Monthly Digest. 2024 / 07
«Promo»
Vkontakte
Twitter
Одноклассники
Monthly Digest. 2024 / 07. Announcement
Welcome to the next edition of our Monthly Digest, your one-stop resource for staying informed on the most recent developments, insights, and best practices in the ever-evolving field of security. In this issue, we have curated a diverse collection of articles, news, and research findings tailored to both professionals and casual enthusiasts. Our digest aims to make our content is both engaging and accessible. Happy reading
A. Inclusive Innovators from smart cities to cyberbiosecurity. Women clean up the forefront of the cyber landscape
In perpetually evolving world of cybersecurity, women have finally stepped up to show everyone how it’s done. Historically underrepresented, women are now making their mark, with projections suggesting they’ll make up 30 percent of the global cybersecurity workforce by 2025 and 35 percent by 2031. This increase in representation is a key to unlocking innovative solutions and growth in the cybersecurity sector.
Women in cybersecurity bring a treasure trove of expertise, resilience, and innovation to the table, tackling the complex task of securing a digital landscape with a finesse that’s been sorely missing. Their contributions span various domains, from developing secure smart city technologies to bolstering the cybersecurity of critical infrastructure sectors like railways and maritime. They are also pushing for more inclusive and diverse work environments, which, surprise, are crucial for fostering creativity and comprehensive problem-solving
1) Women in tech and security
· AI and Generative AI Threats: Theresa Payton, former White House CIO and CEO of Fortalice Solutions, has highlighted the rise of AI-driven threats, including «Frankenfrauds» and deep fake AI personas. These threats involve sophisticated scams using AI to create realistic fake identities and scenarios, posing significant challenges for cybersecurity defenses. Payton emphasizes the need for robust security protocols and collaborative defense strategies to counter these emerging threats.
· Human-Centric Cybersecurity: Dr. Jessica Barker, co-founder and co-CEO of Cygenta, focuses on the human side of cybersecurity. She advocates for improving cybersecurity awareness, behaviors, and culture within organizations. Barker’s work emphasizes the importance of understanding human psychology and sociology in cybersecurity, empowering individuals to recognize and mitigate cyber threats effectively. Her efforts include delivering awareness sessions and keynotes to large audiences, and authoring books on cybersecurity.
· Cybersecurity Transformation and Organizational Culture: Kirsten Davies, CISO at Unilever, is known for her expertise in cybersecurity transformation and enhancing organizational culture. She has led initiatives to refine security processes and improve ways of working across multiple global companies. Davies' approach involves optimizing security practices to align with business goals and fostering a culture of security within organizations.
· Disaster Recovery and AI-Generated Threats: Sarah Armstrong-Smith, Chief Security Advisor for Microsoft EMEA, has been instrumental in addressing disaster recovery, data protection, and privacy. She emphasizes the importance of considering information validity in decision-making, particularly in the context of AI-generated threats like deepfakes and mixed reality. Armstrong-Smith also highlights the need for organizations to stay ahead of evolving threats by leveraging AI and machine learning in their cybersecurity strategies.
· Identity Threats and Influence Security: Theresa Payton also discusses the evolving landscape of identity threats, including the potential for cybercriminals to hack into intelligent buildings and lock them down. She stresses the importance of understanding and mitigating these threats through innovative security measures and influence security strategies.
· Diversity and Inclusion in Cybersecurity: Lynn Dohm, Executive Director of Women in CyberSecurity (WiCyS), is a strong advocate for diversity and inclusion in the cybersecurity workforce. She highlights the importance of DEI policies in bridging the workforce gap and improving the recruitment, retention, and advancement of women in cybersecurity. Dohm’s efforts aim to create a inclusive and effective security industry.
2) Women shaping the futrue AI
· Mira Murati: As the Chief Technology Officer at OpenAI, Mira Murati has been instrumental in the development and deployment of groundbreaking AI technologies such as ChatGPT, DALL-E, and Codex. Murati emphasizes the importance of public testing and responsible AI use, advocating for AI regulation to ensure that AI technologies align with human intentions and serve humanity positively. Her leadership has helped OpenAI become a leader in generative AI, pushing the boundaries of what AI can achieve while maintaining a focus on ethical considerations.
· Linda Yaccarino: Linda Yaccarino, CEO of X (formerly Twitter), is leveraging AI to enhance the platform’s capabilities, particularly in the realm of fact-checking and content moderation. She has introduced Community Notes, a crowd-sourced fact-checking feature, which aims to improve the accuracy and trustworthiness of digital content. This initiative highlights the potential of AI to combat misinformation and enhance the credibility of online platforms.
· Sarah Armstrong-Smith: Sarah Armstrong-Smith, Chief Security Advisor for Microsoft EMEA, focuses on the intersection of AI and cybersecurity. She addresses the challenges posed by AI-generated threats such as deepfakes and emphasizes the importance of disaster recovery, data protection, and privacy. Armstrong-Smith advocates for the integration of AI in cybersecurity strategies to stay ahead of evolving threats, ensuring that AI technologies are used to enhance security and resilience.
· Keren Elazari: Keren Elazari, a security analyst and researcher, promotes the ethical use of AI and the hacker mindset to drive innovation in cybersecurity. She emphasizes the importance of ethical hacking and bug bounty programs to identify and mitigate AI-related vulnerabilities. Elazari’s work in fostering a community of ethical hackers and her advocacy for increased representation of women in cybersecurity are crucial for developing robust AI security measures.
· Catherine Lian: Catherine Lian, General Manager and Technology Leader at IBM ASEAN, is at the forefront of AI integration in business. She stresses the need for upskilling workers to use AI effectively, ensuring that AI augments rather than replaces human jobs. Lian’s efforts in promoting AI education and responsible AI governance are essential for building trust in AI technologies and preparing for future regulatory requirements.
3) Pharmaceutical/Biotech:
· Katalin Karikó — Her work on mRNA technology laid the foundation for the development of mRNA vaccines, including the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines.
· Tu Youyou — Discovered artemisinin, a drug used to treat malaria, for which she was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 2015.
· Impact: Implementing robust security protocols to protect intellectual property and patient information.
4) Cyberbiosecurity:
· Megan Palmer — A pioneer in the field of cyberbiosecurity, she has contributed to developing strategies to secure bioinformatics data and protect biological research from cyber threats.
· Diane DiEuliis — Her work focuses on securing biomanufacturing processes and ensuring the integrity of biological products against cyber threats.
B. Burnout and Liability: The Perks of Being a Modern CISO
The «2024 Voice of the CISO» report by Proofpoint paints a vivid picture of the tumultuous landscape that CISOs have navigated recently After all, dealing with a global pandemic, the chaos of remote work, and record levels of employee turnover was just a walk in the park. Now, with hybrid working becoming the norm and cloud technology expanding the attack surface to unprecedented levels, CISOs can finally relax, right? Wrong.
Cyber threats are more targeted, sophisticated, and frequent than ever. Employees are more mobile, often taking sensitive data with them as they hop from job to job. And let’s not forget the generative AI tools that, while promising, have also made it easier for cybercriminals to launch devastating attacks with just a few dollars.
Sure, CISOs are enjoying closer ties with key stakeholders, board members, and regulators. But this newfound proximity only brings higher stakes, more pressure, and heightened expectations. And with flat or reduced budgets, CISOs are expected to do much more with considerably less. In this environment, shortcuts are sometimes necessary, but they can lead to human error—because, of course, everything always goes perfectly when you’re under-resourced and overworked.
To better understand how CISOs are navigating yet another high-pressure year, Proofpoint surveyed 1,600 CISOs worldwide. They asked about their roles, outlooks for the next two years, and how they see their responsibilities evolving. The report explores the delicate balance between concern and confidence as various factors combine to ramp up the pressure on CISOs. It delves into the persistent risks posed by human error, the challenges of burnout and personal liability, and the evolving relationship between CISOs and the boardroom.
1) Benefits
· Comprehensive Data: The report surveys 1,600 CISOs from organizations with 1,000+ employees across 16 countries, providing a broad and diverse dataset.
· Current Trends and Challenges: It highlights key issues such as the persistent vulnerability of human error, the impact of generative AI, and the economic pressures on cybersecurity budgets.
· Strategic Insights: The report offers actionable insights and recommendations, such as the importance of AI-powered technologies, improving employee cybersecurity awareness, and the need for robust incident response plans.
· Board-CISO Relations: It underscores the improving relationship between CISOs and board members, which is crucial for aligning cybersecurity strategies with business objectives.
2) Limitations
· Overemphasis on AI: The report places significant emphasis on AI as both a threat and a solution. While AI’s role in cybersecurity is undeniable, the focus might overshadow other critical areas that also need attention.
· Potential Bias in Self-Reported Data: The data is self-reported by CISOs, which can introduce bias. CISOs might overstate their preparedness or the effectiveness of their strategies to present a more favorable view of their performance.
· Focus on Large Organizations: The survey targets organizations with 1,000 or more employees, which may not accurately reflect the challenges and realities faced by smaller organizations. This focus can limit the applicability of the findings to a broader range of businesses.
· Economic and Regional Variations: While the report covers multiple countries, the economic and regulatory environments vary significantly across regions. The findings might not be universally applicable, and regional nuances could be underrepresented.
· Human-Centric Security: Although the report emphasizes human-centric security, it might not fully address the complexities of implementing such strategies effectively. The reliance on user education and awareness can be seen as placing too much responsibility on employees rather than improving systemic defenses
3) The Cyber Realities for a CISO in 2024
a) Generative AI:
· Security Risks: 54% of CISOs believe generative AI poses a security risk to their organization.
· AI: While AI can aid cybercriminals by making attacks easier to scale and execute, it also provides defenders with real-time insights into threats, which traditional methods cannot match.
· Top Concerns: ChatGPT and other generative AI models are seen as significant risks, followed by collaboration tools like Slack and Teams (39%) and Microsoft 365 (38%).
b) Economic Impact:
· Economic: 59% of CISOs agree that current economic conditions have negatively impacted their organization’s ability to resource cybersecurity budgets.
· Regional Impact: CISOs in South Korea (79%), Canada (72%), France (68%), and Germany (68%) feel the economic impact most acutely.
· Budget: Nearly half (48%) of CISOs have been asked to cut staff, delay backfills, or reduce spending.
c) Priorities and Strategies:
· Priorities: Improving protection and enabling business innovation remain top priorities for 58% of CISOs.
· Employee Cybersecurity Awareness: Improving employee cybersecurity awareness has become the second-highest priority, indicating a shift towards human-centric security strategies.
d) Board Relations:
· Alignment with Board: 84% of CISOs now see eye to eye with their board members on cybersecurity issues, up from 62% in 2023.
· Board-Level Expertise: 84% of CISOs believe cybersecurity expertise is required at the board level, reflecting a significant increase from previous years.
e) Challenges and Pressures:
· Unrealistic Expectations: 66% of CISOs believe there are excessive expectations on their role, a continued increase from previous years.
· Burnout: More than half (53%) of CISOs have experienced or witnessed burnout in the past 12 months, although there is a slight improvement with 31% reporting no burnout, up from 15% last year.
· Personal Liability: 66% of CISOs are concerned about personal, financial, and legal liability, with 72% unwilling to join an organization without directors and officers (D& O) insurance or similar coverage.
C. Why Secure Medical Images? Hackers Need Jobs Too!
DICOM, which stands for Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine, is a globally recognized standard for the storage, transfer, and management of medical images and related patient data. It is extensively used in hospitals, clinics, and radiology centers to ensure interoperability among various medical imaging devices, regardless of the manufacturer or proprietary technology involved
1) Benefits of using DICOM:
· Interoperability: DICOM enables seamless communication and integration between medical imaging devices and systems from different manufacturers. This allows for efficient sharing and transfer of medical images and related data across healthcare facilities.
· Standardized format: DICOM defines a standardized file format for storing and transmitting medical images, ensuring consistency and compatibility across different systems and platforms.
· Comprehensive metadata: DICOM files contain comprehensive metadata, including patient information, study details, image acquisition parameters, and more. This metadata is crucial for accurate interpretation and analysis of medical images.
· Workflow efficiency: DICOM facilitates efficient workflow management by enabling the storage, retrieval, and display of medical images in a standardized manner, reducing the need for manual intervention and improving productivity.
