Monthly Digest. 2024 / 07
«Promo»
Vkontakte
Twitter
Одноклассники
Cyberbiosecurity Frankenstein. When Hackers Get Bored of Your Bank Account
«Promo»
AI & ML Are Transforming OT Cybersecurity
Who knew that the saviors of our industrial control systems and critical infrastructure would come in the form of AI and ML algorithms? Traditional security measures, with their quaint rule-based approaches, are apparently so last century. Enter AI and ML, the knights in shining armor, ready to tackle the ever-evolving cyber threats that our poor, defenseless OT systems face.
These magical technologies can establish baselines of normal behavior and detect anomalies with the precision of a seasoned detective. They can sift through mountains of data, finding those pesky attack indicators that mere mortals would miss. And let’s not forget their ability to automate threat detection and incident response, because who needs human intervention anyway?
Supervised learning, unsupervised learning, deep learning—oh my! These techniques are like the Swiss Army knives of cybersecurity, each one more impressive than the last. Sure, there are a few minor hiccups, like the lack of high-quality labeled data and the complexity of modeling OT environments, but who’s worried about that?
AI and ML are being seamlessly integrated into OT security solutions, promising a future where cyber-risk visibility and protection are as easy as pie. So, here’s to our new AI overlords—may they keep our OT systems safe while we sit back and marvel at their brilliance.
📌Operational Technology (OT) systems like those used in industrial control systems and critical infrastructure are increasingly being targeted by cyber threats.
📌Traditional rule-based security solutions are inadequate for detecting sophisticated attacks and anomalies in OT environments.
📌Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) technologies are being leveraged to provide more effective cybersecurity for OT systems:
📌AI/ML can establish accurate baselines of normal OT system behavior and detect deviations indicative of cyber threats.
📌AI/ML algorithms can analyze large volumes of OT data from disparate sources to identify subtle attack indicators that humans may miss.
📌AI/ML enables automated threat detection, faster incident response, and predictive maintenance to improve OT system resilience.
📌Supervised learning models trained on known threat data to detect malware and malicious activity patterns.
📌Unsupervised learning for anomaly detection by identifying deviations from normal OT asset behavior profiles.
📌Deep learning models like neural networks and graph neural networks for more advanced threat detection.
📌Challenges remain in training effective AI/ML models due to lack of high-quality labeled OT data and the complexity of modeling OT environments.
📌AI/ML capabilities are being integrated into OT security monitoring and asset management solutions to enhance cyber-risk visibility and protection
Inclusive Innovators from smart cities to cyberbiosecurity. Women clean up the forefront of the cyber landscape
This document serves as an analysis of role women play in the field of cybersecurity, discovering their contributions across various industries while subtly pointing out how they’ve been carrying the load all along. The analysis dives into several key aspects, including the historical context and examining technologies developed or significantly influenced by women, emphasizing their technological advancements that have kept the industry from falling into the dark ages. The analysis further explores the influence of women in cybersecurity across various sectors such as smart cities, railways, maritime, pharmaceutical/biotech, and cyberbiosecurity, demonstrating their undeniable impact on these industries.
This document provides a qualitative synthesis of various aspects, offering valuable insights for security professionals and specialists across different industries. By understanding the unique contributions and perspectives of women in cybersecurity, stakeholders can finally start to appreciate the importance of diversity in enhancing security measures and driving innovation. This analysis is not just beneficial but essential for developing more inclusive cybersecurity strategies, improving industry practices, and inspiring the next generation of cybersecurity professionals.
In perpetually evolving world of cybersecurity, women have finally stepped up to show everyone how it’s done. Historically underrepresented, women are now making their mark, with projections suggesting they’ll make up 30 percent of the global cybersecurity workforce by 2025 and 35 percent by 2031. This increase in representation is a key to unlocking innovative solutions and growth in the cybersecurity sector.
