 cybersecurity 2 energy 2 Google 2 incident response 2 MITM 2 mqtt 2 Passkeys 2 Retro 2 Velociraptor 2 video 2 Vintage 2 vmware 2 windows 2 1981 1 5g network research 1 8-bit 1 Ad Removal 1 Ad-Free Experience 1 ADCS 1 advisory 1 airwatch 1 AlphV 1 AMSI 1 android 1 Android15 1 announcement 1 antiPhishing 1 AntiPhishStack 1 antivirus 1 Apple 1 Atlassian 1 Attack 1 AttackGen 1 BatBadBut 1 Behavioral Analytics 1 BianLian 1 bias 1 Biocybersecurity 1 Biometric 1 bite 1 bitlocker 1 bitlocker bypass 1 Black Lotus Labs 1 blackberry 1 blizzard 1 botnet 1 Browser Data Theft 1 BucketLoot 1 CellularSecurity 1 checkpoint 1 china 1 chisel 1 cisa 1 CloudSecurity 1 CloudStorage 1 content 1 content category 1 cpu 1 Credential Dumping 1 CVE-2023-22518 1 CVE-2023-35080 1 CVE-2023-38043 1 CVE-2023-38543 1 CVE-2024-0204 1 CVE-2024-21111 1 CVE-2024-21345 1 cve-2024-21447 1 CVE-2024-24919 1 CVE-2024-26218 1 cve-2024-27129 1 cve-2024-27130 1 cve-2024-27131 1 cve-2024-3400 1 cvss 1 cyber operations 1 Cyber Toufan Al-Aqsa 1 cyberops 1 D-Link 1 dark pink apt 1 data leakage 1 dcrat 1 Demoscene 1 DevSecOps 1 Dex 1 disassembler 1 DOS 1 e8mm 1 EDR 1 Embedded systems 1 Employee Training 1 EntraID 1 ESC8 1 Event ID 4663 1 Event ID 4688 1 Event ID 5145 1 Evilginx 1 EvilLsassTwin 1 Facebook 1 FBI IC3 1 FIDO2 1 filewave 1 Firebase 1 Firmware 1 Fortra's GoAnywhere MFT 1 france 1 FraudDetection 1 fuxnet 1 fuzzer 1 game console 1 gamification 1 GeminiNanoAI 1 genzai 1 go 1 GoogleIO2024 1 GooglePlayProtect 1 GoPhish 1 gpu 1 ICS 1 ICSpector 1 IDA 1 IncidentResponse 1 Industrial Control Systems 1 jazzer 1 jetbrains 1 jvm 1 KASLR 1 KillNet 1 LeftOverLocals 1 Leviathan 1 lg smart tv 1 lockbit 1 LSASS 1 m-trends 1 Machine Learning Integration 1 Mallox 1 MalPurifier 1 mandiant 1 MediHunt 1 Meta Pixel 1 ML 1 mobile network analysis 1 mobileiron 1 nes 1 nexus 1 NGO 1 Nim 1 Nimfilt 1 NtQueryInformationThread 1 OFGB 1 oracle 1 paid content 1 panos 1 Passwordless 1 Phishing Resilience 1 PingFederate 1 Platform Lock-in Tool 1 PlayIntegrityAPI 1 PlayStation 1 playstation 2 1 playstation 3 1 plc 1 podcast 1 Privilege Escalation 1 ps2 1 ps3 1 PulseVPN 1 qcsuper 1 qemu 1 qualcomm diag protocol 1 radio frame capture 1 Raytracing 1 Real-time Attack Detection 1 Red Team 1 Registry Modification 1 Risk Mitigation 1 RiskManagement 1 rodrigo copetti 1 rooted android devices 1 Router 1 rust 1 Sagemcom 1 sandworm 1 ScamCallDetection 1 security 1 Security Awareness 1 session hijacking 1 SharpADWS 1 SharpTerminator 1 shellcode 1 SIEM 1 Siemens 1 skimming 1 Smart Devices 1 snes 1 SSO 1 stack overflow 1 TA427 1 TA547 1 TDDP 1 telecom security 1 Telegram 1 telerik 1 TeleTracker 1 TEMP.Periscope 1 Terminator 1 Think Tanks 1 Threat 1 threat intelligence 1 threat intelligence analysis 1 Threat Simulation 1 tool 1 toolkit 1 tp-link 1 UK 1 UserManagerEoP 1 uta0218 1 virtualbox 1 VPN 1 vu 1 wargame 1 Web Authentication 1 WebAuthn 1 webos 1 What2Log 1 Windows 11 1 Windows Kernel 1 Windstream 1 women 1 WSUS 1 wt-2024-0004 1 wt-2024-0005 1 wt-2024-0006 1 xbox 1 xbox 360 1 xbox original 1 xss 1 Yubico 1 Z80A 1 ZX Spectrum 1 Больше тегов

Фильтры

Подарить подписку

Будет создан код, который позволит адресату получить бесплатный для него доступ на определённый уровень подписки.

Оплата за этого пользователя будет списываться с вашей карты вплоть до отмены подписки. Код может быть показан на экране или отправлен по почте вместе с инструкцией.

Будет создан код, который позволит адресату получить сумму на баланс.

Разово будет списана указанная сумма и зачислена на баланс пользователя, воспользовавшегося данным промокодом.

Добавить карту
0/2048