· Data integrity: DICOM incorporates mechanisms for ensuring data integrity during transmission and storage, reducing the risk of data corruption or loss.
2) Drawbacks and limitations of DICOM:
· Complexity: The DICOM standard is complex, with numerous specifications and extensions, making it challenging to implement and maintain compliance across different systems and vendors.
· Security concerns: While DICOM provides some security features, such as encryption and access controls, it may not always be implemented or configured properly, potentially exposing sensitive patient data to security risks.
· Limited support for advanced imaging modalities: DICOM was initially designed for traditional imaging modalities like CT, MRI, and X-rays. It may not fully support the requirements of emerging advanced imaging techniques, such as functional MRI or molecular imaging.
· Vendor-specific extensions: Some vendors implement proprietary extensions to DICOM, which can lead to interoperability issues and vendor lock-in.
· De-identification challenges: De-identifying DICOM headers to remove patient identifiers for research or secondary use can be complex and may inadvertently remove or alter important metadata required for accurate interpretation of the images.
3) Impact on Healthcare
a) Exposure of Sensitive Data:
· DICOM attacks can lead to the exposure of sensitive patient information, including personal health records, medical images, and identifiable data such as names, addresses, and Social Security numbers.
· Unauthorized access to this data can result in significant privacy violations and legal consequences for healthcare providers.
b) Data Tampering and Misdiagnosis:
· Attackers can alter medical images and associated data, leading to incorrect diagnoses and inappropriate treatments. For example, adding false signs of illnesses or altering ultrasound images to show non-existent conditions.
c) Ransomware and Extortion:
· DICOM servers and PACS systems are prime targets for ransomware attacks, where attackers encrypt medical data and demand ransom payments to restore access.
· Extortion attacks disrupt medical services, delay treatments, and cause financial losses for healthcare.
d) Denial-of-Service (DoS) Attacks:
· Unprotected DICOM servers are vulnerable to DoS attacks, which can disrupt medical services by making critical systems unavailable.
· Service interruptions can interfere with patient care and delay urgent medical procedures.
e) Increased Attack Surface:
· The shift towards cloud storage and internet connected PACS systems has increased the attack surface, making it easier for attackers to exploit vulnerabilities and gain access to sensitive data.
· Many DICOM servers are inadequately secured, with fewer than 1% using effective security measures.
f) Regulatory and Financial Repercussions:
· Data breaches and security incidents can lead to regulatory penalties, legal actions, and significant financial costs for healthcare providers.
· The reputational damage from such breaches can also erode patient trust and impact the healthcare provider’s standing in the industry.
g) Operational Disruptions:
· Cyberattacks on DICOM systems can cause operational disruptions, affecting the ability of healthcare providers to deliver timely and effective care.
· disruptions can have a direct impact on patient outcomes and the overall efficiency of healthcare services
D. Welcome to Cyberbiosecurity. Because regular cybersecurity wasn’t complicated enough
The evolving landscape of biology and biotechnology, significantly influenced by advancements in computer science, engineering, and data science, is reshaping our understanding and manipulation of biological systems. The integration of these disciplines has led to the development of fields such as computational biology and synthetic biology, which utilize computational power and engineering principles to solve complex biological problems and innovate new biotechnological applications. This interdisciplinary approach has not only accelerated research and development but also introduced new capabilities such as gene editing and biomanufacturing, pushing the boundaries of what is scientifically possible.
· Technological Advancements: advancements in computational capabilities and engineering principles have transformed the study and application of biology and biotechnology globally.
· Data Generation and Sharing: There is an increased ability to generate, analyze, share, and store vast amounts of biological data, which has implications for understanding human health, agriculture, evolution, and ecosystems.
· Economic and Security Consequences: While these technological capabilities bring substantial economic benefits, they also introduce vulnerabilities to unauthorized interventions. This can lead to economic and physical harm due to data theft or misuse by state and non-state actors.
· Data Access: A key concern is the asymmetric access to and use of biological data, driven by varying national policies on data governance. This asymmetry can affect global data sharing and has implications for security and equity in data access.
· Security Risks: There are significant security risks associated with the digital and biological data nexus, emphasizing the potential for significant harm if such data are compromised.
Biological data is increasingly being generated, shared, and analyzed digitally. This enables new scientific discoveries but also creates vulnerabilities:
· Databases containing sensitive biological data like genomic information and proprietary biotechnology research are vulnerable to cyber theft and unauthorized access by malicious actors. This enables economic espionage, development of bioweapons, or targeting of specific populations.
· The ability to integrate and analyze disparate biological datasets using techniques like machine learning raises concerns about engineering pathogens or evading countermeasures.
· There are asymmetries in how different nations or entities govern access to and sharing of biological data, creating potential national security risks. Policies aim to balance data protection with enabling legitimate research.
1) Vulnerability of Biotech Data
· Exploitation by Adversaries: biotechnology data can be exploited by adversaries, leading to significant consequences. This exploitation could involve unauthorized access to sensitive information, which could then be used for harmful purposes.
· Negative Effects of Digitalization: These effects include increased risks of data breaches and the potential misuse of biologically relevant digital data.
· Definition and Scope: Biotechnology is defined broadly to include the manipulation of biological processes for various scientific and industrial purposes. This includes the genetic manipulation of different organisms, which inherently involves handling sensitive genetic data.
· Data Availability and Security: while biotechnology data is often available through online databases and cloud-based platforms, these platforms can be vulnerable to cyberattacks.
· Legal and Illegal Acquisition Risks: risks associated with both the legal and illegal acquisition of biotechnology data lead to the need for stringent measures to mitigate these risks and protect against potential security breaches that could have wide-reaching implications.
· Espionage (Corporate and State-Sponsored): involves unauthorized spying to gather proprietary or confidential information. Biotech firms, due to their innovative research in drug development and medical technologies, are prime targets for espionage to steal intellectual property.
E. Cyberbiosecurity Frankenstein. When Hackers Get Bored of Your Bank Account
The life science industry is undergoing a digital transformation, with networked devices and systems becoming increasingly common. This trend is leading to the development of «smart labs» that offer increased efficiency and productivity. However, the integration of cybertechnologies also presents significant security vulnerabilities that must be effectively managed to avoid existential threats to the enterprise, public health, and national security
· Technological Integration: technological innovation is deeply integrated into daily life, affecting every significant aspect of the world, which now has a cyber component.
· Digital Transformation: the ongoing digital transformation, which, while beneficial, brings about vulnerabilities due to the cyber components of modern technologies.
· Cyber Vulnerabilities: existing cybersecurity vulnerabilities within the life science enterprise and pose risks to laboratory workers, the surrounding community, and the environment.
· Protective Measures: the need for consideration by equipment designers, software developers, and end users to minimize or eliminate vulnerabilities.
· Data Protection: the importance of organizations and individuals respecting, valuing, and protecting data to benefit workers, life science organizations, and national security.
· Proactive Approach: End users are encouraged to view every piece of laboratory equipment and process through a cyberbiosecurity lens to proactively address potential vulnerabilities
1) Biosecurity
· Definition and Scope: Biosecurity refers to measures aimed at preventing the introduction and spread of harmful organisms to humans, animals, and plants. It encompasses the management of biological risks associated with food safety, animal life and health, and environmental protection.
· Focus Areas: Biosecurity measures are often focused on agricultural and environmental settings, aiming to protect against diseases and pests that can impact ecosystems, agriculture, and human health.
· Components: include physical security, personnel reliability, material control, transport security, and information security. These measures are designed to prevent unauthorized access, loss, theft, misuse, or intentional release of biological agents.
· Regulatory and Policy Framework: Biosecurity is supported by various national and international regulations and guidelines that govern the handling, use, and transfer of biological materials.
2) Cyberbiosecurity
· Definition and Scope: Cyberbiosecurity is an emerging discipline at the intersection of cybersecurity, biosecurity, and cyber-physical security. It focuses on protecting the bioeconomy from cyber threats that could compromise biological systems, data, and technologies.
· Focus Areas: security vulnerabilities that arise from the digitization of biology and biotechnology, including threats to genetic data, biomanufacturing processes, and other bioinformatics systems.
· Components: Cyberbiosecurity integrates cybersecurity measures with biosecurity principles to safeguard against unauthorized access, theft, manipulation, and destruction of biological and data systems. It includes the security of digital and physical interfaces between biological and cyber systems.
· Emerging Importance: The discipline is gaining importance due to the increasing use of digital technologies in biological research and healthcare, making traditional biosecurity measures insufficient to address all potential threats.
3) Comparative Analysis
· Overlap & Shared Goals: Both biosecurity and cyberbiosecurity aim to protect against threats that can cause significant harm to public health, agriculture, and the environment. However, cyberbiosecurity extends the concept to include digital threats to biological systems.
· Technological Integration: As biological systems increasingly incorporate digital technologies, the overlap between biosecurity and cybersecurity becomes more pronounced. Cyberbiosecurity addresses the unique challenges at this intersection, ensuring both biological and digital security measures are implemented effectively
· Unique Aspects: Biosecurity traditionally focuses on physical and biological threats, such as pathogens and invasive species. Cyberbiosecurity, on the other hand, also addresses digital threats and the security of information systems related to biological sciences.
· Interdisciplinary Approach: Cyberbiosecurity requires a more interdisciplinary approach, integrating expertise from cybersecurity, biological sciences, and information technology to address complex and evolving threats.
· Regulatory Evolution: As the fields converge, there is a growing need for regulations that address the dual aspects of biosecurity and cybersecurity, ensuring comprehensive protection strategies that cover both biological materials and their associated digital information
4) Cyberbiosecurity Implications
· Digital Transformation: This transformation is characterized by the integration of digital technologies in all aspects of human activities, significantly affecting how laboratories operate.
· Increased Efficiency and Productivity: The integration of networked devices and systems in laboratories has led to increased efficiency and productivity. These technologies allow for faster and more accurate data processing and communication within and across laboratory environments.
· Cyber Vulnerabilities: Despite the benefits, the reliance on digital technologies introduces significant cybersecurity vulnerabilities, potentially leading to data breaches, loss of intellectual property, and disruption of laboratory operations.
· Smart Labs: the future prevalence of «smart labs» will utilize innovations like virtual personal assistants and networked laboratory equipment to further enhance operational efficiency. However, these advancements also increase the potential attack surfaces for cyber threats
· Need for Cyberbiosecurity: The integration of cyber elements in biological research necessitates a focus on cyberbiosecurity to protect sensitive data and biological materials from cyber threats. This involves implementing robust cybersecurity measures and developing new strategies to mitigate risks associated with digital and biological convergence.
· Training and Awareness: There is a highlighted need for training laboratory personnel on cybersecurity best practices and raising awareness about the potential cyber threats in modern laboratory settings. This training is crucial for ensuring that all staff can recognize and respond to security incidents effectively
F. HABs and Cyberbiosecurity. Because Your Digital Algal Blooms Needs a Firewall
Cyberbiosecurity is an emerging interdisciplinary field that addresses the convergence of cybersecurity, biosecurity, and cyber-physical security and other unique challenges. Its development is driven by the need to protect increasingly interconnected and digitized biological systems and data from emerging cyber threats. It focuses on protecting the integrity, confidentiality, and availability of critical biological and biomedical data, systems, and infrastructure from cyber threats. This discipline is relevant in contexts where biological and digital systems interact, such as in biopharmaceutical manufacturing, biotechnology research, and healthcare.
1) Biological harmful threats
· Data Integrity and Confidentiality Breaches: Biological data, such as genetic information and health records, are increasingly digitized and stored in cyber systems. Unauthorized access or manipulation of this data can lead to significant privacy violations and potentially harmful misuses.
· Contamination and Sabotage of Biological Systems: Cyber-physical attacks can lead to the direct contamination of biological systems. For example, hackers could potentially alter the controls of biotechnological equipment, leading to the unintended production of harmful substances or the sabotage of critical biological research.
· Disruption of Healthcare Services: Cyber-physical systems are integral to modern healthcare, from diagnostic to therapeutic devices. Cyberattacks on these systems can disrupt medical services, leading to delayed treatments or misdiagnoses, and potentially endanger patient lives.
· Threats to Agricultural Systems: In agriculture, cyberbiosecurity threats include the potential for cyberattacks that disrupt critical infrastructure used in the production and processing of agricultural products. This can lead to crop failures, livestock losses, and disruptions in the food supply chain.
