Today, we celebrate the EU’s latest triumph in the fight against cybercrime: adding six people to a sanctions list. Yes, you read that right — six whole people. The scourge of cyber-attacks must be shaking in its digital boots.
In a bold move, the EU has decided to freeze the assets of these six individuals and ban them from traveling to the EU. Oh, the horror No more sipping espresso in Paris or strolling along the canals of Amsterdam for these cyber warriors. The EU has truly outdone itself this time.
But wait, there’s more The EU has also vowed to «step up efforts to provide a stronger response to persistent malicious cyber activities.» Because, you know, that’s exactly what’s been missing — a stronger response. Not, say, actual action or tangible results, but a stronger response. That’s sure to strike fear into the hearts of everyone everywhere.
And let’s not forget the EU’s impressive track record on cybersecurity.
The EU’s Greatest Hits in Cyber Sanctions:
2020: The First Ever Cyber Sanctions:
📌Target: Six individuals and three entities.
📌Actions: Travel bans, asset freezes, and prohibitions on EU entities making funds available to the sanctioned parties.
📌Impact: Groundbreaking, in the sense that it was the first time the EU decided to «bite back» at cyber warriors. But did it stop the cyber onslaught? Not really. Cyberattacks continued to rise, and the EU’s digital defenses remained as porous as ever.
2023: Sanctions on Russian Hackers:
📌Target: Eleven Russian nationals involved in the Trickbot and Conti ransomware schemes.
📌Actions: Similar to the 2020 sanctions — travel bans and asset freezes.
📌Impact: The sanctions were more about making a statement than causing any real disruption. The hackers continued their operations, and the EU’s cybersecurity landscape saw little improvement.
2024: The Latest Sanctions:
📌Target: Six individuals, including members of notorious groups like Wizard Spider and Callisto.
📌Actions: You guessed it — travel bans, asset freezes, and prohibitions on transactions with EU entities.
📌Impact: The EU proudly announced that this was the first time they targeted cyber warriors using ransomware against essential services like healthcare and banking. But let’s be real — the hackers are probably not losing sleep over their inability to vacation in the French Riviera.
The EU’s To-Do List for Cyber Sanctions:
📌Identify a few cybercriminals: Six individuals, to be precise. Because, you know, cybercrime is totally limited to just a handful of people.
📌Freeze their assets: Because nothing says «we mean business» like preventing these hackers from accessing their European vacation funds.
📌Ban them from traveling to the EU: Now they can’t enjoy the Eiffel Tower or the Colosseum. That’ll teach them.
📌Issue a press release: The pièce de résistance. A strongly worded statement to show the world that the EU is on top of things.
The Reality:
📌Impact on Cybercrime: Minimal, if any. Cyberattacks from Russian groups like Fancy Bear and Wizard Spider continue unabated, targeting critical infrastructure and causing significant economic damage.
📌Deterrence: Questionable. The sanctions are more about making a public statement than actually disrupting the operations of these cybercriminals.
📌Operational Effectiveness: The EU’s sanctions are often seen as a tactic to sow discord within cybercriminal groups rather than a direct financial hit. Naming and shaming might stress some relationships, but it hardly stops the attacks.
Money
Ah, the EU’s grand strategy to prevent cyberattacks — a tale of throwing money at the problem and hoping it goes away. Let’s take a look at how the EU has been filling its coffers and what they’ve been doing with all that cash.
The EU’s Cybersecurity Funding Extravaganza
Horizon Europe:
📌Budget: €15 billion for digital and industry-related projects, including cybersecurity.
📌Focus: Research into cutting-edge technologies like AI and quantum computing to bolster cybersecurity.
Digital Europe Programme:
📌Budget: €1.6 billion specifically for cybersecurity, out of a total €7.5 billion for various digital initiatives.
📌Focus: Building European cybersecurity infrastructures, promoting state-of-the-art practices, and enhancing digital sovereignty.
European Cybersecurity Competence Centre (ECCC):
📌Role: Manages projects funded by the Digital Europe Programme and other initiatives.
📌Focus: Strengthening the cybersecurity ecosystem, supporting national SOCs, and developing advanced technologies.
Connecting Europe Facility (CEF):
📌Budget: Part of the €2 trillion Recovery Plan for Europe.
📌Focus: High-performance digital infrastructure, secure communication networks, and cybersecurity enhancements.
European Defence Fund (EDF):
📌Budget: €60 million for 2023.
📌Focus: Cybersecurity solutions for defense systems and enhancing the cybersecurity of defense infrastructure.
The Extra Reality
📌Throwing Money at the Problem: The EU has certainly not been shy about allocating funds to cybersecurity. With billions earmarked for various programs, you’d think they’d have this cyber thing under control by now. But alas, the cyberattacks keep coming, and the hackers are still having a field day.
📌Research and Innovation: Sure, investing in AI, quantum computing, and other advanced technologies sounds impressive. But how much of this research actually translates into real-world protection against cyber threats? It’s like buying a fancy alarm system but forgetting to lock the front door.
📌Building Infrastructures: The EU is all about building robust cybersecurity infrastructures and promoting best practices. Yet, despite these efforts, the digital landscape remains as vulnerable as ever. It’s like constructing a fortress with a drawbridge that never quite closes.
📌Supporting SMEs: The EU has initiatives like CYSSME to help small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) with their cybersecurity needs. While this is commendable, the reality is that many SMEs still struggle with basic cybersecurity measures. It’s like giving a band-aid to someone with a broken leg.
📌Grand Plans, Minimal Impact: The EU’s funding programs are filled with grand plans and ambitious goals. But when it comes to actual impact, the results are underwhelming. Cyberattacks continue to rise, and the EU’s digital defenses seem perpetually one step behind the attackers.
Conclusion
So, what exactly did the EU do to prevent these cyberattacks? They threw a lot of money at the problem, set up numerous funding programs, and issued a slew of press releases. And how effective are these sanctions and funding efforts in stopping cyberattacks? Well, let’s just say the hackers are still laughing all the way to the (digital) bank. But hey, at least the EU can say they’re doing something, right?
Vkontakte
Twitter
Одноклассники