Women in cybersecurity bring a treasure trove of expertise, resilience, and innovation to the table, tackling the complex task of securing a digital landscape with a finesse that’s been sorely missing. Their contributions span various domains, from developing secure smart city technologies to bolstering the cybersecurity of critical infrastructure sectors like railways and maritime. They are also pushing for more inclusive and diverse work environments, which, surprise, are crucial for fostering creativity and comprehensive problem-solving.
Evolving Standards: Recent Changes in Maturity Models
The last update Essential Eight Maturity Model introduced several significant changes aimed at enhancing cybersecurity measures across various maturity levels.
Patch Applications and Operating Systems
📌 Increased Priority on Patching: Organizations are now urged to patch critical vulnerabilities within 48 hours. The focus has also been placed on patching applications that interact with untrusted content within a two-week timeframe.
📌 Regular Vulnerability Scanning: The frequency of scanning systems for critical vulnerabilities has been increased from at least fortnightly to at least weekly.
Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA)
📌 Enhanced MFA Requirements: The update introduced stricter MFA requirements, including the use of 'something users have' in addition to 'something users know' starting from Maturity Level One. MFA is now mandatory for web portals storing sensitive data and for staff logging onto business systems at higher maturity levels.
📌 Phishing-Resistant MFA: There is a new emphasis on implementing phishing-resistant MFA to enhance security further.
Restrict Administrative Privileges
📌 Governance of Privileged Access: Enhanced processes for managing privileged access, including the need for secure admin workstations and break glass accounts. Privileged accounts accessing the internet must be explicitly identified and their access strictly limited.
Application Control
📌 Annual Reviews and Blocklists: Organizations are required to conduct annual reviews of application control rule sets and implement Microsoft’s recommended application blocklist at Maturity Level Two.
User Application Hardening
📌 Discontinuation of Internet Explorer 11: Organizations must disable or remove Internet Explorer 11 following its support discontinuation. There is also a focus on implementing stringent vendor and ASD hardening guidance, including PowerShell logging and command-line process creation events at higher maturity levels.
Regular Backups
📌 Data Criticality Consideration: While there are no significant changes to the backup requirements, organizations are encouraged to consider the business criticality of data when prioritizing backups.
Logging
📌 Centralized Logging Requirements: The requirement for centralized logging has been moved from Maturity Level 3 to Maturity Level 2, which will substantially increase the size of log repositories.
Cloud Service Management and Incident Detection and Response
📌 New Focus Areas: These have been added as new focus areas in the update, reflecting the need to manage cloud services more effectively and respond to incidents more robustly.
General Enhancements
📌 Consistency with Information Security Manual (ISM): The update has adopted language from mapped controls within the ISM to ensure consistency between the two frameworks and facilitate the automatic ingestion of Essential Eight tracking and reporting by governance, compliance, and reporting tools
Reaching the Pinnacle: Benefits of Achieving Target Maturity
Reaching the target maturity level in the Essential Eight Maturity Model not only fortifies an organization's defenses against cyber threats but also enhances its operational efficiency, compliance, and strategic positioning in the market
Enhanced Cybersecurity Defense
📌 Reduced Vulnerability to Attacks: By adhering to the Essential Eight strategies at the target maturity level, organizations can significantly reduce their vulnerability to a wide range of cyber-attacks, including malware, ransomware, and phishing.
📌 Prevention of Data Breaches: Implementing the Essential Eight effectively helps prevent unauthorized access to sensitive information, thereby protecting against data breaches that can have severe financial and reputational consequences.
Improved Compliance and Risk Management
📌 Compliance with Standards: For Australian government agencies, compliance with the Essential Eight is mandated, and achieving the target maturity level ensures adherence to these standards. For other organizations, it aligns with best practices and can meet or exceed industry standards, which may become more regulated over time.
📌 Enhanced Risk Management: Achieving the target maturity level allows organizations to manage risks more effectively, aligning cybersecurity measures with their risk appetite and threat landscape.
Operational Benefits
📌 Cost-Effective Security: Implementing the Essential Eight strategies to the required maturity level is generally more cost-effective compared to dealing with the aftermath of security breaches. It provides a good return on investment by mitigating potential losses from cyber incidents.