· Environmental Monitoring and Management: Cyberbiosecurity also encompasses threats to systems that monitor and manage environmental health, such as water quality sensors and air quality monitoring stations. Compromising these systems can lead to incorrect data that may prevent the timely detection of environmental hazards, such as toxic algal blooms or chemical spills.
· Spread of Misinformation: The manipulation of biological data and the dissemination of false information can lead to public health scares, misinformation regarding disease outbreaks, or mistrust in public health systems. This type of cyber threat can have widespread social and economic impacts.
· Biotechnology and Synthetic Biology: As biotechnological and synthetic biology capabilities advance, the potential for their misuse increases if cyberbiosecurity measures are not adequately enforced. This includes the creation of harmful biological agents or materials that could be used in bioterrorism.
· Regulatory and Compliance Risks: Organizations that handle sensitive biological data must comply with numerous regulatory requirements. Cyberattacks that lead to non-compliance can result in legal penalties, loss of licenses, and significant financial damages.
· Insider Threats: Insiders with access to both cyber and biological systems pose a significant threat as they can manipulate or steal sensitive information or biological materials without needing to breach external security measures.
· Data Injection Attacks: These involve the insertion of incorrect or malicious data into a system, which can lead to erroneous outputs or decisions. In the context of HAB monitoring, for example, data injection could mislead response efforts or corrupt research data.
· Automated System Hijacking: This threat involves unauthorized control of automated systems, potentially leading to misuse or sabotage. For instance, automated systems used in water treatment or monitoring could be hijacked to disrupt operations or cause environmental damage.
· Node Forgery Attacks: In systems that rely on multiple sensors or nodes, forging a node can allow an attacker to inject false data or take over the network. This can compromise the integrity of the data collected and the decisions made based on this data.
· Attacks on Learning Algorithms: Machine learning algorithms are increasingly used to analyze complex biological data. These algorithms can be targeted by attacks designed to manipulate their learning process or output, leading to flawed models or incorrect analyses.
· Cyber-Physical System Vulnerabilities: The integration of cyber systems with physical processes (CPS) introduces vulnerabilities where physical damage can result from cyber-attacks. This includes threats to infrastructure that supports biological research and public health, such as power grids or water systems
· Intellectual Property Theft: In sectors like biotechnology, where research and development are key, cyberbiosecurity threats include the theft of intellectual property. This can occur through cyber-attacks aimed at accessing confidential data on new technologies or biological discoveries
· Bioeconomic Espionage: Like intellectual property theft, bioeconomic espionage involves the unauthorized access to confidential economic data related to biological resources. This could impact national security, especially if such data pertains to critical agricultural or environmental technologies.
· Contamination of Biological Data: The integrity of biological data is crucial for research and application in fields like genomics and epidemiology. Cyber-attacks that alter or corrupt this data can have serious consequences for public health, clinical research, and biological sciences.
· Supply Chain Vulnerabilities: The bioeconomy relies on complex supply chains that can be disrupted by cyber-attacks. This includes the supply chains for pharmaceuticals, agricultural products, and other biological materials
· AI-Driven Bioweapon Creation: The misuse of AI in the context of cyberbiosecurity could lead to the development of biological weapons, to design pathogens or to optimize the conditions for their growth, posing a significant bioterrorism threat
2) Industries, Issues and consequences
The consequences of biological cybersecurity issues are diverse and significant, affecting various sectors and aspects of society. These impacts range from the disruption of critical biological systems to economic losses, and from the erosion of public trust to potential threats to national and global security.
· Disruption of Critical Biological Systems and Processes: This can affect healthcare, agriculture, and environmental management, leading to failures in critical services and potential harm to public health and safety.
· Theft of Intellectual Property and Proprietary Data: Cyberbiosecurity breaches often target intellectual property, leading to significant financial losses and competitive disadvantages for affected organizations.
· Compromise of Sensitive Personal and Health Information: Data breaches can expose personal and health information, leading to privacy violations and potential misuse of this sensitive data.
· Economic Losses and Damage to Industries: Cyberbiosecurity incidents can cause direct financial damage to companies and economies, including operational disruptions and the costs associated with mitigating breaches.
· Erosion of Public Trust and Confidence: Incidents that compromise the integrity of critical biological data can lead to a loss of public trust in affected institutions and sectors.
· Potential for Biological Weapons Development and Bioterrorism: The misuse of biological data and technologies can lead to the development and proliferation of biological weapons, posing significant security threats.
· Regulatory Fines and Legal Implications: Organizations failing to adequately protect sensitive data can face regulatory fines and legal actions, further compounding financial and reputational damage.
· Reputational Damage to Organizations and Institutions: Beyond the immediate financial and operational impacts, cyberbiosecurity breaches can cause long-lasting reputational damage, affecting stakeholder trust and market position.
3) Specific issues like Harmful Algal Blooms
· Prevalence and Impact of HABs: HABs have affected a wide range of freshwater ecosystems including large lakes, smaller inland lakes, rivers, and reservoirs, as well as marine coastal areas and estuaries.
· Toxins Produced by HABs: Different cyanobacteria associated with HABs produce a variety of toxins that can impact human health, such as microcystins, saxitoxin, anatoxin-a, and cylindrospermopsin. These toxins pose significant challenges for studying and managing HABs.
· Increasing Prevalence Due to Environmental Factors: HABs may be increasing in prevalence due to rising temperatures and higher nutrient runoff. This necessitates the development of new tools and technology to rapidly detect, characterize, and respond to HABs that threaten water security.
· Cyberbiosecurity of Water Systems: there is a need for a framework to understand cyber threats to technologies that monitor and forecast water quality and the importance of envisioning water security from the perspective of a cyber-physical system (CPS) to properly detect, assess, and mitigate security threats on water infrastructure.
· Research and Management Challenges: the lack of established monitoring procedures for HAB-related pollutants, the diversity of blooms and toxin types, and the cost and effectiveness of current detection and monitoring methods.
· Global Nature of HAB: there is a need for international collaboration in research and management efforts. It calls for a multidisciplinary approach that integrates engineering, ecology, and chemistry to develop effective strategies for water cyberbiosecurity.
4) Key Stakeholders
· Water Utility Management: Responsible for overall implementation of cybersecurity measures, ensuring compliance with regulations, and managing the operational and financial aspects of cybersecurity.
· IT and Cybersecurity Teams: Develop and maintain cyber defenses, monitor systems for security breaches, and respond to incidents and ensure that software and hardware are updated to protect against threats.
· Operational Technology (OT) Personnel: Manage and maintain the physical components of water systems and work with IT teams to ensure that cybersecurity measures do not interfere with operational requirements.
· Government Agencies: Regulatory bodies such as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) provide guidelines, resources, and support for cybersecurity in water systems.
· State and Local Governments: Play a role in funding and supporting cybersecurity initiatives at local water utilities to coordinate with federal agencies to enhance the cybersecurity posture of regional water systems.
· Industry Associations and Expert Groups: Organizations like the American Water Works Association (AWWA) and Water Information Sharing and Analysis Center (WaterISAC) offer guidance, training, and resources to improve security practices.
· Technology Providers and Consultants: Offer specialized cybersecurity services, products, and expertise that help water utilities protect against and respond to cyber threats.
· Research Institutions and Academia: Contribute through research and development of new cybersecurity technologies and strategies. They also provide training and education for cybersecurity professionals.
· Public and Customers: While not directly involved in implementation, the public’s awareness and support for cybersecurity funding and initiatives are crucial for their success. Customers need to be informed about the measures taken to protect their water supply
G. Maritime Security.OSINT
Maritime Open-Source Intelligence (OSINT) refers to the practice of gathering and analyzing publicly available information related to maritime activities, vessels, ports, and other maritime infrastructure for intelligence purposes. It involves leveraging various open-source data sources and tools to monitor, track, and gain insights into maritime operations, potential threats, and anomalies.
1) Data Sources
· Vessel tracking websites and services (e.g., MarineTraffic, VesselFinder) that provide real-time and historical data on ship movements, positions, and details.
· Satellite imagery and remote sensing data from providers like Sentinel, LANDSAT, and commercial vendors.
· Social media platforms, news outlets, and online forums where maritime-related information is shared.
· Public databases and registries containing information on vessels, companies, ports, and maritime infrastructure.
· Open-source intelligence tools and search engines specifically designed for maritime data collection and analysis.
2) Applications
· Maritime security and law enforcement: Monitoring illegal activities like piracy, smuggling, illegal fishing, and potential threats to maritime infrastructure.
· Maritime domain awareness: Enhancing situational awareness by tracking vessel movements, patterns, and anomalies in specific regions or areas of interest.
· Risk assessment and due diligence: Conducting background checks on vessels, companies, and individuals involved in maritime operations for risk mitigation and compliance purposes.
· Environmental monitoring: Tracking potential oil spills, pollution incidents, and assessing the environmental impact of maritime activities.
· Search and rescue operations: Assisting in locating and tracking vessels in distress or missing at sea.
· Competitive intelligence: Monitoring competitors' maritime operations, shipments, and logistics for strategic business insights.
3) Key Tools and Techniques
· Vessel tracking and monitoring platforms like MarineTraffic, VesselFinder, and FleetMon.
· Geospatial analysis tools and platforms for processing and visualizing satellite imagery and remote sensing data.
· Social media monitoring and analysis tools for gathering intelligence from online platforms.
· OSINT frameworks and search engines like Maltego, Recon-ng, and Shodan for comprehensive data collection and analysis.
· Data visualization and reporting tools for presenting maritime intelligence in a clear and actionable manner.
4) Implications for International Trade Agreements & Shipping routes
· Sanctions Evasion: AIS spoofing is frequently used to evade international sanctions by disguising the true location and identity of vessels involved in illicit trade. This undermines the effectiveness of sanctions and complicates enforcement efforts. Vessels can spoof their AIS data to appear as if they are in legal waters while engaging in prohibited activities, such as trading with sanctioned countries like North Korea or Iran.
· False Documentation: Spoofing can be combined with falsified shipping documents to disguise the origin, destination, and nature of cargo. This makes it difficult for authorities to enforce trade restrictions and ensures that illicit goods can be traded without detection.
· Concealing Illicit Activities: AIS spoofing can be used to conceal the true locations and activities of vessels involved in sanctions evasion. By creating false AIS tracks, state actors can argue that their vessels are complying with international regulations, thereby influencing public opinion about the legitimacy of sanctions and the actions of the sanctioned state.
· Highlighting Sanctions' Ineffectiveness: By demonstrating the ability to evade sanctions through AIS spoofing, state actors can influence public opinion by highlighting the ineffectiveness of international sanctions and questioning their legitimacy.
· Economic Disruption: By spoofing AIS data, state actors or criminal organizations can disrupt maritime logistics and supply chains, causing economic losses and operational inefficiencies. This can be part of a broader strategy of economic warfare, where the goal is to destabilize the economies of rival nations by interfering with their trade routes.
· Market Manipulation: AIS spoofing can be used to create false supply and demand signals in the market. For example, by spoofing the location of oil tankers, actors can create the illusion of supply shortages or surpluses, thereby manipulating global oil prices. This can have a destabilizing effect on international markets and trade agreements that rely on stable pricing.
· Floating Storage: Vessels can use AIS spoofing to hide their true locations while storing commodities like oil offshore. This can be used to manipulate market prices by controlling the apparent supply of these commodities.
· Compliance Evasion: AIS spoofing can be used to evade compliance with international maritime regulations and trade agreements. For instance, vessels can spoof their AIS data to avoid detection by regulatory authorities, thereby circumventing environmental regulations, safety standards, and other compliance requirements.
· Flag Hopping: Vessels can repeatedly change their transmitted Maritime Mobile Service Identity (MMSI) numbers and flags to avoid detection and compliance with international regulations. This practice, known as flag hopping, makes it difficult for authorities to track and enforce compliance
· Fake Vessel Positions: Spoofing can create false positions for vessels, making it appear as though they are in different locations than they actually are. This can lead to confusion and misdirection of shipping routes, causing delays and inefficiencies in the supply chain.
· Ghost Ships: Spoofing can generate «ghost ships» that do not exist, cluttering navigational systems and causing real vessels to alter their courses to avoid non-existent threats, further disrupting shipping routes.
