logo
Snarky Security  Trust No One, Especially Not Us… Because We Know That Nothing Is Truly Secure
О проекте Просмотр Уровни подписки Фильтры Обновления проекта Контакты Поделиться Метки
Все проекты
О проекте
Reading about IT and InfoSecurity press, watching videos and following news channels can be a rather toxic activity and bad idea, as it involves discarding the important information from a wide array of all the advertising, company PR, and news article.

Given that my readers, in the absence of sufficient time, have expressed a desire to «be more informed on various IT topics», I’m proposing a project that will do both short-term and long-term analysis, reviews, and interpretations of the flow of information I come across.

Here’s what’s going to happen:
— Obtaining hard-to-come-by facts and content
— Making notes on topics and trends that are not widely reflected in public information field

📌Not sure what level is suitable for you? Check this explanation https://sponsr.ru/snarky_security/55292/Paid_level_explained/

All places to read, listen to, and watch content.
➡️Text and other media: TG, Boosty, Teletype.in, VK, X.com
➡️Audio: Mave, you find here other podcast services, e.g. Youtube Podcasts, Spotify, Apple or Amazon
➡️Video: Youtube

The main categories of materials — use tags:
📌news
📌digest

QA — directly or via email snarky_qa@outlook.com
Публикации, доступные бесплатно
Уровни подписки
Единоразовый платёж

Your donation fuels our mission to provide cutting-edge cybersecurity research, in-depth tutorials, and expert insights. Support our work today to empower the community with even more valuable content.

*no refund, no paid content

Помочь проекту
Promo 750₽ месяц
Доступны сообщения

For a limited time, we're offering our Level "Regular" subscription at an unbeatable price—50% off!

Dive into the latest trends and updates in the cybersecurity world with our in-depth articles and expert insights

Offer valid until the end of this month.

Оформить подписку
Regular Reader 1 500₽ месяц 16 200₽ год
(-10%)
При подписке на год для вас действует 10% скидка. 10% основная скидка и 0% доп. скидка за ваш уровень на проекте Snarky Security
Доступны сообщения

Ideal for regular readers who are interested in staying informed about the latest trends and updates in the cybersecurity world.

Оформить подписку
Pro Reader 3 000₽ месяц 30 600₽ год
(-15%)
При подписке на год для вас действует 15% скидка. 15% основная скидка и 0% доп. скидка за ваш уровень на проекте Snarky Security
Доступны сообщения

Designed for IT professionals, cybersecurity experts, and enthusiasts who seek deeper insights and more comprehensive resources. + Q&A

Оформить подписку
Фильтры
Обновления проекта
Поделиться
Метки
snarkysecurity 156 snarkysecuritypdf 59 news 51 keypoints 41 ai 22 research 22 Cyber Insurance 20 Cyber Insurance Market 19 cybersecurity 16 unpacking 12 AGI 11 Nakasone 11 risk management 11 CTEM 10 nsa 10 OpenAi 10 usa 9 cyber operations 8 discovery 8 EM (Exposure Management) 8 prioritization 8 threat management 8 validation 8 Marine Security 7 Maritime security 7 announcement 6 china 6 Cyber Defense Doctrine 6 cyberbiosecurity 6 Digest 6 Espionage 6 Maritime 6 Monthly Digest 6 biosecurity 5 biotech 5 biotechnology 5 Bioweapon 5 marine 5 patent 5 phishing 5 Russia 5 bio 4 cyber security 4 dgap 4 medical security 4 risks 4 sanctions 4 security 4 content 3 cyber attack 3 data leakage 3 Israel 3 medical communication 3 osint 3 video 3 badges 2 cfr 2 console architecture 2 cyber threat 2 cyberops 2 data breach 2 data theft 2 DICOM 2 EU 2 europol 2 fake news 2 funding 2 Healthcare 2 ICS 2 intelbroker 2 leads 2 malware 2 marketing 2 marketing strategy 2 medicine 2 Microsoft 2 military 2 ML 2 offensive 2 sabotage 2 submarine 2 surveillance 2 tech 2 tracking 2 U.S. Air Force 2 united kingdom 2 vulnerabilities 2 Academic Plagiarism 1 AI Plagiarism 1 Air-Gapped Systems 1 aircraft 1 Amazon 1 amazon web services 1 Antarctica 1 antartica 1 APAC 1 APT29 1 APT42 1 ArcaneDoor 1 Ascension 1 astra 1 astra linux 1 AT&T 1 auto 1 aviation industry 1 aws 1 BeiDou 1 blockchain 1 Boeing 1 books 1 bot 1 broker 1 cable 1 Catholic 1 cisa 1 CISO 1 CISOStressFest 1 compliance 1 content category 1 Continuous Management 1 Copy-Paste Culture 1 criminal charges 1 cuba 1 Cuttlefish 1 cyber 1 Cybercrime 1 CyberDome 1 CybersecurityPressure 1 cybsafe 1 Czech Republic 1 DASF 1 Databricks AI Security Framework 1 defense 1 deferred prosecution agreement 1 dell 1 democracy 1 digital solidarity 1 diplomacy 1 Discord 1 ebike 1 ecosystem 1 end-to-end AI 1 EUelections2024 1 fake 1 fbi 1 fiscal year 1 Framework 1 FTC 1 game console 1 Games 1 GCJ-02 1 gemini 1 Gemma 1 Generative 1 germany 1 global times 1 GLONASS 1 Google 1 google news 1 Government 1 GPS 1 great powers 1 guide 1 hackaton 1 Handala 1 Human Centric Security 1 HumanErrorFTW 1 humanoid robot 1 ICC 1 IIoT 1 incident response 1 Inclusive 1 india 1 indonesia 1 InformationManipulation 1 insurance 1 intelbro 1 Intelligence 1 IoMT 1 IoT 1 iran 1 Iron Dome 1 jamming 1 korea 1 law enforcement 1 lea 1 legal issues 1 LiabilityNightmares 1 Llama 1 LLM 1 LLMs 1 LNG 1 marin 1 market 1 mass 1 message queue 1 military aviation 1 ModelBest 1 Mossad 1 mq broker 1 MTAC 1 National Vulnerability Database 1 NavIC 1 Navigation 1 nes 1 nozomi 1 nsm22 1 nvd 1 NVidia 1 ofac 1 oil 1 Olympics 1 paid content 1 Palestine 1 paris 1 Plagiarism Scandals 1 PlayStation 1 playstation 2 1 playstation 3 1 podcast 1 police 1 PressReleaseDiplomacy 1 ps2 1 ps3 1 radar systems 1 railway 1 Ransomware 1 regulatory 1 Risk-Based Approach 1 rodrigo copetti 1 Russian 1 safety oversight 1 scam 1 semiconductors 1 ShinBet 1 snes 1 Social Engineering: 1 social network 1 spy 1 spyware 1 Stanford 1 surv 1 T-Mobile 1 te 1 technology 1 Tensor 1 Threat 1 Threat Exposure Management 1 Typosquatting 1 uae 1 UK 1 UNC1549 1 UnitedHealth Group 1 us 1 US11483343B2 1 US11496512B2 1 US11611582B2 1 US20220232015A1 1 US9071600B2 1 Verizon 1 VK 1 Vulnerability Management 1 water sector 1 webex 1 Westchester 1 Whatsapp 1 women 1 xbox 1 xbox 360 1 xbox original 1 xz 1 zcaler 1 сybersecurity 1 Больше тегов
Читать: 2+ мин
logo Snarky Security

CTEM Alternatives: Because There's Always a Plan B

There ‎are‏ ‎alternatives ‎to ‎CTEM ‎that ‎might‏ ‎be ‎better‏ ‎suited‏ ‎to ‎certain ‎organizations‏ ‎or ‎scenarios:

📌 Open-source‏ ‎Cloud ‎Security ‎Posture ‎Management‏ ‎(CSPM): Open-source‏ ‎CSPM ‎tools‏ ‎are ‎cost-effective‏ ‎and ‎flexible ‎solutions ‎for ‎cloud‏ ‎security.‏ ‎They ‎offer‏ ‎the ‎benefits‏ ‎of ‎community ‎support ‎and ‎the‏ ‎potential‏ ‎for‏ ‎customization. ‎However,‏ ‎they ‎can‏ ‎be ‎resource-intensive‏ ‎to‏ ‎deploy ‎and‏ ‎may ‎make ‎an ‎organization ‎dependent‏ ‎on ‎the‏ ‎community‏ ‎for ‎updates ‎and‏ ‎improvements

📌 Vanta: Vanta ‎is‏ ‎a ‎youth ‎esports ‎development‏ ‎platform‏ ‎that ‎provides‏ ‎expert ‎coaching‏ ‎and ‎mentorship. ‎It ‎has ‎received‏ ‎accreditation‏ ‎from ‎http://STEM.org, indicating‏ ‎its ‎commitment‏ ‎to ‎developing ‎necessary ‎skills ‎such‏ ‎as‏ ‎innovation,‏ ‎teamwork, ‎and‏ ‎problem-solving ‎in‏ ‎the ‎youth

📌 Defense‏ ‎Surface‏ ‎Management ‎(DSM):‏ ‎DSM ‎provides ‎a ‎more ‎efficient‏ ‎and ‎effective‏ ‎way‏ ‎to ‎connect ‎Threat‏ ‎Intelligence ‎Data‏ ‎(TID) ‎and ‎CTEM. ‎It‏ ‎helps‏ ‎organizations ‎prioritize‏ ‎and ‎optimize‏ ‎their ‎defenses ‎by ‎identifying ‎strengths‏ ‎and‏ ‎weaknesses ‎and‏ ‎comparing ‎capabilities‏ ‎against ‎adversarial ‎Tactics, ‎Techniques, ‎and‏ ‎Procedures‏ ‎(TTPs)

📌 CloudBees‏ ‎Jenkins ‎Enterprise‏ ‎and ‎Operations‏ ‎Center: ‎These‏ ‎tools‏ ‎provide ‎more‏ ‎features ‎to ‎visualize ‎software ‎delivery‏ ‎pipelines ‎and‏ ‎recover‏ ‎from ‎failures. ‎They‏ ‎offer ‎greater‏ ‎visibility ‎into ‎Jenkins ‎operations‏ ‎and‏ ‎allow ‎for‏ ‎the ‎central‏ ‎management ‎of ‎clusters ‎of ‎Jenkins‏ ‎masters,‏ ‎development, ‎and‏ ‎performance ‎analytics

📌 Unifying‏ ‎Remediation: ‎This ‎approach ‎leverages ‎automation‏ ‎to‏ ‎streamline‏ ‎the ‎response‏ ‎to ‎security‏ ‎issues, ‎reducing‏ ‎manual‏ ‎intervention ‎and‏ ‎response ‎time. ‎It ‎also ‎includes‏ ‎considering ‎the‏ ‎context‏ ‎of ‎security ‎issues,‏ ‎which ‎helps‏ ‎in ‎identifying ‎the ‎most‏ ‎critical‏ ‎issues, ‎understanding‏ ‎their ‎root‏ ‎causes, ‎and ‎determining ‎effective ‎remediation‏ ‎strategies

📌 Pen‏ ‎Testing: ‎While‏ ‎CTEM ‎is‏ ‎focused ‎on ‎identifying ‎and ‎preventing‏ ‎as‏ ‎many‏ ‎vulnerabilities ‎as‏ ‎possible, ‎pen‏ ‎testing ‎is‏ ‎a‏ ‎human-driven ‎offensive‏ ‎test ‎that ‎attempts ‎to ‎achieve‏ ‎a ‎specific‏ ‎goal.‏ ‎Using ‎both ‎methodologies‏ ‎increases ‎visibility‏ ‎dramatically ‎and ‎provides ‎a‏ ‎more‏ ‎comprehensive ‎security‏ ‎approach

📌 Automation ‎in‏ ‎Tax ‎Preparation: Automation ‎can ‎help ‎eliminate‏ ‎the‏ ‎risk ‎of‏ ‎human ‎error‏ ‎that ‎can ‎occur ‎with ‎manual‏ ‎data‏ ‎entry,‏ ‎leading ‎to‏ ‎more ‎accurate‏ ‎financial ‎statements.‏ ‎It‏ ‎can ‎streamline‏ ‎audit ‎processes, ‎allowing ‎tax ‎professionals‏ ‎to ‎identify‏ ‎and‏ ‎prioritize ‎high-risk ‎areas

Читать: 2+ мин
logo Snarky Security

Vulnerability Density and Time-to-Remediate: A Tale of Two Metrics (CTEM)

Vulnerability ‎Density‏ ‎and ‎Time-to-Remediate ‎are ‎two ‎key‏ ‎metrics ‎that‏ ‎can‏ ‎be ‎used ‎to‏ ‎measure ‎the‏ ‎effectiveness ‎of ‎a ‎CTEM‏ ‎program.

📌 Vulnerability‏ ‎Density ‎is‏ ‎a ‎measure‏ ‎of ‎the ‎number ‎of ‎vulnerabilities‏ ‎per‏ ‎unit ‎of‏ ‎code ‎or‏ ‎system. ‎It ‎provides ‎an ‎indication‏ ‎of‏ ‎the‏ ‎overall ‎security‏ ‎health ‎of‏ ‎an ‎organization's‏ ‎systems.‏ ‎A ‎lower‏ ‎vulnerability ‎density ‎indicates ‎a ‎more‏ ‎secure ‎system,‏ ‎while‏ ‎a ‎higher ‎vulnerability‏ ‎density ‎suggests‏ ‎a ‎greater ‎potential ‎for‏ ‎exploitation.‏ ‎To ‎use‏ ‎this ‎metric‏ ‎effectively, ‎organizations ‎should ‎track ‎changes‏ ‎in‏ ‎vulnerability ‎density‏ ‎over ‎time.‏ ‎A ‎decreasing ‎trend ‎would ‎indicate‏ ‎that‏ ‎the‏ ‎CTEM ‎program‏ ‎is ‎effectively‏ ‎identifying ‎and‏ ‎remediating‏ ‎vulnerabilities, ‎thereby‏ ‎improving ‎the ‎organization's ‎security ‎posture.‏ ‎It ‎is‏ ‎calculated‏ ‎by ‎dividing ‎the‏ ‎total ‎number‏ ‎of ‎vulnerabilities ‎by ‎the‏ ‎total‏ ‎number ‎of‏ ‎systems ‎or‏ ‎applications. ‎This ‎metric ‎can ‎be‏ ‎used‏ ‎to ‎estimate‏ ‎the ‎number‏ ‎of ‎residual ‎vulnerabilities ‎in ‎a‏ ‎newly‏ ‎released‏ ‎software ‎system‏ ‎given ‎its‏ ‎size. ‎A‏ ‎high‏ ‎vulnerability ‎density‏ ‎indicates ‎that ‎there ‎are ‎more‏ ‎vulnerabilities ‎to‏ ‎remediate,‏ ‎which ‎could ‎lead‏ ‎to ‎a‏ ‎higher ‎risk ‎of ‎exploitation.‏ ‎Organizations‏ ‎should ‎aim‏ ‎to ‎keep‏ ‎vulnerability ‎density ‎low ‎to ‎reduce‏ ‎the‏ ‎risk ‎of‏ ‎exploitation

📌 Time-to-Remediate ‎(also‏ ‎known ‎as ‎Mean ‎Time ‎to‏ ‎Respond‏ ‎or‏ ‎MTTR) ‎is‏ ‎a ‎measure‏ ‎of ‎the‏ ‎average‏ ‎time ‎it‏ ‎takes ‎to ‎respond ‎to ‎and‏ ‎remediate ‎identified‏ ‎vulnerabilities‏ ‎or ‎threats. ‎A‏ ‎lower ‎MTTR‏ ‎indicates ‎efficient ‎response ‎and‏ ‎resolution,‏ ‎suggesting ‎a‏ ‎more ‎effective‏ ‎CTEM ‎program. ‎This ‎metric ‎is‏ ‎crucial‏ ‎because ‎the‏ ‎longer ‎a‏ ‎vulnerability ‎remains ‎unaddressed, ‎the ‎greater‏ ‎the‏ ‎chance‏ ‎it ‎could‏ ‎be ‎exploited‏ ‎by ‎malicious‏ ‎actors.‏ ‎Therefore, ‎a‏ ‎successful ‎CTEM ‎program ‎should ‎help‏ ‎reduce ‎the‏ ‎time‏ ‎between ‎detection ‎and‏ ‎remediation. ‎It‏ ‎is ‎calculated ‎by ‎subtracting‏ ‎the‏ ‎discovery ‎date‏ ‎from ‎the‏ ‎remediation ‎date. ‎In ‎more ‎simple‏ ‎terms,‏ ‎MTTR ‎is‏ ‎the ‎number‏ ‎of ‎days ‎it ‎takes ‎to‏ ‎close‏ ‎a‏ ‎security ‎vulnerability‏ ‎once ‎it‏ ‎has ‎been‏ ‎discovered.‏ ‎MTTR ‎may‏ ‎also ‎be ‎calculated ‎on ‎a‏ ‎case-by-case ‎basis‏ ‎or‏ ‎on ‎a ‎macro‏ ‎level. ‎The‏ ‎macro ‎equation ‎for ‎MTTR‏ ‎is:‏ ‎MTTR ‎=‏ ‎(Total ‎Sum‏ ‎of ‎Detection ‎to ‎Remediation ‎Time)‏ ‎/‏ ‎(Total ‎Number‏ ‎of ‎Incidents).‏ ‎A ‎lower ‎time ‎to ‎remediation‏ ‎indicates‏ ‎that‏ ‎vulnerabilities ‎are‏ ‎being ‎addressed‏ ‎quickly ‎and‏ ‎reduces‏ ‎the ‎risk‏ ‎of ‎exploitation. ‎Organizations ‎should ‎aim‏ ‎for ‎a‏ ‎short‏ ‎time ‎to ‎remediation‏ ‎to ‎reduce‏ ‎risk

Both ‎metrics ‎provide ‎valuable‏ ‎insights‏ ‎into ‎the‏ ‎effectiveness ‎of‏ ‎a ‎CTEM ‎program. ‎By ‎continuously‏ ‎monitoring‏ ‎these ‎metrics,‏ ‎organizations ‎can‏ ‎identify ‎areas ‎for ‎improvement ‎and‏ ‎take‏ ‎action‏ ‎to ‎enhance‏ ‎their ‎security‏ ‎posture

Читать: 2+ мин
logo Snarky Security

CTEM Effectiveness: Measuring the Immeasurable

To ‎measure‏ ‎the ‎effectiveness ‎of ‎a ‎CTEM‏ ‎program, ‎organizations‏ ‎can‏ ‎use ‎several ‎key‏ ‎performance ‎indicators‏ ‎and ‎metrics. ‎By ‎using‏ ‎these‏ ‎metrics ‎and‏ ‎continuously ‎monitoring‏ ‎them, ‎organizations ‎can ‎gain ‎insights‏ ‎into‏ ‎the ‎effectiveness‏ ‎of ‎their‏ ‎CTEM ‎program ‎and ‎make ‎informed‏ ‎decisions‏ ‎to‏ ‎enhance ‎their‏ ‎cybersecurity ‎posture.‏ ‎It’s ‎important‏ ‎to‏ ‎note ‎that‏ ‎the ‎effectiveness ‎of ‎a ‎CTEM‏ ‎program ‎is‏ ‎not‏ ‎static ‎and ‎should‏ ‎be ‎evaluated‏ ‎regularly ‎to ‎adapt ‎to‏ ‎the‏ ‎evolving ‎threat‏ ‎landscape ‎and‏ ‎business ‎needs.