📌 Streamlined IT Management: Organizations that reach their target maturity level have well-defined processes and systems for managing cybersecurity, which can lead to more efficient IT operations and reduced downtime.
Strategic Advantages
📌 Reputation and Trust: Organizations that demonstrate a high level of cybersecurity maturity can build greater trust with customers, partners, and stakeholders, enhancing their market reputation.
📌 Competitive Edge: By achieving and maintaining a high maturity level, organizations can gain a competitive advantage, particularly if cybersecurity is a critical aspect of their business or sector.
Long-Term Sustainability
📌 Future-Proofing: The Essential Eight Maturity Model is designed to be adaptive to changes in the threat landscape. Achieving the target maturity level prepares organizations to quickly adapt to new threats and technologies, ensuring long-term cybersecurity resilience
Stages of Excellence: Understanding Maturity Levels
Organizations are advised to achieve a consistent maturity level across all eight mitigation strategies before considering moving to a higher level. This ensures a balanced approach to cybersecurity, minimizing weak points that could be exploited by attackers.
The choice of a target maturity level should be informed by a risk-based approach, taking into account the organization's specific circumstances and the evolving nature of cyber threats. This approach helps organizations prioritize their cybersecurity efforts effectively.
📌 Maturity Level Zero: Indicates significant weaknesses in an organization's cybersecurity posture, making it easy for adversaries to exploit.
📌 Maturity Level One: Targets basic cyber hygiene to protect against adversaries using widely available tools and techniques. This level is suitable for organizations looking to protect themselves from general, non-targeted cyber threats.
📌 Maturity Level Two: Provides a more advanced defense against adversaries who are willing to invest more effort and resources to target a specific organization. This level involves tighter controls and quicker response actions.
📌 Maturity Level Three: Represents the highest standard of cybersecurity within the model, aimed at protecting against highly capable adversaries who target specific organizations with advanced tactics.
Securing the Future: A Cybersecurity Maturity Approach
These strategies are designed to work in concert to provide a robust defense against a variety of cyber threats. While the Essential Eight focuses on these core strategies, organizations are encouraged to implement these in a manner that aligns with their specific needs and risks, potentially incorporating other security measures as part of a broader cybersecurity framework
📌 Application Control: Restricting the execution of unapproved applications to prevent malware and unauthorized software.
📌 Patch Applications: Regularly updating applications to close security vulnerabilities.
📌 Configure Microsoft Office Macro Settings: Restricting the use of macros to prevent malware delivery via Office documents.
📌 User Application Hardening: Reducing the attack surface by disabling features that are commonly exploited, such as Java, Flash, and web ads.
📌 Restrict Administrative Privileges: Limiting administrative rights to reduce the potential for misuse and limit the scope of damage from an attack.
📌 Patch Operating Systems: Regularly updating operating systems to mitigate vulnerabilities.
📌 Multi-factor Authentication (MFA): Requiring additional verification methods to strengthen access controls.
📌 Regular Backups: Ensuring data is regularly backed up and that backups are tested to ensure they can be restored.
Nuances of Maturity: Specifics and Details
The Essential Eight Maturity Model FAQ provides comprehensive guidance on implementing and understanding the Essential Eight strategies. It emphasizes a proactive, risk-based approach to cybersecurity, reflecting the evolving nature of cyber threats and the importance of maintaining a balanced and comprehensive cybersecurity posture
General Questions
📌 Essential Eight Overview: The Essential Eight consists of eight mitigation strategies recommended for organizations to implement as a baseline to protect against cyber threats. These strategies are application control, patch applications, configure Microsoft Office macro settings, user application hardening, restrict administrative privileges, patch operating systems, multi-factor authentication, and regular backups.
📌 Purpose of Implementing the Essential Eight: Implementing the Essential Eight is seen as a proactive measure that is more cost-effective in terms of time, money, and effort compared to responding to a large-scale cyber security incident.