· Traffic Congestion: Spoofing can create artificial congestion in busy shipping lanes by making it appear that there are more vessels in the area than there actually are. This can lead to rerouting of ships and delays in cargo delivery
H. Ship Happens. Plugging the Leaks in Your Maritime Cyber Defenses
The transformative potential of MASS is driven by advancements in big data, machine learning, and artificial intelligence. These technologies are set to revolutionize the $14 trillion shipping industry, traditionally reliant on human crews.
· Cybersecurity Lag in Maritime Industry: the maritime industry is significantly behind other sectors in terms of cybersecurity, approximately by 20 years. This lag presents unique vulnerabilities and challenges that are only beginning to be fully understood.
· Vulnerabilities in Ship Systems: vulnerabilities in maritime systems are highlighted by the ease with which critical systems can be accessed and manipulated. For example, cyber penetration tests have demonstrated the simplicity of hacking into ship systems like the Electronic Chart Display and Information System (ECDIS), radar displays, and critical operational systems such as steering and ballast.
· Challenges with Conventional Ships: in conventional ships, the cybersecurity risks are exacerbated using outdated computer systems, often a decade old, and vulnerable satellite communication system. These vulnerabilities make ships susceptible to cyber-attacks that compromise critical information and systems.
· Increased Risks with Uncrewed Ships: the transition to uncrewed, autonomous ships introduces a new layer of complexity to cybersecurity. Every system and operation on these ships depends on interconnected digital technologies, making them prime targets for cyber-attacks including monitoring, communication, and navigation, relies on digital connectivity.
· Need for Built-in Cybersecurity: the necessity of incorporating cybersecurity measures right from the design phase of maritime autonomous surface ships is crucial to ensure that these vessels are equipped to handle potential cyber threats and to safeguard their operational integrity.
· Stakeholder Interest: ship manufacturers, operators, insurers, and regulators, all of whom are keen to influence the development and implementation of MASS
Addressing the technological threats and vulnerabilities associated with Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS) or crewless ships requires a multifaceted approach that encompasses advancements in cybersecurity, communication systems, software and hardware reliability, regulatory compliance, and human factors training.
1) Enhanced Cybersecurity Measures
· IDS: Implement advanced IDS to monitor network traffic for suspicious activities and potential threats.
· Encryption: Use strong encryption for data at rest and in transit to protect sensitive information from unauthorized access.
· Software Updates and Patch Management: Ensure that all software components are regularly updated to fix vulnerabilities and enhance security features.
· Security by Design: Incorporate cybersecurity measures from the initial design phase of MASS, ensuring that security is an integral part of the development process.
2) Robust Communication Systems
· Redundant Communication Links: Establish multiple, independent communication channels to ensure continuous connectivity even if one link fails.
· Secure Communication Protocols: Implement secure and authenticated communication protocols to prevent unauthorized access and ensure data integrity.
· Satellite Communication Diversity: Utilize a combination of satellite communication systems to reduce the risk of signal jamming and interception.
3) Software and Hardware Reliability
· Fault Tolerance: Design systems with fault tolerance in mind, allowing them to continue operating correctly even in the presence of hardware or software failures.
· Regular System Testing: Conduct comprehensive testing, including penetration testing and vulnerability assessments, to identify and address potential weaknesses.
· Predictive Maintenance: Implement predictive maintenance technologies that use data analytics to predict equipment failures before they occur, allowing for proactive repairs and replacements.
4) Regulatory Compliance and Standardization
· International Standards: Develop and adhere to international standards for the design, construction, and operation of MASS to ensure safety and interoperability.
· Certification Processes: Establish clear certification processes for MASS technologies, ensuring they meet safety, security, and environmental standards.
5) Human Factor and Training
· Remote Operator Training: Develop comprehensive training programs for remote operators, focusing on the unique challenges of operating MASS, including emergency response and decision-making.
· Simulation-Based Training: Utilize advanced simulators to train operators in a variety of scenarios, enhancing their skills in managing autonomous ships
6) Integration with Existing Fleet
· Collision Avoidance Algorithms: Implement advanced collision avoidance algorithms that comply with the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea (COLREGs), ensuring safe navigation among crewed and uncrewed vessels.
· Inter-Vessel Communication Systems: Develop systems that enable seamless communication between crewless and crewed ships, facilitating coordination and situational awareness.
7) Physical Tampering and Sabotage
· Tamper Detection Sensors: Install sensors that alert control centers when unauthorized access or physical tampering occurs.
· Surveillance Systems: Use advanced surveillance systems, including cameras and drones, to monitor the ship remotely.
· Physical Locks and Barriers: Implement robust physical security measures such as locks and barriers that are difficult to bypass without proper authorization.
8) Identity Spoofing and AIS Manipulation
· Encryption and Authentication: Encrypt AIS signals and implement strict authentication measures to prevent spoofing.
· Anomaly Detection Systems: Deploy systems that detect anomalies in AIS data to identify potential spoofing activities.
· Cross-Verification: Use cross-verification with other data sources such as radar and satellite to confirm vessel locations.
9) Insider Threats
· Access Controls: Implement strict access controls and role-based access to sensitive systems.
· Behavior Monitoring: Use behavior monitoring tools to detect unusual activities that could indicate malicious insider actions.
· Regular Security Training: Conduct regular security awareness training to educate employees about the risks and signs of insider threats
Digests Y2k24
For those lazy bones who consider searching by tags an extreme sport, your prayers have been answered — now you don’t have to strain your precious fingers to click on tags. Welcome to slacker’s paradise! All links gathered here so you can save those precious calories!
- July'24 Digest (is coming)
- June'24 Digest
- May'24 Digest
- April'24 Digest
The main categories of materials — use tags:
Also, your savings level just hit a new high. Meet the 50% discount from Promo Level! Now you can afford twice as much doing nothing for the same money. Hurry up before your laziness beats you to it!
📌Not sure what level is suitable for you? Check this explanation https://sponsr.ru/snarky_security/55292/Paid_level_explained/
Monthly Digest. 2024 / 06
Welcome to the next edition of our Monthly Digest, your one-stop resource for staying informed on the most recent developments, insights, and best practices in the ever-evolving field of security. In this issue, we have curated a diverse collection of articles, news, and research findings tailored to both professionals and casual enthusiasts. Our digest aims to make our content is both engaging and accessible. Happy reading
Check out PDF at the end of post
A. Maritime Security
Maritime cyber-security is an increasingly important area of concern for the maritime industry, as emerging technologies such as the Internet of Things (IoT), digital twins, 5G, and Artificial Intelligence (AI) are becoming more prevalent in the sector. The convergence and digitization of Information Technology (IT) and Operational Technology (OT) have driven the transformation of digital supply routes and maritime operations, expanding cyber-threat surfaces.
1) Key Points
· Increased marine traffic and larger ships with more capacity have led to challenges in maneuvering in existing channels and seaports, lowering safety margins during cyber-incidents. Today’s ships are also more heavily instrumented, increasing the threat surface for cyber-attacks.
· The US Coast Guard reported a 68% increase in marine cyber-incidents, and recent studies show that cyber risks within marine and maritime technology are present and growing as new solutions are adopted.
· While digitization in shipping offers productivity gains, physical safety, lower carbon footprints, higher efficiency, lower costs, and flexibility, there are vulnerabilities in large CPS sensor networks and communication systems.
· A survey of mariners found that 64% of respondents believed that a port had already experienced significant physical damage caused by a cyber security incident, and 56% thought a merchant vessel had already experienced significant physical damage caused by a cyber security incident.
2) Secondary Points
· Emerging Technologies: The maritime sector is adopting new technologies across offices, ships, seaports, offshore structures, and more. These technologies include the Internet of Things (IoT), digital twins, 5G, and Artificial Intelligence (AI).
· Supply Chain Digitization: Supply chains are also using more Information Technology (IT), introducing digital vulnerabilities. The convergence of IT and Operational Technology (OT) is transforming digital supply routes and maritime operations, expanding cyber-threat surfaces.
· Cyber Threats: Nation-state actors and organized crime have the resources and motivation to trigger a cyber-attack on Critical National Infrastructure (CNI), such as large-scale Cyber-Physical Systems, which include maritime operations.
· Cyber-Physical Systems: The integration of physical processes with software and communication networks, known as Cyber-Physical Systems, is a significant part of the maritime sector’s digital transformation. However, it also introduces new cybersecurity challenges.
· Impact of Cyber-Attacks: Cyber-attacks on maritime infrastructure can have significant economic impacts, affecting not only the targeted seaport but also the broader global maritime ecosystem and supply chains.
B. Choosing Secure and Verifiable Technologies
The document «Choosing Secure and Verifiable Technologies» provides comprehensive guidance for organizations on procuring digital products and services with a focus on security from the design phase through the lifecycle of the technology. It emphasizes the critical importance of selecting technologies that are inherently secure to protect user privacy and data against the increasing number of cyber threats. It outlines the responsibility of customers to evaluate the security, suitability, and associated risks of digital products and services. It advocates for a shift towards products and services that are secure-by-design and secure-by-default, highlighting the benefits of an approach, including enhanced resilience, reduced risks, and lower costs related to patching and incident response.
1) Audience
· Organizations that procure and leverage digital products and services: This encompasses a wide range of entities known as procuring organizations, purchasers, consumers, and customers. These organizations are the main focus of the guidance provided in the document, aiming to enhance their decision-making process in procuring digital technologies.
· Manufacturers of digital products and services: The document also addresses the manufacturers of digital technologies, providing them with insights into secure-by-design considerations. This is intended to guide manufacturers in developing technologies that meet the security expectations of their customers.
· Organization Executives and Senior Managers: Leaders who play a crucial role in decision-making and strategy formulation for their organizations.
· Cyber Security Personnel and Security Policy Personnel: Individuals responsible for ensuring the security of digital technologies within their organizations.
· Product Development Teams: Those involved in the creation and development of digital products and services, ensuring these offerings are secure by design.
· Risk Advisers and Procurement Specialists: Professionals who advise on risk management and specialize in the procurement process, ensuring that digital technologies procured do not pose undue risks to the organization.
C. Europol Cybercrime Training Competency Framework 2024
The Europol Cybercrime Training Competency Framework 2024 encompasses a wide range of documents related to cybercrime training, competency frameworks, strategies, and legislation. These materials (as compilation by Europol) collectively aim to enhance the capabilities of law enforcement, judiciary, and other stakeholders in combating cybercrime effectively.
· Purpose of the Framework: The framework aims to identify the required skill sets for key actors involved in combating cybercrime.
· Development Process: The framework was developed following a multi-stakeholder consultation process. This included contributions from various European bodies such as CEPOL, ECTEG, Eurojust, EJCN, and EUCTF.
· Strategic Context: The renewed framework is part of the European Commission’s action plan aimed at enhancing the capacity and capabilities of law enforcement authorities in digital investigations.
· Functional Competences: The framework identifies the essential functional competences required by law enforcement authorities to effectively combat cybercrime. It emphasizes the specific skills needed for cybercrime investigations and handling digital evidence, rather than general law enforcement skills.
· Strategic Capacity Building: The framework is intended as a tool for strategic capacity building within law enforcement and judicial institutions. It aims to enhance the competencies that are crucial for the effective handling of cybercrime cases.
· Role Descriptions: Detailed descriptions of the main functions and skill sets for various roles are provided throughout the framework. These roles include heads of cybercrime units, team leaders, general criminal investigators, cybercrime analysts, and specialized experts among others. Each role is tailored to address specific aspects of cybercrime and digital evidence handling.
· Skill Sets and Levels: The framework outlines specific skill sets required for each role and the desired levels of proficiency. These skill sets include digital forensics, network investigation, programming, and cybercrime legislation, among others. The framework emphasizes the importance of having tailored skills that are directly applicable to the challenges of cybercrime.
D. Market Insights. Simple Solutions Are Just Too Cheap, Spending More is Always Better
Message brokers are essential components in modern distributed systems, enabling seamless communication between applications, services, and devices. They act as intermediaries that validate, store, route, and deliver messages, ensuring reliable and efficient data exchange across diverse platforms and programming languages. This functionality is crucial for maintaining the decoupling of processes and services, which enhances system scalability, performance, and fault tolerance.
Major players in this market include Kinesis, Cisco IoT, Solace, RabbitMQ, Apache Kafka, ApacheMQ, IBM MQ, Microsoft Azure Service Bus, and Google Cloud IoT, each offering unique capabilities and serving a wide range of industries from financial services to healthcare and smart cities.