📌 Risk ‎Reduction: ‎Evaluate ‎the‏ ‎reduction‏ ‎in ‎security‏ ‎risks ‎by‏ ‎tracking ‎the ‎number ‎of ‎vulnerabilities‏ ‎identified‏ ‎and‏ ‎remediated ‎over‏ ‎time. ‎A‏ ‎successful ‎CTEM‏ ‎program‏ ‎should ‎demonstrate‏ ‎a ‎downward ‎trend ‎in ‎the‏ ‎number ‎and‏ ‎severity‏ ‎of ‎security ‎risks

📌 Improved‏ ‎Threat ‎Detection:‏ ‎Measure ‎the ‎effectiveness ‎of‏ ‎threat‏ ‎detection ‎capabilities‏ ‎by ‎tracking‏ ‎the ‎time ‎it ‎takes ‎to‏ ‎detect‏ ‎new ‎vulnerabilities‏ ‎or ‎threats.‏ ‎A ‎lower ‎Mean ‎Time ‎to‏ ‎Detect‏ ‎(MTTD)‏ ‎indicates ‎a‏ ‎more ‎effective‏ ‎CTEM ‎program

📌 Time‏ ‎to‏ ‎Remediate: ‎Assess‏ ‎the ‎speed ‎at ‎which ‎identified‏ ‎threats ‎and‏ ‎vulnerabilities‏ ‎are ‎addressed. ‎A‏ ‎successful ‎CTEM‏ ‎program ‎should ‎help ‎reduce‏ ‎the‏ ‎time ‎between‏ ‎detection ‎and‏ ‎remediation, ‎known ‎as ‎Mean ‎Time‏ ‎to‏ ‎Respond ‎(MTTR)

📌 Security‏ ‎Control ‎Effectiveness:‏ ‎Use ‎tools ‎like ‎Security ‎Control‏ ‎Validation‏ ‎and‏ ‎Breach ‎and‏ ‎Attack ‎Simulation‏ ‎to ‎test‏ ‎the‏ ‎organization’s ‎defenses‏ ‎against ‎simulated ‎threats. ‎The ‎results‏ ‎can ‎validate‏ ‎the‏ ‎impact ‎of ‎the‏ ‎implemented ‎controls‏ ‎and ‎the ‎effectiveness ‎of‏ ‎the‏ ‎security ‎measures‏ ‎in ‎place

📌 Compliance‏ ‎Metrics: ‎For ‎industries ‎with ‎regulatory‏ ‎requirements,‏ ‎achieving ‎and‏ ‎maintaining ‎compliance‏ ‎is ‎a ‎key ‎success ‎indicator.‏ ‎Track‏ ‎compliance‏ ‎violations ‎or‏ ‎issues ‎to‏ ‎gauge ‎the‏ ‎effectiveness‏ ‎of ‎the‏ ‎CTEM ‎program ‎in ‎maintaining ‎regulatory‏ ‎standards

📌 Business ‎Alignment:‏ ‎Ensure‏ ‎that ‎the ‎CTEM‏ ‎program ‎aligns‏ ‎with ‎business ‎priorities. ‎This‏ ‎can‏ ‎be ‎measured‏ ‎qualitatively ‎by‏ ‎assessing ‎whether ‎remediation ‎efforts ‎focus‏ ‎on‏ ‎protecting ‎the‏ ‎most ‎critical‏ ‎business ‎assets ‎and ‎align ‎with‏ ‎key‏ ‎business‏ ‎objectives

📌 Stakeholder ‎Feedback:‏ ‎Collect ‎and‏ ‎analyze ‎feedback‏ ‎from‏ ‎stakeholders ‎involved‏ ‎in ‎the ‎CTEM ‎process. ‎Positive‏ ‎feedback ‎can‏ ‎indicate‏ ‎that ‎the ‎program‏ ‎is ‎meeting‏ ‎its ‎objectives ‎and ‎is‏ ‎well-received‏ ‎by ‎those‏ ‎it ‎affects

Читать: 3+ мин
logo Snarky Security

CTEM: Miscellaneous Mayhem

Prioritization ‎Threats

The‏ ‎Prioritization ‎phase ‎is ‎the ‎third‏ ‎stage ‎in‏ ‎the‏ ‎CTEM ‎framework. ‎During‏ ‎this ‎phase,‏ ‎organizations ‎evaluate ‎the ‎potential‏ ‎vulnerabilities‏ ‎identified ‎in‏ ‎the ‎Discovery‏ ‎phase ‎based ‎on ‎how ‎likely‏ ‎they‏ ‎are ‎to‏ ‎be ‎exploited‏ ‎and ‎the ‎potential ‎impact ‎this‏ ‎would‏ ‎have‏ ‎on ‎the‏ ‎organization. ‎Here‏ ‎are ‎the‏ ‎key‏ ‎steps ‎involved‏ ‎in ‎prioritizing ‎threats ‎during ‎CTEM‏ ‎implementation:

📌 Assess ‎Severity‏ ‎and‏ ‎Likelihood: Businesses ‎often ‎use‏ ‎a ‎risk‏ ‎assessment ‎methodology ‎to ‎analyze‏ ‎the‏ ‎severity ‎and‏ ‎likelihood ‎of‏ ‎each ‎vulnerability. ‎This ‎involves ‎evaluating‏ ‎the‏ ‎potential ‎damage‏ ‎that ‎could‏ ‎be ‎caused ‎if ‎the ‎vulnerability‏ ‎were‏ ‎to‏ ‎be ‎exploited.

📌 Consider‏ ‎Business ‎Impact: CTEM‏ ‎programs ‎help‏ ‎organizations‏ ‎prioritize ‎threats‏ ‎based ‎on ‎their ‎potential ‎impact‏ ‎on ‎the‏ ‎business.‏ ‎This ‎involves ‎considering‏ ‎factors ‎such‏ ‎as ‎the ‎criticality ‎of‏ ‎the‏ ‎affected ‎system‏ ‎or ‎data,‏ ‎the ‎potential ‎financial ‎impact, ‎and‏ ‎the‏ ‎potential ‎reputational‏ ‎damage.

📌 Availability ‎of‏ ‎Compensating ‎Controls: The ‎availability ‎of ‎compensating‏ ‎controls,‏ ‎which‏ ‎are ‎alternative‏ ‎measures ‎that‏ ‎can ‎reduce‏ ‎the‏ ‎risk ‎of‏ ‎a ‎vulnerability ‎being ‎exploited, ‎is‏ ‎also ‎a‏ ‎factor‏ ‎in ‎prioritization.

📌 Tolerance ‎for‏ ‎Residual ‎Risk: The‏ ‎organization's ‎tolerance ‎for ‎residual‏ ‎risk,‏ ‎which ‎is‏ ‎the ‎risk‏ ‎that ‎remains ‎after ‎all ‎controls‏ ‎have‏ ‎been ‎applied,‏ ‎is ‎another‏ ‎factor ‎that ‎can ‎influence ‎prioritization.

📌 Allocate‏ ‎Resources: Based‏ ‎on‏ ‎prioritization, ‎organizations‏ ‎can ‎effectively‏ ‎allocate ‎resources‏ ‎towards‏ ‎the ‎most‏ ‎significant ‎risks. ‎This ‎strategic ‎approach‏ ‎to ‎threat‏ ‎management‏ ‎results ‎in ‎more‏ ‎efficient ‎use‏ ‎of ‎resources ‎and ‎a‏ ‎quicker‏ ‎response ‎to‏ ‎the ‎most‏ ‎potentially ‎damaging ‎threats

Prioritization ‎Methods

Here ‎are‏ ‎some‏ ‎common ‎methods‏ ‎and ‎best‏ ‎practices ‎for ‎prioritizing ‎threats ‎during‏ ‎CTEM‏ ‎implementation:

📌 Business-Aligned‏ ‎Prioritization: CTEM ‎aligns‏ ‎its ‎prioritization‏ ‎with ‎business‏ ‎objectives,‏ ‎focusing ‎on‏ ‎the ‎most ‎critical ‎threats ‎and‏ ‎vulnerabilities ‎that‏ ‎could‏ ‎impact ‎the ‎organization's‏ ‎most ‎valuable‏ ‎assets. ‎This ‎approach ‎ensures‏ ‎that‏ ‎resources ‎are‏ ‎allocated ‎where‏ ‎they ‎matter ‎the ‎most, ‎aligning‏ ‎the‏ ‎organization's ‎efforts‏ ‎with ‎the‏ ‎ever-changing ‎threat ‎landscape

📌 Impact ‎Analysis: Prioritization ‎should‏ ‎include‏ ‎an‏ ‎analysis ‎of‏ ‎the ‎potential‏ ‎impact ‎of‏ ‎each‏ ‎threat. ‎By‏ ‎evaluating ‎the ‎severity ‎and ‎potential‏ ‎damage ‎of‏ ‎each‏ ‎threat, ‎organizations ‎can‏ ‎effectively ‎allocate‏ ‎resources ‎towards ‎the ‎most‏ ‎significant‏ ‎risks

📌 Dynamic ‎Prioritization: The‏ ‎threat ‎landscape‏ ‎is ‎dynamic, ‎with ‎new ‎vulnerabilities‏ ‎emerging‏ ‎regularly. ‎Therefore,‏ ‎prioritization ‎strategies‏ ‎need ‎to ‎be ‎adaptable ‎to‏ ‎address‏ ‎evolving‏ ‎threats ‎effectively

📌 Resource‏ ‎Allocation: Human ‎resources‏ ‎are ‎finite,‏ ‎and‏ ‎security ‎teams‏ ‎must ‎prioritize ‎their ‎efforts. ‎The‏ ‎key ‎is‏ ‎to‏ ‎allocate ‎resources ‎towards‏ ‎impactful ‎vulnerabilities‏ ‎that ‎can ‎significantly ‎impact‏ ‎the‏ ‎organization

To ‎ensure‏ ‎that ‎threat‏ ‎prioritization ‎is ‎aligned ‎with ‎business‏ ‎goals,‏ ‎organizations ‎should‏ ‎incorporate ‎strategic‏ ‎business ‎goals ‎into ‎their ‎CTEM‏ ‎program.‏ ‎This‏ ‎approach ‎allows‏ ‎organizations ‎to‏ ‎evaluate ‎the‏ ‎severity‏ ‎and ‎damage‏ ‎potential ‎of ‎every ‎threat, ‎and‏ ‎then ‎allocate‏ ‎resources‏ ‎accordingly, ‎ensuring ‎that‏ ‎security ‎measures‏ ‎are ‎focused ‎on ‎protecting‏ ‎the‏ ‎most ‎critical‏ ‎business ‎assets

Читать: 7+ мин
logo Snarky Security

CTEM Implementation: A Step-by-Step Guide to Madness

Implementing ‎CTEM‏ ‎involves ‎a ‎systematic ‎five-step ‎process‏ ‎that ‎helps‏ ‎organizations‏ ‎proactively ‎manage ‎and‏ ‎mitigate ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎risks. ‎Implementing ‎CTEM ‎is‏ ‎a‏ ‎continuous ‎cycle,‏ ‎as ‎the‏ ‎threat ‎landscape ‎is ‎always ‎evolving.‏ ‎Organizations‏ ‎must ‎regularly‏ ‎revisit ‎each‏ ‎step ‎to ‎adapt ‎to ‎new‏ ‎threats‏ ‎and‏ ‎changes ‎in‏ ‎their ‎digital‏ ‎environment:

📌 Scoping: ‎This‏ ‎initial‏ ‎phase ‎is‏ ‎about ‎defining ‎what ‎needs ‎to‏ ‎be ‎protected‏ ‎within‏ ‎the ‎organization. ‎It‏ ‎involves ‎understanding‏ ‎the ‎assets, ‎systems, ‎and‏ ‎data‏ ‎that ‎are‏ ‎critical ‎to‏ ‎the ‎business ‎and ‎could ‎be‏ ‎potential‏ ‎targets ‎for‏ ‎cyber ‎threats

📌 Discovery:‏ ‎In ‎this ‎stage, ‎the ‎organization‏ ‎actively‏ ‎seeks‏ ‎out ‎and‏ ‎identifies ‎vulnerabilities‏ ‎and ‎weaknesses‏ ‎in‏ ‎the ‎scoped‏ ‎assets. ‎This ‎includes ‎using ‎tools‏ ‎and ‎technologies‏ ‎to‏ ‎scan ‎for ‎and‏ ‎analyze ‎potential‏ ‎security ‎issues ‎across ‎the‏ ‎organization's‏ ‎attack ‎surface,‏ ‎which ‎encompasses‏ ‎external, ‎internal, ‎and ‎cloud ‎environments

📌 Prioritization:‏ ‎After‏ ‎discovering ‎vulnerabilities,‏ ‎the ‎next‏ ‎step ‎is ‎to ‎prioritize ‎them‏ ‎based‏ ‎on‏ ‎their ‎potential‏ ‎impact ‎on‏ ‎the ‎business.‏ ‎This‏ ‎involves ‎assessing‏ ‎the ‎severity, ‎exploitability, ‎and ‎the‏ ‎criticality ‎of‏ ‎the‏ ‎potential ‎impact ‎to‏ ‎the ‎business,‏ ‎as ‎well ‎as ‎any‏ ‎compensating‏ ‎security ‎controls

📌 Validation:‏ ‎This ‎phase‏ ‎is ‎crucial ‎for ‎ensuring ‎that‏ ‎the‏ ‎organization's ‎vulnerability‏ ‎to ‎threats‏ ‎has ‎been ‎accurately ‎assessed ‎and‏ ‎that‏ ‎the‏ ‎remediation ‎operations‏ ‎are ‎effective.‏ ‎It ‎typically‏ ‎involves‏ ‎practices ‎like‏ ‎penetration ‎testing ‎and ‎Red ‎Team‏ ‎exercises ‎to‏ ‎simulate‏ ‎attacks ‎and ‎validate‏ ‎the ‎protections‏ ‎in ‎place

📌 Mobilization: ‎The ‎final‏ ‎step‏ ‎involves ‎operationalizing‏ ‎the ‎findings‏ ‎from ‎the ‎CTEM ‎process. ‎This‏ ‎means‏ ‎putting ‎in‏ ‎place ‎the‏ ‎necessary ‎actions ‎to ‎correct ‎identified‏ ‎risks‏ ‎and‏ ‎ensuring ‎that‏ ‎all ‎teams‏ ‎within ‎the‏ ‎organization‏ ‎are ‎informed‏ ‎and ‎aligned ‎with ‎the ‎security‏ ‎efforts. ‎This‏ ‎may‏ ‎include ‎automating ‎mitigation‏ ‎through ‎integration‏ ‎with ‎SIEM ‎and ‎SOAR‏ ‎platforms,‏ ‎as ‎well‏ ‎as ‎establishing‏ ‎communication ‎standards ‎and ‎documented ‎cross-team‏ ‎workflows

Scoping‏ ‎phase

📌 The ‎scoping‏ ‎phase ‎is‏ ‎the ‎initial ‎stage ‎in ‎the‏ ‎CTEM‏ ‎framework.‏ ‎It ‎involves‏ ‎defining ‎the‏ ‎scope ‎of‏ ‎the‏ ‎CTEM ‎program,‏ ‎determining ‎which ‎systems, ‎assets, ‎and‏ ‎infrastructure ‎segments‏ ‎will‏ ‎be ‎included, ‎and‏ ‎identifying ‎the‏ ‎stakeholders ‎who ‎will ‎be‏ ‎involved.

📌 During‏ ‎this ‎stage,‏ ‎security ‎teams‏ ‎need ‎to ‎understand ‎what ‎matters‏ ‎most‏ ‎to ‎their‏ ‎business ‎in‏ ‎order ‎to ‎define ‎the ‎scope.‏ ‎This‏ ‎includes‏ ‎identifying ‎the‏ ‎key ‎attack‏ ‎surfaces ‎where‏ ‎vulnerabilities‏ ‎can ‎be‏ ‎managed. ‎The ‎scoping ‎process ‎ensures‏ ‎accurate ‎identification‏ ‎of‏ ‎critical ‎and ‎vulnerable‏ ‎systems, ‎which‏ ‎makes ‎it ‎the ‎foundational‏ ‎step‏ ‎in ‎devising‏ ‎security ‎measures.

📌 The‏ ‎scoping ‎stage ‎forms ‎the ‎foundation‏ ‎of‏ ‎the ‎CTEM‏ ‎program ‎and‏ ‎is ‎essential ‎to ‎its ‎overall‏ ‎success‏ ‎as‏ ‎it ‎establishes‏ ‎the ‎framework‏ ‎for ‎the‏ ‎subsequent‏ ‎stages. ‎It‏ ‎is ‎crucial ‎to ‎include ‎all‏ ‎relevant ‎areas‏ ‎under‏ ‎the ‎scope ‎of‏ ‎CTEM, ‎such‏ ‎as ‎external ‎attack ‎surfaces‏ ‎and‏ ‎cloud ‎environments,‏ ‎to ‎avoid‏ ‎leaving ‎any ‎potential ‎breach ‎points‏ ‎exposed.

Discovery‏ ‎phase

📌 The ‎Discovery‏ ‎phase ‎is‏ ‎the ‎second ‎stage ‎in ‎the‏ ‎CTEM‏ ‎framework.‏ ‎This ‎phase‏ ‎involves ‎identifying‏ ‎and ‎cataloging‏ ‎all‏ ‎vulnerable ‎resources‏ ‎within ‎the ‎organization, ‎such ‎as‏ ‎hardware, ‎software,‏ ‎databases,‏ ‎and ‎network ‎infrastructure.

📌 During‏ ‎the ‎Discovery‏ ‎phase, ‎businesses ‎use ‎a‏ ‎wide‏ ‎variety ‎of‏ ‎IT ‎discovery‏ ‎tools ‎and ‎methods ‎to ‎audit‏ ‎all‏ ‎their ‎IT‏ ‎resources. ‎This‏ ‎often ‎includes ‎conducting ‎vulnerability ‎assessments,‏ ‎penetration‏ ‎testing,‏ ‎and ‎other‏ ‎security ‎audits.‏ ‎The ‎goal‏ ‎is‏ ‎to ‎actively‏ ‎seek ‎out ‎and ‎identify ‎potential‏ ‎vulnerabilities ‎within‏ ‎the‏ ‎organization's ‎systems ‎and‏ ‎assets.

📌 It's ‎important‏ ‎to ‎involve ‎a ‎diverse‏ ‎team‏ ‎of ‎experts‏ ‎in ‎the‏ ‎discovery ‎stage, ‎including ‎IT ‎personnel,‏ ‎security‏ ‎personnel, ‎and‏ ‎other ‎employees‏ ‎who ‎may ‎have ‎a ‎unique‏ ‎perspective‏ ‎on‏ ‎potential ‎vulnerabilities.‏ ‎This ‎ensures‏ ‎that ‎all‏ ‎potential‏ ‎threats ‎are‏ ‎identified ‎and ‎evaluated.

📌 The ‎Discovery ‎phase‏ ‎serves ‎as‏ ‎the‏ ‎bridge ‎between ‎the‏ ‎Scoping ‎and‏ ‎Prioritization ‎phases ‎in ‎the‏ ‎CTEM‏ ‎process. ‎After‏ ‎the ‎Scoping‏ ‎phase, ‎where ‎the ‎key ‎attack‏ ‎surfaces‏ ‎and ‎stakeholders‏ ‎are ‎identified,‏ ‎the ‎Discovery ‎phase ‎focuses ‎on‏ ‎the‏ ‎in-detail‏ ‎identification ‎of‏ ‎all ‎assets‏ ‎and ‎vulnerabilities.

Prioritization‏ ‎phase

📌 The‏ ‎Prioritization ‎phase‏ ‎is ‎the ‎third ‎stage ‎in‏ ‎the ‎CTEM‏ ‎framework.‏ ‎This ‎phase ‎is‏ ‎crucial ‎as‏ ‎it ‎helps ‎organizations ‎identify‏ ‎what‏ ‎high-value ‎assets‏ ‎need ‎to‏ ‎be ‎prioritized, ‎as ‎not ‎everything‏ ‎can‏ ‎be ‎protected‏ ‎at ‎once.

📌 During‏ ‎the ‎Prioritization ‎phase, ‎organizations ‎evaluate‏ ‎the‏ ‎potential‏ ‎vulnerabilities ‎identified‏ ‎in ‎the‏ ‎Discovery ‎phase‏ ‎based‏ ‎on ‎how‏ ‎likely ‎they ‎are ‎to ‎be‏ ‎exploited ‎and‏ ‎the‏ ‎potential ‎impact ‎this‏ ‎would ‎have‏ ‎on ‎the ‎organization. ‎This‏ ‎involves‏ ‎assessing ‎the‏ ‎severity, ‎exploitability,‏ ‎and ‎the ‎criticality ‎of ‎the‏ ‎potential‏ ‎impact ‎to‏ ‎the ‎business,‏ ‎as ‎well ‎as ‎any ‎compensating‏ ‎security‏ ‎controls.

📌 The‏ ‎primary ‎purpose‏ ‎of ‎prioritization‏ ‎is ‎to‏ ‎create‏ ‎a ‎task‏ ‎list ‎to ‎reduce ‎risk ‎efficiently.‏ ‎This ‎enables‏ ‎organizations‏ ‎to ‎optimally ‎allocate‏ ‎their ‎resources,‏ ‎ensuring ‎effective ‎utilization. ‎Prioritization‏ ‎helps‏ ‎organizations ‎determine‏ ‎which ‎assets‏ ‎are ‎most ‎critical ‎and ‎need‏ ‎the‏ ‎highest ‎level‏ ‎of ‎protection.

📌 The‏ ‎Prioritization ‎phase ‎is ‎an ‎ongoing‏ ‎process‏ ‎that‏ ‎involves ‎continually‏ ‎assessing, ‎ranking,‏ ‎and ‎selecting‏ ‎which‏ ‎assets ‎require‏ ‎immediate ‎attention. ‎This ‎phase ‎is‏ ‎dynamic ‎and‏ ‎needs‏ ‎to ‎be ‎adaptable‏ ‎to ‎address‏ ‎evolving ‎threats ‎effectively.