📌 Essential Eight Maturity Model (E8MM): The E8MM assists organizations in implementing the Essential Eight in a graduated manner based on different levels of tradecraft and targeting.
Updates to the Essential Eight Maturity Model
📌 Reason for Updates: The Australian Signals Directorate (ASD) updates the E8MM to ensure the advice remains contemporary, fit for purpose, and practical. Updates are based on evolving malicious tradecraft, cyber threat intelligence, and feedback from Essential Eight assessment and uplift activities.
📌 Recent Updates: Recent updates include recommendations for using an automated method of asset discovery at least fortnightly and ensuring vulnerability scanners use an up-to-date vulnerability database.
Maturity Model Updates and Implementation
📌 Redefinition of Maturity Levels: The July 2021 update redefined the number of maturity levels and moved to a stronger risk-based approach to implementation. It also reintroduced Maturity Level Zero to provide a broader range of maturity level ratings.
📌 Risk-Based Approach: The model now emphasizes a risk-based approach, where circumstances like legacy systems and technical debt are considered. Choosing not to implement entire mitigation strategies where technically feasible is generally considered Maturity Level Zero.
📌 Implementation as a Package: Organizations are advised to achieve a consistent maturity level across all eight mitigation strategies before moving to a higher maturity level. This approach aims to provide a more secure baseline than achieving higher maturity levels in a few strategies to the detriment of others.
Specific Strategy Updates
📌 Application Control Changes: Additional executable content types were introduced for all maturity levels, and Maturity Level One was updated to focus on using file system access permissions to prevent malware execution
Embarking on the Maturity Journey: Introduction
The Essential Eight Maturity Model provides detailed guidance and information for businesses and government entities on implementing and assessing cybersecurity practices.
📌 Purpose and Audience: designed to assist small and medium businesses, large organizations, and government entities in enhancing their cybersecurity posture. It serves as a resource to understand and apply the Essential Eight strategies effectively.
📌 Content Updates: was first published on July 16, 2021, and has been regularly updated, with the latest update on April 23, 2024. This ensures that the information remains relevant and reflects the latest cybersecurity practices and threats.
📌 Resource Availability: available as a downloadable, titled "PROTECT - Essential Eight Maturity Model," making it accessible for offline use and easy distribution within organizations.
📌 Feedback Mechanism: users are encouraged to provide feedback on the usefulness of the information, which indicates an ongoing effort to improve the resource based on user input.
📌 Additional Services: page http://cyber.gov.au also offers links to report cyber security incidents, especially for critical infrastructure, and to sign up for alerts on new threats, highlighting a proactive approach to cybersecurity.
Security Maturity Model. Even Cybersecurity Needs to Grow Up
The Essential Eight Maturity Model, that grand old strategic framework whipped up by the wizards at the Australian Cyber Security Centre to magically enhance cybersecurity defenses within organizations. This analysis promises to dive deep into the thrilling world of the model’s structure, the Herculean challenges of implementation, and the dazzling benefits of climbing the maturity ladder.
We’ll provide a qualitative summary of this legendary Essential Eight Maturity Model, offering «valuable» insights into its application and effectiveness. This analysis is touted as a must-read for security professionals, IT managers, and decision-makers across various industries, who are all presumably waiting with bated breath to discover the secret sauce for fortifying their organizations against those pesky cyber threats.
So, buckle up and prepare for an analysis that promises to be as enlightening as it is essential, guiding you through the mystical realm of cybersecurity maturity with the grace and precision of a cybersecurity guru.
----
This document provides an analysis of the Essential Eight Maturity Model, a strategic framework developed by the Australian Cyber Security Centre to enhance cybersecurity defenses within organizations. The analysis will cover various aspects of the model, including its structure, implementation challenges, and the benefits of achieving different maturity levels.
The analysis offers valuable insights into its application and effectiveness. This analysis is particularly useful for security professionals, IT managers, and decision-makers across various industries, helping them to understand how to better protect their organizations from cyber threats and enhance their cybersecurity measures.