· Market Share: The percentage each broker holds in the queueing, messaging, and processing category.
· Number of Users: The total number of companies or devices using the broker.
· Corporate Users: The number of enterprise customers using the broker.
· Revenue Distribution: The distribution of companies using the broker based on their revenue.
· Geographical Coverage: The percentage of users based in different regions.
E. Cybersecurity & Antarctica
In April, the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) announced that it would not support any new field research this season due to delays in upgrading the McMurdo Station. The NSF and the U.S. Coast Guard also announced cuts that will jeopardize the U.S.'s scientific and geopolitical interests in the region for decades to come. Specifically, in April, the NSF announced that it would not renew the lease of one of its two Antarctic research vessels, the Laurence M. Gould. Prior to this, in October 2023, the NSF announced that it would operate only one research vessel in the coming decades.
Additionally, in March, the U.S. Coast Guard announced that it needed to «reassess baseline metrics» for its long-delayed Polar Security Cutter program, a vital program for U.S. national interests at both poles. Decisions made today will have serious consequences for U.S. activities in Antarctica well beyond 2050.
The State Department has refrained from announcing U.S. foreign policy interests in the Antarctic region, and the White House appears satisfied with an outdated and inconsistent national strategy for Antarctica from the last century. The U.S. Congress has also not responded to scientists' calls.
As a result, on April 1, the NSF’s Office of Polar Programs announced that it is putting new fieldwork proposals on hold for the next two seasons and will not be soliciting new fieldwork proposals in Antarctica.
Ships capable of operating in polar seas are becoming increasingly in demand and difficult to build. Facing significant challenges in the ice-class ship and vessel project, the U.S. Coast Guard announced in March that it would «shift baseline timelines» for developing new icebreaker projects.
The outcome of these seemingly independent decisions will be a reduction in the U.S. physical presence in Antarctica. This will have negative consequences not only for American scientists but also for U.S. geopolitics in the region, especially considering Russia’s total superiority in icebreaker vessels and China’s catching up.
The U.S. has missed the most important aspects: adequate and regular funding for Antarctic scientific research, a new national strategy for Antarctica (the current strategy was published in June 1994), and lawmakers' understanding of the importance of U.S. interests and decisions in Antarctica. The inability to fund the operational and logistical support necessary for U.S. scientific research and geopolitical influence effectively means the dominance of Russia and China in the Antarctic region, as no other country, including traditional Antarctic stakeholders like Chile, Australia, and Sweden, can surpass the existing and growing scientific potential of Russia and China.
F. Humanoid Robot
Humanoid robots are advanced machines designed to mimic human form and behavior, equipped with articulated limbs, advanced sensors, and often the ability to interact socially. These robots are increasingly being utilized across various sectors, including healthcare, education, industry, and services, due to their adaptability to human environments and their ability to perform tasks that require human-like dexterity and interaction.
In healthcare, humanoid robots assist with clinical tasks, provide emotional support, and aid in-patient rehabilitation. In education, they serve as interactive companions and personal tutors, enhancing learning experiences and promoting social integration for children with special needs. The industrial sector benefits from humanoid robots through automation of repetitive and hazardous tasks, improving efficiency and safety. Additionally, in service industries, these robots handle customer assistance, guide visitors, and perform maintenance tasks, showcasing their versatility and potential to transform various aspects of daily life.
1) Market Forecasts for Humanoid Robots
The humanoid robot market is poised for substantial growth, with projections indicating a multi-billion-dollar market by 2035. Key drivers include advancements in AI, cost reductions, and increasing demand for automation in hazardous and manufacturing roles.
· Goldman Sachs Report (January 2024):
o Total Addressable Market (TAM): The TAM for humanoid robots is expected to reach $38 billion by 2035, up from an initial forecast of $6 billion. This increase is driven by a fourfold rise in shipment estimates to 1.4 million units.
o Shipment Estimates: The base case scenario predicts a 53% compound annual growth rate (CAGR) from 2025 to 2035, with shipments reaching 1.4 million units by 2035. The bull case scenario anticipates shipments hitting 1 million units by 2031, four years ahead of previous expectations.
o Cost Reductions: The Bill of Materials (BOM) cost for high-spec robots has decreased by 40% to $150,000 per unit in 2023, down from $250,000 the previous year, due to cheaper components and a broader domestic supply chain.
· Data Bridge Market Research: The global humanoid robot market is expected to grow from $2.46 billion in 2023 to $55.80 billion by 2031, with a CAGR of 48,5% during the forecast period.
· SkyQuestt: The market is projected to grow from $1.48 billion in 2019 to $34.96 billion by 2031, with a CAGR of 42,1%.
· GlobeNewswire: The global market for humanoid robots, valued at approximately $1.3 billion in 2022, is anticipated to expand to $6.3 billion by 2030, with a CAGR of 22,3%.
· The Business Research Company: The market is expected to grow from $2.44 billion in 2023 to $3.7 billion in 2024, with a CAGR of 51,6%. By 2028, the market is projected to reach $19.69 billion, with a CAGR of 51,9%.
· Grand View Research: Market Size: The global humanoid robot market was estimated at $1.11 billion in 2022 and is expected to grow at a CAGR of 21,1% from 2023 to 2030.
· Goldman Sachs (February 2024): In a blue-sky scenario, the market could reach up to $154 billion by 2035, comparable to the global electric vehicle market and one-third of the global smartphone market as of 2021.
· Macquarie Research: Under a neutral assumption, the global humanoid robot market is expected to reach $107.1 billion by 2035, with a CAGR of 71% from 2025 to 2035.
Monthly Digest. 2024 / 05 [Pro Level]
Welcome to the next edition of our Monthly Digest, your one-stop resource for staying informed on the most recent developments, insights, and best practices in the ever-evolving field of security. In this issue, we have curated a diverse collection of articles, news, and research findings tailored to both professionals and casual enthusiasts. Our digest aims to make our content is both engaging and accessible. Happy reading
Monthly Digest. 2024 / 04
Welcome to the next edition of our Monthly Digest, your one-stop resource for staying informed on the most recent developments, insights, and best practices in the ever-evolving field of security. In this issue, we have curated a diverse collection of articles, news, and research findings tailored to both professionals and casual enthusiasts. Our digest aims to make our content is both engaging and accessible. Happy reading
Monthly Digest. 2024 / 07
«Promo»
Read the announcement https://sponsr.ru/overkill_security/59140/Monthly_Digest_2024__07_Announcement/
Monthly Digest. 2024 / 07. Announcement
Welcome to the next edition of our Monthly Digest, your one-stop resource for staying informed on the most recent developments, insights, and best practices in the ever-evolving field of security. In this issue, we have curated a diverse collection of articles, news, and research findings tailored to both professionals and casual enthusiasts. Our digest aims to make our content is both engaging and accessible. Happy reading
Content keypoints
A. Bias in AI. Because Even Robots Can Be Sexist
Cybersecurity has traditionally been viewed through a technical lens, focusing on protecting systems and networks from external threats. However, this approach often neglects the human element, particularly the differentiated impacts of cyber threats on various gender groups. Different individuals frequently experience unique cyber threats such as online harassment, doxing, and technology-enabled abuse, which are often downplayed or omitted in conventional threat models.
Recent research and policy discussions have begun to recognize the importance of incorporating gender perspectives into cybersecurity. For instance, the UN Open-Ended Working Group (OEWG) on ICTs has highlighted the need for gender mainstreaming in cyber norm implementation and gender-sensitive capacity building. Similarly, frameworks developed by organizations like the Association for Progressive Communications (APC) provide guidelines for creating gender-responsive cybersecurity policies.
Human-centric security prioritizes understanding and addressing human behavior within the context of cybersecurity. By focusing on the psychological and interactional aspects of security, human-centric models aim to build a security culture that empowers individuals, reduces human errors, and mitigates cyber risks effectively.
SUCCESSFUL CASE STUDIES OF GENDER-BASED THREAT MODELS IN ACTION
📌 Online Harassment Detection: A social media platform implemented an AI-based system to detect and mitigate online harassment. According to UNIDIR the system used NLP techniques to analyze text for abusive language and sentiment analysis to identify harassment. The platform reported a significant reduction in harassment incidents and improved user satisfaction.
📌 Doxing Prevention: A cybersecurity firm developed a model to detect doxing attempts by analyzing patterns in data access and sharing. According to UNIDIR the model used supervised learning to classify potential doxing incidents and alert users. The firm reported a 57% increase in the detection of doxing attempts and a 32% reduction in successful doxing incidents.
📌 Gender-Sensitive Phishing Detection: A financial institution implemented a phishing detection system that included gender-specific phishing tactics. According to UNIDIR the system used transformer-based models like BERT to analyze email content for gender-specific language and emotional manipulation and reported a 22% reduction in phishing click-through rates and a 38% increase in user reporting of phishing attempts.
IMPACT OF GENDERED ASSUMPTIONS IN ALGORITHMS ON CYBERSECURITY
📌 Behavioral Differences: Studies have shown significant differences in cybersecurity behaviors between men and women. Women are often more cautious and may adopt different security practices compared to men.
📌 Perceptions and Responses: Women and men perceive and respond to cybersecurity threats differently. Women may prioritize different aspects of security, such as privacy and protection from harassment, while men may focus more on technical defenses.
📌 Gender-Disaggregated Data: Collecting and analyzing gender-disaggregated data is crucial for understanding the different impacts of cyber threats on various gender groups. This data can inform more effective and inclusive cybersecurity policies.
📌 Promoting Gender Diversity: Increasing the representation of women in cybersecurity roles can enhance the field’s overall effectiveness. Diverse teams bring varied perspectives and are better equipped to address a wide range of cyber threats.
📌 Reinforcement of Gender Stereotypes: Algorithms trained on biased datasets can reinforce existing gender stereotypes. For example, machine learning models used in cybersecurity may inherit biases from the data they are trained on, leading to gendered assumptions in threat detection and response mechanisms.
📌 Gendered Outcomes of Cyber Threats: Traditional threats, such as denial of service attacks, can have gendered outcomes like additional security burdens and targeted attacks, which are often overlooked in gender-neutral threat models.
📌 Bias in Threat Detection and Response: Automated threat detection systems, such as email filters and phishing simulations, may incorporate gendered assumptions. For example, phishing simulations often involve gender stereotyping, which can affect the accuracy and effectiveness of these security measures.
B. Security Maturity Model. Even Cybersecurity Needs to Grow Up
This document provides an analysis of the Essential Eight Maturity Model, a strategic framework developed by the Australian Cyber Security Centre to enhance cybersecurity defenses within organizations. The analysis will cover various aspects of the model, including its structure, implementation challenges, and the benefits of achieving different maturity levels.
The analysis offers valuable insights into its application and effectiveness. This analysis is particularly useful for security professionals, IT managers, and decision-makers across various industries, helping them to understand how to better protect their organizations from cyber threats and enhance their cybersecurity measures.
The Essential Eight Maturity Model provides detailed guidance and information for businesses and government entities on implementing and assessing cybersecurity practices.
📌 Purpose and Audience: designed to assist small and medium businesses, large organizations, and government entities in enhancing their cybersecurity posture. It serves as a resource to understand and apply the Essential Eight strategies effectively.
📌 Content Updates: was first published on July 16, 2021, and has been regularly updated, with the latest update on April 23, 2024. This ensures that the information remains relevant and reflects the latest cybersecurity practices and threats.
📌 Resource Availability: available as a downloadable, titled «PROTECT — Essential Eight Maturity Model, » making it accessible for offline use and easy distribution within organizations.
📌 Feedback Mechanism: users are encouraged to provide feedback on the usefulness of the information, which indicates an ongoing effort to improve the resource based on user input.
📌 Additional Services: page http://cyber.gov.au also offers links to report cyber security incidents, especially for critical infrastructure, and to sign up for alerts on new threats, highlighting a proactive approach to cybersecurity.
The Essential Eight Maturity Model FAQ provides comprehensive guidance on implementing and understanding the Essential Eight strategies. It emphasizes a proactive, risk-based approach to cybersecurity, reflecting the evolving nature of cyber threats and the importance of maintaining a balanced and comprehensive cybersecurity posture
Updates to the Essential Eight Maturity Model
📌 Reason for Updates: The Australian Signals Directorate (ASD) updates the E8MM to ensure the advice remains contemporary, fit for purpose, and practical. Updates are based on evolving malicious tradecraft, cyber threat intelligence, and feedback from Essential Eight assessment and uplift activities.