Validation ‎phase

📌 The‏ ‎Validation‏ ‎phase ‎is‏ ‎the ‎fourth‏ ‎stage ‎in ‎the ‎CTEM ‎framework.‏ ‎This‏ ‎phase ‎is‏ ‎crucial ‎as‏ ‎it ‎verifies ‎the ‎effectiveness ‎of‏ ‎the‏ ‎organization's‏ ‎cybersecurity ‎posture‏ ‎and ‎the‏ ‎measures ‎taken‏ ‎to‏ ‎control ‎and‏ ‎decrease ‎vulnerabilities.

📌 During ‎the ‎Validation ‎phase,‏ ‎organizations ‎evaluate‏ ‎how‏ ‎they ‎would ‎handle‏ ‎an ‎actual‏ ‎attack ‎and ‎assess ‎their‏ ‎ability‏ ‎to ‎defend‏ ‎against ‎it.‏ ‎This ‎involves ‎using ‎tools ‎like‏ ‎Breach‏ ‎and ‎Attack‏ ‎Simulation ‎(BAS)‏ ‎and ‎Security ‎Control ‎Validation ‎to‏ ‎test‏ ‎the‏ ‎organization's ‎defenses‏ ‎against ‎simulated‏ ‎threats.

📌 The ‎Validation‏ ‎phase‏ ‎ensures ‎that‏ ‎the ‎plans ‎for ‎addressing ‎the‏ ‎vulnerabilities ‎and‏ ‎threats‏ ‎identified ‎in ‎the‏ ‎Prioritization ‎phase‏ ‎are ‎effective. ‎This ‎could‏ ‎involve‏ ‎adding ‎additional‏ ‎safeguards, ‎updating‏ ‎software, ‎or ‎changing ‎security ‎settings

📌 It's‏ ‎also‏ ‎important ‎to‏ ‎involve ‎a‏ ‎wide ‎range ‎of ‎stakeholders ‎in‏ ‎the‏ ‎Validation‏ ‎phase, ‎including‏ ‎IT ‎personnel,‏ ‎security ‎personnel,‏ ‎and‏ ‎other ‎relevant‏ ‎teams. ‎This ‎ensures ‎that ‎the‏ ‎validation ‎process‏ ‎is‏ ‎comprehensive ‎and ‎that‏ ‎the ‎remediation‏ ‎measures ‎are ‎effective ‎across‏ ‎the‏ ‎organization

Mobilization ‎phase

📌 The‏ ‎Mobilization ‎phase‏ ‎is ‎the ‎final ‎stage ‎in‏ ‎the‏ ‎CTEM ‎framework.‏ ‎This ‎phase‏ ‎is ‎about ‎operationalizing ‎the ‎findings‏ ‎from‏ ‎the‏ ‎CTEM ‎process‏ ‎and ‎implementing‏ ‎the ‎necessary‏ ‎actions‏ ‎to ‎correct‏ ‎identified ‎risks.

📌 During ‎the ‎Mobilization ‎phase,‏ ‎organizations ‎put‏ ‎into‏ ‎action ‎the ‎plans‏ ‎for ‎addressing‏ ‎the ‎vulnerabilities ‎and ‎threats‏ ‎identified‏ ‎in ‎the‏ ‎Prioritization ‎phase‏ ‎and ‎validated ‎in ‎the ‎Validation‏ ‎phase.‏ ‎This ‎could‏ ‎involve ‎adding‏ ‎additional ‎safeguards, ‎updating ‎software, ‎or‏ ‎changing‏ ‎security‏ ‎settings.

📌 This ‎phase‏ ‎also ‎involves‏ ‎ensuring ‎that‏ ‎all‏ ‎teams ‎within‏ ‎the ‎organization ‎are ‎informed ‎and‏ ‎aligned ‎with‏ ‎the‏ ‎security ‎efforts. ‎This‏ ‎may ‎include‏ ‎automating ‎mitigation ‎through ‎integration‏ ‎with‏ ‎Security ‎Information‏ ‎and ‎Event‏ ‎Management ‎(SIEM) ‎and ‎Security ‎Orchestration,‏ ‎Automation,‏ ‎and ‎Response‏ ‎(SOAR) ‎platforms,‏ ‎as ‎well ‎as ‎establishing ‎communication‏ ‎standards‏ ‎and‏ ‎documented ‎cross-team‏ ‎workflows.

📌 The ‎Mobilization‏ ‎phase ‎is‏ ‎crucial‏ ‎as ‎it‏ ‎drives ‎the ‎message ‎that ‎remediation‏ ‎cannot ‎be‏ ‎entirely‏ ‎automated ‎and ‎requires‏ ‎human ‎intervention.‏ ‎It ‎emphasizes ‎the ‎need‏ ‎for‏ ‎security ‎leaders‏ ‎to ‎mobilize‏ ‎a ‎response ‎and ‎remove ‎exposures‏ ‎from‏ ‎the ‎environment

Смотреть: 59+ мин
logo Snarky Security

CTEM Unpacking (Video & Audio)


Check ‎out‏ ‎Mave ‎or ‎other ‎audio ‎podcast‏ ‎platform

Let’s ‎dive‏ ‎into‏ ‎the ‎thrilling ‎world‏ ‎of ‎Continuous‏ ‎Threat ‎Exposure ‎Management ‎(CTEM),‏ ‎shall‏ ‎we? ‎CTEM,‏ ‎in ‎its‏ ‎infinite ‎wisdom, ‎is ‎not ‎just‏ ‎a‏ ‎fancy ‎tool‏ ‎or ‎a‏ ‎magical ‎technology ‎wand ‎you ‎can‏ ‎wave‏ ‎to‏ ‎make ‎all‏ ‎the ‎bad‏ ‎cyber ‎gremlins‏ ‎go‏ ‎away. ‎No,‏ ‎it’s ‎a ‎convoluted ‎five-step ‎program‏ ‎that ‎includes‏ ‎scoping,‏ ‎discovery, ‎prioritization, ‎validation,‏ ‎and ‎mobilization.‏ ‎Because ‎why ‎make ‎things‏ ‎simple‏ ‎when ‎you‏ ‎can ‎turn‏ ‎them ‎into ‎a ‎bureaucratic ‎nightmare?

Now,‏ ‎let’s‏ ‎talk ‎about‏ ‎the ‎tools‏ ‎and ‎technologies ‎that ‎make ‎CTEM‏ ‎tick.‏ ‎We’ve‏ ‎got ‎CAASM‏ ‎(Cyber ‎Asset‏ ‎Attack ‎Surface‏ ‎Management),‏ ‎EASM ‎(External‏ ‎Attack ‎Surface ‎Management), ‎EM ‎(Exposure‏ ‎Management), ‎and‏ ‎RSAS‏ ‎(Red ‎Team ‎Automation‏ ‎Systems). ‎These‏ ‎acronyms ‎sound ‎like ‎something‏ ‎out‏ ‎of ‎a‏ ‎dystopian ‎sci-fi‏ ‎novel, ‎don’t ‎they? ‎They’re ‎crucial‏ ‎for‏ ‎peeking ‎into‏ ‎every ‎nook‏ ‎and ‎cranny ‎of ‎your ‎organization’s‏ ‎digital‏ ‎environment,‏ ‎including ‎that‏ ‎forgotten ‎server‏ ‎from ‎2003‏ ‎that‏ ‎everyone’s ‎too‏ ‎scared ‎to ‎touch.

Moving ‎on ‎to‏ ‎the ‎methodology,‏ ‎which‏ ‎is ‎as ‎straightforward‏ ‎as ‎assembling‏ ‎IKEA ‎furniture ‎without ‎the‏ ‎manual.‏ ‎First, ‎we‏ ‎have ‎scoping,‏ ‎where ‎you ‎pretend ‎to ‎know‏ ‎what‏ ‎you’re ‎doing‏ ‎by ‎defining‏ ‎the ‎initial ‎exposure ‎scope. ‎Then‏ ‎there’s‏ ‎discovery,‏ ‎where ‎you‏ ‎play ‎digital‏ ‎detective ‎and‏ ‎hunt‏ ‎for ‎vulnerabilities.‏ ‎Prioritization ‎is ‎next, ‎where ‎you‏ ‎decide ‎which‏ ‎digital‏ ‎fires ‎to ‎put‏ ‎out ‎first.‏ ‎Validation ‎is ‎like ‎checking‏ ‎your‏ ‎work ‎to‏ ‎make ‎sure‏ ‎you ‎didn’t ‎just ‎make ‎everything‏ ‎worse.‏ ‎And ‎finally,‏ ‎mobilization, ‎where‏ ‎you ‎rally ‎the ‎troops ‎and‏ ‎hope‏ ‎for‏ ‎the ‎best.

As‏ ‎for ‎best‏ ‎practices, ‎let’s‏ ‎start‏ ‎with ‎stakeholder‏ ‎engagement. ‎Because ‎nothing ‎gets ‎the‏ ‎blood ‎pumping‏ ‎like‏ ‎a ‎good ‎old‏ ‎meeting ‎with‏ ‎legal, ‎compliance, ‎and ‎IT‏ ‎to‏ ‎discuss ‎cybersecurity.‏ ‎Don’t ‎forget‏ ‎to ‎regularly ‎update ‎your ‎systems,‏ ‎because‏ ‎hackers ‎totally‏ ‎adhere ‎to‏ ‎a ‎schedule ‎and ‎will ‎wait‏ ‎patiently‏ ‎for‏ ‎you ‎to‏ ‎patch ‎things‏ ‎up. ‎An‏ ‎incident‏ ‎response ‎plan‏ ‎is ‎also ‎key, ‎because ‎when‏ ‎things ‎inevitably‏ ‎go‏ ‎south, ‎you’ll ‎need‏ ‎a ‎plan‏ ‎to ‎pretend ‎like ‎you‏ ‎had‏ ‎everything ‎under‏ ‎control ‎all‏ ‎along. ‎Lastly, ‎continuous ‎improvement ‎is‏ ‎crucial.‏ ‎After ‎all,‏ ‎the ‎only‏ ‎constant ‎in ‎cybersecurity ‎is ‎that‏ ‎you’re‏ ‎always‏ ‎one ‎step‏ ‎behind ‎the‏ ‎latest ‎threat.

So‏ ‎there‏ ‎you ‎have‏ ‎it, ‎folks. ‎CTEM ‎in ‎all‏ ‎its ‎glory.‏ ‎A‏ ‎strategy ‎so ‎complex,‏ ‎it ‎makes‏ ‎rocket ‎science ‎look ‎like‏ ‎child’s‏ ‎play. ‎But‏ ‎hey, ‎at‏ ‎least ‎we’re ‎all ‎having ‎fun,‏ ‎right?‏ ‎Right?

PDF

Читать: 1+ мин
logo Snarky Security

CTEM: The Struggle is Real

Challenges ‎of‏ ‎Implementing ‎CTEM

📌 Getting ‎Non-security ‎and ‎Security‏ ‎Teams ‎Aligned:‏ ‎IT‏ ‎infrastructure, ‎DevOps, ‎and‏ ‎security ‎teams‏ ‎often ‎have ‎communication ‎gaps,‏ ‎which‏ ‎can ‎pose‏ ‎a ‎challenge‏ ‎when ‎implementing ‎CTEM

📌 Seeing ‎the ‎Bigger‏ ‎Picture:‏ ‎A ‎comprehensive‏ ‎CTEM ‎program‏ ‎covers ‎many ‎areas, ‎each ‎with‏ ‎its‏ ‎own‏ ‎set ‎of‏ ‎tools ‎and‏ ‎unresolved ‎problems.‏ ‎Aggregating‏ ‎all ‎information‏ ‎to ‎understand ‎priorities ‎and ‎responsibilities‏ ‎can ‎be‏ ‎challenging

📌 Overcoming‏ ‎Diagnostic ‎Overload: ‎Each‏ ‎area ‎covered‏ ‎in ‎CTEM ‎has ‎its‏ ‎own‏ ‎tools, ‎which‏ ‎yield ‎alerts.‏ ‎Managing ‎the ‎information ‎stemming ‎from‏ ‎these‏ ‎alerts ‎can‏ ‎be ‎challenging

📌 Adopting‏ ‎a ‎Risk-centric ‎Approach: ‎Traditional ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎measures‏ ‎often‏ ‎focus ‎on‏ ‎achieving ‎compliance.‏ ‎However, ‎CTEM‏ ‎emphasizes‏ ‎understanding ‎and‏ ‎managing ‎risks ‎specific ‎to ‎an‏ ‎organization’s ‎unique‏ ‎context,‏ ‎which ‎requires ‎a‏ ‎nuanced ‎understanding‏ ‎of ‎the ‎business ‎landscape

📌 Integration‏ ‎of‏ ‎Continuous ‎Monitoring‏ ‎Tools ‎and‏ ‎Technologies: As ‎organizations ‎embrace ‎innovations ‎such‏ ‎as‏ ‎the ‎Internet‏ ‎of ‎Things‏ ‎(IoT) ‎and ‎cloud ‎computing, ‎they‏ ‎must‏ ‎adapt‏ ‎their ‎CTEM‏ ‎frameworks ‎to‏ ‎address ‎the‏ ‎unique‏ ‎challenges ‎posed‏ ‎by ‎these ‎technologies

📌 Operationalizing ‎a ‎CTEM‏ ‎Strategy: ‎Implementing‏ ‎a‏ ‎CTEM ‎strategy ‎requires‏ ‎significant ‎investments‏ ‎in ‎time, ‎budget, ‎personnel,‏ ‎and‏ ‎technology

Читать: 1+ мин
logo Snarky Security

Cyber Insurance benefits

Cyber ‎insurance‏ ‎offers ‎several ‎benefits ‎for ‎businesses:

📌 Coverage‏ ‎for ‎Data‏ ‎Breaches: Cyber‏ ‎insurance ‎can ‎cover‏ ‎the ‎costs‏ ‎associated ‎with ‎data ‎breaches,‏ ‎including‏ ‎litigation, ‎recovery,‏ ‎and ‎identity‏ ‎theft. ‎This ‎is ‎particularly ‎beneficial‏ ‎given‏ ‎that ‎a‏ ‎cyber ‎attack,‏ ‎on ‎average, ‎can ‎cost ‎a‏ ‎company‏ ‎over‏ ‎$1 ‎million.

📌 Reimbursement‏ ‎for ‎Business‏ ‎Loss: ‎Cyber‏ ‎attacks‏ ‎often ‎interrupt‏ ‎business ‎and ‎cause ‎lost ‎revenue.‏ ‎An ‎effective‏ ‎cyber‏ ‎insurance ‎policy ‎can‏ ‎insulate ‎a‏ ‎company ‎from ‎these ‎costs.

📌 Defense‏ ‎Against‏ ‎Cyber ‎Extortion:‏ ‎Cyber ‎insurance‏ ‎can ‎provide ‎coverage ‎against ‎cyber‏ ‎extortion,‏ ‎such ‎as‏ ‎ransomware ‎attacks,‏ ‎where ‎critical ‎business ‎data ‎is‏ ‎encrypted‏ ‎and‏ ‎held ‎hostage‏ ‎by ‎cybercriminals‏ ‎until ‎the‏ ‎company‏ ‎pays.

📌 Coverage ‎for‏ ‎Business ‎Interruption ‎Losses: ‎Cyber ‎insurance‏ ‎can ‎cover‏ ‎business‏ ‎interruption ‎losses, ‎keeping‏ ‎businesses ‎financially‏ ‎afloat ‎while ‎recovery ‎efforts‏ ‎are‏ ‎underway.

📌 Regulatory ‎Compliance:‏ ‎Cyber ‎insurance‏ ‎can ‎help ‎cover ‎potential ‎fines‏ ‎and‏ ‎the ‎cost‏ ‎of ‎legal‏ ‎defense ‎associated ‎with ‎non-compliance ‎to‏ ‎data‏ ‎protection‏ ‎regulations.

📌 Reputation ‎Management: If‏ ‎customer ‎information‏ ‎is ‎hacked‏ ‎or‏ ‎data ‎is‏ ‎held ‎hostage, ‎it ‎can ‎significantly‏ ‎damage ‎an‏ ‎organization's‏ ‎reputation. ‎Cyber ‎insurance‏ ‎often ‎provides‏ ‎crisis ‎management ‎and ‎public‏ ‎relations‏ ‎support ‎to‏ ‎manage ‎such‏ ‎situations.

📌 Risk ‎Mitigation ‎and ‎Recovery ‎Resources:‏ ‎Cyber‏ ‎insurance ‎provides‏ ‎resources ‎for‏ ‎risk ‎mitigation ‎and ‎recovery, ‎helping‏ ‎businesses‏ ‎respond‏ ‎quickly ‎and‏ ‎effectively ‎to‏ ‎cyber ‎incidents.

📌 Limited‏ ‎Financial‏ ‎Liability: ‎Cyber‏ ‎insurance ‎limits ‎the ‎financial ‎liability‏ ‎of ‎a‏ ‎business‏ ‎in ‎the ‎event‏ ‎of ‎a‏ ‎attack, ‎providing ‎financial ‎compensation‏ ‎to‏ ‎respond.

📌 Peace ‎of‏ ‎Mind: ‎Cyber‏ ‎insurance ‎provides ‎peace ‎of ‎mind‏ ‎that‏ ‎businesses ‎have‏ ‎taken ‎action‏ ‎to ‎ensure ‎their ‎financial ‎stability‏ ‎in‏ ‎the‏ ‎event ‎of‏ ‎a ‎cyber‏ ‎incident.

📌 Competitive ‎Differentiation:‏ ‎Having‏ ‎cyber ‎insurance‏ ‎can ‎provide ‎a ‎competitive ‎edge,‏ ‎demonstrating ‎a‏ ‎business's‏ ‎commitment ‎to ‎managing‏ ‎cyber ‎risks

Читать: 1+ мин
logo Snarky Security

Adapting to the changing cyber landscape

Insurance ‎companies‏ ‎are ‎adapting ‎to ‎the ‎changing‏ ‎cyber ‎landscape‏ ‎through‏ ‎several ‎strategies:

📌 Stricter ‎Underwriting‏ ‎Practices: ‎Insurers‏ ‎are ‎requiring ‎more ‎detailed‏ ‎information‏ ‎about ‎IT‏ ‎systems ‎and‏ ‎security ‎controls ‎from ‎businesses ‎seeking‏ ‎coverage.‏ ‎This ‎helps‏ ‎them ‎better‏ ‎assess ‎the ‎risk ‎and ‎tailor‏ ‎the‏ ‎policies‏ ‎accordingly.

📌 Higher ‎Deductibles‏ ‎and ‎Coverage‏ ‎Restrictions: ‎To‏ ‎manage‏ ‎their ‎risk‏ ‎exposure, ‎insurers ‎are ‎increasing ‎deductibles‏ ‎and ‎placing‏ ‎restrictions‏ ‎on ‎coverage, ‎particularly‏ ‎for ‎systemic‏ ‎risks ‎and ‎technology ‎errors‏ ‎and‏ ‎omissions.

📌 Emphasis ‎on‏ ‎Proactive ‎Risk‏ ‎Management: ‎Insurers ‎are ‎placing ‎more‏ ‎emphasis‏ ‎on ‎proactive‏ ‎risk ‎management,‏ ‎encouraging ‎businesses ‎to ‎engage ‎in‏ ‎comprehensive‏ ‎risk‏ ‎management ‎practices,‏ ‎including ‎partnering‏ ‎with ‎third-party‏ ‎security‏ ‎providers ‎to‏ ‎identify ‎and ‎mitigate ‎vulnerabilities.

📌 Collaboration ‎with‏ ‎Cybersecurity ‎Firms:‏ ‎Insurers‏ ‎are ‎collaborating ‎with‏ ‎cybersecurity ‎firms‏ ‎to ‎develop ‎comprehensive ‎insurance‏ ‎products‏ ‎that ‎reflect‏ ‎a ‎better‏ ‎understanding ‎of ‎the ‎risks ‎involved.

📌 Investment‏ ‎in‏ ‎Cybersecurity ‎Measures: Insurers‏ ‎are ‎investing‏ ‎in ‎robust ‎cybersecurity ‎measures, ‎regularly‏ ‎updating‏ ‎their‏ ‎systems, ‎and‏ ‎providing ‎comprehensive‏ ‎training ‎to‏ ‎employees‏ ‎to ‎identify‏ ‎and ‎respond ‎to ‎potential ‎threats.

📌 Tailoring‏ ‎Insurance ‎Products:‏ ‎Insurers‏ ‎are ‎tailoring ‎their‏ ‎insurance ‎products‏ ‎to ‎meet ‎the ‎individual‏ ‎needs‏ ‎of ‎clients,‏ ‎recognizing ‎that‏ ‎different ‎businesses ‎have ‎different ‎concerns‏ ‎and‏ ‎risk ‎profiles.