The Essential Eight Maturity Model provides detailed guidance and information for businesses and government entities on implementing and assessing cybersecurity practices.
📌 Purpose and Audience: designed to assist small and medium businesses, large organizations, and government entities in enhancing their cybersecurity posture. It serves as a resource to understand and apply the Essential Eight strategies effectively.
📌 Content Updates: was first published on July 16, 2021, and has been regularly updated, with the latest update on April 23, 2024. This ensures that the information remains relevant and reflects the latest cybersecurity practices and threats.
📌 Resource Availability: available as a downloadable, titled «PROTECT — Essential Eight Maturity Model, » making it accessible for offline use and easy distribution within organizations.
📌 Feedback Mechanism: users are encouraged to provide feedback on the usefulness of the information, which indicates an ongoing effort to improve the resource based on user input.
📌 Additional Services: page http://cyber.gov.au also offers links to report cyber security incidents, especially for critical infrastructure, and to sign up for alerts on new threats, highlighting a proactive approach to cybersecurity.
The Essential Eight Maturity Model FAQ provides comprehensive guidance on implementing and understanding the Essential Eight strategies. It emphasizes a proactive, risk-based approach to cybersecurity, reflecting the evolving nature of cyber threats and the importance of maintaining a balanced and comprehensive cybersecurity posture
General Questions
📌 Essential Eight Overview: The Essential Eight consists of eight mitigation strategies recommended for organizations to implement as a baseline to protect against cyber threats. These strategies are application control, patch applications, configure Microsoft Office macro settings, user application hardening, restrict administrative privileges, patch operating systems, multi-factor authentication, and regular backups.
📌 Purpose of Implementing the Essential Eight: Implementing the Essential Eight is seen as a proactive measure that is more cost-effective in terms of time, money, and effort compared to responding to a large-scale cyber security incident.
📌 Essential Eight Maturity Model (E8MM): The E8MM assists organizations in implementing the Essential Eight in a graduated manner based on different levels of tradecraft and targeting.
Updates to the Essential Eight Maturity Model
📌 Reason for Updates: The Australian Signals Directorate (ASD) updates the E8MM to ensure the advice remains contemporary, fit for purpose, and practical. Updates are based on evolving malicious tradecraft, cyber threat intelligence, and feedback from Essential Eight assessment and uplift activities.
📌 Recent Updates: Recent updates include recommendations for using an automated method of asset discovery at least fortnightly and ensuring vulnerability scanners use an up-to-date vulnerability database.
Maturity Model Updates and Implementation
📌 Redefinition of Maturity Levels: The July 2021 update redefined the number of maturity levels and moved to a stronger risk-based approach to implementation. It also reintroduced Maturity Level Zero to provide a broader range of maturity level ratings.
📌 Risk-Based Approach: The model now emphasizes a risk-based approach, where circumstances like legacy systems and technical debt are considered. Choosing not to implement entire mitigation strategies where technically feasible is generally considered Maturity Level Zero.
📌 Implementation as a Package: Organizations are advised to achieve a consistent maturity level across all eight mitigation strategies before moving to a higher maturity level. This approach aims to provide a more secure baseline than achieving higher maturity levels in a few strategies to the detriment of others.
Specific Strategy Updates
📌 Application Control Changes: Additional executable content types were introduced for all maturity levels, and Maturity Level One was updated to focus on using file system access permissions to prevent malware execution
Bias in AI. Because Even Robots Can Be Sexist
The intersection of gender and cybersecurity is an emerging field that highlights the differentiated impacts and risks faced by individuals based on their gender identities. Traditional cybersecurity models often overlook gender-specific threats such as online harassment, doxing, and technology-enabled abuse, leading to inadequate protection for vulnerable groups. This paper explores the integration of human-centric and gender-based threat models in cybersecurity, emphasizing the need for inclusive and equitable approaches. By leveraging AI and ML technologies, we can develop more effective threat detection and response systems that account for gender-specific vulnerabilities. Additionally, the paper provides a framework for developing and implementing gender-sensitive cybersecurity standards. The goal is to create a more inclusive cybersecurity environment that addresses the unique needs and experiences of all individuals, thereby enhancing overall security.