📌 Recent Updates: Recent updates include recommendations for using an automated method of asset discovery at least fortnightly and ensuring vulnerability scanners use an up-to-date vulnerability database.
Maturity Model Updates and Implementation
📌 Redefinition of Maturity Levels: The July 2021 update redefined the number of maturity levels and moved to a stronger risk-based approach to implementation. It also reintroduced Maturity Level Zero to provide a broader range of maturity level ratings.
📌 Risk-Based Approach: The model now emphasizes a risk-based approach, where circumstances like legacy systems and technical debt are considered. Choosing not to implement entire mitigation strategies where technically feasible is generally considered Maturity Level Zero.
📌 Implementation as a Package: Organizations are advised to achieve a consistent maturity level across all eight mitigation strategies before moving to a higher maturity level. This approach aims to provide a more secure baseline than achieving higher maturity levels in a few strategies to the detriment of others.
Specific Strategy Updates
📌 Application Control Changes: Additional executable content types were introduced for all maturity levels, and Maturity Level One was updated to focus on using file system access permissions to prevent malware execution
C. Human Factors in Biocybersecurity Wargames & Gamification
The paper «Human Factors in Biocybersecurity Wargames» emphasizes the need to understand vulnerabilities in the processing of biologics and how they intersect with cyber and cyber-physical systems. This understanding is crucial for ensuring product and brand integrity and protecting those served by these systems. It discusses the growing prominence of biocybersecurity and its importance to bioprocessing in both domestic and international contexts.
Scope of Bioprocessing:
📌 Bioprocessing encompasses the entire lifecycle of biosystems and their components, from initial research to development, manufacturing, and commercialization.
📌 It significantly contributes to the global economy, with applications in food, fuel, cosmetics, drugs, and green technology.
Vulnerability of Bioprocessing Pipelines:
📌 The bioprocessing pipeline is susceptible to attacks at various stages, especially where bioprocessing equipment interfaces with the internet.
📌 This vulnerability necessitates enhanced scrutiny in the design and monitoring of bioprocessing pipelines to prevent potential disruptions.
Role of Information Technology (IT):
📌 Progress in bioprocessing is increasingly dependent on automation and advanced algorithmic processes, which require substantial IT engagement.
📌 IT spending is substantial and growing, paralleling the growth in bioprocessing.
Open-Source Methodologies and Digital Growth:
📌 The adoption of open-source methodologies has led to significant growth in communication and digital technology development worldwide.
📌 This growth is further accelerated by advancements in biological computing and storage technologies.
Need for New Expertise:
📌 The integration of biocomputing, bioprocessing, and storage technologies will necessitate new expertise in both operation and defense.
📌 Basic data and process protection measures remain crucial despite technological advancements.
Importance of Wargames:
📌 To manage and secure connected bioprocessing infrastructure, IT teams must employ wargames to simulate and address potential risks.
📌 Simulations are essential for preparing organizations to handle vulnerabilities in their bioprocessing pipelines.
D. Oops, We Did It Again. CVE-2024-21111 Strikes
This document provides a comprehensive analysis of CVE-2024-21111, a critical vulnerability in Oracle VM VirtualBox affecting Windows hosts. The analysis will cover various aspects of the vulnerability, including its technical details, exploitation mechanisms, potential impacts on different industries.
This document provides a high-quality summary of the vulnerability, offering valuable insights for security professionals and other stakeholders across various industries. The analysis is beneficial for understanding the risks associated with CVE-2024-21111 and implementing effective measures to safeguard systems against potential attacks.
CVE-2024-21111 is a significant security vulnerability identified in Oracle VM VirtualBox, specifically affecting Windows hosts. This vulnerability is present in versions of VirtualBox prior to 7.0.16. It allows a low privileged attacker with logon access to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox is executed to potentially take over the system
An attacker exploiting this vulnerability could achieve unauthorized control over the affected Oracle VM VirtualBox. The specific technical mechanism involves local privilege escalation through symbolic link following, which can lead to arbitrary file deletion and movement.
📌 Vulnerability Type: Local Privilege Escalation (LPE) allows a low privileged attacker who already has access to the system to gain higher privileges.
📌 Attack Vector and Complexity: The CVSS 3.1 vector (CVSS: 3.1/AV: L/AC: L/PR: L/UI: N/S: U/C: H/I: H/A: H) indicates that the attack vector is local (AV: L), meaning the attacker needs local access to the host. The attack complexity is low (AC: L), and no user interaction (UI: N) is required. The privileges required are low (PR: L), suggesting that an attacker with basic user privileges can exploit this vulnerability.
📌 Impact: The impacts on confidentiality, integrity, and availability are all rated high (C: H/I: H/A: H), indicating that an exploit could lead to a complete compromise of the affected system’s confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
📌 Exploitation Method: The vulnerability can be exploited through symbolic link (symlink) attacks. This involves manipulating symbolic links to redirect operations intended for legitimate files or directories to other targets, which the attacker controls. This can lead to arbitrary file deletion or movement, potentially allowing the attacker to execute arbitrary code with elevated privileges.
📌 Specific Mechanism: The vulnerability specifically involves the manipulation of log files by the VirtualBox system service (VboxSDS). The service, which runs with SYSTEM privileges, manages log files in a directory that does not have strict access controls. This allows a low privileged user to manipulate these files, potentially leading to privilege escalation. The service performs file rename/move operations recursively, and if manipulated correctly, this behavior can be abused to perform unauthorized actions.
📌 Mitigation: Users are advised to update their VirtualBox to version 7.0.16 or later, which contains the necessary patches to mitigate this vulnerability
E. When Velociraptors Meet VMs. A Forensic Fairytale
This document provides a comprehensive analysis of forensics using the Velociraptor tool. The analysis delves into various aspects of forensic investigations specific environments, which are maintaining the integrity and security of virtualized server infrastructures. Key aspects covered include data extraction methodologies, log analysis, and the identification of malicious activities within the virtual machines hosted on ESXi servers.
This analysis is particularly beneficial for security professionals, IT forensic analysts, and other specialists across different industries who are tasked with the investigation and mitigation of security breaches in virtualized environments.
This document discusses the application of Velociraptor, a forensic and incident response tool, for conducting forensic analysis on VMware ESXi environments. The use of Velociraptor in this context suggests a focus on advanced forensic techniques tailored to the complexities of virtualized server infrastructures
Key Aspects of the Analysis
📌 Data Extraction Methodologies: it discusses methods for extracting data from ESXi systems, which is vital for forensic investigations following security incidents.
📌 Log Analysis: it includes detailed procedures for examining ESXi logs, which can reveal unauthorized access or other malicious activities.
📌 Identification of Malicious Activities: by analyzing the artifacts and logs, the document outlines methods to identify and understand the nature of malicious activities that may have occurred within the virtualized environment.
📌 Use of Velociraptor for Forensics: it highlights the capabilities of Velociraptor in handling the complexities associated with ESXi systems, making it a valuable tool for forensic analysts.
Utility of the Analysis
This forensic analysis is immensely beneficial for various professionals in the cybersecurity and IT fields:
📌 Security Professionals: helps in understanding potential vulnerabilities and points of entry for security breaches within virtualized environments.
📌 Forensic Analysts: provides methodologies and tools necessary for conducting thorough investigations in environments running VMware ESXi.
📌 IT Administrators: assists in the proactive monitoring and securing of virtualized environments against potential threats.
📌 Industries Using VMware ESXi offers insights into securing and managing virtualized environments, which is crucial for maintaining the integrity and security of business operations.
F. MalPurifier. Detoxifying Your Android, One Malicious Byte at a Time
This document provides a comprehensive analysis of the paper titled «MalPurifier: Enhancing Android Malware Detection with Adversarial Purification against Evasion Attacks.» The analysis delves into various aspects of the paper, including the motivation behind the research, the methodology employed, the experimental setup, and the results obtained.
This analysis provides a high-quality summary of the document, offering valuable insights for security professionals, researchers, and practitioners in various fields. By understanding the strengths and limitations of the MalPurifier framework, stakeholders can better appreciate its potential applications and contributions to enhancing Android malware detection systems. The analysis is useful for those involved in cybersecurity, machine learning, and mobile application security, as it highlights innovative approaches to mitigating the risks posed by adversarial evasion attacks.
The paper titled «MalPurifier: Enhancing Android Malware Detection with Adversarial Purification against Evasion Attacks» presents a novel approach to improving the detection of Android malware, particularly in the face of adversarial evasion attacks. The paper highlights that this is the first attempt to use adversarial purification to mitigate evasion attacks in the Android ecosystem, providing a promising solution to enhance the security of Android malware detection systems.
Motivation:
📌 Prevalence of Android Malware: The paper highlights the widespread issue of Android malware, which poses significant security threats to users and devices.
📌 Evasion Techniques: Attackers often use evasion techniques to modify malware, making it difficult for traditional detection systems to identify them.
Challenges:
📌 Adversarial Attacks: it discusses the challenge posed by adversarial attacks, where small perturbations are added to malware samples to evade detection.
📌 Detection System Vulnerabilities: Existing malware detection systems are vulnerable to these adversarial attacks, leading to a need for more robust solutions.
Objective and proposed Solution:
📌 Enhancing Detection Robustness: The primary objective of the research is to enhance the robustness of Android malware detection systems against adversarial evasion attacks.
📌 Adversarial Purification: The proposed solution, MalPurifier, aims to purify adversarial examples, removing the perturbations and restoring the malware to a detectable form.
📌 Techniques Used: The system employs techniques such as autoencoders and generative adversarial networks (GANs) for the purification process.
Techniques Used in Evasion Attacks:
📌 Adversarial Examples: Attackers create adversarial examples by adding small perturbations to malware samples. These perturbations are designed to exploit vulnerabilities in the detection model’s decision boundaries.
📌 Obfuscation: Techniques such as code encryption, packing, and polymorphism are used to alter the appearance of the malware without changing its functionality.
📌 Feature Manipulation: Modifying features used by the detection model, such as adding benign features or obfuscating malicious ones, to evade detection.
Significance:
📌 Improved Security: By enhancing the detection capabilities of malware detection systems, MalPurifier aims to provide better security for Android devices.
Benefits
📌 High Accuracy: MalPurifier demonstrates high effectiveness, achieving accuracies over 90,91% against 37 different evasion attacks. This indicates a robust performance in detecting adversarially perturbed malware samples.
📌 Scalability: The method is easily scalable to different detection models, offering flexibility and robustness in its implementation without requiring significant modifications.
📌 Lightweight and Flexible: The use of a plug-and-play Denoising AutoEncoder (DAE) model allows for a lightweight and flexible approach to purifying adversarial malware. This ensures that the method can be integrated into existing systems with minimal overhead.
📌 Comprehensive Defense: By focusing on adversarial purification, MalPurifier addresses a critical vulnerability in ML-based malware detection systems, enhancing their overall security and robustness against sophisticated evasion techniques.
Limitations
📌 Generalization to Other Platforms: The current implementation and evaluation are focused solely on the Android ecosystem. The effectiveness of MalPurifier on other platforms, such as iOS or Windows, remains untested and uncertain.
📌 Scalability Concerns: While the paper claims scalability, the actual performance and efficiency of MalPurifier in large-scale, real-time detection scenarios have not been thoroughly evaluated. This raises questions about its practical applicability in high-volume environments.
📌 Computational Overhead: The purification process introduces additional computational overhead. Although described as lightweight, the impact on system performance, especially in resource-constrained environments, needs further investigation.
📌 Adversarial Adaptation: Attackers may develop new strategies to adapt to the purification process, potentially circumventing the defenses provided by MalPurifier. Continuous adaptation and improvement of the purification techniques are necessary to stay ahead of evolving threats.
📌 Evaluation Metrics: The evaluation primarily focuses on detection accuracy and robustness against evasion attacks. Other important metrics, such as energy consumption, user experience, and long-term efficacy, are not addressed, limiting the comprehensiveness of the assessment.