📌 Building‏ ‎Partnerships ‎Beyond‏ ‎the ‎Insurance ‎Industry: Insurers ‎are ‎working‏ ‎with‏ ‎government‏ ‎agencies, ‎academic‏ ‎institutions, ‎and‏ ‎industry ‎associations‏ ‎to‏ ‎navigate ‎emerging‏ ‎risks ‎and ‎develop ‎a ‎more‏ ‎comprehensive ‎understanding‏ ‎of‏ ‎the ‎cyber ‎threat‏ ‎landscape.

📌 Adjusting ‎to‏ ‎Market ‎Volatility: ‎Experienced ‎insurers‏ ‎are‏ ‎using ‎their‏ ‎historical ‎knowledge‏ ‎to ‎navigate ‎market ‎fluctuations ‎and‏ ‎provide‏ ‎stable, ‎effective‏ ‎solutions ‎for‏ ‎clients.

Читать: 2+ мин
logo Snarky Security

Growth factors of cyber insurance market

Several ‎key‏ ‎factors ‎are ‎driving ‎the ‎growth‏ ‎of ‎the‏ ‎cyber‏ ‎insurance ‎market:

📌 Increasing ‎Cyber‏ ‎Threats: ‎The‏ ‎rise ‎in ‎cyber ‎attacks‏ ‎and‏ ‎data ‎breaches‏ ‎has ‎led‏ ‎to ‎an ‎increased ‎awareness ‎of‏ ‎the‏ ‎risks ‎and‏ ‎the ‎need‏ ‎for ‎protection, ‎driving ‎demand ‎for‏ ‎cyber‏ ‎insurance.

📌 Growing‏ ‎Awareness: More ‎businesses‏ ‎are ‎understanding‏ ‎the ‎need‏ ‎for‏ ‎cyber ‎insurance‏ ‎as ‎they ‎become ‎more ‎aware‏ ‎of ‎the‏ ‎potential‏ ‎financial ‎and ‎reputational‏ ‎damage ‎that‏ ‎can ‎result ‎from ‎cyber‏ ‎threats.

📌 Regulatory‏ ‎Environment: ‎The‏ ‎regulatory ‎environment‏ ‎is ‎also ‎driving ‎growth. ‎As‏ ‎data‏ ‎protection ‎regulations‏ ‎become ‎stricter,‏ ‎businesses ‎are ‎increasingly ‎seeking ‎cyber‏ ‎insurance‏ ‎to‏ ‎help ‎manage‏ ‎their ‎regulatory‏ ‎risk.

📌 Digital ‎Transformation:‏ ‎The‏ ‎shift ‎in‏ ‎business ‎models ‎towards ‎more ‎digital‏ ‎and ‎e-commerce‏ ‎capabilities‏ ‎has ‎increased ‎the‏ ‎exposure ‎to‏ ‎cyber ‎threats, ‎driving ‎the‏ ‎demand‏ ‎for ‎cyber‏ ‎insurance.

📌 Data-Driven ‎Policies:‏ ‎The ‎use ‎of ‎data ‎to‏ ‎drive‏ ‎policy ‎underwriting‏ ‎is ‎becoming‏ ‎more ‎prevalent. ‎This ‎allows ‎cyber‏ ‎insurance‏ ‎companies‏ ‎to ‎offer‏ ‎more ‎accurately‏ ‎priced ‎premiums,‏ ‎which‏ ‎can ‎lead‏ ‎to ‎lower ‎loss ‎ratios ‎and‏ ‎higher ‎profitability‏ ‎for‏ ‎the ‎industry, ‎thereby‏ ‎driving ‎growth.

📌 Limited‏ ‎Supply: ‎Demand ‎for ‎cyber‏ ‎insurance‏ ‎has ‎been‏ ‎increasing, ‎but‏ ‎limited ‎capacity ‎on ‎the ‎supply‏ ‎side‏ ‎has ‎led‏ ‎to ‎adjustments‏ ‎in ‎coverage, ‎terms, ‎and ‎conditions,‏ ‎which‏ ‎has‏ ‎contributed ‎to‏ ‎market ‎growth

📌 Risk‏ ‎Awareness ‎and‏ ‎Preparedness:‏ ‎Increased ‎awareness‏ ‎of ‎cyber ‎risks ‎among ‎businesses‏ ‎and ‎the‏ ‎recognition‏ ‎of ‎the ‎need‏ ‎to ‎protect‏ ‎themselves ‎against ‎these ‎risks‏ ‎are‏ ‎contributing ‎to‏ ‎market ‎growth.

📌 Advancements‏ ‎in ‎Underwriting ‎and ‎Risk ‎Assessment‏ ‎Models: Insurers‏ ‎are ‎working‏ ‎to ‎better‏ ‎understand ‎and ‎quantify ‎cyber ‎risks,‏ ‎which‏ ‎is‏ ‎helping ‎to‏ ‎fuel ‎market‏ ‎growth.


Emerging ‎technologies‏ ‎are‏ ‎expected ‎to‏ ‎shape ‎the ‎future ‎of ‎cyber‏ ‎insurance ‎in‏ ‎several‏ ‎ways:

📌 Artificial ‎Intelligence ‎and‏ ‎the ‎Metaverse: Future‏ ‎cyberattacks ‎will ‎be ‎increasingly‏ ‎influenced‏ ‎by ‎key‏ ‎technology ‎trends‏ ‎such ‎as ‎artificial ‎intelligence ‎and‏ ‎the‏ ‎so-called ‎"metaverse".

📌 Internet‏ ‎of ‎Things‏ ‎(IoT) ‎and ‎Operational ‎Technology ‎(OT):‏ ‎The‏ ‎expanding‏ ‎worlds ‎of‏ ‎IoT ‎and‏ ‎OT ‎offer‏ ‎great‏ ‎opportunities ‎but‏ ‎also ‎create ‎new ‎attack ‎surfaces,‏ ‎vulnerabilities, ‎and‏ ‎systemic‏ ‎risks.

📌 Crypto ‎Insurance ‎Services:‏ ‎The ‎rising‏ ‎adoption ‎of ‎crypto ‎insurance‏ ‎services‏ ‎is ‎expected‏ ‎to ‎drive‏ ‎market ‎expansion, ‎reflecting ‎the ‎increasing‏ ‎digitization‏ ‎of ‎financial‏ ‎services

Читать: 1+ мин
logo Snarky Security

Predictions for the future of the cyber insurance market

The ‎future‏ ‎of ‎the ‎cyber ‎insurance ‎market‏ ‎is ‎expected‏ ‎to‏ ‎see ‎significant ‎growth,‏ ‎driven ‎by‏ ‎the ‎increasing ‎frequency ‎and‏ ‎cost‏ ‎of ‎cyber‏ ‎threats:

📌 Market ‎Growth:‏ ‎The ‎global ‎cyber ‎insurance ‎market‏ ‎is‏ ‎projected ‎to‏ ‎grow ‎significantly.‏ ‎According ‎to ‎Fortune ‎Business ‎Insights,‏ ‎the‏ ‎market‏ ‎was ‎valued‏ ‎at ‎USD‏ ‎13.33B ‎in‏ ‎2022‏ ‎and ‎is‏ ‎forecast ‎to ‎grow ‎to ‎USD‏ ‎84.62B ‎by‏ ‎2030,‏ ‎exhibiting ‎a ‎CAGR‏ ‎of ‎26.1%‏ ‎during ‎the ‎forecast ‎period.

📌 Increasing‏ ‎Demand: Demand‏ ‎for ‎cyber‏ ‎insurance ‎has‏ ‎been ‎increasing, ‎but ‎limited ‎capacity‏ ‎on‏ ‎the ‎supply‏ ‎side ‎has‏ ‎led ‎to ‎adjustments ‎in ‎coverage,‏ ‎terms,‏ ‎and‏ ‎conditions. ‎This‏ ‎demand ‎is‏ ‎likely ‎to‏ ‎continue‏ ‎to ‎grow‏ ‎as ‎cyber ‎threats ‎increase.

📌 Dynamic ‎Underwriting:‏ ‎As ‎cyber‏ ‎risk‏ ‎management ‎and ‎risk‏ ‎quantification ‎become‏ ‎increasingly ‎popular, ‎the ‎shift‏ ‎to‏ ‎dynamic ‎underwriting‏ ‎will ‎become‏ ‎more ‎feasible. ‎This ‎involves ‎insurers‏ ‎adjusting‏ ‎premiums ‎based‏ ‎on ‎a‏ ‎company's ‎current ‎cybersecurity ‎posture ‎and‏ ‎practices,‏ ‎rather‏ ‎than ‎static‏ ‎factors.

📌 Stricter ‎Requirements: Insurers‏ ‎are ‎developing‏ ‎stricter‏ ‎requirements ‎for‏ ‎policies, ‎which ‎could ‎lead ‎to‏ ‎a ‎decrease‏ ‎in‏ ‎the ‎number ‎of‏ ‎insurable ‎companies‏ ‎but ‎an ‎increase ‎in‏ ‎the‏ ‎demand ‎for‏ ‎cyber ‎insurance.

📌 Data-Driven‏ ‎Policies: ‎The ‎use ‎of ‎data‏ ‎to‏ ‎drive ‎policy‏ ‎underwriting ‎is‏ ‎expected ‎to ‎increase. ‎This ‎could‏ ‎lead‏ ‎to‏ ‎more ‎accurately‏ ‎priced ‎premiums,‏ ‎lower ‎loss‏ ‎ratios,‏ ‎and ‎higher‏ ‎profitability ‎for ‎the ‎insurance ‎industry.

📌 Increased‏ ‎Collaboration: ‎Insurers‏ ‎and‏ ‎vendors ‎are ‎expected‏ ‎to ‎work‏ ‎together ‎more ‎closely ‎to‏ ‎develop‏ ‎sustainable ‎solutions‏ ‎for ‎the‏ ‎cyber ‎insurance ‎market. ‎This ‎could‏ ‎involve‏ ‎increased ‎communication‏ ‎to ‎prevent‏ ‎attacks.

Читать: 2+ мин
logo Snarky Security

Industry cyber risks (Cyber Insurance)

Healthcare

📌 Data ‎Breaches:‏ ‎Healthcare ‎organizations ‎hold ‎large ‎amounts‏ ‎of ‎sensitive‏ ‎data,‏ ‎making ‎them ‎prime‏ ‎targets ‎for‏ ‎data ‎breaches.

📌 Ransomware: ‎Cybercriminals ‎target‏ ‎healthcare‏ ‎to ‎cause‏ ‎disruptions ‎and‏ ‎extort ‎money ‎by ‎encrypting ‎patient‏ ‎data‏ ‎and ‎demanding‏ ‎ransom.

Financial ‎Services

📌 Data‏ ‎Theft: Financial ‎institutions ‎are ‎targeted ‎for‏ ‎the‏ ‎financial‏ ‎data ‎they‏ ‎handle, ‎which‏ ‎can ‎be‏ ‎used‏ ‎for ‎fraud‏ ‎or ‎sold ‎on ‎the ‎dark‏ ‎web.

📌 System ‎Disruption:‏ ‎Attacks‏ ‎aimed ‎at ‎disrupting‏ ‎financial ‎systems‏ ‎can ‎have ‎widespread ‎economic‏ ‎impacts.

Education

📌 Data‏ ‎Breaches: Educational ‎institutions‏ ‎hold ‎valuable‏ ‎research ‎data ‎and ‎personal ‎information‏ ‎of‏ ‎students ‎and‏ ‎staff, ‎which‏ ‎can ‎be ‎targeted.

📌 Ransomware: ‎Schools ‎and‏ ‎universities‏ ‎are‏ ‎increasingly ‎victims‏ ‎of ‎ransomware‏ ‎attacks, ‎disrupting‏ ‎operations‏ ‎and ‎accessing‏ ‎sensitive ‎data.

Retail

📌 Payment ‎Card ‎Fraud: ‎Retailers‏ ‎process ‎large‏ ‎volumes‏ ‎of ‎payment ‎transactions,‏ ‎making ‎them‏ ‎targets ‎for ‎cybercriminals ‎looking‏ ‎to‏ ‎steal ‎credit‏ ‎card ‎information.

📌 E-commerce‏ ‎Attacks: Online ‎retail ‎platforms ‎are ‎susceptible‏ ‎to‏ ‎various ‎cyberattacks,‏ ‎including ‎data‏ ‎breaches ‎and ‎denial-of-service ‎attacks.

Public ‎Sector

📌 Espionage: Government‏ ‎data‏ ‎is‏ ‎often ‎stolen‏ ‎for ‎espionage‏ ‎purposes.

📌Financial ‎Gain: Public‏ ‎administration‏ ‎is ‎targeted‏ ‎for ‎financial ‎gain ‎through ‎various‏ ‎cyberattacks.

Manufacturing

📌 Intellectual ‎Property‏ ‎Theft: Manufacturing‏ ‎companies ‎are ‎targeted‏ ‎by ‎hackers‏ ‎who ‎want ‎to ‎steal‏ ‎intellectual‏ ‎property ‎such‏ ‎as ‎product‏ ‎designs ‎and ‎blueprints.

📌 Operational ‎Disruption: Cyberattacks ‎can‏ ‎cause‏ ‎physical ‎damage‏ ‎to ‎products‏ ‎or ‎machines, ‎leading ‎to ‎operational‏ ‎disruptions.

Automotive

📌 Connected‏ ‎Vehicle‏ ‎Attacks: ‎As‏ ‎vehicles ‎become‏ ‎more ‎connected,‏ ‎they‏ ‎are ‎at‏ ‎risk ‎of ‎cyberattacks ‎that ‎could‏ ‎compromise ‎vehicle‏ ‎functionality‏ ‎and ‎safety.

📌 Theft ‎of‏ ‎Intellectual ‎Property:‏ ‎Automotive ‎companies ‎may ‎face‏ ‎cyber‏ ‎risks ‎related‏ ‎to ‎the‏ ‎theft ‎of ‎design ‎and ‎manufacturing‏ ‎data.

Agriculture

📌 Data‏ ‎Theft: ‎As‏ ‎farming ‎becomes‏ ‎more ‎digital, ‎data ‎related ‎to‏ ‎crop‏ ‎yields,‏ ‎livestock ‎health,‏ ‎and ‎machinery‏ ‎performance ‎can‏ ‎be‏ ‎targeted.

📌 Operational ‎Disruption:‏ ‎Cyberattacks ‎on ‎agricultural ‎technology ‎could‏ ‎disrupt ‎farming‏ ‎operations.

Construction

📌 Data‏ ‎Breaches: Construction ‎companies ‎often‏ ‎handle ‎sensitive‏ ‎project ‎data, ‎which ‎can‏ ‎be‏ ‎targeted ‎by‏ ‎cybercriminals.

📌 Operational ‎Disruption: Cyberattacks‏ ‎on ‎construction ‎technology ‎could ‎disrupt‏ ‎project‏ ‎timelines ‎and‏ ‎cause ‎financial‏ ‎loss.

Entertainment ‎and ‎Media

📌 Intellectual ‎Property ‎Theft:‏ ‎Entertainment‏ ‎and‏ ‎media ‎companies‏ ‎often ‎hold‏ ‎valuable ‎intellectual‏ ‎property,‏ ‎which ‎can‏ ‎be ‎targeted ‎by ‎cybercriminals.

📌 Data ‎Breaches:‏ ‎These ‎companies‏ ‎often‏ ‎handle ‎personal ‎data‏ ‎of ‎customers,‏ ‎which ‎can ‎be ‎targeted.

Services‏ ‎(Non-Financial)

📌 Data‏ ‎Breaches: ‎Service‏ ‎companies ‎often‏ ‎handle ‎personal ‎data ‎of ‎customers,‏ ‎which‏ ‎can ‎be‏ ‎targeted.

📌 Financial ‎Fraud:‏ ‎Cybercriminals ‎may ‎target ‎these ‎companies‏ ‎for‏ ‎financial‏ ‎gain, ‎such‏ ‎as ‎through‏ ‎fraudulent ‎transactions

Читать: 1+ мин
logo Snarky Security

Industries with low cyber risk (Cyber Insurance)

Low-risk ‎industries‏ ‎include:

📌 Agriculture: ‎Traditional ‎farming ‎may ‎not‏ ‎be ‎as‏ ‎attractive‏ ‎to ‎cybercriminals ‎due‏ ‎to ‎less‏ ‎reliance ‎on ‎digital ‎technology‏ ‎and‏ ‎fewer ‎valuable‏ ‎digital ‎assets‏ ‎compared ‎to ‎other ‎industries.

📌 Construction: ‎While‏ ‎construction‏ ‎companies ‎are‏ ‎increasingly ‎using‏ ‎technology, ‎they ‎may ‎not ‎be‏ ‎as‏ ‎high-value‏ ‎targets ‎as‏ ‎industries ‎like‏ ‎finance ‎or‏ ‎healthcare.

📌 Entertainment‏ ‎and ‎Media:‏ ‎While ‎these ‎industries ‎do ‎face‏ ‎cyber ‎risks,‏ ‎especially‏ ‎related ‎to ‎intellectual‏ ‎property ‎theft,‏ ‎they ‎may ‎not ‎be‏ ‎as‏ ‎heavily ‎targeted‏ ‎for ‎sensitive‏ ‎personal ‎data ‎as ‎industries ‎like‏ ‎healthcare‏ ‎or ‎financial‏ ‎services.

📌 Services ‎(Non-Financial):‏ ‎Service ‎industries ‎that ‎do ‎not‏ ‎handle‏ ‎large‏ ‎volumes ‎of‏ ‎sensitive ‎financial‏ ‎data ‎may‏ ‎face‏ ‎lower ‎cyber‏ ‎risks.

It's ‎important ‎to ‎note ‎that‏ ‎no ‎industry‏ ‎is‏ ‎immune ‎to ‎cyber‏ ‎risk, ‎and‏ ‎the ‎level ‎of ‎risk‏ ‎can‏ ‎vary ‎within‏ ‎an ‎industry‏ ‎based ‎on ‎a ‎company's ‎specific‏ ‎practices‏ ‎and ‎exposure.‏ ‎Even ‎within‏ ‎industries ‎that ‎are ‎generally ‎considered‏ ‎to‏ ‎have‏ ‎lower ‎cyber‏ ‎risk, ‎companies‏ ‎that ‎are‏ ‎more‏ ‎digitally ‎connected‏ ‎or ‎that ‎handle ‎any ‎sensitive‏ ‎data ‎may‏ ‎still‏ ‎face ‎significant ‎risks‏ ‎and ‎should‏ ‎take ‎appropriate ‎cybersecurity ‎measures.

Читать: 1+ мин
logo Snarky Security

Industries with high cyber risk (Cyber Insurance)

Industries ‎with‏ ‎high ‎cyber ‎risk ‎are ‎typically‏ ‎those ‎that‏ ‎handle‏ ‎sensitive ‎data, ‎have‏ ‎a ‎high‏ ‎degree ‎of ‎digital ‎connectivity,‏ ‎or‏ ‎are ‎critical‏ ‎to ‎infrastructure.‏ ‎Here ‎are ‎some ‎examples:

📌 Healthcare: This ‎industry‏ ‎is‏ ‎a ‎prime‏ ‎target ‎due‏ ‎to ‎the ‎sensitive ‎nature ‎of‏ ‎the‏ ‎data‏ ‎it ‎handles,‏ ‎including ‎personal‏ ‎health ‎information‏ ‎and‏ ‎payment ‎details.‏ ‎Cyberattacks ‎can ‎also ‎disrupt ‎critical‏ ‎healthcare ‎services.

📌 Financial‏ ‎Services: Banks‏ ‎and ‎other ‎financial‏ ‎institutions ‎are‏ ‎attractive ‎targets ‎due ‎to‏ ‎the‏ ‎financial ‎data‏ ‎they ‎handle.‏ ‎They ‎are ‎often ‎targeted ‎for‏ ‎financial‏ ‎gain ‎or‏ ‎to ‎disrupt‏ ‎financial ‎systems.

📌 Education: ‎Educational ‎institutions ‎often‏ ‎have‏ ‎large‏ ‎amounts ‎of‏ ‎personal ‎data‏ ‎and ‎research‏ ‎information,‏ ‎making ‎them‏ ‎attractive ‎targets. ‎They ‎also ‎often‏ ‎have ‎less‏ ‎robust‏ ‎cybersecurity ‎measures ‎compared‏ ‎to ‎other‏ ‎sectors.

📌 Retail: ‎Retailers ‎handle ‎a‏ ‎large‏ ‎amount ‎of‏ ‎personal ‎and‏ ‎financial ‎data ‎from ‎customers, ‎making‏ ‎them‏ ‎attractive ‎targets‏ ‎for ‎cybercriminals.‏ ‎E-commerce ‎platforms ‎are ‎particularly ‎vulnerable‏ ‎due‏ ‎to‏ ‎their ‎online‏ ‎nature.