----
Cybersecurity has traditionally been viewed through a technical lens, focusing on protecting systems and networks from external threats. However, this approach often neglects the human element, particularly the differentiated impacts of cyber threats on various gender groups. Different individuals frequently experience unique cyber threats such as online harassment, doxing, and technology-enabled abuse, which are often downplayed or omitted in conventional threat models.
Recent research and policy discussions have begun to recognize the importance of incorporating gender perspectives into cybersecurity. For instance, the UN Open-Ended Working Group (OEWG) on ICTs has highlighted the need for gender mainstreaming in cyber norm implementation and gender-sensitive capacity building. Similarly, frameworks developed by organizations like the Association for Progressive Communications (APC) provide guidelines for creating gender-responsive cybersecurity policies.
Human-centric security prioritizes understanding and addressing human behavior within the context of cybersecurity. By focusing on the psychological and interactional aspects of security, human-centric models aim to build a security culture that empowers individuals, reduces human errors, and mitigates cyber risks effectively.
SUCCESSFUL CASE STUDIES OF GENDER-BASED THREAT MODELS IN ACTION
📌 Online Harassment Detection: A social media platform implemented an AI-based system to detect and mitigate online harassment. According to UNIDIR the system used NLP techniques to analyze text for abusive language and sentiment analysis to identify harassment. The platform reported a significant reduction in harassment incidents and improved user satisfaction.
📌 Doxing Prevention: A cybersecurity firm developed a model to detect doxing attempts by analyzing patterns in data access and sharing. According to UNIDIR the model used supervised learning to classify potential doxing incidents and alert users. The firm reported a 57% increase in the detection of doxing attempts and a 32% reduction in successful doxing incidents.
📌 Gender-Sensitive Phishing Detection: A financial institution implemented a phishing detection system that included gender-specific phishing tactics. According to UNIDIR the system used transformer-based models like BERT to analyze email content for gender-specific language and emotional manipulation and reported a 22% reduction in phishing click-through rates and a 38% increase in user reporting of phishing attempts.
IMPACT OF GENDERED ASSUMPTIONS IN ALGORITHMS ON CYBERSECURITY
📌 Behavioral Differences: Studies have shown significant differences in cybersecurity behaviors between men and women. Women are often more cautious and may adopt different security practices compared to men.
📌 Perceptions and Responses: Women and men perceive and respond to cybersecurity threats differently. Women may prioritize different aspects of security, such as privacy and protection from harassment, while men may focus more on technical defenses.
📌 Gender-Disaggregated Data: Collecting and analyzing gender-disaggregated data is crucial for understanding the different impacts of cyber threats on various gender groups. This data can inform more effective and inclusive cybersecurity policies.
📌 Promoting Gender Diversity: Increasing the representation of women in cybersecurity roles can enhance the field’s overall effectiveness. Diverse teams bring varied perspectives and are better equipped to address a wide range of cyber threats.
📌 Reinforcement of Gender Stereotypes: Algorithms trained on biased datasets can reinforce existing gender stereotypes. For example, machine learning models used in cybersecurity may inherit biases from the data they are trained on, leading to gendered assumptions in threat detection and response mechanisms.
📌 Misgendering and Privacy Violations: Social media platforms and other online services often use algorithms to infer user attributes, including gender. These inferences can be inaccurate, leading to misgendering and privacy violations.
📌 Gendered Outcomes of Cyber Threats: Traditional cybersecurity threats, such as denial of service attacks, can have gendered outcomes like additional security burdens and targeted attacks, which are often overlooked in gender-neutral threat models.
📌 Bias in Threat Detection and Response: Automated threat detection systems, such as email filters and phishing simulations, may incorporate gendered assumptions. For example, phishing simulations often involve gender stereotyping, which can affect the accuracy and effectiveness of these security measures.