📌 Integration with Existing Systems: The paper does not extensively discuss the integration of MalPurifier with existing malware detection systems and the potential impact on their performance. Seamless integration strategies and combined performance evaluations are needed
Impact on Technology
📌 Advancement in Malware Detection: MalPurifier represents a significant technological advancement in the field of malware detection. By leveraging adversarial purification techniques, it enhances the robustness of Android malware detection systems against evasion attacks. This innovation can lead to the development of more secure and reliable malware detection tools.
📌 Adversarial Defense Mechanisms: The paper contributes to the broader field of adversarial machine learning by demonstrating the effectiveness of adversarial purification. This technique can be adapted and applied to other areas of cybersecurity, such as network intrusion detection and endpoint security, thereby improving the overall resilience of these systems against sophisticated attacks.
📌 Machine Learning Applications: The use of Denoising AutoEncoders (DAEs) and Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) in MalPurifier showcases the potential of advanced machine learning models in cybersecurity applications. This can inspire further research and development in applying these models to other security challenges, such as phishing detection and fraud prevention.
Impact on Industry
📌 Enhanced Security for Mobile Devices: Industries that rely heavily on mobile devices, such as healthcare, finance, and retail, can benefit from the enhanced security provided by MalPurifier. By improving the detection of Android malware, these industries can better protect sensitive data and maintain the integrity of their mobile applications.
📌 Reduction in Cybersecurity Incidents: The implementation of robust malware detection systems like MalPurifier can lead to a reduction in cybersecurity incidents, such as data breaches and ransomware attacks. This can result in significant cost savings for businesses and reduce the potential for reputational damage.
📌Innovation in Cybersecurity Products: Cybersecurity companies can incorporate the techniques presented in the paper into their products, leading to the development of next-generation security solutions. This can provide a competitive edge in the market and drive innovation in the cybersecurity industry.
📌 Cross-Industry Applications: While the paper focuses on Android malware detection, the underlying principles of adversarial purification can be applied across various industries. Sectors such as manufacturing, public administration, and transportation, which are also affected by malware, can adapt these techniques to enhance their cybersecurity measures.
G. Leveraging Energy Consumption Patterns for Cyberattack Detection in IoT Systems
The proliferation of smart devices and the Internet of Things (IoT) has revolutionized various aspects of modern life, from home automation to industrial control systems. However, this technological advancement has also introduced new challenges, particularly in the realm of cybersecurity. One critical area of concern is the energy consumption of smart devices during cyberattacks, which can have far-reaching implications for device performance, longevity, and overall system resilience.
Cyberattacks on IoT devices (DDoS attacks, malware infections, botnets, ransomware, false data injection, energy consumption attacks, and cryptomining attacks) can significantly impact the energy consumption patterns of compromised devices, leading to abnormal spikes, deviations, or excessive power usage.
Monitoring and analyzing energy consumption data has emerged as a promising approach for detecting and mitigating these cyberattacks. By establishing baselines for normal energy usage patterns and employing anomaly detection techniques, deviations from expected behavior can be identified, potentially indicating the presence of malicious activities. Machine learning algorithms have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in detecting anomalies and classifying attack types based on energy consumption footprints.
The importance of addressing energy consumption during cyberattacks is multifaceted. Firstly, it enables early detection and response to potential threats, mitigating the impact of attacks and ensuring the continued functionality of critical systems. Secondly, it contributes to the overall longevity and performance of IoT devices, as excessive energy consumption can lead to overheating, reduced operational efficiency, and shortened device lifespan. Thirdly, it has economic and environmental implications, as increased energy consumption translates to higher operational costs and potentially greater carbon emissions, particularly in large-scale IoT deployments.
Furthermore, the integration of IoT devices into critical infrastructure, such as smart grids, industrial control systems, and healthcare systems, heightens the importance of addressing energy consumption during cyberattacks. Compromised devices in these environments can disrupt the balance and operation of entire systems, leading to inefficiencies, potential service disruptions, and even safety concerns.
ENERGY CONSUMPTION IMPLICATIONS
📌 Detection and Response to Cyberattacks: Monitoring the energy consumption patterns of IoT devices can serve as an effective method for detecting cyberattacks. Abnormal energy usage can indicate the presence of malicious activities, such as Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks, which can overload devices and networks, leading to increased energy consumption. By analyzing energy consumption footprints, it is possible to detect and respond to cyberattacks with high efficiency, potentially at levels of about 99,88% for detection and about 99,66% for localizing malicious software on IoT devices.
📌 Impact on Device Performance and Longevity: Cyberattacks can significantly increase the energy consumption of smart devices, which can, in turn, affect their performance and longevity. For instance, excessive energy usage can lead to overheating, reduced operational efficiency, and in the long term, can shorten the lifespan of the device. This is particularly concerning for devices that are part of critical infrastructure or those that perform essential services.
📌 Impact of Vulnerabilities: The consequences of IoT vulnerabilities are far-reaching, affecting both individual users and organizations. Cyberattacks on IoT devices can lead to privacy breaches, financial losses, and operational disruptions. For instance, the Mirai botnet attack in 2016 demonstrated the potential scale and impact of IoT-based DDoS attacks, which disrupted major online services by exploiting insecure IoT devices.
📌 Economic and Environmental Implications: The increased energy consumption of smart devices during cyberattacks has both economic and environmental implications. Economically, it can lead to higher operational costs for businesses and consumers due to increased electricity bills. Environmentally, excessive energy consumption contributes to higher carbon emissions, especially if the energy is sourced from non-renewable resources. This aspect is crucial in the context of global efforts to reduce carbon footprints and combat climate change.
📌 Energy Efficiency Challenges: Despite the benefits, smart homes face significant challenges in terms of energy efficiency. The continuous operation and connectivity of smart devices can lead to high energy consumption. To address this, IoT provides tools for better energy management, such as smart thermostats, lighting systems, and energy-efficient appliances. These tools optimize energy usage based on occupancy, weather conditions, and user preferences, significantly reducing energy waste and lowering energy bills.
📌 Challenges in Smart Grids and Energy Systems: Smart devices are increasingly integrated into smart grids and energy systems, where they play a crucial role in energy management and distribution. Cyberattacks on these devices can disrupt the balance and operation of the entire energy system, leading to inefficiencies, potential blackouts, and compromised energy security. Addressing the energy consumption of smart devices during cyberattacks is therefore vital for ensuring the stability and reliability of smart grids.
H. Hacking the Hippocratic Oath. Forensic Fun with Medical IoT
The rapid adoption of the Internet of Things (IoT) in the healthcare industry, known as the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT), has revolutionized patient care and medical operations. IoMT devices, such as wearable health monitors, implantable medical devices, and smart hospital equipment, generate and transmit vast amounts of sensitive data over networks.
Medical IoT network forensics is an emerging field that focuses on the identification, acquisition, analysis, and preservation of digital evidence from IoMT devices and networks. It plays a crucial role in investigating security incidents, data breaches, and cyber-attacks targeting healthcare organizations. The unique nature of IoMT systems, with their diverse range of devices, communication protocols, and data formats, presents significant challenges for traditional digital forensics techniques.
The primary objectives of medical IoT network forensics are:
📌 Incident Response: Rapidly respond to security incidents by identifying the source, scope, and impact of the attack, and gathering evidence to support legal proceedings or regulatory compliance.
📌 Evidence Acquisition: Develop specialized techniques to acquire and preserve digital evidence from IoMT devices, networks, and cloud-based systems while maintaining data integrity and chain of custody.
📌 Data Analysis: Analyze the collected data, including network traffic, device logs, and sensor readings, to reconstruct the events leading to the incident and identify potential vulnerabilities or attack vectors.
📌 Threat Intelligence: Leverage the insights gained from forensic investigations to enhance threat intelligence, improve security measures, and prevent future attacks on IoMT systems.
Medical IoT network forensics requires a multidisciplinary approach, combining expertise in digital forensics, cybersecurity, healthcare regulations, and IoT technologies. Forensic investigators must navigate the complexities of IoMT systems, including device heterogeneity, resource constraints, proprietary protocols, and the need to maintain patient privacy and data confidentiality.
Digests'24
«If laziness were an Olympic sport, I’d… ah, nevermind, too much effort. Here are all the digests so you don’t have to strain yourself.»
- July'24 Digest (is coming)
- June'24 Digest
- May'24 Digest
- April'24 Digest
The main categories of materials — use tags:
Also, now you can criticize everything around you with double enthusiasm and for half the price. Don’t miss the chance to become a professional whiner at a super bargain price! Check out promo level
📌Not sure what level is suitable for you? Check this explanation https://sponsr.ru/overkill_security/55291/Paid_Content/
Monthly Digest. 2024 / 06
Welcome to the next edition of our Monthly Digest, your one-stop resource for staying informed on the most recent developments, insights, and best practices in the ever-evolving field of security. In this issue, we have curated a diverse collection of articles, news, and research findings tailored to both professionals and casual enthusiasts. Our digest aims to make our content is both engaging and accessible. Happy reading
Check out PDF at the end of post
A. AntiPhishStack
The paper titled «LSTM-based Stacked Generalization Model for Optimized Phishing» discusses the escalating reliance on revolutionary online web services, which has introduced heightened security risks, with persistent challenges posed by phishing attacks.
Phishing, a deceptive method through social and technical engineering, poses a severe threat to online security, aiming to obtain illicit user identities, personal account details, and bank credentials. It’s a primary concern within criminal activity, with phishers pursuing objectives such as selling stolen identities, extracting cash, exploiting vulnerabilities, or deriving financial gains.
The study aims to advance phishing detection with operating without prior phishing-specific feature knowledge. The model leverages the capabilities of Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, a type of recurrent neural network that is capable of learning order dependence in sequence prediction problems. It leverages the learning of URLs and character-level TF-IDF features symmetrically, enhancing its ability to combat emerging phishing threats.
B. NSA’s panic. AdaptTactics
The document titled «cyber actors adapt tactics for initial cloud access» released by the National Security Agency (NSA) warns of use of cyber actors have adapted their tactics to gain initial access to cloud services, as opposed to exploiting on-premise network vulnerabilities.
This shift is in response to organizations modernizing their systems and moving to cloud-based infrastructure. The high-profile cyber campaigns like the SolarWinds supply chain compromise are now expanding to sectors such as aviation, education, law enforcement, local and state councils, government financial departments, and military organizations.
The stark reality is that to breach cloud-hosted networks, these actors need only to authenticate with the cloud provider, and if they succeed, the defenses are breached. The document highlights a particularly disconcerting aspect of cloud environments: the reduced network exposure compared to on-premises systems paradoxically makes initial access a more significant linchpin.
1) Key findings
· Adaptation to Cloud Services: Cyber actors have shifted their focus from exploiting on-premises network vulnerabilities to directly targeting cloud services. This change is a response to the modernization of systems and the migration of organizational infrastructure to the cloud.
· Authentication as a Key Step: To compromise cloud-hosted networks, cyber actors must first successfully authenticate with the cloud provider. Preventing this initial access is crucial for stopping from compromising the target.
· Expansion of Targeting: Cyber actors have broadened their targeting to include sectors such as aviation, education, law enforcement, local and state councils, government financial departments, and military organizations. This expansion indicates a strategic diversification of targets for intelligence gathering.
· Use of Service and Dormant Accounts: it highlights that cyber actors have been observed using brute force attacks to access service and dormant accounts over the last 12 months. This tactic allows to gain initial access to cloud environments.
· Sophistication of cyber actors: The cyber actors can execute global supply chain compromises, such as the 2020 SolarWinds incident.
· Defense through Cybersecurity Fundamentals: The advisory emphasizes that a strong baseline of cybersecurity fundamentals can defend against cyber actors. For organizations that have transitioned to cloud infrastructure, protecting against TTPs for initial access is presented as a first line of defense.
C. NSA’s panic. Ubiquiti
Routers to Facilitate Cyber Operations» released by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), National Security Agency (NSA), US Cyber Command, and international partners warns of use of compromised Ubiquiti EdgeRouters to facilitate malicious cyber operations worldwide.
The popularity of Ubiquiti EdgeRouters is attributed to their user-friendly, Linux-based operating system, default credentials, and limited firewall protections. The routers are often shipped with insecure default configurations and do not automatically update firmware unless configured by the user.