📌 Public ‎Sector:‏ ‎Government ‎agencies‏ ‎are‏ ‎often ‎targeted‏ ‎for ‎the ‎sensitive ‎information ‎they‏ ‎hold, ‎which‏ ‎can‏ ‎include ‎personal ‎data,‏ ‎financial ‎information,‏ ‎and ‎state ‎secrets. ‎These‏ ‎attacks‏ ‎can ‎be‏ ‎motivated ‎by‏ ‎financial ‎gain, ‎espionage, ‎or ‎disruption.

📌 Manufacturing:‏ ‎The‏ ‎manufacturing ‎sector‏ ‎is ‎increasingly‏ ‎being ‎targeted ‎due ‎to ‎its‏ ‎high‏ ‎disruption‏ ‎factor ‎and‏ ‎the ‎potential‏ ‎for ‎theft‏ ‎of‏ ‎intellectual ‎property.

📌 Automotive:‏ ‎The ‎automotive ‎industry ‎is ‎becoming‏ ‎a ‎target‏ ‎due‏ ‎to ‎the ‎increasing‏ ‎connectivity ‎of‏ ‎vehicles ‎and ‎the ‎potential‏ ‎for‏ ‎large-scale ‎disruptions.

Смотреть: 44+ мин
logo Snarky Security

Operation Stargazer. CFR’s Astra Linux Vulnerability & Flaws Daydreams [Video]


In ‎the‏ ‎grand ‎theater ‎of ‎global ‎technology,‏ ‎the ‎West‏ ‎and‏ ‎its ‎allies, ‎along‏ ‎with ‎the‏ ‎Council ‎on ‎Foreign ‎Relations,‏ ‎are‏ ‎putting ‎on‏ ‎quite ‎the‏ ‎performance. ‎Picture ‎this: ‎a ‎dramatic‏ ‎scene‏ ‎where ‎Western‏ ‎powers ‎are‏ ‎in ‎a ‎tizzy ‎over ‎Russia’s‏ ‎strides‏ ‎towards‏ ‎technological ‎independence.‏ ‎As ‎Astra‏ ‎Linux ‎emerges‏ ‎as‏ ‎a ‎symbol‏ ‎of ‎this ‎shift, ‎Western ‎tech‏ ‎giants ‎lament‏ ‎their‏ ‎lost ‎market ‎share,‏ ‎shedding ‎tears‏ ‎over ‎the ‎billions ‎once‏ ‎flowing‏ ‎from ‎Russian‏ ‎coffers. ‎Meanwhile,‏ ‎espionage ‎budgets ‎are ‎being ‎stretched‏ ‎thin‏ ‎as ‎intelligence‏ ‎agencies ‎scramble‏ ‎to ‎uncover ‎vulnerabilities ‎in ‎Astra‏ ‎Linux.‏ ‎But,‏ ‎in ‎a‏ ‎bid ‎to‏ ‎save ‎costs,‏ ‎they’re‏ ‎calling ‎on‏ ‎everyone ‎to ‎use ‎open-source ‎intelligence,‏ ‎or ‎OSINT,‏ ‎essentially‏ ‎outsourcing ‎the ‎heavy‏ ‎lifting ‎to‏ ‎others ‎for ‎free.

Text ‎/‏ ‎PDF

Читать: 1+ мин
logo Snarky Security

Cyber Insurance exclusions

Cyber ‎insurance‏ ‎policies ‎typically ‎include ‎several ‎exclusions,‏ ‎which ‎are‏ ‎specific‏ ‎situations ‎or ‎circumstances‏ ‎that ‎are‏ ‎not ‎covered ‎by ‎the‏ ‎policy:

📌 War‏ ‎and ‎Terrorism:‏ ‎Cyber ‎insurance‏ ‎policies ‎typically ‎exclude ‎coverage ‎for‏ ‎losses‏ ‎resulting ‎from‏ ‎acts ‎of‏ ‎war, ‎terrorism, ‎or ‎other ‎hostile‏ ‎actions.

📌 Physical‏ ‎Damage:‏ ‎If ‎a‏ ‎cyber ‎attack‏ ‎destroys ‎physical‏ ‎infrastructure‏ ‎or ‎equipment,‏ ‎the ‎insurer ‎may ‎not ‎cover‏ ‎the ‎costs‏ ‎of‏ ‎repairing ‎or ‎replacing‏ ‎those ‎assets.

📌 Technological‏ ‎Improvements: ‎Cyber ‎insurance ‎helps‏ ‎businesses‏ ‎restore ‎their‏ ‎computer ‎systems‏ ‎to ‎the ‎state ‎they ‎were‏ ‎in‏ ‎before ‎the‏ ‎cyber ‎incident.‏ ‎However, ‎the ‎cost ‎of ‎upgrades‏ ‎or‏ ‎improvements‏ ‎to ‎the‏ ‎technology ‎is‏ ‎typically ‎not‏ ‎covered.

📌 Unencrypted‏ ‎Data: If ‎a‏ ‎data ‎breach ‎involves ‎unencrypted ‎data,‏ ‎the ‎insurer‏ ‎may‏ ‎deny ‎the ‎claim‏ ‎based ‎on‏ ‎this ‎exclusion. ‎To ‎minimize‏ ‎the‏ ‎risk ‎of‏ ‎having ‎a‏ ‎claim ‎denied, ‎businesses ‎should ‎follow‏ ‎industry‏ ‎best ‎practices‏ ‎for ‎data‏ ‎encryption ‎and ‎other ‎security ‎measures.

📌 Potential‏ ‎Future‏ ‎Lost‏ ‎Profits ‎and‏ ‎Loss ‎of‏ ‎Value ‎Due‏ ‎to‏ ‎Theft ‎of‏ ‎Intellectual ‎Property: ‎insurance ‎policies ‎generally‏ ‎do ‎not‏ ‎cover‏ ‎potential ‎future ‎lost‏ ‎profits ‎or‏ ‎the ‎loss ‎of ‎value‏ ‎due‏ ‎to ‎the‏ ‎theft ‎of‏ ‎intellectual ‎property

Читать: 7+ мин
logo Snarky Security

Cyber Insurance covered attacks

Cyber ‎insurance‏ ‎policies ‎typically ‎cover ‎a ‎range‏ ‎of ‎cyber‏ ‎attacks,‏ ‎and ‎the ‎specific‏ ‎coverage ‎can‏ ‎vary ‎based ‎on ‎the‏ ‎size‏ ‎of ‎the‏ ‎business ‎and‏ ‎the ‎specific ‎risks ‎it ‎faces:

📌 Data‏ ‎Breaches: This‏ ‎is ‎one‏ ‎of ‎the‏ ‎most ‎common ‎types ‎of ‎cyber‏ ‎attacks‏ ‎covered‏ ‎by ‎cyber‏ ‎insurance. ‎It‏ ‎involves ‎incidents‏ ‎where‏ ‎sensitive, ‎protected,‏ ‎or ‎confidential ‎data ‎has ‎been‏ ‎accessed ‎or‏ ‎disclosed‏ ‎in ‎an ‎unauthorized‏ ‎manner.

📌 Cyber ‎Extortion: This‏ ‎includes ‎ransomware ‎attacks, ‎where‏ ‎a‏ ‎type ‎of‏ ‎malicious ‎software‏ ‎threatens ‎to ‎publish ‎the ‎victim's‏ ‎data‏ ‎or ‎perpetually‏ ‎block ‎access‏ ‎to ‎it ‎unless ‎a ‎ransom‏ ‎is‏ ‎paid.

📌 Network‏ ‎Security ‎Breaches:‏ ‎This ‎covers‏ ‎incidents ‎where‏ ‎an‏ ‎unauthorized ‎individual‏ ‎gains ‎access ‎to ‎a ‎company's‏ ‎network, ‎potentially‏ ‎leading‏ ‎to ‎data ‎theft‏ ‎or ‎damage.

📌 Business‏ ‎Interruption: This ‎covers ‎losses ‎that‏ ‎a‏ ‎business ‎may‏ ‎suffer ‎due‏ ‎to ‎a ‎cyber ‎attack ‎that‏ ‎disrupts‏ ‎their ‎normal‏ ‎business ‎operations.

📌 Privacy‏ ‎Liability: ‎This ‎covers ‎liabilities ‎resulting‏ ‎from‏ ‎privacy‏ ‎law ‎violations‏ ‎or ‎cyber‏ ‎incidents ‎that‏ ‎expose‏ ‎private ‎data.

For‏ ‎large ‎corporations, ‎these ‎policies ‎often‏ ‎include ‎coverage‏ ‎for‏ ‎third-party ‎liabilities, ‎such‏ ‎as ‎costs‏ ‎related ‎to ‎disputes ‎or‏ ‎lawsuits,‏ ‎losses ‎related‏ ‎to ‎defamation,‏ ‎and ‎copyright ‎or ‎trademark ‎infringement.

For‏ ‎small‏ ‎businesses, ‎the‏ ‎coverage ‎may‏ ‎be ‎more ‎focused ‎on ‎first-party‏ ‎losses,‏ ‎such‏ ‎as ‎costs‏ ‎associated ‎with‏ ‎notifying ‎customers‏ ‎of‏ ‎a ‎breach,‏ ‎paying ‎legal ‎fees, ‎and ‎hiring‏ ‎computer ‎forensics‏ ‎experts‏ ‎to ‎recover ‎compromised‏ ‎data.

Businesses ‎often‏ ‎need ‎a ‎combination ‎of‏ ‎both‏ ‎first-party ‎and‏ ‎third-party ‎coverages‏ ‎to ‎be ‎fully ‎protected ‎against‏ ‎the‏ ‎range ‎of‏ ‎cyber ‎risks‏ ‎they ‎face. ‎

First-Party ‎Coverage ‎in‏ ‎Cyber‏ ‎Insurance‏ ‎Policies

First-party ‎coverage‏ ‎in ‎cyber‏ ‎insurance ‎policies‏ ‎is‏ ‎designed ‎to‏ ‎cover ‎the ‎direct ‎costs ‎that‏ ‎a ‎business‏ ‎incurs‏ ‎as ‎a ‎result‏ ‎of ‎a‏ ‎cyber ‎incident:

📌 Business ‎Interruption: ‎Loss‏ ‎of‏ ‎income ‎and‏ ‎extra ‎expenses‏ ‎incurred ‎due ‎to ‎a ‎cyber‏ ‎event‏ ‎that ‎disrupts‏ ‎the ‎business.

📌 Cyber‏ ‎Extortion: Coverage ‎for ‎ransom ‎payments ‎made‏ ‎in‏ ‎response‏ ‎to ‎ransomware‏ ‎or ‎other‏ ‎cyber ‎extortion‏ ‎threats.

📌 Data‏ ‎Recovery: ‎Costs‏ ‎associated ‎with ‎recovering ‎or ‎replacing‏ ‎lost ‎or‏ ‎corrupted‏ ‎data.

📌 Notification ‎Costs: ‎Expenses‏ ‎for ‎notifying‏ ‎affected ‎individuals, ‎customers, ‎or‏ ‎regulators‏ ‎following ‎a‏ ‎data ‎breach.

📌 Credit‏ ‎Monitoring ‎Services: Costs ‎for ‎credit ‎monitoring‏ ‎services‏ ‎offered ‎to‏ ‎affected ‎individuals‏ ‎after ‎a ‎data ‎breach.

📌 Public ‎Relations:‏ ‎Expenses‏ ‎related‏ ‎to ‎managing‏ ‎the ‎company's‏ ‎reputation ‎in‏ ‎the‏ ‎aftermath ‎of‏ ‎a ‎cyber ‎incident.

📌 Forensic ‎Investigation: Fees ‎for‏ ‎experts ‎to‏ ‎determine‏ ‎the ‎cause ‎and‏ ‎extent ‎of‏ ‎the ‎cyber ‎breach.

Third-Party ‎Coverage‏ ‎in‏ ‎Cyber ‎Insurance‏ ‎Policies

Third-party ‎coverage‏ ‎is ‎liability ‎coverage ‎that ‎protects‏ ‎a‏ ‎business ‎against‏ ‎claims ‎made‏ ‎by ‎others ‎(clients, ‎partners, ‎etc.)‏ ‎due‏ ‎to‏ ‎a ‎cyber‏ ‎incident ‎for‏ ‎which ‎the‏ ‎business‏ ‎is ‎held‏ ‎responsible:

📌 Legal ‎Defense ‎Costs: ‎Fees ‎for‏ ‎defending ‎against‏ ‎lawsuits‏ ‎related ‎to ‎cyber‏ ‎incidents.

📌 Settlements ‎and‏ ‎Judgments: ‎Costs ‎of ‎court‏ ‎verdicts‏ ‎or ‎settlements‏ ‎resulting ‎from‏ ‎such ‎lawsuits.

📌 Regulatory ‎Fines ‎and ‎Penalties:‏ ‎Coverage‏ ‎for ‎fines‏ ‎and ‎penalties‏ ‎that ‎may ‎be ‎imposed ‎by‏ ‎regulators‏ ‎following‏ ‎a ‎data‏ ‎breach ‎or‏ ‎cyber ‎incident.

📌 Media‏ ‎Liability:‏ ‎Protection ‎against‏ ‎claims ‎of ‎intellectual ‎property ‎infringement,‏ ‎defamation, ‎or‏ ‎invasion‏ ‎of ‎privacy ‎due‏ ‎to ‎electronic‏ ‎content.

How ‎do ‎first-party ‎and‏ ‎third-party‏ ‎cyber ‎insurance‏ ‎policies ‎differ‏ ‎in ‎terms ‎of ‎premiums

The ‎premiums‏ ‎for‏ ‎first-party ‎and‏ ‎third-party ‎cyber‏ ‎insurance ‎policies ‎can ‎vary ‎based‏ ‎on‏ ‎several‏ ‎factors, ‎and‏ ‎the ‎difference‏ ‎between ‎them‏ ‎is‏ ‎not ‎typically‏ ‎standardized ‎across ‎the ‎industry.

For ‎first-party‏ ‎coverage, ‎premiums‏ ‎are‏ ‎often ‎influenced ‎by‏ ‎the ‎type‏ ‎and ‎amount ‎of ‎sensitive‏ ‎data‏ ‎a ‎company‏ ‎holds, ‎its‏ ‎industry, ‎the ‎robustness ‎of ‎its‏ ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎measures, ‎and‏ ‎its ‎history‏ ‎of ‎cyber ‎incidents. ‎The ‎more‏ ‎extensive‏ ‎the‏ ‎potential ‎direct‏ ‎costs ‎(such‏ ‎as ‎business‏ ‎interruption,‏ ‎data ‎recovery,‏ ‎and ‎crisis ‎management), ‎the ‎higher‏ ‎the ‎premium‏ ‎is‏ ‎likely ‎to ‎be.

Third-party‏ ‎coverage ‎premiums,‏ ‎on ‎the ‎other ‎hand,‏ ‎are‏ ‎often ‎influenced‏ ‎by ‎the‏ ‎company's ‎exposure ‎to ‎liability ‎risks.‏ ‎This‏ ‎can ‎depend‏ ‎on ‎factors‏ ‎such ‎as ‎the ‎nature ‎of‏ ‎the‏ ‎company's‏ ‎operations, ‎the‏ ‎extent ‎to‏ ‎which ‎it‏ ‎handles‏ ‎or ‎has‏ ‎access ‎to ‎third-party ‎data, ‎and‏ ‎its ‎contractual‏ ‎obligations‏ ‎related ‎to ‎data‏ ‎security. ‎Companies‏ ‎that ‎provide ‎technology ‎services‏ ‎or‏ ‎handle ‎large‏ ‎amounts ‎of‏ ‎third-party ‎data ‎may ‎face ‎higher‏ ‎premiums‏ ‎for ‎third-party‏ ‎coverage.

How ‎do‏ ‎first-party ‎and ‎third-party ‎cyber ‎insurance‏ ‎policies‏ ‎differ‏ ‎in ‎terms‏ ‎of ‎deductibles

The‏ ‎deductibles ‎for‏ ‎both‏ ‎first-party ‎and‏ ‎third-party ‎cyber ‎insurance ‎policies ‎can‏ ‎vary ‎based‏ ‎on‏ ‎several ‎factors, ‎including‏ ‎the ‎type‏ ‎and ‎size ‎of ‎the‏ ‎business,‏ ‎the ‎level‏ ‎of ‎cyber‏ ‎risk ‎it ‎faces, ‎and ‎the‏ ‎specific‏ ‎coverages ‎included‏ ‎in ‎the‏ ‎policy.

For ‎first-party ‎coverage, ‎the ‎deductible‏ ‎may‏ ‎be‏ ‎influenced ‎by‏ ‎the ‎potential‏ ‎direct ‎costs‏ ‎to‏ ‎the ‎business‏ ‎from ‎a ‎cyber ‎incident, ‎such‏ ‎as ‎business‏ ‎interruption,‏ ‎data ‎recovery, ‎and‏ ‎crisis ‎management‏ ‎costs. ‎A ‎business ‎with‏ ‎a‏ ‎robust ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎infrastructure ‎and‏ ‎a ‎good ‎track ‎record ‎of‏ ‎managing‏ ‎cyber ‎risks‏ ‎may ‎be‏ ‎able ‎to ‎negotiate ‎a ‎lower‏ ‎deductible.

For‏ ‎third-party‏ ‎coverage, ‎the‏ ‎deductible ‎may‏ ‎be ‎influenced‏ ‎by‏ ‎the ‎business's‏ ‎exposure ‎to ‎liability ‎risks. ‎Businesses‏ ‎that ‎handle‏ ‎a‏ ‎lot ‎of ‎third-party‏ ‎data ‎or‏ ‎provide ‎technology ‎services ‎may‏ ‎have‏ ‎higher ‎deductibles‏ ‎due ‎to‏ ‎the ‎increased ‎risk ‎of ‎third-party‏ ‎claims.

In‏ ‎general, ‎higher‏ ‎deductibles ‎result‏ ‎in ‎lower ‎premiums, ‎and ‎vice‏ ‎versa.‏ ‎Therefore,‏ ‎businesses ‎must‏ ‎balance ‎the‏ ‎desire ‎for‏ ‎lower‏ ‎premiums ‎with‏ ‎the ‎ability ‎to ‎pay ‎a‏ ‎higher ‎deductible‏ ‎in‏ ‎the ‎event ‎of‏ ‎a ‎claim.

It's‏ ‎important ‎to ‎note ‎that‏ ‎the‏ ‎specific ‎deductibles‏ ‎can ‎vary‏ ‎widely ‎between ‎insurers ‎and ‎individual‏ ‎policies.‏ ‎Businesses ‎should‏ ‎carefully ‎review‏ ‎the ‎terms ‎of ‎any ‎policy‏ ‎they‏ ‎are‏ ‎considering ‎and‏ ‎discuss ‎their‏ ‎needs ‎and‏ ‎risk‏ ‎tolerance ‎with‏ ‎their ‎insurance ‎broker ‎or ‎agent

Factors‏ ‎Affecting ‎Premiums‏ ‎for‏ ‎First-Party ‎Cyber ‎Insurance‏ ‎Policies

Several ‎factors‏ ‎can ‎affect ‎the ‎premiums‏ ‎for‏ ‎first-party ‎cyber‏ ‎insurance ‎policies:

📌 Type‏ ‎and ‎Amount ‎of ‎Data: ‎Companies‏ ‎that‏ ‎handle ‎large‏ ‎amounts ‎of‏ ‎sensitive ‎data, ‎such ‎as ‎personal‏ ‎information‏ ‎or‏ ‎credit ‎card‏ ‎details, ‎may‏ ‎face ‎higher‏ ‎premiums‏ ‎due ‎to‏ ‎the ‎increased ‎risk ‎of ‎data‏ ‎breaches.

📌 Industry: ‎Certain‏ ‎industries,‏ ‎such ‎as ‎healthcare‏ ‎and ‎finance,‏ ‎are ‎often ‎targeted ‎by‏ ‎cybercriminals‏ ‎and ‎may‏ ‎face ‎higher‏ ‎premiums.

📌 Cybersecurity ‎Measures: Companies ‎with ‎robust ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎measures‏ ‎in ‎place‏ ‎may ‎be‏ ‎able ‎to ‎negotiate ‎lower ‎premiums.

📌 Past‏ ‎Incidents:‏ ‎Companies‏ ‎with ‎a‏ ‎history ‎of‏ ‎cyber ‎incidents‏ ‎may‏ ‎face ‎higher‏ ‎premiums.

📌 Revenue: ‎Larger ‎companies ‎with ‎higher‏ ‎revenues ‎may‏ ‎face‏ ‎higher ‎premiums ‎due‏ ‎to ‎the‏ ‎greater ‎potential ‎financial ‎impact‏ ‎of‏ ‎a ‎cyber‏ ‎incident

📌 Coverage ‎Limits‏ ‎and ‎Deductibles: Higher ‎coverage ‎limits ‎and‏ ‎lower‏ ‎deductibles ‎typically‏ ‎result ‎in‏ ‎higher ‎premiums.

Factors ‎Affecting ‎Premiums ‎for‏ ‎Third-Party‏ ‎Cyber‏ ‎Insurance ‎Policies

The‏ ‎premiums ‎for‏ ‎third-party ‎cyber‏ ‎insurance‏ ‎policies ‎can‏ ‎also ‎be ‎influenced ‎by ‎several‏ ‎factors:

📌 Type ‎of‏ ‎Services‏ ‎Provided: ‎Companies ‎that‏ ‎provide ‎services‏ ‎involving ‎access ‎to ‎third-party‏ ‎data‏ ‎or ‎systems‏ ‎may ‎face‏ ‎higher ‎premiums ‎due ‎to ‎the‏ ‎increased‏ ‎liability ‎risk.

📌 Contractual‏ ‎Obligations: ‎Companies‏ ‎may ‎face ‎higher ‎premiums ‎if‏ ‎they‏ ‎have‏ ‎contractual ‎obligations‏ ‎that ‎increase‏ ‎their ‎liability‏ ‎in‏ ‎the ‎event‏ ‎of ‎a ‎data ‎breach.

📌 Industry: ‎As‏ ‎with ‎first-party‏ ‎coverage,‏ ‎certain ‎industries ‎may‏ ‎face ‎higher‏ ‎premiums ‎due ‎to ‎the‏ ‎increased‏ ‎risk ‎of‏ ‎cyber ‎incidents.

📌 Past‏ ‎Incidents: ‎A ‎history ‎of ‎cyber‏ ‎incidents‏ ‎or ‎claims‏ ‎can ‎result‏ ‎in ‎higher ‎premiums.

📌 Coverage ‎Limits ‎and‏ ‎Deductibles:‏ ‎As‏ ‎with ‎first-party‏ ‎coverage, ‎higher‏ ‎coverage ‎limits‏ ‎and‏ ‎lower ‎deductibles‏ ‎typically ‎result ‎in ‎higher ‎premiums

Читать: 22+ мин
logo Snarky Security

Operation Stargazer. CFR’s Astra Linux Vulnerability & Flaws Daydreams

In ‎the‏ ‎grand ‎theater ‎of ‎global ‎technology,‏ ‎the ‎West‏ ‎and‏ ‎its ‎allies, ‎along‏ ‎with ‎the‏ ‎Council ‎on ‎Foreign ‎Relations,‏ ‎are‏ ‎putting ‎on‏ ‎quite ‎the‏ ‎performance. ‎Picture ‎this: ‎a ‎dramatic‏ ‎scene‏ ‎where ‎Western‏ ‎powers ‎are‏ ‎in ‎a ‎tizzy ‎over ‎Russia’s‏ ‎strides‏ ‎towards‏ ‎technological ‎independence.‏ ‎As ‎Astra‏ ‎Linux ‎emerges‏ ‎as‏ ‎a ‎symbol‏ ‎of ‎this ‎shift, ‎Western ‎tech‏ ‎giants ‎lament‏ ‎their‏ ‎lost ‎market ‎share,‏ ‎shedding ‎tears‏ ‎over ‎the ‎billions ‎once‏ ‎flowing‏ ‎from ‎Russian‏ ‎coffers. ‎Meanwhile,‏ ‎espionage ‎budgets ‎are ‎being ‎stretched‏ ‎thin‏ ‎as ‎intelligence‏ ‎agencies ‎scramble‏ ‎to ‎uncover ‎vulnerabilities ‎in ‎Astra‏ ‎Linux.‏ ‎But,‏ ‎in ‎a‏ ‎bid ‎to‏ ‎save ‎costs,‏ ‎they’re‏ ‎calling ‎on‏ ‎everyone ‎to ‎use ‎open-source ‎intelligence,‏ ‎or ‎OSINT,‏ ‎essentially‏ ‎outsourcing ‎the ‎heavy‏ ‎lifting ‎to‏ ‎others ‎for ‎free.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Wanna ‎read‏ ‎in‏ ‎PDF? ‎scroll‏ ‎to ‎the‏ ‎end ‎of ‎pages ‎for ‎PDF

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In‏ ‎recent‏ ‎years, ‎Russia‏ ‎has ‎embarked‏ ‎on ‎a ‎path ‎of ‎digital‏ ‎sovereignty,‏ ‎driven‏ ‎by ‎a‏ ‎combination ‎of‏ ‎geopolitical ‎tensions,‏ ‎Western‏ ‎sanctions, ‎and‏ ‎domestic ‎policy ‎choices. ‎This ‎shift,‏ ‎accelerated ‎by‏ ‎Western‏ ‎sanctions, ‎has ‎led‏ ‎to ‎a‏ ‎significant ‎transformation ‎in ‎the‏ ‎country’s‏ ‎technological ‎landscape.‏ ‎As ‎Western‏ ‎companies ‎withdraw ‎and ‎sanctions ‎tighten,‏ ‎Russia‏ ‎has ‎increasingly‏ ‎turned ‎to‏ ‎domestic ‎alternatives ‎and ‎Chinese ‎technology‏ ‎to‏ ‎fill‏ ‎the ‎void.‏ ‎This ‎analysis‏ ‎examines ‎Russia’s‏ ‎increasing‏ ‎digital ‎sovereignty‏ ‎and ‎growing ‎dependence ‎on ‎Chinese‏ ‎technology, ‎particularly‏ ‎in‏ ‎light ‎of ‎Western‏ ‎sanctions. ‎It‏ ‎explores ‎the ‎implications ‎of‏ ‎this‏ ‎shift ‎for‏ ‎human ‎rights‏ ‎in ‎Russia, ‎cybersecurity, ‎and ‎international‏ ‎relations.‏ ‎The ‎paper‏ ‎argues ‎that‏ ‎while ‎Russia ‎aims ‎for ‎technological‏ ‎independence,‏ ‎its‏ ‎reliance ‎on‏ ‎Chinese ‎tech‏ ‎creates ‎new‏ ‎vulnerabilities‏ ‎and ‎policy‏ ‎opportunities ‎for ‎the ‎West.

I. ‎CFR’s‏ ‎Call ‎to‏ ‎Action:‏ ‎Assessing ‎Astra ‎Linux‏ ‎Security ‎and‏ ‎Russia’s ‎Digital ‎Sovereignty

The ‎Council‏ ‎on‏ ‎Foreign ‎Relations‏ ‎(CFR), ‎a‏ ‎prominent ‎US ‎think ‎tank, ‎has‏ ‎called‏ ‎for ‎the‏ ‎use ‎of‏ ‎intelligence ‎resources ‎to ‎assess ‎the‏ ‎security‏ ‎of‏ ‎Astra ‎Linux,‏ ‎a ‎Russian‏ ‎operating ‎system.‏ ‎This‏ ‎initiative ‎is‏ ‎part ‎of ‎a ‎broader ‎study‏ ‎on ‎Russia’s‏ ‎efforts‏ ‎in ‎import ‎substitution‏ ‎and ‎digital‏ ‎sovereignty. ‎Astra ‎Linux ‎is‏ ‎widely‏ ‎used ‎in‏ ‎Russian ‎military‏ ‎and ‎intelligence ‎systems, ‎making ‎its‏ ‎security‏ ‎a ‎matter‏ ‎of ‎interest‏ ‎for ‎US ‎analysts.

The ‎CFR ‎suggests‏ ‎that‏ ‎the‏ ‎open-source ‎nature‏ ‎of ‎Astra‏ ‎Linux ‎might‏ ‎introduce‏ ‎vulnerabilities ‎that‏ ‎could ‎be ‎exploited ‎at ‎scale.‏ ‎They ‎advocate‏ ‎for‏ ‎the ‎use ‎of‏ ‎open-source ‎intelligence‏ ‎(OSINT) ‎to ‎understand ‎how‏ ‎Russia‏ ‎implements ‎technologies‏ ‎like ‎Astra‏ ‎Linux ‎and ‎to ‎identify ‎potential‏ ‎security‏ ‎weaknesses. ‎The‏ ‎CFR ‎also‏ ‎notes ‎that ‎«Russia’s ‎increasing ‎digital‏ ‎isolation‏ ‎and‏ ‎reliance ‎on‏ ‎domestic ‎and‏ ‎Chinese ‎technologies‏ ‎might‏ ‎limit ‎its‏ ‎access ‎to ‎global ‎cybersecurity ‎expertise,‏ ‎potentially ‎impacting‏ ‎the‏ ‎security ‎of ‎Astra‏ ‎Linux».

Astra ‎Linux‏ ‎has ‎been ‎certified ‎by‏ ‎Russian‏ ‎authorities ‎for‏ ‎use ‎in‏ ‎environments ‎requiring ‎high ‎levels ‎of‏ ‎data‏ ‎protection, ‎including‏ ‎military ‎and‏ ‎government ‎offices. ‎Despite ‎this, ‎the‏ ‎US‏ ‎analytical‏ ‎center ‎sees‏ ‎potential ‎opportunities‏ ‎to ‎exploit‏ ‎vulnerabilities‏ ‎due ‎to‏ ‎the ‎limited ‎resources ‎available ‎for‏ ‎testing ‎and‏ ‎securing‏ ‎the ‎system ‎compared‏ ‎to ‎Western‏ ‎counterparts.

The ‎key ‎points ‎of‏ ‎CFR‏ ‎statement:

  • CFR’s ‎Position: The‏ ‎CFR, ‎while‏ ‎claiming ‎to ‎be ‎an ‎independent‏ ‎organization,‏ ‎has ‎former‏ ‎intelligence ‎officers,‏ ‎journalists, ‎and ‎business ‎representatives ‎(including‏ ‎Alphabet’s‏ ‎CFO)‏ ‎on ‎its‏ ‎board ‎of‏ ‎directors.
  • Target ‎of‏ ‎Interest: Astra‏ ‎Linux ‎is‏ ‎widely ‎used ‎in ‎Russian ‎military‏ ‎and ‎intelligence‏ ‎information‏ ‎systems.
  • Proposed ‎Approach: The ‎CFR‏ ‎has ‎urged‏ ‎analysts ‎in ‎the ‎US‏ ‎and‏ ‎allied ‎countries‏ ‎to ‎use‏ ‎open-source ‎intelligence ‎to ‎understand ‎how‏ ‎Russia‏ ‎implements ‎technologies‏ ‎like ‎Astra‏ ‎Linux.
  • Potential ‎Vulnerabilities: The ‎CFR ‎suggests ‎that‏ ‎Astra‏ ‎Linux,‏ ‎being ‎based‏ ‎on ‎open-source‏ ‎software, ‎might‏ ‎have‏ ‎vulnerabilities ‎that‏ ‎could ‎be ‎exploited ‎on ‎a‏ ‎large ‎scale.
  • Limited‏ ‎Resources: The‏ ‎CFR ‎argues ‎that‏ ‎Russian ‎developers‏ ‎may ‎have ‎fewer ‎resources‏ ‎for‏ ‎extensive ‎testing‏ ‎and ‎defending‏ ‎their ‎code ‎compared ‎to ‎Western‏ ‎counterparts.

The‏ ‎developers ‎of‏ ‎Astra ‎Linux,‏ ‎«Astra ‎Group,» ‎have ‎responded ‎to‏ ‎these‏ ‎statements:

  • They‏ ‎emphasized ‎that‏ ‎their ‎product‏ ‎undergoes ‎rigorous‏ ‎testing‏ ‎and ‎certification.
  • The‏ ‎company ‎advised ‎its ‎clients ‎to‏ ‎carefully ‎follow‏ ‎security‏ ‎configuration ‎recommendations ‎and‏ ‎promptly ‎apply‏ ‎updates ‎to ‎address ‎potential‏ ‎vulnerabilities.
  • «Astra‏ ‎Group» ‎stated‏ ‎that ‎they‏ ‎have ‎strengthened ‎measures ‎to ‎detect‏ ‎malicious‏ ‎inclusions ‎in‏ ‎their ‎software‏ ‎due ‎to ‎the ‎current ‎international‏ ‎situation.

A.‏ ‎Voices‏ ‎from ‎the‏ ‎Digital ‎Frontier:‏ ‎Expert ‎Perspectives‏ ‎on‏ ‎Russia’s ‎Cyber‏ ‎Sovereignty ‎and ‎Astra ‎Linux

As ‎Russia‏ ‎charts ‎its‏ ‎course‏ ‎towards ‎digital ‎sovereignty,‏ ‎a ‎chorus‏ ‎of ‎voices ‎from ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎experts,‏ ‎policy ‎analysts,‏ ‎and ‎industry‏ ‎insiders ‎offers ‎diverse ‎perspectives ‎on‏ ‎this‏ ‎complex ‎landscape.‏ ‎Their ‎insights‏ ‎paint ‎a ‎nuanced ‎picture ‎of‏ ‎Russia’s‏ ‎digital‏ ‎sovereignty, ‎the‏ ‎potential ‎vulnerabilities‏ ‎and ‎strengths‏ ‎of‏ ‎Astra ‎Linux,‏ ‎and ‎the ‎broader ‎implications ‎for‏ ‎global ‎cybersecurity.‏ ‎From‏ ‎concerns ‎about ‎limited‏ ‎access ‎to‏ ‎international ‎expertise ‎to ‎the‏ ‎challenges‏ ‎of ‎creating‏ ‎a ‎self-sustaining‏ ‎internet ‎ecosystem, ‎these ‎commentators ‎shed‏ ‎light‏ ‎on ‎the‏ ‎multifaceted ‎nature‏ ‎of ‎Russia’s ‎technological ‎pivot.

  • Justin ‎Sherman, founder‏ ‎and‏ ‎CEO‏ ‎of ‎Global‏ ‎Cyber ‎Strategies,‏ ‎commented ‎on‏ ‎Russia’s‏ ‎digital ‎isolation‏ ‎and ‎its ‎impact ‎on ‎the‏ ‎country’s ‎cybersecurity.‏ ‎He‏ ‎mentioned ‎that ‎Russia’s‏ ‎increasing ‎reliance‏ ‎on ‎domestic ‎and ‎Chinese‏ ‎technologies‏ ‎might ‎limit‏ ‎its ‎access‏ ‎to ‎global ‎cybersecurity ‎expertise, ‎potentially‏ ‎impacting‏ ‎the ‎security‏ ‎of ‎Astra‏ ‎Linux.
  • The ‎Security ‎Affairs article ‎discusses ‎the‏ ‎Russian‏ ‎military’s‏ ‎plans ‎to‏ ‎replace ‎Windows‏ ‎with ‎Astra‏ ‎Linux,‏ ‎citing ‎concerns‏ ‎about ‎the ‎possible ‎presence ‎of‏ ‎hidden ‎backdoors‏ ‎in‏ ‎foreign ‎software. ‎This‏ ‎highlights ‎the‏ ‎decrease ‎of ‎potential ‎risks‏ ‎of‏ ‎relying ‎on‏ ‎foreign ‎technologies.
  • The‏ ‎Cybersec84 ‎article mentions ‎Astra ‎Linux’s ‎bug‏ ‎bounty‏ ‎program, ‎which‏ ‎aims ‎to‏ ‎identify ‎security ‎vulnerabilities ‎in ‎the‏ ‎operating‏ ‎system.‏ ‎This ‎suggests‏ ‎that ‎Astra‏ ‎Linux ‎might‏ ‎have‏ ‎unknown ‎opportunities‏ ‎for ‎testing ‎and ‎securing ‎its‏ ‎code ‎compared‏ ‎to‏ ‎Western ‎counterparts.
  • Margin ‎Research’s‏ ‎study on ‎Russia’s‏ ‎cyber ‎operations ‎highlights ‎the‏ ‎country’s‏ ‎growing ‎focus‏ ‎on ‎open-source‏ ‎software, ‎particularly ‎the ‎Astra ‎Linux‏ ‎operating‏ ‎system, ‎as‏ ‎part ‎of‏ ‎its ‎strategy ‎to ‎replace ‎Western‏ ‎technology‏ ‎and‏ ‎expand ‎its‏ ‎global ‎tech‏ ‎footprint
II. ‎CFR’s‏ ‎Concerns:‏ ‎Russia’s ‎Limited‏ ‎Capacity ‎to ‎Secure ‎Astra ‎Linux‏ ‎Amidst ‎Digital‏ ‎Isolation

In‏ ‎recent ‎years, ‎Russia‏ ‎has ‎been‏ ‎pursuing ‎a ‎path ‎of‏ ‎digital‏ ‎sovereignty, ‎developing‏ ‎its ‎own‏ ‎technologies ‎to ‎reduce ‎dependence ‎on‏ ‎Western‏ ‎products. ‎A‏ ‎key ‎component‏ ‎of ‎this ‎strategy ‎is ‎Astra‏ ‎Linux,‏ ‎a‏ ‎domestically ‎developed‏ ‎operating ‎system‏ ‎widely ‎used‏ ‎in‏ ‎Russian ‎military‏ ‎and ‎intelligence ‎systems. ‎However, ‎the‏ ‎Council ‎on‏ ‎Foreign‏ ‎has ‎raised ‎concerns‏ ‎about ‎potential‏ ‎vulnerabilities ‎in ‎this ‎system.

It’s‏ ‎crucial‏ ‎to ‎understand‏ ‎that ‎these‏ ‎concerns ‎are ‎largely ‎speculative. ‎The‏ ‎actual‏ ‎security ‎capabilities‏ ‎of ‎Astra‏ ‎Linux ‎are ‎not ‎publicly ‎known,‏ ‎and‏ ‎its‏ ‎developers ‎assert‏ ‎that ‎rigorous‏ ‎security ‎measures‏ ‎are‏ ‎in ‎place.‏ ‎Nevertheless, ‎the ‎CFR’s ‎analysis ‎highlights‏ ‎several ‎potential‏ ‎weaknesses‏ ‎stemming ‎from ‎Russia’s‏ ‎shift ‎towards‏ ‎domestic ‎and ‎Chinese ‎technologies.

  • Limited‏ ‎resources: The‏ ‎Council ‎on‏ ‎Foreign ‎Relations‏ ‎(CFR) ‎suggests ‎that ‎Russian ‎developers‏ ‎may‏ ‎have ‎fewer‏ ‎resources ‎for‏ ‎extensive ‎testing ‎and ‎securing ‎their‏ ‎code‏ ‎compared‏ ‎to ‎Western‏ ‎counterparts. ‎This‏ ‎could ‎potentially‏ ‎lead‏ ‎to ‎undiscovered‏ ‎vulnerabilities.
  • Reduced ‎access ‎to ‎global ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎talent: By ‎shifting‏ ‎towards‏ ‎domestic ‎and ‎Chinese‏ ‎products, ‎Russia‏ ‎may ‎be ‎losing ‎access‏ ‎to‏ ‎cybersecurity ‎expertise‏ ‎from ‎the‏ ‎United ‎States, ‎Western ‎Europe, ‎Japan,‏ ‎and‏ ‎other ‎countries.‏ ‎This ‎could‏ ‎impact ‎(positively) ‎the ‎overall ‎security‏ ‎of‏ ‎the‏ ‎system.
  • Open-source ‎base: Astra‏ ‎Linux ‎is‏ ‎based ‎on‏ ‎an‏ ‎open-source ‎operating‏ ‎system. ‎While ‎this ‎allows ‎for‏ ‎customization ‎and‏ ‎hardening,‏ ‎it ‎may ‎also‏ ‎introduce ‎vulnerabilities‏ ‎that ‎could ‎be ‎exploited‏ ‎on‏ ‎a ‎large‏ ‎scale.
  • Independence ‎from‏ ‎global ‎tech ‎community: Russia’s ‎increasing ‎digital‏ ‎independence‏ ‎may ‎limit‏ ‎its ‎access‏ ‎to ‎the ‎latest ‎security ‎practices,‏ ‎tools,‏ ‎and‏ ‎threat ‎intelligence‏ ‎shared ‎within‏ ‎the ‎global‏ ‎tech‏ ‎community ‎(CFR‏ ‎carefully ‎avoid ‎using ‎phrases ‎‘data‏ ‎leaks’ ‎and‏ ‎‘backdoor’).
  • Concentration‏ ‎of ‎technology: The ‎widespread‏ ‎adoption ‎of‏ ‎Astra ‎Linux ‎in ‎Russian‏ ‎military‏ ‎and ‎intelligence‏ ‎systems ‎could‏ ‎create ‎a ‎situation ‎where ‎any‏ ‎potential‏ ‎vulnerabilities ‎might‏ ‎be ‎exploitable‏ ‎across ‎a ‎wide ‎range ‎of‏ ‎critical‏ ‎infrastructure.
  • Rapid‏ ‎development ‎and‏ ‎deployment: The ‎push‏ ‎to ‎quickly‏ ‎develop‏ ‎and ‎deploy‏ ‎domestic ‎technology ‎solutions ‎may ‎lead‏ ‎to ‎rushed‏ ‎security‏ ‎implementations ‎or ‎overlooked‏ ‎vulnerabilities.
  • Less ‎diverse‏ ‎ecosystem: A ‎more ‎homogeneous ‎technology‏ ‎environment‏ ‎might ‎be‏ ‎easier ‎for‏ ‎attackers ‎to ‎target ‎once ‎they‏ ‎find‏ ‎a ‎vulnerability,‏ ‎as ‎opposed‏ ‎to ‎a ‎diverse ‎ecosystem ‎with‏ ‎multiple‏ ‎operating‏ ‎systems ‎and‏ ‎software ‎versions.
III.‏ ‎Global ‎Cybersecurity‏ ‎Alliance:‏ ‎U.S. ‎and‏ ‎Allies ‎Unite ‎to ‎Assess ‎Astra‏ ‎Linux ‎Vulnerabilities

As‏ ‎concerns‏ ‎grow ‎over ‎the‏ ‎security ‎of‏ ‎Russia’s ‎Astra ‎Linux ‎operating‏ ‎system,‏ ‎the ‎United‏ ‎States ‎is‏ ‎not ‎standing ‎alone ‎in ‎its‏ ‎efforts‏ ‎to ‎assess‏ ‎potential ‎vulnerabilities.‏ ‎A ‎coalition ‎of ‎technological ‎allies,‏ ‎each‏ ‎bringing‏ ‎unique ‎expertise‏ ‎and ‎resources‏ ‎to ‎the‏ ‎table,‏ ‎will ‎attempt‏ ‎play ‎a ‎crucial ‎role ‎in‏ ‎this ‎complex‏ ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎challenge. ‎From ‎the‏ ‎Five ‎Eyes‏ ‎intelligence ‎alliance ‎to ‎NATO‏ ‎members‏ ‎and ‎strategic‏ ‎partners ‎in‏ ‎Asia, ‎this ‎international ‎effort ‎represents‏ ‎a‏ ‎formidable ‎pool‏ ‎of ‎talent‏ ‎and ‎resources.