The compromised EdgeRouters have been used by APT28 to harvest credentials, collect NTLMv2 digests, proxy network traffic, and host spear-phishing landing pages and custom tools. APT28 accessed the routers using default credentials and trojanized OpenSSH server processes. With root access to the compromised routers, the actors had unfettered access to the Linux-based operating systems to install tooling and obfuscate their identity.
APT28 also deployed custom Python scripts on the compromised routers to collect and validate stolen webmail account credentials obtained through cross-site scripting and browser-in-the-browser spear-phishing campaigns. Additionally, they exploited a critical zero-day elevation-of-privilege vulnerability in Microsoft Outlook (CVE-2023-23397) to collect NTLMv2 digests from targeted Outlook accounts and used publicly available tools to assist with NTLM relay attacks
D. NSA’s panic. SOHO
The exploitation of insecure SOHO routers by malicious cyber actors, particularly state-sponsored groups, poses a significant threat to individual users and critical infrastructure. Manufacturers are urged to adopt secure by design principles and transparency practices to mitigate these risks, while users and network defenders are advised to implement best practices for router security and remain vigilant against potential threats.
The root causes of insecure SOHO routers are multifaceted, involving both technical vulnerabilities and lapses in secure design and development practices by manufacturers, as well as negligence on the part of users in maintaining router security.
· Widespread Vulnerabilities: A significant number of vulnerabilities, totaling 226, have been identified in popular SOHO router brands. These vulnerabilities range in severity but collectively pose a substantial security risk.
· Outdated Components: Core components such as the Linux kernel and additional services like VPN in these routers are outdated. This makes them susceptible to known exploits for vulnerabilities that have long since been made public.
· Insecure Default Settings: Many routers come with easy-to-guess default passwords and use unencrypted connections. This can be easily exploited by attackers.
· Lack of Secure Design and Development: SOHO routers often lack basic security features due to insecure design and development practices. This includes the absence of automatic update capabilities and the presence of exploitable defects, particularly in web management interfaces.
· Exposure of Management Interfaces: Manufacturers frequently create devices with management interfaces exposed to the public internet by default, often without notifying the customers of this frequently unsafe configuration.
· Lack of Transparency and Accountability: There is a need for manufacturers to embrace transparency by disclosing product vulnerabilities through the CVE program and accurately classifying these vulnerabilities using the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) system
· Neglect of Security in Favor of Convenience and Features: Manufacturers prioritize ease of use and a wide variety of features over security, leading to routers that are «secure enough» right out of the box without considering the potential for exploitation.
· User Negligence: Many users, including IT professionals, do not follow basic security practices such as changing default passwords or updating firmware, leaving routers exposed to attacks.
· Complexity in Identifying Vulnerable Devices: Identifying specific vulnerable devices is complex due to legal and technical issues, complicating the process of mitigating these vulnerabilities.
E. Detection of Energy Consumption Cyber Attacks on Smart Devices
The paper «Detection of Energy Consumption Cyber Attacks on Smart Devices» emphasizes the rapid integration of IoT technology into smart homes, highlighting the associated security challenges due to resource constraints and unreliable networks.
· Energy Efficiency: it emphasizes the significance of energy efficiency in IoT systems, particularly in smart home environments for comfort, convenience, and security.
· Vulnerability: it discusses the vulnerability of IoT devices to cyberattacks and physical attacks due to their resource constraints. It underscores the necessity of securing these devices to ensure their effective deployment in real-world scenarios.
· Proposed Detection Framework: The authors propose a detection framework based on analyzing the energy consumption of smart devices. This framework aims to classify the attack status of monitored devices by examining their energy consumption patterns.
· Two-Stage Approach: The methodology involves a two-stage approach. The first stage uses a short time window for rough attack detection, while the second stage involves more detailed analysis.
· Lightweight Algorithm: The paper introduces a lightweight algorithm designed to detect energy consumption attacks on smart home devices. This algorithm is tailored to the limited resources of IoT devices and considers three different protocols: TCP, UDP, and MQTT.
· Packet Reception Rate Analysis: The detection technique relies on analyzing the packet reception rate of smart devices to identify abnormal behavior indicative of energy consumption attacks.
These benefits and drawbacks provide a balanced view of the proposed detection framework’s capabilities and limitations, highlighting its potential for improving smart home security.
1) Benefits
· Lightweight Detection Algorithm: The proposed algorithm is designed to be lightweight, making it suitable for resource constrained IoT devices. This ensures that the detection mechanism does not overly burden the devices it aims to protect.
· Protocol Versatility: The algorithm considers multiple communication protocols (TCP, UDP, MQTT), enhancing its applicability across various types of smart devices and network configurations.
· Two-Stage Detection Approach: The use of a two-stage detection approach (short and long-time windows) improves the accuracy of detecting energy consumption attacks while minimizing false positives. This method allows for both quick initial detection and detailed analysis.
· Real-Time Alerts: The framework promptly alerts administrators upon detecting an attack, enabling quick response and mitigation of potential threats.
· Effective Anomaly Detection: By measuring packet reception rates and analyzing energy consumption patterns, the algorithm effectively identifies deviations from normal behavior, which are indicative of cyberattacks.
2) Drawbacks
· Limited Attack Scenarios: The experimental setup has tested only specific types of attacks, which limit the generalizability of the results to other potential attack vectors not covered in the study.
· Scalability Concerns: While the algorithm is designed to be lightweight, its scalability in larger, more complex smart home environments with numerous devices and varied network conditions may require further validation.
· Dependency on Baseline Data: The effectiveness of the detection mechanism relies on accurate baseline measurements of packet reception rates and energy consumption. Any changes in the normal operating conditions of the devices could affect the baseline, potentially leading to false positives or negatives.
· Resource Constraints: Despite being lightweight, the algorithm still requires computational resources, which might be a challenge for extremely resource-limited devices. Continuous monitoring and analysis could also impact the battery life and performance of these devices.
F. MediHunt
The paper «MediHunt: A Network Forensics Framework for Medical IoT Devices» addresses the need for robust network forensics in Medical Internet of Things (MIoT) environments, particularly focusing on MQTT (Message Queuing Telemetry Transport) networks. These networks are commonly used in smart hospital environments for their lightweight communication protocol. It highlights the challenges in securing MIoT devices, which are often resource-constrained and have limited computational power. The lack of publicly available flow-based MQTT-specific datasets for training attack detection systems is mentioned as a significant challenge.
The paper presents MediHunt as an automatic network forensics solution designed for real-time detection of network flow-based traffic attacks in MQTT networks. It aims to provide a comprehensive solution for data collection, analysis, attack detection, presentation, and preservation of evidence. It is designed to detect a variety of TCP/IP layers and application layer attacks on MQTT networks. It leverages machine learning models to enhance the detection capabilities and is suitable for deployment on resource constrained MIoT devices.
Unlike many network forensics frameworks, MediHunt is specifically designed for the MIoT domain. This specialization allows it to address the unique challenges and requirements of medical IoT devices, such as resource constraints and the need for real-time attack detection.
1) Benefits
· Real-time Attack Detection: MediHunt is designed to detect network flow-based traffic attacks in real-time, which is crucial for mitigating potential damage and ensuring the security of MIoT environments.
· Comprehensive Forensic Capabilities: The framework provides a complete solution for data collection, analysis, attack detection, presentation, and preservation of evidence. This makes it a robust tool for network forensics in MIoT environments.
· Machine Learning Integration: By leveraging machine learning models, MediHunt enhances its detection capabilities. The use of a custom dataset that includes flow data for both TCP/IP layer and application layer attacks allows for more accurate and effective detection of a wide range of cyber-attacks.
· High Performance: The framework has demonstrated high performance, with F1 scores and detection accuracy exceeding 0.99 and indicates that it is highly reliable in detecting attacks on MQTT networks.
· Resource Efficiency: Despite its comprehensive capabilities, MediHunt is designed to be resource-efficient, making it suitable for deployment on resource-constrained MIoT devices like Raspberry Pi.
2) Drawbacks
· Dataset Limitations: While MediHunt uses a custom dataset for training its machine learning models, the creation and maintenance of such datasets can be challenging. The dataset needs to be regularly updated to cover new and emerging attack scenarios.
· Resource Constraints: Although MediHunt is designed to be resource-efficient, the inherent limitations of MIoT devices, such as limited computational power and memory, can still pose challenges. Ensuring that the framework runs smoothly on these devices without impacting their primary functions can be difficult.
· Complexity of Implementation: Implementing and maintaining a machine learning-based network forensics framework can be complex. It requires expertise in cybersecurity and machine learning, which may not be readily available in all healthcare settings.
· Dependence on Machine Learning Models: The effectiveness of MediHunt heavily relies on the accuracy and robustness of its machine learning models. These models need to be trained on high-quality data and regularly updated to remain effective against new types of attacks.
· Scalability Issues: While the framework is suitable for small-scale deployments on devices like Raspberry Pi, scaling it up to larger, more complex MIoT environments may present additional challenges. Ensuring consistent performance and reliability across a larger network of devices can be difficult
G. Fuxnet
The Blackjack hacking group, purportedly linked to Ukrainian intelligence services, has claimed responsibility for a cyberattack that allegedly compromised emergency detection and response capabilities in Moscow and its surrounding areas. This group has been associated with previous cyberattacks targeting internet providers and military infrastructure. Their most recent claim involves an attack on Moscollector, a company responsible for constructing and monitoring underground water, sewage, and communications infrastructure.
Regarding the infection methods, the Fuxnet malware appears to have been designed to target sensor-gateways and potentially disable them, as well as to fuzz sensors, which could lead to their malfunction or destruction.
· Unverified Claims: Team82 and Claroty have not been able to confirm the claims made by the Blackjack group regarding the impact of their cyberattack on the government’s emergency response capabilities or the extent of the damage caused by the Fuxnet malware.
· Discrepancy in Reported Impact: The Blackjack group initially claimed to have targeted 2,659 sensor-gateways, with about 1,700 being successfully attacked. However, Team82's analysis of the data leaked by Blackjack suggests that only a little more than 500 sensor gateways were actually impacted by the malware. The claim of having destroyed 87,000 sensors was also clarified by Blackjack, stating that they disabled the sensors by destroying the gateways and using M-Bus fuzzing, rather than physically destroying the sensors.
· M-Bus Fuzzing: The Blackjack group utilized a dedicated M-Bus fuzzer within the Fuxnet malware’s code to fuzz the sensors. This technique was aimed at disabling the sensors, but the exact number of sensors that were «fried» or permanently damaged as a result of this fuzzing is unknown due to the network being taken down and access to the sensor-gateways being disabled.
· Lack of Direct Evidence: Direct evidence to confirm the extent of the damage or the impact on emergency detection and response capabilities is lacking (including targeted Moscollector).
· Clarification from Blackjack: Following the publication of Team82's initial analysis, the Blackjack group reached out to provide updates and clarifications, particularly challenging the contention that only around 500 sensor-gateways had been impacted. They emphasized that the JSON files made public were only a sample of the full extent of their activity.
Monthly Digest. 2024 / 05 [Pro Level]
Welcome to the next edition of our Monthly Digest, your one-stop resource for staying informed on the most recent developments, insights, and best practices in the ever-evolving field of security. In this issue, we have curated a diverse collection of articles, news, and research findings tailored to both professionals and casual enthusiasts. Our digest aims to make our content is both engaging and accessible. Happy reading
Monthly Digest. 2024 / 05 [Regular Level]
Welcome to the next edition of our Monthly Digest, your one-stop resource for staying informed on the most recent developments, insights, and best practices in the ever-evolving field of security. In this issue, we have curated a diverse collection of articles, news, and research findings tailored to both professionals and casual enthusiasts. Our digest aims to make our content is both engaging and accessible. Happy reading!
Monthly Digest. 2024 / 05 [Free Level]
Welcome to the next edition of our Monthly Digest, your one-stop resource for staying informed on the most recent developments, insights, and best practices in the ever-evolving field of security. In this issue, we have curated a diverse collection of articles, news, and research findings tailored to both professionals and casual enthusiasts. Our digest aims to make our content is both engaging and accessible. Happy reading!
Monthly Digest. 2024 / 04
Welcome to the next edition of our Monthly Digest, your one-stop resource for staying informed on the most recent developments, insights, and best practices in the ever-evolving field of security. In this issue, we have curated a diverse collection of articles, news, and research findings tailored to both professionals and casual enthusiasts. Our digest aims to make our content is both engaging and accessible. Happy reading