A. ‎Intelligence ‎Sharing ‎and‏ ‎Analysis

  • United‏ ‎Kingdom: As‏ ‎a ‎key‏ ‎member ‎of‏ ‎the ‎Five‏ ‎Eyes‏ ‎alliance, ‎the‏ ‎UK ‎brings ‎extensive ‎signals ‎intelligence‏ ‎capabilities ‎through‏ ‎GCHQ.‏ ‎Its ‎expertise ‎in‏ ‎cryptography ‎and‏ ‎data ‎analysis ‎is ‎particularly‏ ‎valuable.
  • Canada: The‏ ‎Communications ‎Security‏ ‎Establishment ‎(CSE)‏ ‎offers ‎advanced ‎capabilities ‎in ‎protecting‏ ‎critical‏ ‎infrastructure ‎and‏ ‎analyzing ‎foreign‏ ‎signals ‎intelligence.
  • Australia: The ‎Australian ‎Signals ‎Directorate‏ ‎(ASD)‏ ‎contributes‏ ‎significant ‎cyber‏ ‎defense ‎expertise‏ ‎and ‎regional‏ ‎intelligence‏ ‎insights.

B. ‎Technological‏ ‎Innovation

  • Japan: Known ‎for ‎its ‎cutting-edge ‎technology‏ ‎sector, ‎Japan‏ ‎can‏ ‎offer ‎innovative ‎approaches‏ ‎to ‎cybersecurity,‏ ‎particularly ‎in ‎areas ‎like‏ ‎quantum‏ ‎computing ‎and‏ ‎AI-driven ‎threat‏ ‎detection.
  • South ‎Korea: With ‎its ‎advanced ‎IT‏ ‎infrastructure,‏ ‎South ‎Korea‏ ‎brings ‎expertise‏ ‎in ‎securing ‎5G ‎networks ‎and‏ ‎Internet‏ ‎of‏ ‎Things ‎(IoT)‏ ‎devices.
  • Israel: Renowned ‎for‏ ‎its ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎industry,‏ ‎Israel ‎contributes‏ ‎advanced ‎threat ‎intelligence ‎and ‎innovative‏ ‎security ‎solutions.

C.‏ ‎Strategic‏ ‎and ‎Operational ‎Support

  • NATO‏ ‎members: Countries ‎like‏ ‎France, ‎Germany, ‎and ‎the‏ ‎Netherlands‏ ‎offer ‎diverse‏ ‎perspectives ‎and‏ ‎can ‎contribute ‎to ‎a ‎unified‏ ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎strategy ‎through‏ ‎NATO’s ‎cyber‏ ‎defense ‎framework.
  • New ‎Zealand: Though ‎smaller, ‎New‏ ‎Zealand’s‏ ‎Government‏ ‎Communications ‎Security‏ ‎Bureau ‎(GCSB)‏ ‎provides ‎valuable‏ ‎signals‏ ‎intelligence ‎and‏ ‎cybersecurity ‎support.

D. ‎Regional ‎Expertise

  • Australia ‎and‏ ‎Japan: Both ‎offer‏ ‎crucial‏ ‎insights ‎into ‎cyber‏ ‎threats ‎in‏ ‎the ‎Asia-Pacific ‎region, ‎enhancing‏ ‎the‏ ‎coalition’s ‎global‏ ‎perspective.
  • European ‎partners: NATO‏ ‎members ‎can ‎provide ‎deep ‎understanding‏ ‎of‏ ‎cyber ‎challenges‏ ‎facing ‎Europe‏ ‎and ‎potential ‎Russian ‎cyber ‎activities.
IV.‏ ‎Global‏ ‎Scrutiny‏ ‎and ‎Chinese‏ ‎Influence: ‎The‏ ‎Evolving ‎Landscape‏ ‎of‏ ‎Russia’s ‎Digital‏ ‎Sovereignty

As ‎Russia ‎continues ‎its ‎pursuit‏ ‎of ‎digital‏ ‎sovereignty,‏ ‎particularly ‎through ‎the‏ ‎development ‎and‏ ‎deployment ‎of ‎Astra ‎Linux,‏ ‎international‏ ‎organizations ‎and‏ ‎the ‎Council‏ ‎on ‎Foreign ‎Relations ‎(CFR) ‎are‏ ‎closely‏ ‎monitoring ‎the‏ ‎situation. ‎This‏ ‎scrutiny ‎is ‎driven ‎by ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎concerns,‏ ‎economic‏ ‎interests, ‎and‏ ‎the ‎growing‏ ‎influence ‎of‏ ‎Chinese‏ ‎technology ‎in‏ ‎Russia. ‎The ‎interplay ‎between ‎Russia’s‏ ‎digital ‎sovereignty,‏ ‎its‏ ‎increasing ‎reliance ‎on‏ ‎Chinese ‎tech,‏ ‎and ‎the ‎potential ‎implications‏ ‎for‏ ‎global ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎and ‎human‏ ‎rights ‎have ‎become ‎focal ‎points‏ ‎for‏ ‎analysis.

· International ‎Monitoring‏ ‎of ‎Astra‏ ‎Linux:

  • Atlantic ‎Council: Published ‎articles ‎and ‎reports‏ ‎on‏ ‎Russia’s‏ ‎digital ‎sovereignty‏ ‎and ‎Astra‏ ‎Linux ‎development.
  • Council‏ ‎on‏ ‎Foreign ‎Relations: Analyzed‏ ‎Russia’s ‎digital ‎sovereignty ‎and ‎Astra‏ ‎Linux ‎development.
  • Global‏ ‎Cyber‏ ‎Strategies: Published ‎reports ‎on‏ ‎Russia’s ‎digital‏ ‎sovereignty ‎and ‎Astra ‎Linux.

Reasons‏ ‎for‏ ‎Monitoring:

  • Cybersecurity ‎concerns: Assessing‏ ‎potential ‎risks‏ ‎in ‎government ‎and ‎defense ‎sectors.
  • Economic‏ ‎interests: Evaluating‏ ‎the ‎impact‏ ‎on ‎Western‏ ‎companies ‎and ‎markets.
  • Digital ‎sovereignty: Analyzing ‎the‏ ‎effects‏ ‎on‏ ‎global ‎cybersecurity‏ ‎and ‎cooperation.
  • Huawei‏ ‎and ‎DJI: Shifting‏ ‎focus‏ ‎to ‎talent‏ ‎acquisition ‎and ‎R& ‎D ‎in‏ ‎Russia.

CFR’s ‎Concerns:

  • Cybersecurity‏ ‎risks: Potential‏ ‎vulnerabilities ‎in ‎Chinese‏ ‎products.
  • Strategic ‎alignment: Russia’s‏ ‎dependence ‎on ‎China ‎creating‏ ‎new‏ ‎geopolitical ‎dynamics.
  • Economic‏ ‎implications: Shift ‎in‏ ‎global ‎trade ‎patterns ‎and ‎tech‏ ‎industry‏ ‎dynamics.
V. ‎The‏ ‎Ripple ‎Effect:‏ ‎Global ‎Consequences ‎of ‎Russia’s ‎Tech‏ ‎Pivot‏ ‎and‏ ‎the ‎Rise‏ ‎of ‎Astra‏ ‎Linux

As ‎Russia‏ ‎forges‏ ‎ahead ‎with‏ ‎its ‎digital ‎sovereignty ‎agenda, ‎spearheaded‏ ‎by ‎the‏ ‎development‏ ‎and ‎deployment ‎of‏ ‎Astra ‎Linux,‏ ‎the ‎global ‎tech ‎landscape‏ ‎is‏ ‎experiencing ‎seismic‏ ‎shifts. ‎This‏ ‎technological ‎reorientation ‎is ‎not ‎just‏ ‎a‏ ‎matter ‎of‏ ‎national ‎policy;‏ ‎it’s ‎triggering ‎a ‎cascade ‎of‏ ‎consequences‏ ‎that‏ ‎reverberate ‎through‏ ‎international ‎markets,‏ ‎geopolitical ‎alliances,‏ ‎and‏ ‎cybersecurity ‎paradigms.‏ ‎From ‎disrupting ‎established ‎market ‎shares‏ ‎to ‎creating‏ ‎new‏ ‎vulnerabilities ‎and ‎opportunities,‏ ‎Russia’s ‎tech‏ ‎pivot ‎is ‎reshaping ‎the‏ ‎digital‏ ‎world ‎as‏ ‎we ‎know‏ ‎it.

A. ‎Shift ‎in ‎Global ‎Tech‏ ‎Industry‏ ‎Dynamics

· Market ‎Share‏ ‎Disruption:

  • Western ‎tech‏ ‎giants ‎like ‎Microsoft, ‎Intel, ‎and‏ ‎Apple‏ ‎are‏ ‎losing ‎significant‏ ‎market ‎share‏ ‎in ‎Russia.‏ ‎This‏ ‎loss ‎of‏ ‎market ‎share ‎could ‎impact ‎these‏ ‎companies' ‎global‏ ‎revenues‏ ‎and ‎influence.

· Fragmentation ‎of‏ ‎Global ‎Tech‏ ‎Ecosystem:

  • Russia’s ‎push ‎for ‎technological‏ ‎sovereignty‏ ‎could ‎inspire‏ ‎other ‎countries‏ ‎to ‎develop ‎their ‎own ‎domestic‏ ‎alternatives‏ ‎to ‎Western‏ ‎technologies.
  • This ‎trend‏ ‎could ‎lead ‎to ‎a ‎more‏ ‎fragmented‏ ‎global‏ ‎tech ‎landscape,‏ ‎potentially ‎hindering‏ ‎interoperability ‎and‏ ‎global‏ ‎collaboration ‎in‏ ‎tech ‎development.

B. ‎Supply ‎Chain ‎Vulnerabilities

· Dependence‏ ‎on ‎Chinese‏ ‎Technology:

  • Russia‏ ‎has ‎become ‎heavily‏ ‎reliant ‎on‏ ‎Chinese ‎semiconductors ‎and ‎this‏ ‎dependence‏ ‎may ‎create‏ ‎potential ‎single‏ ‎points ‎of ‎failure ‎in ‎Russia’s‏ ‎supply‏ ‎chain, ‎which‏ ‎could ‎be‏ ‎exploited ‎by ‎Western ‎countries.

· Cybersecurity ‎Risks:

  • The‏ ‎use‏ ‎of‏ ‎Chinese ‎technology,‏ ‎which ‎may‏ ‎have ‎known‏ ‎security‏ ‎vulnerabilities, ‎could‏ ‎introduce ‎new ‎cybersecurity ‎risks ‎into‏ ‎Russian ‎systems.
  • This‏ ‎situation‏ ‎could ‎potentially ‎be‏ ‎exploited ‎by‏ ‎Western ‎intelligence ‎agencies ‎or‏ ‎cybercriminals.

C.‏ ‎Economic ‎Implications‏ ‎for ‎the‏ ‎West

Loss ‎of ‎Russian ‎Market:

  • Western ‎tech‏ ‎companies‏ ‎have ‎lost‏ ‎access ‎to‏ ‎the ‎Russian ‎market, ‎which ‎was‏ ‎worth‏ ‎billions‏ ‎of ‎dollars‏ ‎annually.
  • Microsoft: The ‎revenue‏ ‎of ‎Microsoft‏ ‎Rus‏ ‎decreased ‎significantly‏ ‎in ‎recent ‎years, ‎with ‎a‏ ‎reported ‎revenue‏ ‎of‏ ‎211.6 ‎million ‎rubles‏ ‎in ‎2023‏ ‎compared ‎to ‎6.4 ‎billion‏ ‎rubles‏ ‎in ‎2022.‏ ‎This ‎indicates‏ ‎a ‎sharp ‎decline ‎in ‎their‏ ‎business‏ ‎operations ‎in‏ ‎Russia.
  • IBM: IBM’s ‎revenue‏ ‎in ‎Russia ‎in ‎2021 ‎was‏ ‎about‏ ‎$300‏ ‎million, ‎and‏ ‎the ‎company‏ ‎did ‎not‏ ‎expect‏ ‎revenues ‎from‏ ‎the ‎Russian ‎market ‎in ‎2022.‏ ‎This ‎suggests‏ ‎a‏ ‎significant ‎reduction ‎in‏ ‎their ‎business‏ ‎activities ‎in ‎Russia.
  • SAP: SAP ‎reported‏ ‎a‏ ‎decrease ‎in‏ ‎revenue ‎in‏ ‎Russia ‎by ‎50,8% ‎to ‎19.382‏ ‎billion‏ ‎rubles ‎in‏ ‎2022. ‎The‏ ‎company’s ‎exit ‎from ‎the ‎Russian‏ ‎market‏ ‎due‏ ‎to ‎geopolitical‏ ‎events ‎significantly‏ ‎impacted ‎its‏ ‎financial‏ ‎performance.
  • Cisco: Cisco’s ‎revenue‏ ‎in ‎Russia ‎decreased ‎by ‎3,7%‏ ‎in ‎2021,‏ ‎from‏ ‎37.1 ‎billion ‎to‏ ‎35.8 ‎billion‏ ‎rubles. ‎The ‎company ‎faced‏ ‎challenges‏ ‎due ‎to‏ ‎geopolitical ‎tensions‏ ‎and ‎sanctions.

Shift ‎in ‎Global ‎Trade‏ ‎Flows:

  • The‏ ‎reorientation ‎of‏ ‎Russia’s ‎tech‏ ‎supply ‎chains ‎away ‎from ‎the‏ ‎West‏ ‎and‏ ‎towards ‎China‏ ‎is ‎altering‏ ‎global ‎trade‏ ‎patterns‏ ‎in ‎the‏ ‎technology ‎sector.
  • This ‎shift ‎could ‎potentially‏ ‎weaken ‎the‏ ‎West’s‏ ‎economic ‎leverage ‎over‏ ‎Russia ‎and‏ ‎strengthen ‎China’s ‎global ‎economic‏ ‎position.

Sanctions‏ ‎Evasion ‎Challenges:

  • The‏ ‎use ‎of‏ ‎intermediary ‎countries ‎and ‎complex ‎supply‏ ‎chains‏ ‎to ‎circumvent‏ ‎sanctions ‎poses‏ ‎challenges ‎for ‎Western ‎policymakers ‎and‏ ‎enforcement‏ ‎agencies.
  • This‏ ‎situation ‎may‏ ‎require ‎more‏ ‎sophisticated ‎and‏ ‎coordinated‏ ‎efforts ‎to‏ ‎maintain ‎the ‎effectiveness ‎of ‎sanctions.

D.‏ ‎Long-term ‎Strategic‏ ‎Implications

· Geopolitical‏ ‎Power ‎Shift:

  • Russia’s ‎increasing‏ ‎technological ‎dependence‏ ‎on ‎China ‎could ‎alter‏ ‎the‏ ‎balance ‎of‏ ‎power ‎in‏ ‎the ‎region ‎and ‎globally.
  • This ‎shift‏ ‎could‏ ‎potentially ‎weaken‏ ‎Western ‎influence‏ ‎and ‎strengthen ‎the ‎Russia-China ‎strategic‏ ‎partnership.

Impact‏ ‎on‏ ‎Russian ‎Tech‏ ‎Independence:

  • Russia ‎made‏ ‎a ‎move‏ ‎toward‏ ‎domestic ‎production‏ ‎and ‎a ‎shift ‎in ‎dependence‏ ‎from ‎Western‏ ‎to‏ ‎Chinese ‎technology, ‎which‏ ‎could ‎have‏ ‎long-term ‎strategic ‎implications.

Technological ‎Innovation‏ ‎Race:

  • The‏ ‎fragmentation ‎of‏ ‎the ‎global‏ ‎tech ‎ecosystem ‎could ‎lead ‎to‏ ‎parallel‏ ‎development ‎of‏ ‎technologies, ‎potentially‏ ‎accelerating ‎innovation ‎in ‎some ‎areas‏ ‎but‏ ‎also‏ ‎leading ‎to‏ ‎incompatible ‎standards‏ ‎and ‎systems.

E.‏ ‎Opportunities‏ ‎for ‎Western‏ ‎Policy

Exploiting ‎Vulnerabilities:

  • The ‎CFR ‎suggests ‎that‏ ‎Western ‎countries‏ ‎could‏ ‎identify ‎and ‎potentially‏ ‎exploit ‎vulnerabilities‏ ‎in ‎Russia’s ‎new ‎tech‏ ‎ecosystem,‏ ‎particularly ‎in‏ ‎areas ‎where‏ ‎Russian ‎systems ‎rely ‎on ‎Chinese‏ ‎technology.

Strengthening‏ ‎Alliances:

  • The ‎West‏ ‎use ‎this‏ ‎situation ‎to ‎strengthen ‎technological ‎and‏ ‎economic‏ ‎alliances‏ ‎with ‎other‏ ‎countries, ‎potentially‏ ‎isolating ‎Russia‏ ‎and‏ ‎China ‎in‏ ‎certain ‎tech ‎sectors.

Promoting ‎Open ‎Standards:

  • Western‏ ‎countries ‎could‏ ‎push‏ ‎for ‎open, ‎interoperable‏ ‎standards ‎in‏ ‎emerging ‎technologies ‎to ‎counter‏ ‎the‏ ‎trend ‎towards‏ ‎fragmentation ‎and‏ ‎maintain ‎global ‎technological ‎leadership.

Technological ‎Risks‏ ‎Associated‏ ‎with ‎Using‏ ‎Astra ‎Linux‏ ‎Internationally ‎— ‎are ‎primarily ‎linked‏ ‎to‏ ‎efforts‏ ‎to ‎prevent‏ ‎its ‎spread‏ ‎in ‎Western‏ ‎markets.

  • Compatibility‏ ‎Issues: ‎Astra‏ ‎Linux’s ‎custom ‎features ‎may ‎not‏ ‎integrate ‎seamlessly‏ ‎with‏ ‎international ‎software ‎and‏ ‎hardware. ‎This‏ ‎can ‎lead ‎to ‎significant‏ ‎compatibility‏ ‎challenges.
  • Limited ‎Support:‏ ‎With ‎restricted‏ ‎international ‎support, ‎users ‎may ‎struggle‏ ‎to‏ ‎access ‎help‏ ‎and ‎resources‏ ‎when ‎needed. ‎This ‎limitation ‎can‏ ‎hinder‏ ‎the‏ ‎ability ‎of‏ ‎Western ‎tech‏ ‎ecosystems ‎to‏ ‎adapt‏ ‎to ‎diverse‏ ‎operating ‎systems.
  • Impact ‎on ‎Collaboration ‎and‏ ‎Innovation: Preventing ‎the‏ ‎spread‏ ‎of ‎Astra ‎Linux‏ ‎might ‎limit‏ ‎opportunities ‎for ‎collaboration ‎and‏ ‎innovation.‏ ‎Diverse ‎technological‏ ‎environments ‎are‏ ‎generally ‎more ‎resilient ‎and ‎foster‏ ‎innovation.
  • Increased‏ ‎Cybersecurity ‎Vulnerability: Relying‏ ‎on ‎a‏ ‎single ‎technology ‎source ‎can ‎increase‏ ‎vulnerability‏ ‎to‏ ‎cybersecurity ‎threats.‏ ‎Engaging ‎with‏ ‎Astra ‎Linux‏ ‎could‏ ‎help ‎Western‏ ‎markets ‎understand ‎and ‎mitigate ‎potential‏ ‎security ‎risks.
VI.‏ ‎Astra‏ ‎Linux ‎Defense ‎for‏ ‎anti ‎espionage

In‏ ‎the ‎ever-evolving ‎landscape ‎of‏ ‎cybersecurity,‏ ‎Astra ‎Linux‏ ‎stands ‎as‏ ‎Russia’s ‎bulwark ‎against ‎digital ‎espionage.‏ ‎As‏ ‎the ‎nation‏ ‎pursues ‎technological‏ ‎independence, ‎the ‎importance ‎of ‎robust‏ ‎anti-espionage‏ ‎measures‏ ‎cannot ‎be‏ ‎overstated. ‎Astra‏ ‎Linux’s ‎defense‏ ‎strategy‏ ‎encompasses ‎a‏ ‎multi-faceted ‎approach, ‎combining ‎cutting-edge ‎technology‏ ‎with ‎stringent‏ ‎protocols‏ ‎to ‎safeguard ‎sensitive‏ ‎information. ‎This‏ ‎comprehensive ‎framework ‎not ‎only‏ ‎protects‏ ‎against ‎external‏ ‎threats ‎but‏ ‎also ‎addresses ‎internal ‎vulnerabilities, ‎creating‏ ‎a‏ ‎formidable ‎defense‏ ‎against ‎industrial‏ ‎espionage ‎and ‎cyber ‎attacks.

The ‎key‏ ‎components‏ ‎of‏ ‎Astra ‎Linux’s‏ ‎anti-espionage ‎arsenal:

  • Conduct‏ ‎Risk ‎Assessments: Regularly‏ ‎evaluate‏ ‎the ‎risks‏ ‎associated ‎with ‎your ‎trade ‎secrets‏ ‎and ‎sensitive‏ ‎information.‏ ‎Identify ‎potential ‎threats‏ ‎and ‎vulnerabilities‏ ‎to ‎understand ‎who ‎might‏ ‎be‏ ‎interested ‎in‏ ‎your ‎data‏ ‎and ‎how ‎they ‎might ‎attempt‏ ‎to‏ ‎access ‎it.
  • Secure‏ ‎Infrastructure: Implement ‎a‏ ‎layered ‎security ‎approach ‎to ‎protect‏ ‎your‏ ‎network‏ ‎and ‎data.‏ ‎This ‎includes‏ ‎establishing ‎a‏ ‎secure‏ ‎perimeter, ‎and‏ ‎implementing ‎a ‎zero-trust ‎model ‎where‏ ‎access ‎is‏ ‎verified‏ ‎at ‎every ‎step.
  • Limit‏ ‎Access: Restrict ‎access‏ ‎to ‎sensitive ‎information ‎to‏ ‎only‏ ‎those ‎who‏ ‎need ‎it.‏ ‎Use ‎physical ‎and ‎technological ‎barriers‏ ‎to‏ ‎limit ‎who‏ ‎can ‎view‏ ‎or ‎handle ‎trade ‎secrets.
  • Non-Disclosure ‎Agreements‏ ‎(NDAs): Require‏ ‎employees,‏ ‎contractors, ‎and‏ ‎partners ‎to‏ ‎sign ‎NDAs‏ ‎to‏ ‎legally ‎bind‏ ‎them ‎from ‎disclosing ‎confidential ‎information.
  • Employee‏ ‎Training: Educate ‎employees‏ ‎and‏ ‎contractors ‎about ‎the‏ ‎importance ‎of‏ ‎protecting ‎trade ‎secrets ‎and‏ ‎recognizing‏ ‎potential ‎espionage‏ ‎threats. ‎Training‏ ‎should ‎include ‎how ‎to ‎handle‏ ‎sensitive‏ ‎information ‎and‏ ‎report ‎suspicious‏ ‎activities.
  • Monitor ‎and ‎Investigate: Continuously ‎monitor ‎for‏ ‎unauthorized‏ ‎access‏ ‎or ‎suspicious‏ ‎activities. ‎Promptly‏ ‎investigate ‎any‏ ‎suspected‏ ‎espionage ‎or‏ ‎data ‎breaches ‎to ‎mitigate ‎potential‏ ‎damage.
  • Physical ‎Security: Protect‏ ‎physical‏ ‎locations ‎and ‎assets‏ ‎that ‎contain‏ ‎sensitive ‎information. ‎This ‎includes‏ ‎secure‏ ‎storage ‎for‏ ‎documents ‎and‏ ‎monitoring ‎of ‎physical ‎access ‎points.
  • Use‏ ‎of‏ ‎Technology: Employ ‎advanced‏ ‎cybersecurity ‎technologies,‏ ‎such ‎as ‎intrusion ‎detection ‎systems,‏ ‎encryption,‏ ‎and‏ ‎secure ‎communication‏ ‎channels, ‎to‏ ‎protect ‎digital‏ ‎information‏ ‎from ‎cyber‏ ‎espionage.
  • Trade ‎Secret ‎Protection: Implement ‎policies ‎and‏ ‎procedures ‎specifically‏ ‎designed‏ ‎to ‎protect ‎trade‏ ‎secrets, ‎such‏ ‎as ‎marking ‎documents ‎as‏ ‎confidential‏ ‎and ‎conducting‏ ‎regular ‎audits‏ ‎to ‎ensure ‎compliance ‎with ‎security‏ ‎protocols.


Читать: 2+ мин
logo Snarky Security

Cyber insurance premiums difference

Cyber ‎insurance‏ ‎premiums ‎can ‎vary ‎significantly ‎between‏ ‎industries ‎with‏ ‎high‏ ‎and ‎low ‎cyber‏ ‎risks.

For ‎industries‏ ‎with ‎high ‎cyber ‎risks,‏ ‎such‏ ‎as ‎healthcare,‏ ‎finance, ‎and‏ ‎retail, ‎which ‎often ‎handle ‎sensitive‏ ‎customer‏ ‎data, ‎the‏ ‎premiums ‎are‏ ‎typically ‎higher. ‎These ‎industries ‎are‏ ‎attractive‏ ‎targets‏ ‎for ‎cybercriminals,‏ ‎and ‎as‏ ‎a ‎result,‏ ‎they‏ ‎face ‎higher‏ ‎premiums ‎due ‎to ‎the ‎increased‏ ‎risk.

On ‎the‏ ‎other‏ ‎hand, ‎industries ‎with‏ ‎low ‎cyber‏ ‎risks, ‎such ‎as ‎those‏ ‎with‏ ‎strong ‎cyber‏ ‎controls, ‎can‏ ‎have ‎average ‎premiums ‎ranging ‎from‏ ‎about‏ ‎$1,400 ‎to‏ ‎about ‎$3,000‏ ‎per ‎million ‎of ‎limit.

In ‎addition,‏ ‎the‏ ‎size‏ ‎of ‎the‏ ‎company ‎also‏ ‎plays ‎a‏ ‎role‏ ‎in ‎the‏ ‎premium ‎costs. ‎Larger ‎companies ‎typically‏ ‎have ‎more‏ ‎complex‏ ‎systems ‎and ‎more‏ ‎data, ‎which‏ ‎can ‎increase ‎their ‎risk‏ ‎profile‏ ‎and ‎therefore,‏ ‎they ‎may‏ ‎face ‎higher ‎premiums. ‎Conversely, ‎smaller‏ ‎entities‏ ‎in ‎low-risk‏ ‎industries ‎with‏ ‎strong ‎cyber ‎controls ‎can ‎have‏ ‎lower‏ ‎premiums.‏ ‎Insurers ‎have‏ ‎also ‎become‏ ‎more ‎selective‏ ‎about‏ ‎who ‎and‏ ‎what ‎gets ‎covered, ‎and ‎have‏ ‎tightened ‎policy‏ ‎terms‏ ‎and ‎conditions ‎to‏ ‎reduce ‎unexpected‏ ‎losses

Several ‎factors ‎are ‎driving‏ ‎the‏ ‎high ‎premiums‏ ‎in ‎the‏ ‎cyber ‎insurance ‎market:

📌 Increasing ‎Cyber ‎Threats:‏ ‎The‏ ‎number ‎and‏ ‎cost ‎of‏ ‎cyber ‎threats ‎are ‎increasing, ‎which‏ ‎in‏ ‎turn‏ ‎increases ‎the‏ ‎value ‎of‏ ‎insurance ‎premiums.‏ ‎As‏ ‎the ‎cost‏ ‎of ‎threats ‎rises, ‎so ‎does‏ ‎the ‎value‏ ‎of‏ ‎the ‎premiums.

📌 Rising ‎Claims:‏ ‎The ‎frequency‏ ‎and ‎cost ‎of ‎claims‏ ‎have‏ ‎been ‎increasing,‏ ‎leading ‎to‏ ‎higher ‎loss ‎ratios ‎for ‎insurers.‏ ‎This‏ ‎has ‎resulted‏ ‎in ‎higher‏ ‎premiums ‎to ‎cover ‎the ‎increased‏ ‎payouts.

📌 Lack‏ ‎of‏ ‎Historical ‎Data: The‏ ‎cyber ‎insurance‏ ‎market ‎lacks‏ ‎extensive‏ ‎historical ‎data,‏ ‎making ‎it ‎difficult ‎for ‎insurers‏ ‎to ‎accurately‏ ‎predict‏ ‎future ‎risks ‎and‏ ‎set ‎premiums‏ ‎accordingly.

📌 Industry-Specific ‎Risks: ‎The ‎risk‏ ‎and‏ ‎therefore ‎the‏ ‎cost ‎of‏ ‎cyber ‎insurance ‎can ‎vary ‎significantly‏ ‎depending‏ ‎on ‎the‏ ‎industry. ‎Industries‏ ‎with ‎higher ‎cyber ‎risks ‎typically‏ ‎face‏ ‎higher‏ ‎premiums.

📌 Business ‎Size‏ ‎and ‎Nature: The‏ ‎size ‎and‏ ‎nature‏ ‎of ‎a‏ ‎business ‎can ‎also ‎impact ‎premiums.‏ ‎Larger ‎businesses‏ ‎or‏ ‎those ‎with ‎a‏ ‎higher ‎risk‏ ‎profile ‎typically ‎face ‎higher‏ ‎premiums.

📌 Geographical‏ ‎Location ‎and‏ ‎Regulatory ‎Environment:‏ ‎The ‎location ‎of ‎a ‎business‏ ‎and‏ ‎the ‎regulatory‏ ‎environment ‎in‏ ‎which ‎it ‎operates ‎can ‎also‏ ‎impact‏ ‎premiums.‏ ‎For ‎example,‏ ‎businesses ‎operating‏ ‎in ‎regions‏ ‎with‏ ‎strict ‎data‏ ‎protection ‎regulations ‎may ‎face ‎higher‏ ‎premiums.

📌 Coverage ‎Type:‏ ‎The‏ ‎type ‎of ‎coverage‏ ‎a ‎business‏ ‎chooses ‎can ‎also ‎impact‏ ‎premiums.‏ ‎More ‎comprehensive‏ ‎coverage ‎typically‏ ‎comes ‎with ‎higher ‎premiums.

📌 Risk ‎Management‏ ‎Practices:‏ ‎Insurers ‎often‏ ‎consider ‎a‏ ‎company's ‎cybersecurity ‎practices ‎when ‎setting‏ ‎premiums.‏ ‎Companies‏ ‎with ‎robust‏ ‎cybersecurity ‎measures‏ ‎may ‎be‏ ‎rewarded‏ ‎with ‎lower‏ ‎premiums, ‎while ‎those ‎with ‎poor‏ ‎practices ‎may‏ ‎face‏ ‎higher ‎premiums.

Читать: 1+ мин
logo Snarky Security

Cyber Insurance market challenges

The ‎cyber‏ ‎insurance ‎market ‎faced ‎several ‎challenges‏ ‎in ‎the‏ ‎past‏ ‎year:

📌 Lack ‎of ‎Historical‏ ‎Data: ‎The‏ ‎cyber ‎insurance ‎industry ‎has‏ ‎struggled‏ ‎with ‎a‏ ‎lack ‎of‏ ‎historical ‎data, ‎making ‎it ‎difficult‏ ‎to‏ ‎predict ‎future‏ ‎cyber ‎risks‏ ‎and ‎set ‎prices ‎for ‎cyber‏ ‎insurance.

📌 High‏ ‎Demand,‏ ‎Limited ‎Supply:‏ ‎The ‎demand‏ ‎for ‎cyber‏ ‎insurance‏ ‎has ‎been‏ ‎increasing, ‎but ‎limited ‎capacity ‎on‏ ‎the ‎supply‏ ‎side‏ ‎has ‎led ‎to‏ ‎rising ‎rates‏ ‎and ‎adjustments ‎in ‎coverage,‏ ‎terms,‏ ‎and ‎conditions.

📌 Risk‏ ‎Miscalculation: ‎The‏ ‎cyber ‎insurance ‎market ‎has ‎experienced‏ ‎significant‏ ‎losses ‎due‏ ‎to ‎risk‏ ‎miscalculation, ‎leading ‎to ‎a ‎shift‏ ‎in‏ ‎the‏ ‎market ‎from‏ ‎a ‎soft‏ ‎cycle, ‎characterized‏ ‎by‏ ‎lower ‎premiums‏ ‎and ‎higher ‎limits, ‎to ‎a‏ ‎hard ‎cycle,‏ ‎resulting‏ ‎in ‎skyrocketing ‎insurance‏ ‎premiums.

📌 Unsuitable ‎Underwriting‏ ‎Practices: The ‎market ‎has ‎been‏ ‎characterized‏ ‎by ‎unsuitable‏ ‎underwriting ‎practices,‏ ‎with ‎insurers ‎developing ‎stricter ‎requirements‏ ‎for‏ ‎policies, ‎causing‏ ‎the ‎number‏ ‎of ‎insurable ‎companies ‎to ‎decline‏ ‎and‏ ‎the‏ ‎demand ‎to‏ ‎skyrocket.

📌 Systemic ‎Cyber‏ ‎Risk: ‎The‏ ‎possibility‏ ‎of ‎a‏ ‎large-scale ‎attack ‎where ‎losses ‎are‏ ‎highly ‎correlated‏ ‎across‏ ‎companies ‎makes ‎it‏ ‎difficult ‎to‏ ‎write ‎comprehensive ‎policies.

📌 Sector-Specific ‎Challenges:‏ ‎Specific‏ ‎sectors ‎with‏ ‎historically ‎poor‏ ‎security ‎postures, ‎like ‎education, ‎or‏ ‎highly‏ ‎targeted ‎sectors,‏ ‎like ‎software‏ ‎developers, ‎may ‎have ‎a ‎more‏ ‎challenging‏ ‎time‏ ‎obtaining ‎coverage.

Показать еще

Обновления проекта

Метки

snarkysecurity 156 snarkysecuritypdf 59 news 51 keypoints 41 ai 22 research 22 Cyber Insurance 20 Cyber Insurance Market 19 cybersecurity 16 unpacking 12 AGI 11 Nakasone 11 risk management 11 CTEM 10 nsa 10 OpenAi 10 usa 9 cyber operations 8 discovery 8 EM (Exposure Management) 8 prioritization 8 threat management 8 validation 8 Marine Security 7 Maritime security 7 announcement 6 china 6 Cyber Defense Doctrine 6 cyberbiosecurity 6 Digest 6 Espionage 6 Maritime 6 Monthly Digest 6 biosecurity 5 biotech 5 biotechnology 5 Bioweapon 5 marine 5 patent 5 phishing 5 Russia 5 bio 4 cyber security 4 dgap 4 medical security 4 risks 4 sanctions 4 security 4 content 3 cyber attack 3 data leakage 3 Israel 3 medical communication 3 osint 3 video 3 badges 2 cfr 2 console architecture 2 cyber threat 2 cyberops 2 data breach 2 data theft 2 DICOM 2 EU 2 europol 2 fake news 2 funding 2 Healthcare 2 ICS 2 intelbroker 2 leads 2 malware 2 marketing 2 marketing strategy 2 medicine 2 Microsoft 2 military 2 ML 2 offensive 2 sabotage 2 submarine 2 surveillance 2 tech 2 tracking 2 U.S. Air Force 2 united kingdom 2 vulnerabilities 2 Academic Plagiarism 1 AI Plagiarism 1 Air-Gapped Systems 1 aircraft 1 Amazon 1 amazon web services 1 Antarctica 1 antartica 1 APAC 1 APT29 1 APT42 1 ArcaneDoor 1 Ascension 1 astra 1 astra linux 1 AT&T 1 auto 1 aviation industry 1 aws 1 BeiDou 1 blockchain 1 Boeing 1 books 1 bot 1 broker 1 cable 1 Catholic 1 cisa 1 CISO 1 CISOStressFest 1 compliance 1 content category 1 Continuous Management 1 Copy-Paste Culture 1 criminal charges 1 cuba 1 Cuttlefish 1 cyber 1 Cybercrime 1 CyberDome 1 CybersecurityPressure 1 cybsafe 1 Czech Republic 1 DASF 1 Databricks AI Security Framework 1 defense 1 deferred prosecution agreement 1 dell 1 democracy 1 digital solidarity 1 diplomacy 1 Discord 1 ebike 1 ecosystem 1 end-to-end AI 1 EUelections2024 1 fake 1 fbi 1 fiscal year 1 Framework 1 FTC 1 game console 1 Games 1 GCJ-02 1 gemini 1 Gemma 1 Generative 1 germany 1 global times 1 GLONASS 1 Google 1 google news 1 Government 1 GPS 1 great powers 1 guide 1 hackaton 1 Handala 1 Human Centric Security 1 HumanErrorFTW 1 humanoid robot 1 ICC 1 IIoT 1 incident response 1 Inclusive 1 india 1 indonesia 1 InformationManipulation 1 insurance 1 intelbro 1 Intelligence 1 IoMT 1 IoT 1 iran 1 Iron Dome 1 jamming 1 korea 1 law enforcement 1 lea 1 legal issues 1 LiabilityNightmares 1 Llama 1 LLM 1 LLMs 1 LNG 1 marin 1 market 1 mass 1 message queue 1 military aviation 1 ModelBest 1 Mossad 1 mq broker 1 MTAC 1 National Vulnerability Database 1 NavIC 1 Navigation 1 nes 1 nozomi 1 nsm22 1 nvd 1 NVidia 1 ofac 1 oil 1 Olympics 1 paid content 1 Palestine 1 paris 1 Plagiarism Scandals 1 PlayStation 1 playstation 2 1 playstation 3 1 podcast 1 police 1 PressReleaseDiplomacy 1 ps2 1 ps3 1 radar systems 1 railway 1 Ransomware 1 regulatory 1 Risk-Based Approach 1 rodrigo copetti 1 Russian 1 safety oversight 1 scam 1 semiconductors 1 ShinBet 1 snes 1 Social Engineering: 1 social network 1 spy 1 spyware 1 Stanford 1 surv 1 T-Mobile 1 te 1 technology 1 Tensor 1 Threat 1 Threat Exposure Management 1 Typosquatting 1 uae 1 UK 1 UNC1549 1 UnitedHealth Group 1 us 1 US11483343B2 1 US11496512B2 1 US11611582B2 1 US20220232015A1 1 US9071600B2 1 Verizon 1 VK 1 Vulnerability Management 1 water sector 1 webex 1 Westchester 1 Whatsapp 1 women 1 xbox 1 xbox 360 1 xbox original 1 xz 1 zcaler 1 сybersecurity 1 Больше тегов

Фильтры

Подарить подписку

Будет создан код, который позволит адресату получить бесплатный для него доступ на определённый уровень подписки.

Оплата за этого пользователя будет списываться с вашей карты вплоть до отмены подписки. Код может быть показан на экране или отправлен по почте вместе с инструкцией.

Будет создан код, который позволит адресату получить сумму на баланс.

Разово будет списана указанная сумма и зачислена на баланс пользователя, воспользовавшегося данным промокодом.

Добавить карту
0/2048